Europa FAQ

EDITOR’S NOTE: This 150+ page document is a continuously updated, cut-and-paste collection of threads - primarily Lotus Europa Twin Cam and some S2 – collected from two lists beginning in 1998. Where available, date stamps and email addresses are included from reference and further investigation. Regards, Warren Hartenstine 74 TC R3642

  CONTENTS (Click on "Topic" to jump to the section)

A/C

Battery

BODY, Front trunk

BODY, Parts

BODY, Paint cleaner

BODY, Paint Stripping

BODY, Removal

BODY, Sill installation

BODY, Sill paint

BODY, Windows

BRAKES, Fluid

BRAKES, Inboard rear

BRAKES, Master cylinder

BRAKES, Tubing

BRAKES, Tubing flare

CARBERATERS, Rebuilding

CARBERATORS, Stromberg

CARBERATERS, Webers

CARBERATERS, Temperature compensators

CHASSIS, Closing plate

CHASSIS, Identification

COOLING SYSTEM, Cassette pump

COOLING SYSTEM, Coolant

COOLING SYSTEM, Water pump

DASH, Structural support

ELECTRICAL, Regulator

ENGINE, Timing

ENGINE, Tuning

ENGINE, Turning

ENGINE, Valves

ENGINE, Valve shims

EXHAUST, Muffler

HELICOIL, Removal

IGNITION, Electronic

INTRUMENTS, Speedometer

INSTRUMENTS, Tachometer>

INTERIOR, Dashboard glue

LIST, Subscribing

NUTS & BOLTS, Grade specification

OIL

OIL, Change additives

STEERING, Tie rod ends

SUSPENSION, Hubs

SUSPENSION, Loctite

SUSPENSION, Lower links

SUSPENSION, Pin removal

SUSPENSION, Rear ‘clunk’

SUSPENSION, Rear hubs

SUSPENSION, Roll center

SUSPENSION, Shock absorbers

SUSPENSION, Shock adjustment

SUSPENSION, Spring compression

SUSPENSION, Spring shortening

SUSPENSION, Sway bar

SUSPENSION, Sway bar bushings

SUSPENSION, Twin Cam - Special differences

TRANSAXLE, Spirol pin

TRANSMISSION, Drain plug

TRANSMISSION, Gear change

TRANSMISSION, Freeing clutch

TRANSMISSION, Linkage

TRANSMISSION, Removal

WHEELS, Hubcentric

WHEELS, Well trim

WINDSHIELD, Washer

     

A/C

bdboyle@fpe.erenj.com (Boyle, Bryan D.) Subject: AC in a 'Ropa Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:11:01 -0500
Aaron spake thus: >"squirrel cage" blower that feeds air to the air box in front. My Europa (Special) doesn't have this, if I remember correctly. It had something in the same place that I didn't recognize, with a mini radiator inside the air box (for heat?).


Seem to recall that you mentioned that A/C had been installed in your car at one time; this may be the cooling coil for the installation. Blow air thru it, cooling it down, and open up the dash vents...the front trunk is a fresh air plenum, so this may have been the mod that got your car its ac flow. Have a feeling that the compressor was taken out at some point or another if you can't find it in the engine compartment...

From: ClassMaker@AOL.com hillmotorsports@sympatico.ca writes: I seem to recall seeing a picture on a website (somewhere) showing an evaporator installation in the front boot/heater plenum.


Cool Aire -- once had a kit for the TC. I've seen one with my own eyes. Yes, in the front boot. Very tidy. On a yellow (L07) TC in Biloxi, Mississippi, 1973. Could go on the S2 as well... if you can find one!!! Inquire at Banks Europa (UK) and see what they know. There's someone in the Ohio area with one in their car, and a brand new spare kit on the shelf, as I heard it. Also, someone on these lists took one off their car, IIRC. There was some discussion a few months back. Search the archives at our site on
www.onelist.com.

Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Coolaire did an A/C system for the Europa TC... but that was a quarter of a century ago. At the time it was $235 complete with Sankyo compressor and 5.25" clutch. Such a deal. The contact info back then was:

Coolaire / Nordic, Attn. Michael Paquet
3701 North 29th Avenue
Hollywood, Florida

1 (305) 921-8474

I have absolutely no idea if any of that is still current. Check out the A/C from a Yugo. It used an electric compressor instead of engine-driven, greatly simplifying that aspect of the installation. Just put it anywhere you want and wire it in. Of course, you will need a larger alternator, perhaps the one from the donor Yugo. Also, check out the street rod industry... get some catalogs. There are several modular A/C-ventilation systems designed for installation in resto-rods. I know of one Esprit S2 owner who did a full restoration with upgrades. He replaced the stock ventilation system with a modular street rod unit that was more compact than the stock Lotus unit yet performed better. Stuff one of those in the Europa's front boot (trunk) and combine it with the Yugo compressor.

rgvivace@aol.com You want to go to the Banks/Europa Engineering site, which has details of their system based on a custom plenum, including some nice pictures on the "47 Replica photos" page.


AUTO-X, Preparation

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> I received this via e-mail this morning from one of my Atlanta SCCA colleagues. It's an article from Grass Roots Motorsports and is about building a Europa Twink for autox.

Date: Sunday, February 27, 2000 11:55 AM Subject: recommended online article on engine rebuilds >This article happens to be about a rebuild to a Lotus Europa but it is so well done including pictures that I would recommend it to other folks. It happens to be for a A/Street Prepared autocross car.
>
http://www.lotuselan.net/print/magazines/grassroots_motorsports/90_5.html

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> I read the article, and it's generally OK. However, the authors did some "creative" rules interpretation. An engine built using the procedures they describe isn't quite a legal ASP engine. Caveat Emptor.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Friday night I finished reassembly of the car's suspension, removed the wheels/tires from their winter storage containers (garbage bags), installed them, and put the car back down on the floor. During the off season, I had done the following:

  1. Installed new shocks and springs to allow a further reduction in ride height. I had also raised the damping rates over my previous settings.
  2. Designed and fabricated a new front swaybar configuration that has articulating end links and is adjustable.
  3. Fitted fiberglass fender flares (no alliteration intended), filled and feathered the flanges, and cut more of the original fenders so as to have tire clearance at the reduced ride height.
  4. Rebuilt the halfaxles and replaced rear wheel bearings and spacers.

It's really low now: for those who measure such things, the leading edge of the front bumper is 13" off the floor, the bottom of the closing plate is 4", and the leading edge of the floor pan is just over 3". It's not feasible to reduce the car's ride height beyond this. It's almost down there with the Formula Fords now. Even at this low setting, there's still more than 2" of compression travel in both front and rear suspensions. I'm gonna have to modify my trailer so I can pull the car onto it without scraping. And I'm gonna have to grid with the formula cars because I won't be able to clear the course exit all the "real" cars have to use at one of our sites. I had calculated the required spring preloads at each corner using known corner weights. After settling the car's suspension, I checked ride heights for L/R match. Looked good. Last night I took corner weight measurements. No changes necessary: the calculated spring perch positions worked perfectly. I love it when things work out. 8<). Initial camber measurements yielded - 2.1 LF, - 2.1 RF, - 2.1 LR, and - 2.25 RR. The values at the front are what I wanted, but the rear values were a bit high. To reduce the rear camber, I used an adjustment I have never heard mentioned on any of the Lotus lists, including this one: I raised the transmission mount in its slotted bracket. This reduced the rear camber to 1.7 degrees left, 1.5 degrees right. Right on the money, and it had the added side effect of bringing the halfaxles closer to level in the static ride position. Using this adjustment saved me having to refit offset bushings on the inner ends of the lower links - I had gone back to the stock rubber ones at the inner ends, with offset Delrin bushings at the outer ends only. Now, all that's left is to do more sanding, filling, priming – mostly around the flares - and paint the car. Well, there's also the spare engine I'm building, but I don't figure on having that ready until July or so. My first autox event of the y2k season is March 19. I'm not sure I can complete the painting by then, but I'll have almost a month after that before our National Tour event, which is the drop-dead date for the cosmetic work. I'll update the list as I progress.

From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> On Friday, March 24, I took the Europa to an Evolution Performance Driving School at Mineral Wells. For those of you who aren't familiar with autox, the school (originally called McKamey School) is specifically targeted at improving performance in the autocross
environment. In this regard, it's far more valuable than any racetrack-based school, as certain skills that are necessary for autox aren't taught in the on-track type of school. As I'm mainly interested in updating the list on the car's performance, I'll summarize the driver side by saying that, yes, the school is well worth the price of admission, even for an experienced autocrosser. More on all that in another post. The car: it's now evident from 20 school runs broken out into four groups that the car is ever so slightly loose on cold tires, and that the condition fixes itself entirely within half a run or so. This is nothing new, but it's worth knowing about. Otherwise, you're tempted to adjust your driving and/or the car after the first run, when what you really need to do is continue exactly as before and wait for the car's behavior to stabilize. This is the price of having such a light car. The rear tires build a bit more heat - typically they've been 10-15 degrees F hotter than the fronts when I've measured - so their grip improves more over cold. That also means they'll go off sooner if you heat them over the top, so the car will be loose either on cold or overheated tires. Overheating is unlikely, but it might happen in the 110+ heat we encounter in late July through August. If that's the case, I'll run road race compound tires during that part of the season. It's now apparent that the car can now be driven much more assertively than before through any type of course feature, particularly slaloms and offsets. Transient response is razor-sharp, thanks to the damping increase over my previous setup. Not that it was ever slow. It's also possible that the articulating swaybar end links have helped here. As there is now no bending of the bar, the front suspension is more supple around the static position, in spite of stiffer damping. Reducing the ride height below the car's already-low setting yielded another increment of improvement. As I noted before, the front wheels acquired more negative camber from the lowering - about 2.1 degrees - which I allowed to remain there, as the Hoosier radials are alleged to need this much. The rear wheels are set at about 1.6 degrees negative, which I can easily increase if necessary. So far, camber appears to be about right. I'm now using a bit more of the edges of the tires, although there is still relatively unmolested rubber at the very outside of the tread on the front tires. Overall assessment: the car's chassis development work is nearing completion. Further improvements will be increasingly subtle, and reducing my autox times by significant amounts will, in the future, have to come from engine and driver development. Compared to the previous iteration in its development, I'd say that the car is more than a second quicker on the McKamey course, which I was consistently doing in 34.0xx last Friday. The Hoosier autocross radials now have 31 runs on them, and you can still see the "holographic" portion of the tread, which is less than 1/32" deep on new tires. Looks like I'll be needing some more Formula V, or else I'll run out of stick long before I've used up the rubber. I've got photos of the car developed, and I'll scan them and upload them to my website tomorrow a.m. As soon as they're up, I'll post a URL. I'll say more about the driver part of the equation in a later post.

From: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> This is in Texas, I believe. Concrete? I was just thinking that overheating tires on my car in autocross was just about impossible. We only have one concrete site here (2 events a year) and I don't think it is likely to be 110 degrees F air temp here in Minnesota any time soon. It is apparent that you are not getting the most out of your front tires. This also appears to be irrelevant. Since the car is always either loose or neutral, improvements to the rear stick would be required before worrying about the front stick. More engine than driver unless you come up against lame-brain courses. If the Real Roger Johnson is designing the courses down there in Texas, or the other designers are paying attention to him, that won't be a problem. This makes me feel better about myself. I got down to 34.136 on the standard McKamey course on the asphalt at Canterbury Park. Neither Jean Kinser or Brian Priebe were driving my car faster than I. I'm not kidding myself that I have anywhere near their talent for several reasons: I know my car better. They are not there to embarrass the student, but to teach. They had been trained by Jim McKamey to be kind to the customers' cars, particularly in shifting (and new school owner Jean Kinser is continuing that rule). I agree with Jay that this school is 100% worth the substantial entry fee.

From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> If the forces generated were the only factor, concrete would always heat tires more. It's the color. On a hot day - even a moderate 95 or so - pavement temperatures on asphalt can easily get to 120+. Under these conditions, autocross compound tires have been heated close to their
optimum temperature before a runs begins. With concrete, the amount of heat is more a function of the length and intensity of the course. Concrete probably does heat tires more than asphalt under cool conditions, but that's not applicable here in Texas. Another factor is the pavement surface itself. Concrete doesn't change that much when it's heated by the sun. Asphalt oozes oil and gets really greasy. So, even if your tires don't go off when it gets hot, the pavement will. As an example, my car's attitude around the apex cone between segments 2 and 3 is neutral if you do it right, (mild) understeer if you're not patient. That's the targeted behavior. If a car oversteers in a maneuver like that, you won't be able to keep up with it when you encounter two of them in quick succession. kWeber 32/36 DGV on the stock intake manifold. 26mm primary, 27mm secondary. Same carb that's used on Formula Fords. Maximum power with this carb isn't any different than stock. The only engine upgrades I have done so far are a header and the Tilton flywheel. Engine is definitely a factor in Street Prepared. Ask anyone who does well in SP if they could turn similar times with a stock engine. That might be the case for high-torque cars that are traction-limited most of the time. It's definitely not the case in ASP, CSP, DSP, or (now FSP). All those guys are working hard to extract all the engine performance they can. So am I, once I get my income taxes paid for '99. :<( Do a compression check. If you've got the correct pistons, you'll get readings over 200 psi if the engine's in even mediocre condition. Flat top pistons will give readings around 160 psi. I got my best times solo, in the afternoon, in the first three segments. Segment 2 and three best times occurred in the same run. My best segment 4 time was the fifth morning run, with Larry Fine in the passenger seat. My best segment 5 time was on my third "baseline run" in the morning. I was within a few hundredths of my best segment times at various points
throughout the day. Likewise my best run times. I turned a 34.024 in the morning with Larry on board, a 34.098 in the afternoon with Ron Bauer along, and a 34.020 and a 34.042 during my last three runs with no passenger. If I could have put all my best segment times together - which isn't really feasible, as there are some cases where a quick time in one segment will hurt your time in the next one - I could have turned a 33.295. We can all dream, can't we? My best segment 3 and 4 times occurred in the same run, with Ron riding, in the afternoon. Well, you WERE paying attention on the first day (before you were a student), weren't you? ;<) My best segment 5 was pre-instruction - I really didn't need much help going around in a circle - but my best segment 2 was in the afternoon with Ron Bauer aboard. That makes perfect sense - passenger weight helps in a right-hand circle. They were telling us this sort of thing during our last three runs. I think that must be part of the standard instructional procedure. The "slalom," in my Europa, is completely flat out all the way until you have to brake for the first circle. A requisite for the best possible time in that segment would be a Pro Solo-style (dragstrip) launch. Since there was nothing at stake here, I refrained from doing that. My new U-joints are grateful, I'm sure. ;<)

BATTERY

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Europa Battery Question Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 07:29:39 -0800
Jerry Geil wrote: What is a good battery for a Lotus Europa Twin Cam? The previous owner of my car had a battery that was too large for the hold down system. I want to replace it so the battery can be solidly restrained. The workshop manual calls for an "Exide 6VTA 29L" 12-volt battery rated at 39 amp hours. None of the auto parts stores can figure out that rating. Batteries now are all rated in "cold cranking amps". What kind of cold cranking amps do I need for my Twin Cam?


Jerry, Thanks to personnel on this list, I selected a type 45 Delco Freedom battery for mine. It fits in the hole, and has vent tubes so you can direct the fumes away from all the "rustables". I don't know what the amp hours are, but they are significantly more than the original 39. I wanted a light but adequate battery, the more AH, the heavier the battery is. Jerry Rude 73 Europa

Richard.Longo@usa.xerox.com writes: > Also the battery cable to the starter should be in top shape. And the ground braid from motor back to chassis, as Mark MarKell has reminded me to pay attention to round trip current path from battery through starter. PS: I fussed around with my Europa's starter before LOG-18, thinking the solenoid contacts were marginal. Mark put a meter on the battery and watched it drop to about 2 volts. Bingo! We replaced that guaranteed "Firebrick" battery with el cheapo discount store battery from my 72 Dodge Dart. Cranked like crazy.


BATTERY, Front mount

rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> From: "jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> Has anyone successfully mounted a battery in the front of a Europa? I heard from someone a while back theirs was actually breaking through the fiberglass.


I had no problems so far. The battery is mounted on a steel tray and bolted through the fiberglass. I reinforced the underside with steel straps. The whole battery is encased in a box cover to conform to Vintage racing standards.

BATTERY, Jump starting

Karl-Franz Marquez <karlfranz@bol.net> Subject: Re: Jump Start Question (E) Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 13:34:11 –0400 The donor car gets positive terminal to positive cable and negative terminal to negative cable. It is the car disabled car that has the negative cable connected to the block or some other suitable unpainted metal surface away from the battery. Here's all the steps: In cold weather, a good quality booster cable with four to six gauge wire is necessary to provide enough current to the disabled car to start the engine. (The smaller the wire gauge number, i.e., the larger the wire diameter, the better.) Please check the owner's manual for BOTH vehicles BEFORE attempting to jump start and follow the manufacturer's procedure because some cars should not be running during a jump start. However, starting the disabled car with the good car running can prevent having two disabled. DO NOT allow the booster cable clamps touch each other or the POSITIVE clamp to touch the frame or engine block.

  1. If BELOW freezing, determine that the electrolyte is NOT frozen in the dead battery. If frozen, allow to thaw BEFORE proceeding. A discharged battery, i.e., battery voltage or 12.0 volts or less or specific gravity of 1.140 or less, will freeze at approximately 8 degrees F (-15 degrees C).
  2. Without the cars touching, turn off all unnecessary accessories and lights on BOTH cars, insure there is plenty of ventilation, and put on some protective eye ware.
  3. Start the car with the good battery and let it run for at least two or three minutes at fast idle to recharge it's battery BEFORE proceeding.
  4. Connect the POSITIVE booster cable clamp (usually RED) to the POSITIVE terminal on the dead battery. Connect the POSITIVE booster cable clamp on the other end of the booster cable to the POSITIVE terminal on the good battery.
  5. Connect the NEGATIVE booster cable clamp (usually BLACK) to the NEGITIVE terminal on the good battery and the NEGATIVE booster cable clamp on the other end to a clean, unpainted area on the engine block or frame on the disabled car AWAY from the battery.
  6. Let the good car to continue to run at high idle for five minutes OR MORE to allow the dead battery to receive some recharge and to warm it's electrolyte.
  7. Start the disabled car and allow to run at high idle. If the car does not start the first time, recheck the connections, wait a few minutes and try again.
  8. Disconnect the booster cables in the REVERSE order, starting with the NEGITIVE clamp on the block or frame of the disabled car to minimize the possibility of an explosion.
  9. As soon as possible, fully recharge and test the dead battery for latent or permanent damage as a result of the deep discharge.

BEARINGS, U-joint replacements

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Subject: Re: Wheel bearings & Ujs Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 23:01:32 –0600 09 Nov 99, Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> wrote: 1) The cross reference was published in 6/78.
> Are the part numbers still valid?

Yes. The size and configuration are industry standard. The exact part numbers vary with from one manufacturer to the next.

>2) The reccommended bearings for the rear are A)Fafnir 206PP for rear outer, B)MRC 206-SZZ for Special inner. Are these correct? Are there newer and better alternatives?

The TC Special uses the same bearing for inner and outer. Yes the bearing numbers you listed are correct. There may be more brands to choose from, but the bearing configuration is an industry standard. The Fafnir 206PP and MRC 206-SZZ are basically interchangeable counterparts. Here are some more.

TC Special, Inner & Outer:
Lotus 36D6017
.... Bore.. 30 mm... 1.1811"
.... O.D.... 62 mm... 2.4409"
.... Width 16 mm.... .6299"
A light series, non-filling slot, single row radial bearing with two seals.
Fafnir........................................... 206PP
New Departure........................... Z99506
Federal Mogul, Bower & BCA.. 206
MRC............................................. 206-SZZ
SKF & FAG................................. 6206-2RS

> 3) The listing for the front bearings is a little confusing (to me, anyway). For front inner and outer, it lists 2 different bearings, a "cone" and a "cup". Which do I need? The suggestions are all made by Timken.

Europa front wheel bearings are from the Triumph Spitfire. Front wheel bearings are two-piece assemblies. A separate outer race, the "Cup", is pressed into the hub. The taper roller bearing (the "Cone") is pressed onto the spindle. You will need to purchase Cup and Cone sets for both the inner and outer bearings on each spindle... and seals. There used to be a Timken Cup and Cone set sold under the GHB1__ numbers listed below, but I don't think they're still available that way. The 07___ format is for the separate Cup and Cone bearings.

................. Inner.............. Outer......... Seals
Lotus....... 36C6017...... 36C6016... 36C6018
Timken.... GHGB111.... GHB110.... GHB146 Cup and Cone sets.
Inner Bearing (Cone)..... Timken 07100S Cone
Inner Race (Cup)............ Timken 07210X Cup
Outer Bearing (Cone).... Timken 03062 Cone
Outer Race (Cup)........... Timken 03162 Cup
Cup & Cone purchased separately

> 4) Also, I'll do new UJs while I'm at it. The cross reference reccommends Hardy-Spicer Type U-110 #K5-GB161 (that fits a TR-3). Is this the non-lubrucation-port type I've heard about?

Yes, that's the good U-joint. No provision for a grease fitting, but it has good seals and it last a long time. Make sure to assemble it with all the grease it will hold. Not just the little smear it comes with. Here are others:

Lotus................ A074D6008Z
BAP-Geon....... U-110
Hardy Spicer... K5-GB161 (alias GKN)
Also used on:
Triumph............ TR-3, TR-4, TR-4A, TR-250, TR-6
Volvo................ 164, 164E
Renault............. R4, R6, R12, R16


>BTW, I *still* haven't managed to get the drive yoke off the output of the gearbox! It is stuck rather well. What was the suggested removal (gear puller *didn't* work)?

Do you have the roll pins out? (Visually inspect the bore for a broken off stub of a roll pin.) I've had the pins fracture in the bore at the joint line between the ID of the yoke and the OD of the output shaft, turning the roll pin into three pieces. Then the slightest mis-alignment of the holes (1 in the shaft and 2 in the yoke) causes the fractured end of the pin to stub it's toe against the edge of the next hole. In that case, you can hammer on them all day long and not drive them out. You're better off trying to get a grip on the exposed end and pulling it out. Easy Out, Vise Grips... It's not easy, but at least it's not futile. If all remnants of the pins are out and the yoke still won't slide off of the output shaft, it's probably rusted on. It could have been Locktited on, but that's a no-no. In either case, spend a few days soaking it in penetrating oil. Kroil is probably the best. Then install a puller, apply plenty of tension, and then heat the outside of the yoke with a propane torch. Heat it evenly all around. Not just warm, HOT. Periodically apply a little more tension to the puller. Now is the time to exercise your best bar-room vocabulary. How old are you? The applied heat will toast the output shaft seals and O-rings, so plan on replacing them. They're due anyway, so it's no loss.

BEARINGS, Spacers

SJMARCY@aol.com I came across an easy way to get super strong, precise between-the-sealed-bearing spacers. Drill jig bushings. For $ 3.66 each I obtained a few 1 3/16 ID straight simple bushes made of hard, high grade, well finished, shiny steel. They are a hair too long though and will need a quick lathe job to get them down to the 2 inch stock Special length. Earlier cars use 2 1/8 length spacers with the small inner bearings. The stock 30 mm stub axle diameter is quite a bit smaller than the stock tube-spacers. A loose fit is prone to problems since the spacer won't self center itself. A bad combo given known compressive yield issues. So at one section only about half of the stock tube more or less touches the bearing rings due to the loose fit.. Again, not so hot! By using a 1 3/16 drill jig bush with a precise, accurate ID we wind up about 0.006 inches larger than the stub axle OD. It pilots on the 30 mm portions of the stub axle at either end so it is very stable. The lathe work to cut the length down from 2 1/2 to 2 inches might take me about 15 minutes or so on my small lathe. Shorter lengths might be available - my supplier was out of stock. The Europas with the 31 mm ID inner bearings can't use that size. But it's a good idea to machine such a stub axle down to 30 mm OD anyway so that cheaper, readily available bearings can be used.. If you have it all apart, of course. Else use a larger ID drill jig bush.

BODY, Door hinges

From: Michael Johannes Ditz <mditz@bndlg.de> From: <phil72@snet.net> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 3:14 PM > Has anyone on the list seen , or have any experience with the door hinges that Banks sells ? I have been trying to align my doors to get ready for paint ,but when I tighten the assemblies in place the rod is impossible to remove. It seems the bobbins that are in the doors are nowhere near parallel to one another. I need to be able to remove the doors without loosening the hinges to paint the jambs.

Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 7:45 PM Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa Doors The pin does not come out with the hinges fixed. You could run the car for 20 years without the securing pin in the rod. The Banks hinges are very massive and I personally did not succeed in putting them into place. I think they have to be machined at the top first.

BODY, Fasteners

magriese@us.ibm.com Subject: Fasteners Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 07:25:46 –0500 If you're looking to replace those rusty old fasteners in your car with nice clean stainless steel, a company called McMaster-Carr is worth a look. You can order single quantity bolts from their website http://www.mcmaster.com at their box rate. So, if you want 5 M8x45 bolts and the box price is $29.00 per 100, you pay 5x29/100 = $1.45. Don't work for them, don't own any part of them, but I did place an order for most of the external bolts, washers and nuts for my engine - total was around $120 including shipping.

BODY, Fiberglass

Some questions: 1) How critical is the mix ratio for final result - i.e. does it just affect hardening time or does it actually influence the strength?

Hardener mix does indeed affect the strength. In non structural applications you probably don't need to be overly concerned with it. The more catalyst you put in to speed up the curing process the more brittle the hardened resin will be. It is also important to the overall strength of the job to get as much fiberglass and as little resin into the work area as possible. That is to say - use the amount of glass needed - and use as little resin as possible while avoiding resin starved areas and pinhole bubbles. Resin starved areas are the biggest error I have seen on fiberglass repairs. Next most common problem is insufficient cleaning of the surface being bonded to. (These are opinions and certainly not statistically backable facts)

2) Does the shape of the container have any influence on hardening time? Will mix in a large shallow container harden faster than in a small tall one?

Shape of the container will affect the set up to some degree. If you have a square it will set up faster than if you were using a baking sheet. This however should not affect you. Mix only what you can use within the working time of a container like a can or similar mixing container.

3) Is it worthwhile to try to reuse brushes?

I second the motion of using the CHEAPEST brush you can find. Don't hassle with trying to clean it out and salvage it. Brushes can be had at Home Depot for $.79 -.99. Briggs Pletcher

Briggs Pletcher wrote: > In non structural applications you probably don't need to be overly concerned with it.

That was my point. None of the fiberglass on a Europa is structural.

> The more catalyst you put in to speed up the curing process the more brittle the hardened resin will be.

That's true, but too little glass will make a brittle repair regardless of the catalyst ratio.

> That is to say - use the amount of glass needed - and use as little resin as possible while avoiding resin starved areas and pinhole bubbles.

Unless you're vacumm-bagging, some voids are inevitable. As they were on Lotus' original layup work. I have used a 3" fine nap paint roller to roll out mat layup, and that does a good job of saturating the layup while using minimum resin.

> Next most common problem is insufficient cleaning of the surface being bonded to. (These are opinions and certainly not statistically backable facts).

I'm in agreement with the need for cleanliness. To get a structural bond, you really need to sand or grind through the original gelcoat and do the repair layup on the original fiber/resin material. It's almost a certainty that there will be voids that must be filled after repair, but careful saturation and rolling (there are toothed metal rollers that are good for this as well) will keep them to a minimum.

> Shape of the container will affect the set up to some degree. If you have a square it will set up faster than if you were using a baking sheet.

My recommendation is not to wet the mat before applying it. Rather, wet the area to which the mat will be applied, carefully lay the mat in place, then add resin as necessary until the mat is thoroughly saturated. This is where the roller technique comes in handy.

> This however should not affect you. Mix only what you can use within the working time of a container like a can or similar mixing container.

I usually mix resin in batches of 10 ounces or less. By the time I've got that worked in, it's usually starting to go off (gel). If I need more, I put the brush and/or roller in an acetone bath, and mix again. Other tips I have found useful:

  1. Mix resin in foil baking tins, available at the grocery store. They'll hold about as much resin as you can lay up before gel.
  2. Always use chemical resistant gloves.
  3. You can never have too much acetone on hand.
  4. If you can get 3/4 oz. mat, definitely do so. It conforms to tight contours much better than the more common 1 1/2 oz variety. Use the light mat to make a skin coat, then use the heavier stuff for buildup.
  5. You'll get best results by far if your work area and all of your materials are at least 70 degrees F. 80 is even better. Polyester resin will not cure below 60, so don't even try if it's anywhere near that temp.
  6. If you're using resin you bought at an auto parts store, your layup will have a layer of wax on top after it cures. ALWAYS remove this, first with acetone, then with 80 or 100 grit sandpaper, before doing any additional layup or finish work.
  7. If you can see a bubble of any size below the surface of your repair, go ahead and cut into it, then level the area as much as possible by sanding around the edges.
  8. Once you've got your repair worked down to relatively small voids, use polyester body filler, then polyester primer/surfacer, to complete the fill/build process.
  9. If your layup has edges that will need to be trimmed, you can do so very easily with a utility knife just after the resin hardens enough to stiffen the protruding fibers. Wait any longer, and you'll need to use a grinder.

That's all I can think of right now. Hope it's useful. Jay Mitchell

BODY, Front trunk

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: How many holes (U) Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 13:30:12 –0700
David B Anderson wrote: How many holes are there in the front luggage area (boot, trunk) of a 1972 Europa Twin Cam? (not the spare wheel/tire area, the luggage area). I believe the emergency brake bolts up there, two holes. The emergency brake pivot has, I think, four holes of a small diameter on the floor, spanning the centerline. The windshield wiper motor, one or two more holes on the passenger side, rear bulkhead. Two holes, about 1 inch diameter on either side with small rubber grommets that plug them, they lead into the pass and driver compartments, and are on the floor, forward (for what purpose, I don't know). Two holes, 1/4 inch, below fan hole for fan bracket.

BODY, Gas struts

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> I too have to add the gas struts. The 74 models had the struts stock. Ken Landaiche has a drawing showing the lower supports needed to install the struts, the upper support, however, hasn't been drawn yet. The normal Lotus suppliers still stock the struts (same as on an Eclat/Elite front strut). I haven't calculated the strut size yet, but plan to do so in the near future, just to save a few $$. Once two struts are on the hood/bonnett, no extra stiffing should be required as it will be evenly supported.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Mine had the single prop in the rear, front too. It had lost the grommet on the lower pivot, and had ripped down the fiberglass about 2 inches. After repairing that mess, and looking at the situation of working on the engine with the tray out, I decided to go with the struts. The later 74s had struts, so I'm not really getting too away from stock, except that the lower attachment points are in a different location than original. I wanted to do something that 1) didn't require I reinstall the brace across the firewall, 2) would minimize any stresses on the hood, and 3) would be universal for all Europas, if possible. I think I've achieved all what I set out to do, the struts have 26lb force each, the lower points bolt to the fenderwells where the 4 bolt flanges do for the seat belt tension bars did (will work if you have them also), the upper and lower points align horizontally when the hood is shut, so no vertical stress on the hood when it is closed. The only modification to the car to install them is 4 rivet holes on each side of the hood, on the vertical edges. The hood opens pretty wide, about as far as when I was using the lotus #1 tool (6 foot wood dowel), not so far as to look unseemly, but enough to have full access. I hope to publish a little article soon. From a practical point, its soooo much better. When closing, light pressure is required so minimal stress on the glass during transition. Cost was about $75 or so.

BODY, Gelcoat repair

farberjf@us.ibm.com I brushed regular resin on ...... carefully. It did just what I wanted which was seal the surface and eliminate future problems........ It hardened and I sanded lightly to flatten. I primered and painted as usual.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> > I’m finding a lot of small hairline cracks or starbursts.. any easy way to seal them?


The only reliable way to keep those from coming back is to grind them out and repair them. There is an 'accepted method' for this that works quite well. Some other methods may work for awhile, but I wouldn't count on anything else keeping long term problems away.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Don't go thru the primer, stop there. The starbursts/cracking is called "stress cracks" and is due the brittleness of the gel coat on the fiberglass. R&D enterprises sells what is called "tissue" which
is very thin fiberglass mat. You sand down thru the gel coat and then use this with resin to bring the surface back up. Works great, but is tedious, and the only way to prevent recurrence of the cracking. Don't try just filling and sealing, doesn't work.

BODY, Lifting

From: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Given that you contemplate suspending a substantial weight
overhead, you need to be VERY careful in how you lift and secure your car's body.

  1. Your hanging points must be through-bolted with large flat washers on both sides of the wooden beam. Use Grade 5 or better hardware everywhere.
  2. Don't use rope, use steel aircraft cable with properly terminated loop ends (with Crosby clips).
  3. Use forged eyebolts and/or threaded chain end links. DO NOT use S-hooks or bent eyebolts.
  4. Use a come-along, as opposed to a block and tackle, to do the lifting. The ratchet in the come-along will prevent the body from dropping if your hand slips on the handle.
  5. The rule of thumb for overhead suspension is a minimum 5:1 safety factor. I use 10:1. This means that the structure from which you hang the body should be capable of supporting 2000 lbs - if your estimate of the Europa's body weight is accurate - without giving way.

The above precautions are all in the interest of personal safety - yours and anyone else's who might be in the garage while the car's body is hanging in the rafters. As for supporting the body itself, I'd use two loops of nylon webbing through the door openings, with additional straps to hold each loop in its intended fore-aft position. I believe this will balance reasonably well.

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Here's what I did: Use a cherry picker (under $200) and climbing rope. Suspend the body front and rear and pick the whole works off. I did it by myself - and reinstalled it by myself also. The cherry picker is great for doing engines/trans too, since you can move things around. I even use it for loading heavy stuff into a truck. I can't remember how much I paid for mine, but I'm sure it was well under $200, and worth every cent. Now they have fold up ones for about the same price, so they don't take up so much room when not in use.

From: "Briggs Pletcher" <Briggs1@ix.netcom.com> Lifting the body is probably best done with 4 guys (people),
certainly not a requirement but a nice insurance policy. The weight isn't that great but you could be in for some disconcerting cracking noises if you try to lift the body off without keeping it level. Having extra hands also allows for someone to run around to find out why it's not coming off as easily as you thought it would. The "body shell" itself is really light, one person could move it around if it weren't so awkward. My neighbor and I danced around my garage, driveway and yard over the years with the body before if finally went back on to the frame. What is different about your car however is that I believe you still have the windshield, windows and doors attached to the shell. These items (glass and motors) along with all of the other interior pieces, gas tanks and radiator add a substantial weight to the overall body. You may want to consider taking the doors off to lighten the load. It's not much but it does lighten the load and you can get better access to grabbing the side sills when you can lean into the body a little bit. As for the hanging thought. Not bad, it would probably work but you may find it to be a nuisance every time you want to work on the body that you have to take it up and down. An alternate offering, one that worked well for me, is to build a rolling dolly that you set the body on. I supported only the floor pan and let the ends hang off of the dolly. If you make it tall enough to clear the tires on the frame you can store the body and frame side by side and only increase the overall width by on half of the frame. Depending how far in you put the wheels on the dolly you may even be able to do better than that. The other nice part about doing this is that the body is always within reach and is held secure while you do all of the little things that you will end up doing to the interior or the body itself. The other benefit is that it was CHEAP, a factor that seems of value to you. I actually used scrap lumber and bought pivoting wheels for about $50.

BODY, Locks

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> New Europa boot lock sets are still available. The usual Vendors (Tingle, Bean, RD, JAE)

>From:
dsrgr@aol.com I managed to lose the key to my trunk lock and had another one made after taking the hinge pins out to get it open. I've now discovered that the threads for the bolt that holds the securing clip on are stripped. Anyone know what type of vehicle the lock came from and if they might still be available?

BODY, Parts

Benjamin Levy (hedge spice) <seven@apocalypse.org> Subject: Engine-less Europa for sale in MA. Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:17:02 –0400 I heard (second hand) that Rob Quindezi (sp?) has engine-less Europa for sale. That car was used for racing, so it has various modifications. It has Hewland transaxle, flared fenders and an easy-off body. You can reach Rob at Shine Racing Service (SRS) at 508 660-7974. 508 is on the South Shore of Massachusetts, near Boston.

BODY, Paint cleaner

"Peter M. Blackford" <pmbsab@naples.infi.net Subject: "clay" paint cleaner? Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 21:22:22 –0400 I don't know if anyone here is familiar with this product, but it's been getting some good press... this is just one of several notes: Just thought I would mention the use of this clay and my results. I only had the time to do the hood and roof today, but the results are GREAT! Before you could run your hand over the surface after just washing the car. You could feel all the "crap" that had planted itself on the paint. After using the Clay Magic on the surface, it was unbelievable how smooth it became. You could see in the clay all the crap it picked up. I then waxed the surface with carnuba and WOW! What a great shine. Hopefully I'll have the time to finish the rest of the car next weekend. I recommend this highly. My car is a 93 and has never had anything but wax performed on the paint. This is now a must do. It is quite easy to do. It might add an extra 45min to 1 hr, but your car will love you for it. You can get this stuff from Don Mallinson. Check out his web site http://www.dccarcare.com. It is a small investment to help your paint. (probably available elsewhere, as well... not a commercial message).

One warning though. If you pick up "chunks" of dirt etc. in the clay, you can end up putting fine scratches all over you paint job. But use care, and the results are great. Tim Mullen, Chantilly, VA

BODY, Paint numbers

Tell me your paint code and I'll look up the Pinchin Johnson numbers, etc. "Service Parts List" section BL has all the paint codes & names listed. (LO-?? usually etched into the chassis ID plate, in the engine bay?) Do you know the name of the color? Maybe "Ford Tawny (Met)" L-16 or "Roman Bronze (Met)" L-34 ?

Start by looking on the VIN plate for a 'paint code' box (Usually very small and hard to see) which often has the paint code scratched in by hand. It will probably be a letter and two digits like 'L11' for my Elite. The paint codes are listed in the workshop manual and a good automotive paint retailer can make up a touchup quantity. The manual gives an ICI number which is a large automotive paint distributor similar to PPG or DuPont>

BODY, Paint Stripping

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Subject: Stripping FRP (was Re: Comments?) Using a chemical stripper to take paint off a fiberglass part can be risky. I've gotten away with it, but I've only tried it on small parts I wouldn't cry over if things went south. I wouldn't want to risk it on a car body. If the stripper gets to the glass fiber, it will wick into the matte or weave. Once in there, it's difficult or impossible to get out. Depending upon the type of chemistry, it may actually attack the FRP, or it may just make painting problematic. A "little" pocket of stripper in the fibers will attack any paint that is applied over it and cause it to lift or blister. Some strippers are stronger that others. The strongest ones will actually attack the resin in a FRP part. I used a water based chemical stripper to take some paint off a fiberglass laminated wood structure (fuselage of an RC sailplane), and ended up taking all the glass off with the first application. Milder strippers may not attack the resin and the gelcoat may protect the fiber matte/ cloth from the nastier effects. May. If the gelcoat is intact and crack free. But any chip that exposes the matte, any stress crack that allows the gel to wick into the fiber, any stress crack repair in progress that exposes fibers... is potentially a problem. The gentleman who purchased my late '71 Europa S2 decided it need to be stripped and resprayed (and it did). He took it to a specialty body shop known for the beautiful work they did on Porsches, BMW's and Mercedes... but no fiberglass cars. They chemically stripped it. There was a small starburst stress crack in the center of the roof. After stripping the car, they repaired the starburst and repainted the car. About a month later the paint blistered where the star had been. They sanded it down and repainted. It blistered. Sanded and painted. It blistered. I saw the car periodically for several years afterwards and it always had the blister. The roof was repainted several times and the blister always returned. I don't know what stripper they used... sorry. But I know I won't use a chemical stripper on a fiberglass car. Sand it or take it in to be media blasted. If you blast it, be aware that blasting has a whole can of worms all it's own. Aggressive, hard media or high pressure can do severe damage to a fiberglass body... lightweight Lotus bodies in particular. Go to someone experienced in blast-stripping fiberglass, have a serious heart-to-heart about the delicate nature of Lotus bodywork, use only "soft" media like plastic, ground walnut shells or soda and keep the pressure low. Go slow. Strip the gray primer and sand from there.


I'm not trying to be an alarmist, but there are some risks you should know about. I do suggest you invest in some sandpaper. However, if you do continue with the chem-strip, don't try to take it all the way down chemically. It sounds like there's a lot of paint build up on your car, so be happy with just chem-stripping the upper layer, then sand it the rest of the way down to the primer. When you are done, wash the car thoroughly with acetone. Then let it sit and bake in the hot sun for a month or more to drive out any volatiles before attempting to paint it. Regards, Tim Engel


21 Mar 99, Mark MarKell <
Type46@micro-engineering.com> wrote: I seem to remember a note from someone about strippers used on glass being not a good idea. Is that so? Something > about absorption or damage at the gel-coat level?

The key is water soluble strippers...... I basically gave my car a light sponge bath after I stripped each section ---and it was clean after. Also since you will be grinding down all those cracks it wont be a problem. As an aside ---after stripping many more cracks will be visible.......I fixed about 150 spots. That was 5 years ago -- not 1 crack has returned. I tell you I have had hudreds of "experts" (folks with no experience stripping) tell me that it wouldnt work......... All I have is experience both ways. My partner and I have now restored six glass cars. And if only a small bit needs to be repaired ---we sand. Ask each person that gives you an opinion how many complete cars THEY have stripped. -----Joel

Do not use paint strippers. It will be absorbed into the 'glass, and later it will bleed out and ruin the paint job. The only good way is to sand it down. Good 'ol manual labor... If you are interested in a *good* body shop that specializes in Lotus, Evans Leinbach in Salisbury North Carolina, does *excellent* work. He did my car, and several other have seen it, and taken their car to him also. For what it's worth, my Elan won Best of Show at the LOG 18, mostly due to Evan's paint job (and body work). Several others at the LOG also decided to take their car to him after seeing mine... The pictures aren't very high resolution, but check out my web site <http://www.erols.com/elans4/> Tim Mullen, Chantilly, VA 72 Elan Sprint

This is a big topic and has been discussed frequently on the List. I restore Lotuses for a living and have stripped several. I have tried everything. There is basically no alternative to sanding off the paint. The relatively flat surfaces can be sanded with a pneumatic dual-action (random orbital) sander with about 80 grit down into the original color, then 150 or 220 down to the original primer. Then it is best to hand sand (preferably wet sand) down to bare gel coat, probably gray on your car. If you don't have a big industrial air compressor, you won't be able to run a D-A sander for more than 5 minutes out of every 15... The sharp corners and deep features will have to be laboriously hand sanded. Some have had success with chemical strippers or bicarbonate of soda blasting. I have not. No shortcuts to a lasting result. Randall Fehr Restorations, Seattle

Stripping -- how to have more fun. By Joel Farber

Maybe your Lotus could use paint and you have time on your hands and you need a challenge. It is generally accepted that if you want a "real good" paint job - you want to start by getting down to the naked surface. Additionally, getting all that old paint off reduces the weight of the car, aiding the performance.

Well, the following are some considerations and revelations discovered as I decided to strip the paint off my 69 Elan+2 to prepare It for its new paint.

The historical wisdom and almost universal practice among the west coast professional glass painters I have talked to is: "grind it off". However, I was concerned about my skill and results (possibly ruining the gel coat or the shape) using a power grinder. I will not discuss the pros and cons of the two approaches - which gets religious ….

Alternatively, according to Miles Wilken's book, How to Restore Fibreglass Bodywork (Osprey series), the other method is chemical stripping - with care. This is the route I chose. It took me in the vicinity of 100 hours and about $60 worth of stripper. Also on a personal note, I believe in better living through chemistry.

Many strippers say that they strip glass and do it - but soften the gel coat. A water soluble stripper - applied properly, is necessary. I used J. Scott Company's RFD stripper (175 Barneveld Ave, San Francisco, Ca. 415-824-1741 ).

They aren't enthusiastic about selling less than a case ..... however, they are more pliable if you go and pick It up. This stripper worked well and left the gel coat hard as a rock - when the directions were followed. It was very safe in that the stripper could be left in contact with the gel for several minutes without damage.

One benefit of chemical stripping is that since the glass gets completely exposed, all the glass defects are easily visible, so none are missed as might happen it repairs are made only where the defects show through the paint.

One disadvantage of the chemicals is that once chemicals have been used on paint, you are committed to remove all that paint. New paint will not adhere well to contaminated paint. So the worst case is needing to sand to remove "partial work". However, I had no such problems.

Let me note up front that there is some messiness involved in the process, and you absolutely should PROTECT YOUR EYES at all times. I also used black textured Boss brand gloves that I got at Orchard Supply for $2.50 that worked extremely well and didn't dissolve. The stripper burns skin - but is neutralized by water - so have some handy.

My car had 4 coats of paint when I began: an outer black coat over the car, sometimes below that was a red primer, below that was what I believe to be the original factory British racing green, below that a grey-white primer.

The effort to strip the paint was uneven. Sometimes the paint was stubborn (esp. areas like the bonnet that were engine baked), other areas were a piece of cake. Your effort will vary depending on the specifics of the paint.

I discovered that there is no one technique for doing the stripping that works for all situations. Here is what I found by trial and error:

The black outer coat tended to respond best to a thick stripper application - It bubbled quickly and came off beat by scraping It with a putty knife.

The green factory coat was very hard being 20 years old, Again, after a thick application of stripper and waiting 10+ minutes, it scraped off with force. However, the 2' knife was still more effective then a wire brush.

The grey white primer was thick and soft. Again, a fairly heavy application of stripper, 5-10 minutes time and a wire brush turned it into a slurry that got about 80% of It. The next coat of stripper and #0 steel wool got the surface completely clean to the naked tanish gel coat. I then wiped the surface dry with another piece of clean steel wool.

I found that I had to push quite vigorously on the tools to get the paint off, and was surprised that the amount of force used didn't hurt the glass at all. The stripper didn't harm metal or ordinary glass, but be careful near rubber or synthetics. Again, PROTECT YOUR EYES.

My results were very good. At the point where I declared victory, I had removed the doors, windows, and all trim items. I did the door jams (necessary if changing colors), rocker panels, 2" down into the engine compartment, the boot channel, the light pods, and down under the car to the front and rear seams.

JerTigger@aol.com Subject: Fwd: Stripping Paint - Europa Special Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:58:24 EST
I am currently removing all the paint from my 72 Europa TC. The best product I could find for the price is BIX all finish paint remover. It costs about $10 per gallon at Home Depot. I slop it on thick, reapply several times to keep it wet over the course of 1 1/2 hours then use a plastic putty knife and it comes off like a gob of slime. This car has been repainted twice, very thick coats and most areas I get it down to the first coat of primer if not to the gel coat.

I know you don't want to hear it, but sanding is the best method, even though it takes much time and patience, it produces the best result, and it doesn't go thru the primer surfacer original to the car. Just sand to the grey and stop. Jerry Rude 73 Special VIN 4005R

I have read the GGLC article and do not entirely agree with it. I don't understand "sanding leads to waves - unavoidably", unless it is understood that sanding off all the primers (block sanded at the factory) and fillers (applied and sanded in repairs later) reveal all the imperfections in the moulding. Some of these flaws were there from manufacture, some appear over time with aging and expansion/contraction of the resin in the structure. Others from damage. What I'm getting at is that 80% of a repair/repaint is sanding fillers and primers to a perfect, flaw-free shape. And for that to remain fairly stable over the years, you should remove all the old layers of paint, primer etc. Some say to leave at least the factory primer under the original color to save some of this effort, but I have not often found this to be practical. The very best info on stripping, repairing and painting Lotus bodies is Miles Wilkins' two books in the Osprey Restoration series - out of print. Apparently they are still available from www.Lotus-Books.com in Germany. I highly recommend you study these. –Randall

I'm going through the same process with my 72 TC. Thought I'd pass on my experience. The Europa has one quirk to it's fiberglass - it doesn't like paint. Well, you have to admit, this isn't your normal car... seriously, if you strip it to bare fiberglass and then paint it, the paint begins to bubble up in a couple of years. Reason: the primer gets sucked into the glass fibers, and comes loose later. From what I've heard, multiple coats of primer don't help any. So, when someone tells you not to sand past the gelcoat, the gray coat over the fiberglass, that's why you shouldn't. I'm stripping mine by hand right now. It's a long, drawn out process that involves a paint scraper (faster than sanding) here the paint will come loose, and the sander where it won't. In the process, I'm finding out that my euro spec TC has been crunched in the front, and the massive slabs of bondo around the front turn signals are now coming loose. No simple solution for that situation. Be prepared for a long, drawn out process, I've been scraping in evenings off and on since last fall, and winter hiatus aside, I've cleared maybe half the car. However, if you plan to keep the car for more than two years, this is something that has to be done. --John

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Subject: Re: Fwd: Stripping Paint - Europa Special Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 08:59:33 –0800 I personally wouldn't use any paint stripper. I know people that have, but there is too good of a chance of getting it into the gel coat. Even if it doesn't damage it, there is a good posibility of later problems with paint contamination. Sanding. I hate to say it, but thats really the best way. Try not to go through the original primer (if it is still there). If the paint it original, I'd sand with 180grit, nothing heavier. That can take a long time, but you have solves the problem of sand scratches showing through the final paint. Sanding it wet will make the paper work much better and last longer.

Sorry to reply to this so late, but I have stripped paint off my Plus 2. For the first top coat I used chemical stripper, being very careful to remove it again almost immediately as if it touches the glass, then the gel coat will dissolve. After that I used 3M safety Stripper which is also chemical, but does not attack the glass. Its very slow. Apply on thick, cover with clingwrap and leave overnight. Works beautifully. However the safest method is to sand using a big block and wet paper. Just go down to the grey primer. Go any further and you will sand the heads off air bubbles in the gel coat which are a pain to recitify. For all those nasty little corners etc like around door jambs etc use the safety stripper. ray edwards

farberjf@us.ibm.com I didnt have any residual solvent problems at all. But after stripping I had many different surfaces (repairs / different types of glass.....). I painted on the thinnest possible coat of glass epoxy resin ---then sanded. It gave me one uniform surface to prime. Might have been overkill but I got good results. Keep in mind that Miles Wilkens --- THE Lotus factory reccomended restoration guy strips..... If you look down a bit in the www.gglotus.org site in the forsale Section I have a picture of my +2 painted.

JerTigger@aol.com My Europa had three finish coats plus several coats of primer in between, had alligator cracks,etc. all the way down. I heard many horror stories about paint strippers after I started. Used BIX stripper from Home Depot let it stay on for about 1 1/2 hours with rewetting in between. I did not have any problems with softening the fiberglass, except I left the small cup I used to hold the remover on the car upside down over night, softened the gelcoat and fiber glass base, no problem only one more patch out of many. It has been about three months since I did that so the chemical should be gassed out by now plus much wet sanding. I had many other things to do on the car and sit will be about another month before it sees primer.

"Warren Hartenstine" <whartenstine@earthlink.net> I stripped, using NAPA 6802, a water-soluble, lower strength stripper. When I applied a sufficient amount, the color coat blistered within 10 minutes and the primer stayed in tact. I washed the car twice after each day's work - about two days.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> I am continuing with my rough removal of paint with the knotted wire wheel. I have been slow to answer requests for a description of this tool, so here we go: The center of the thing is a metal disk about 3 inches in diameter with an integral mandrel threaded to fit an angle grinder. Radiating from the periphery of this disk are maybe a dozen twisted-wire bundles, each of which resembles a section of stout steel cable. The material is twisted in a direction so that as the disc spins, the wire at the contact point with the work is trying to "unwrap". Each wire point in turn imparts quite an impact to the edge of a layer of paint, chipping it off. This is especially effective with very hard paints (just the kind that ought not be on a Europa in the first place, but anyone dumb enough to paint a Europa black when he lives in Hawaii can't be expected to figure that out) which are difficult to sand off. It is true that one can take one layer of paint at a time if sufficient care is used. In one area of the left front fender, I found that the archeological layers consisted of

  1. very hard and brittle paint, as found all over the car,
  2. another layer of the same hard black
  3. gray primer
  4. a layer of blackpaint which, unlike the similar layer elsewhere on the car was soft
  5. medium-hard brown which is evidently a primer of sorts
  6. the usual assortment of metallic blue, primers and the original Lotus Yellow #7.

In this area, I found that I could quickly scrape off layers 1-4 with a sharp wood chisel without going through the layer-5 brown. Too bad it is not like this everywhere! But that is the trouble with this car. There is a basic pattern, but wild variations exist. On the front of the car, around the mouth area, it appears to have one coat of black painted directly on the fiberglass. No primer, no gelcoat, just black paint.

BODY, Rear lid

"Briggs Pletcher" <Briggs1@ix.netcom.com> I believe the gasket on the rear deck lid does not actually act as a seal but rather more of an aesthetic cover for the rough edge of the body behind the window. My S2 had just a "U" channel flexible trim slipped over the edge where the body was trimmed after molding. As for the gap to leave : I just went through he same exercise with my S2. What I found was that there is enough play in the deck holes and in the holes that go through the body behind the window to allow you to align for perfect fit. My biggest concern with hole placement was that the lid did not rub on the sides and that at the back where it "flips" up (the 1970's wing) that it matched up with the peaks in the body. Again the hole size that was originally in the body, maybe 3/8" left enough play around studs to adjust to taste.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> On my special, there was a seal, like a door seal, which slips over the body lip to seal the front of the hood. I haven't found a replacement yet (haven't been looking very hard though). To fit the lid, I would put it in place, and find where it looks best and mark the hinge location, then drill from that. Also, note that the factory had extra large holes to allow adjustment during assembly, but be careful as too wide will negate all you've accomplished so far (as if you didn't already know...). Make sure you use large fender washers underneath, and the hinges had a gasket between them and the body/hood. It took me awhile to get mine adjusted, and I too had to glass over the stress cracks in that area, though the holes were still visible underneath.

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> I'd like to pass this one along. I got this from Mark Michalski (who I don't think is on list) at LOG. Mark had drilled a hole in the drain trough for the rear trunk. Then a grommet was installed and this hole was used for the rear trunk prop rod when the trunk basket wasn't in the car. I haven't had to take the trunk off the car since I made this mod. I've found it immensely useful.

BODY, Removal

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> (by way of Phil Ethier <phil.ethier@ci.stpaul.mn.us>) Subject: Europa Body Removal Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:27:50 –0800 From: VACUUMTUBE@aol.com <VACUUMTUBE@aol.com> >Does anyone happen to have a list of steps to follow to remove said body from a 74 TC Special? That is, what must first be released before removing the body. This is from an exchange with Cory Carpenter, in which I told him about my 1970 Europa S2 chassis' out-of-body experience

\\\\\\\\body removal


>How much of a hassle was it to pull the body >off your frame? Were there a *lot* of electrical connections, or do most of them stay with the dash?

Not too many. I believe in the stock car the wires run under the carpet on the right side of the tunnel, just below the console cover. Since they don't go through the frame, no problem. Take off the engine lid and remove the battery. Disconnect anything that runs between the body and the frame/engine assembly.


>How heavy is the body with, say everything but the seats and steering column in it?


Dunno. Got six guys to lift it.


>you pulled your doors off too, didn't you?)

The doors are still on. The right one has had the hinge pin replaced, the left one needs it (parts came with car). I am going to wait until I am ready to repaint before I pull them. This will be long after the car is afoot again.

>It occurs to me that I could easily fix a good dozen nagging little things one shot if I bit the bullet and pulled my body.

Be sure to check the frame carefully for rust and cracks. The long brake line cannot be replaced with the body on, so check it.

>I think I could build a rack to suspend it over the top of the frame and running gear, and thus keep everything in the garage.

I was going to do this, but never found a way. I never designed a method to hoist the body, as I was advised that the many-people theory was easier on the body. (NOTE: make sure the guys on the front lift only on the rear portion of the front wheelwells. Nobody lifts on the nose.)


>If there's not too much overhead involved, I'm going to make a shot at completing my "restoration" in time for the Norm
>Thompson Historical Races/International Lotus Convention at PIR the 8th through 10th of next month. That gives me two weeks.


I think you are going to be disappointed. Shipwright's disease is a danger here. You will find lots of things you want to do, and two weeks will never do it. There are other reasons for it, but my body has been off for a year.


Here are the things I remember about body removal. Remember the body is destined to go straight up, so look for anything that will prevent that.

Remove both deck lids. The rear on my car had bolts for hinge pins. I threw these away and replaced them with big hair-pins from the hardware store. (Now I can pop the lid off for easy access anytime I want.) The socially acceptable way to remove the rear deck lid with unmodified hinges is to unbolt the hinge from the lid. The front lid is held in by two bolts which serve as hinges. Some day I may replace these with Sonett-style pins.


Remove all electrical connections between body and frame/engine: Back-up light switch at rear of gearbox; brake-light switch on frame, right of engine; starter; alternator; various gauge sensors.


Remove fuel line from engine.


Remove heater and choke cables from engine. Since neither of these things existed on my worked-over car, I have no hints.


Drain cooling system. There does not seem to be a drain anywhere, so removing the radiator hoses is the only way. I took off the upper hose at the radiator end first, and drained down as far as possible by lowering the hose end into a bucket in the nose. I cut up an antifreeze bottle to make a big flat pan to fit under the lower radiator hose connection. Any coolant you spill goes out the drain hole in the nose, so have a pan under the car to catch it.


Remove heater hoses from frame "Y" area. Reach up from under the car.

Remove manifolds. Probably not necessary with stock manifold, but was with my side-draft. I had to take out one of the coolant hoses, too, but maybe on a stock car you can skip out on it.


Remove seats.


Remove inboard seat belt mounts. They go through the body to the frame. Outboard mounts can stay with the body.


Remove brake and clutch pedal assembly, as it through-bolts to frame. Pull the clutch cable all the way from the clutch. Don't forget to reassemble the cable parts. The little barrel that fits the clutch arm clevis is the only part I lost over the time the car was apart. This could only be due to inattention at the time of disassembly.


Remove throttle pedal. Trust me. It blocks access to the hand-brake. Pull the throttle cable all the way out of the car, after disconnecting at the carb end.


Remove hand-brake arm. The umbrella handle can stay attached to the body. The bolt that holds the arm to the frame is reached by removing the rubber plug in the bottom of the trunk/plenum. This is bitch. I have no idea how I am going to hook it up again, but am looking forward to some contortionism and cursing. (I did manage to get it together when the time came. It was a real challenge. Wish I could tell you how I did it, but it was one of those things that just finally came together, amid general rejoicing.)


Remove both coolant hoses from radiator and frame tubes in the nose section.


Remove steering column.


Remove frame-body closing plate. I put this off until later. I was wrong.


Remove brake master cylinder. Four bolts hold the base to the frame. There is a loose plate inside the frame that is tapped for the bolts. This is going to be really fun to refit (I discovered a trick for reinstallation: Bolt the loose plate inside the frame without the master-cylinder base. Drill a hole through the frame and plate in the middle, between the big holes. Install a pop-rivet. Remove the bolts and the plate stays put whilst you install the master-cylinder base with the four bolts. The bottom ones are easier to reach with the frame-body closing plate out.)


The link from the (now removed) brake pedal will come with the base. To get the base out after the bolts are out, either raise the steering rack or remove the lower closing plate. I moved the rack. I was wrong. Closing plate is easier. Be very careful around the nose after the closing plate is out, as the nose has no support and you can crack the glass over the wheelwells.


Remove shift knob.


Remove console cover.


At the center base of the dashboard are two angle brackets. Remove the vertical bolts that secure them to threaded bosses in the frame.


Remove hoses that run from frame to heater cores.


Remove three body/frame bolts from each side of the tunnel on the firewall behind the seat area. There are nuts on the other end, on angles welded to the frame.


Remove one body/frame bolt from each side on the rear of frame rails flanking the gearbox.


Remove one body/frame bolt from each side of the trunk/plenum area. There are supposed to be rubber plugs covering these, but of course the plugs were missing on my car. In fact, the BOLTS were missing! I really wonder about some of the previous owners of this car.


If front closing plate is still attached, remove the two bolts that hold it to the nose. If you have been paying attention to my mistakes, you have already removed this part.


If you are going to work on fuel tanks, unfasten them now. Loosen the clamps and release the filler hoses. The tanks are held into the body by several tiny nut-bolt combos. If you still have the factory splash covers in front of the rear wheels, and of course I don't, they will have to come out to reach the nuts. When the tanks are loose, drop them to the floor. You will not be able to remove them yet. (When I put the tanks back in, I used bigger [!] 1/4-inch bolts, nylock nuts and large fender washers.)


Make a flat cart to match the width of the car and the length of the rocker panels. Use four casters, not fixed wheels. Pad the top.


Call the troops. You will need at least six besides yourself.


Be sure everything is ready. Shift the gearbox to neutral. Have the muscular types lift on the wheelwells. Remember to lift only near the back of the front ones. Nobody lifts on the nose.


Yank out the fuel tanks.

Roll the chassis straight back and out of the way. Be sure the tires and gear lever miss the body.


Roll the cart in from the side. Have the muscular types lower the body onto the cart.


Let the muscular types make jokes about putting a motorcycle saddle on the frame and driving it. :-)


Have one of the attending Lotus enthusiasts convince you to remove everything from the frame, strip and repaint it. :-) :-)


(Good thing, too. I found a couple of cracks that had to be repaired.)


(When I put the body back on, I replaced all the water-trapping felt with closed-cell foam.)
pethier@isd.net

"Ed & Ruth Young" <lotusracer@home.com> Subject: Europa body removal Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:29:04 –0600 Many years ago, I removed the body from my Twin Cam Europa. Some helpful tips follow. Of course, you will want to remove all attaching bolts, gearshift knob, the seats(to lighten the body even more) and the oil pressure line(that's the one I almost forgot). I then started by jacking the body slowly off the frame, a little here, a little there to make sure that I indeed had undone all the important things. After raising it quite a bit, I took some long 4X4's and slid them through the wheel arch openings, one at the front 'T' section and one at the rear. They were long enough for my helpers to grab onto and to lift the body with. No wheel arch grabbing please! We lifted it up, clearing the shifter and walked it out of the garage. Later, we carried it back in, and set it down on the other half of the garage. When I put the body back on, I did it all by myself. I took 2 'come alongs', attaching one to the center of the 4X4 in the rear, which I had bolted to the body to prevent slipping, and the other one I attached to 2 eyebolts that I had attached to the 4X4 in the front through the shock bolt access holes. Winched the body up, rolled the chassis back under it, and slowly lowered it back on. A couple of clicks in front, a couple of clicks in the rear, watching and adjusting position of the chassis as I went. Once the body was resting on the 4X4's that were resting on the chassis, I took the jacks and raised the body back up enough to unbolt the 4X4's and slide them out. Then, all I needed to do was to lower it back off of the jacks. As light as the Europa body is, this was extremely easy on the back.

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net>

12 mounting bolts (I think I counted them all)
2 seat belt bolts
Brake rod
Pedals
front body closing plate
steering column pulled back
fusebox
heater hoses (inside car)
shifter inside car
parking brake cable
master cylinder

Those are the things I can think of off the top of my head. Most of the stuff you have already removed doesn't need to be taken off to remove the body.

BODY, Seal protection

Steve Shipley <shiples@home.com> Subject: Re: Rubber treatment Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:06:37 -0700
I use Meguiar's #40 for appearance. With 1 year's experience I can't vouch for the long term performance claims.


Mark MarKell wrote: Anyone recommend a good treatment for rubber seals at doors, windows to keep the rubber from cracking with age and exposure?

BODY, Sill installation

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Warren Hartenstine wrote: It appears to me from the manual and from my memory of removing them that you would install the chrome strip and clips, and put the two sided tape on the car. It appears to me from the manual and from my memory of removing them that you would install the chrome strip and clips, and put the two sided tape on the car just below the chrome clips. Then push the sill straight up, nesting the lead edge under the chrome strip, against the two sided tape, and into the bottom clip at the same time. I do know that my sills were pretty tightly nested up under that chrome strip. Manual says, "To remove the trim sills, drill out pop rivet at both front and rear top edges, ease sills away from body at their upper edges, and remove by pushing down away from the clip. Replace by reversing these instructions."


Warren, good description, right on.

BODY, Sill paint

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Landaiche Ken (Nokia/PL) wrote: I don't. But I do have one that was painted with some gawdoffal gold metal flake paint. It doesn't match the one on the other side of the car. Does anyone know what the official paint is for that sill? And while we're at it, does anyone know what double sided tape to use for installing it?

For the double stick tape, look in the 3M catalog. They have some neat stuff, I even have some left from mine, if you can't find any. The sparkley paint I used was mixed up by the paint guy. That is he mixed the "binder" which I poured in the "sparkleys" and shot it on the sills. You have to be patient, as it doesn't cover well and the sparkle bits get everywhere. Also, its made so the sparkles stand on end, thats why its so expensive (80 for the sparkles/binder) After that dries, shoot 3 coats of clear, wait 24 hrs, another 3 coats. Worked pretty well, but getting the flakes on without tiger stripes is difficult. I went to a boat guy, to try and get the original type system, but he wanted $250 for the pair to be done in glass.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Landaiche Ken (Nokia/PL) wrote: This is getting interesting. What gun are you using for the paint work? And do you have a booth set up, or renting space as needed? And what do you mean about tiger stripes? As I recall, the sparkly paint is gold, right? I find it hard to believe that all Europa Special color scemes would use the same sill color, except that it would be cheaper :)


For the gun, I just have an old sharpe touchup gun, not any low pressure/high volume jobby doo, just an old high pressure type which I cranked up the pressure a little to get the flakes to go thru the nozzle. No booth, just a table in the garage where I shot the thing. The tiger stripes, as described to me by the tech at the paint store, are when the flakes align themselves such that when looking at the piece at an angle, it appears there are stripes. You want the flakes to be at random angles so it appears consistant. I would have thought the sills should be gold also, considering the gold pinstripes, etc., but all I've run across is the silver flake ones (which mine were/are). I think that is the only color, but check with Randall, he may know of other variations.

BODY, Spoiler

"Brian Martley" <Brian.Martley@tesco.net> When the first TC was launched in the UK, Lotus quoted some figures for drag at 100mph for the new body shape/spoiler - saying the spoiler was to reduce the effects of removing the rear fins on straight line stability. Quoted reduced lift from 66lb to 34lb with a drag coeff of 0.35. Also quoted lower roll centres at 3.25" and spring rates of 68/76 in half-laden state. I assume the "before" figure was for UK spec, the R&T test quotes 95lbs lift for the US S2.

JERTIGGER2@cs.com It looks like if the front is lowered the spoiler may be removed without any effect on the car. I have already installed short springs with adjustable perches at the lowest setting. One less part to prep, prime, sand and put back on.

BODY, Windows

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: E(U)ropa Update - Brake saga continues Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:14:04 –0800 Just an update as things progress. The glass guy came to the house again, third time! The front winshield was installed on the second trip, glued in with urethane instead of the old butyl type mastic. He says its the new legal glue and 9 times stronger than the butyl. The chrome plastic trim was really a mess, he stuck it on the window after warming it and brought the window up "encapsulated", but it was still wavey and malformed. He cleaned the grove in the car, put a foam "dam" in (a 1/4 inch square foam strip which keeps the glue from oozing all over), and put a black primer in and then put a 1/4 x 3/4 inch bead of glue in the groove. Then he put the windshield with trim attached in his truck and turned up the heater. It sure was warm when he removed it and the trim really became pliable. We then just stuck in on. It looks pretty good now - not perfect but presentable. The rear window was a different matter though, on the first trip he made a pattern, on the second trip we tried to install it, but he cut it too small. So today he returned with a new window and worked from 9:30 AM straight to 3
PM putting that thing in. Finally, he got the whole thing in, even with all the right tools, that window is a bear!! So I'm $250 poorer but much happier .:-)

"Al Hostettler" <honor@erinet.com> Subject: Europa rear window Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:23:59 –0500 I feel as if great progress was made tonight. I started at 6:05 pm to install my rear window. At 7:27 pm I was cleaning things up. While it is not the easiest job and some help would probably be helpful, I did it myself and really did not think it was that bad. I was really afraid this would be a major job, so I had reserved this Saturday to do this. Now what will I do with Saturday? I have to admit it is not a perfect job. Even though I was stretching the molding it came up about 1/8 inch short. Well after looking at it a bit I decided it was OK. Then I installed the plastic retaining trim. I stretched this too but came up about 1/2 inch short. Well this will just have to do, besides maybe that is how it was originally. I have some black silicone that will seal it up water tight and it will be fine. Now if only the heater core is as easy.

thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov writes: > What is the earlier windshield surround? Black rubber channel, narrow silver plastic locking strip. If the strip ages, you just paint it black for a nice look. Or, you black it out from day one to keep it simple. The visual effect of the silver strip in the black rubber is similar to that of any 1991-1998 Lincoln Town Car, around all side windows and rear screen. Since you are in Texas, there should be plenty of those Lincolns around -- nice "land yacht" or "prarie schooner" huh? Mine was my "beltway battlecruiser" in the D.C. area! ken ritchie atlanta

BRAKES, Binding

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Jason Rowan wrote: <snip> Basically, after a short drive the brakes won't release all the way, the brake lights stay on, and all the brakes get nice and hot.


Sounds like you've got residual hydraulic pressure that's not being released. That's the only way the brake lights would stay on. Something must be functioning as a "one way valve," allowing the pressure to increase but then retaining it when you release the pedal. Is the pedal being fully returned to its rest position? I'd check the Mc/pedal linkage and make sure that the pedal and MC have positive return action.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> It sounds to me as if you have a bad flex brake hose. I've had those act like one way valves before, they pump up, but will not release. Replace your hoses- probably due anyway.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> It sounds like the MC/pedal is not retracting all the way or is not adjusted to come all the way back when released. You said you replaced the MC and the adjustment would be suspect. Check and adjust the pedal free play at the MC.

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> Since all four brakes are binding and the brake light stays on, I would suspect the master cylinder, or the transfer mechanism on the front frame. Also, the pedal itself could be binding. Does the pedal return completely? Try pulling up on it and have someone see if the lights go out. Try to operate the pedal by hand to check for binding, free return etc. Also check the booster, if equipped. I've had one go bad on my Seven which caused the exact same thing.

BRAKES, Bleeding

You might start bleeding the brakes one wheel at a time to see where the leaks are. But you might just start rebuilding each corner since you'll probably have to anyway. Read up on the pesky brake fail switch. You have to carefully bleed each side a bit at a time to keep from tripping that SOVY device. (Is that the item?) I have found that the pressurized EeziBleed (Sp?) bleeder works the best. Ken Landaiche

I would not get too depressed about the brakes. My 70 S2 had not turned a wheel in 16 years whilst standing in a lean to behind horse stables. Any part that had been in contact with brake fluid had a white crystalline deposit on it that washed / wire brushed off. I washed all internals with Methylated spirits ( Ethanol with a purple dye in it ) before assembling the bits using clean brake fluid. Front calipers only need a seal kit and probably pistons if the plating has started to flake off. The seal fits in a groove in the bore so sleeving is not needed. Rear slave cylinders will need a girling seal kit and the rubber dust cover that fits around the hand brake lever. If the bore will not clean up with 1200 grit wet silicon carbide paper then a SS sleeve will be needed. $15 equivalent in South Africa at most brake specialists. Master cylinder about the same as the slave cylinders. Discs.Girling note that they are "Lotus supply" ! and I therefore skimmed a few thou off until they were clean and true. Rear drums. I skimmed most of the grooves off without them being too thin. Servo. After spending hours making a special tool to split the front and rear shell I put the bits in a box and decided to operate without it !!!. No one here is interested in rebuilding it. That includes Girling themselves. I have Girling parts lists and diagrams for all the S1 & S2 brakes both plain and boosted which I can send you if need be. All this assumes that your later car uses about the same gear. Geoff Ford Cape Town South Africa.

Power-bleed them. Air can get in a line in a place where it does not all get moved in one stroke of the pedal. Then the air bubble just returns to a high spot in time for you to repeat the process. Power-bleeding, as with a Gunson E Z Bleed, can move a lot more fluid in one shot, thus carrying the air out of the zone where it can backstream. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA

In addition, you need to get all the old fluid out of the lines and to pump it back up, ...there's nothing like using a pressure bleeder. You can make one pretty easy with some larger pvc pipe (mine is 3"), fittings, and a doner MC lid w/ a quick disconnect fitting screwed/sealed on. Put about 5-10lbs of pressure on the system and you get a nice steady stream of fluid flowing out till it's clean and air-free. Usually you start at the furthest wheel from the master cyl. and work back towards it. I'd price out building my own SS braided lines w/ earl's fittings vs. pre-made. It's a good thing to know how to do, semi-fun, and there's all kinds of plumbing jobs you'll want to tackle to trick out the lotus and make it look like an airplane ;). I have an S2, but have had a coupla MGC's which used boosters and I'd say throw 'em overboard if they give you trouble. Something like $300 each to rebuild, (15 years ago) they're heavy, take up space and I actually prefered the firmer pedal you end up with. (I changed the MC) And don't get brake fluid on the paint. Good luck. Jeff

As for the brakes, I finally solved the bleeding delimma. The pedal was moving about 1.5 inches and spongy Friday. So I decided to remove all the brake line going aft (3 lines total) and s**tcan the differential pressure switch, and ran a single line back aft as it should have had originally (Fed requirement with the boosters). With the lines out, and after talking with Ken at Bean, I bench bled the master cylinder. This involves making short lines which dump the fluid back into the reservoir. I pumped it several times (it was still in the car so I couldn't see how much air came out) and then put a solid plug in the front outled port. The pedal went in half way and was solid. OK, so the foot valve for the front piston seems to be working (Thanks for the tip though John, I too thought this was it). Then I put a plug in the back outlet port. Very nice pedal then, solid and very little play, proving the MC is OK. So the culprit must have been air in the lines (I had to be sure). Anyway, I replaced the 3 lines with one, put a short jumper in for the front discs and bled 2 pints thru the system. I still had significant pedal movement! But if I put the parking brake on now, the pedal is reasonable. So tomorrow I'll check the brake shoes to see if they are round, or what and if they are causing the excessive pedal movement. (I really hate it when Kiyoshi is right - thanks guy :-) Jerry - getting there finally – Rude 73 Special


BRAKES, Boosters

Chances are they are not going to work after sitting for so long. You can have them rebuilt ($$), switch to Lockheed (?) units, or eliminate them, and use the S2 MC. I think Jerry Rude just did this. The tech article is at the GGLC web site.

"Ed & Ruth Young" <lotusracer@home.com> Subject: (U)Europa booster/brake question Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:15:51 –0600 I am forwarding this question for a friend who is the original owner of a 1974 Europa Twin Cam. His only e-mail is through work, and he is unable to subscribe to the list there. So, therefore I am posting this question for him :


>Nearly two years ago, I went through the process of rebuilding the brake >boosters of my Europa Special. Heeding the advice of Ray Psulkowski at R.D.Enterprises, I had the bores resleeved, and from Steve Styer's recommendation, by White Post Restorations. This was not cheap ($50 per bore, 5 bores per cylinder body, 2 bodies for the car), nor were the rebuild kits at $120 each. After all of that, imagine my disappointment when upon application, the brake pedal slowy but surely starts to push back at me! No matter how hard I push, the brake pedal continues it's travel back upwards. This really reduces one's confidence level when driving the car, especially in traffic. I have called White Post, and they seem puzzled by this too. Are you aware of anyone who has had this experience?


>Also, one extra favor....I would appreciate if someone could tell me what the "theory of operation" is for these boosters, which are the Girling Powerstop Mk2B remote servos. If nothing else, I could try to figure out the problem if only I knew how the crazy things worked! My e-mail address is
sarro_carl@videojet.com, phone number at work is (630)860-7394 x1853, or (847)464-5213 at home.

I am about to remove the last brake booster from my '74 Special and thought I might share what I have learned so far. According to DBE the TC MC is .875. When removing the boosters the logical replacement would be the MC from an S2 Europa, except it was discontinued by Girling years ago. DBE specs it as .700. What I intend to try is to have the current MC sleeved in brass to .700, then have the pistons turned to match and use an S2 rebuild kit. Jerry Rude has drawings with the S2 internal dimensions for getting the pistons setup. I plan on getting the piston work done first, and then sending the whole lot to Whitepost or Apple and having them do the complete rebuild. I'll keep the list updated as this project progresses. Tom Rollins 1974 Lotus Europa Special 4158R tom@ntcs-inc.com

Robert "Fast Bob" Scheib <Robert.Scheib@gte.net> Your attempts to bleed out your Europa's brake system sounds very familiar - my car had sat for about 9 years when I bought it, and the brakes weren't working "very well" when I drove it home!! Oh my, now thats a story!! After many attempts at flushing and bleeding - the flushed out fluid looked the same- nasty, and there just did'nt seem to be much pedal effort, although the m.cyl. held pressure when it's line fittings were plugged. I finally realized that the boosters were leaking internally, and were filling up with fluid! You may be experiencing the same thing. During my cars restoration process I've replumbed the brakes to be "non-boosted", installed a S2 mastercylinder and Aeroquip flex lines. I now have a very firm pedal with just the right effort and "feel". If you want to keep your boosters [a real undertaking to rebuild!!] and existing mastercylinder, I would recommend sending the m.cyl. to "Whitepost Restorations" to be rebored and brass sleeved - I've had super good results from this operation. A "hone" and new seals are a waste of time.

Ken Landaiche <ken.landaiche@dlcc.com> Subject: RE: Europa Pedal Drawing! Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:41:27 –0800 From: whs018@conrad.appstate.edu [mailto:whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Am I asking for trouble using boosterless brakes on a Europa? Since the Europa uses a single cylinder setup, wouldn't it be too much trouble to convert the car to use double cylinders?


My TC Special came to me without any boosters. I changed toa smaller master cylinder. It works well. It uses a single cylinder, but two brake circuits. So a dual cylinder setup would require some cutting, but the plumbing would be preserved. The stock Europa's brake balance isn't the best. Having dual cylinders, and the associated variable balance bar, would allow precise tuning of fore-aft braking. That was what Mike referred to.

Jerry Rude gdrude@pacbell.net Subject: Re: (U)Europa booster/brake question Wed, 17 Mar 1999 21:13:30 –0800 Join Lotus Ltd for $20 and get the Europa book for $15, it has an article on using the Europa without the brake boosters. It involves utilizing lower quality brake pads/shoes to achieve a high enough coefficient of friction. Or convert to a S2 master cylinder, or have yours sleeved down to the S2 size and have the pistons machined down to match. The S2 and the TC cylinders are the same design, only difference is the piston/bore diameters.

Lotus Ltd Europa manual Section J, page 3 has an excellent article on tuning the boosters written by Charles Rehrenbach. The book is $15 if you are a club member, and $20 to join the club.

Now on the GGLC site - 3 new tech articles... An excellent one from Jerry Rude detailing the conversion of TC Europa brakes to non-boosted system using S2 dual master cylinder. http://www.gglotus.org

I have the Tilton brake(dual master)/clutch overhanging "buy it off the shelf" setup in my autocross/racing prepared europa. Yes, it has a hydraulic clutch conversion. Yes, it has a bracket to mount the assembly to the chassis cross member with the reservoirs sticking up into the plenum chamber. And finally, yes, you have to cut the fiberglass at the front of the foot well to mount the bracket to the chassis member which would allow air/water to enter, but on a non street car that's not a problem. It's easier to buy it pre made and then adapt it than to make a new design yourself (been there, done that, wasted time there). Trust me I'm a doctor. :) christopher

richard.clifton@bigfoot.com I have restored three Lotus cars and each time used a copper nickle alloy brake pipe called Kunifer 10 (I think it is spelt that way). It has been excellent in service and on the Elan I restored 16 years ago the pipes show no sign of deterioration in any way. I get all my brake parts supplied by Classicar Automotive in Cheshire (+44 (0) 625 860910) and have always had good service from them. However...After reading the previous posts I rang them to ask if they still supplied Kunifer 10 and they say they now only supply copper pipes! They say that in the restoration business copper is now used 100 times more frequently than the Kunifer. They admit it is softer (thereby easier to work with) and that it is a perfectly good material for the job. Maybe one shouldn't use it for out & out race cars but in general use it would seem OK. Richard A Clifton, Wakefield, 1967 Elan S3 S/E DHC 1967 +2 1973 Europa TC 1990 Elan SE (150,000 miles) 1988 Sealine 305 Statesman

BRAKES, Bleeding

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Jason, sounds somewhat like the problems I was having on bleeding my brakes. I too was using the ezibleed system. I found that for some reason the ezibleed would not push the bubble past the 3 way junction where the brake light switch is, on top of the left side of the frame, just behind the frame "Y". What I did was remove the bolt securing the junction, and put a rag under it. Then using the ezibleed, crack one of the line fittings. Then return to the rear wheels and bleed both of them. That firmed my pedal up substantually.

I have had "pedal to the metal" problems for the following reasons:

In addition, I have heard of:

The biggest problem over the years was bleeding the lines. I tried all of the gizmos after exhausting the help of innocent bystanders. I only started getting consistently good brakes when I started using a pressure bleeder. Ken Landaiche 1974 4631R

BRAKES, Calipers


The stock calipers are Spitfire and are still easy and cheap to obtain, so I don't worry much about them. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA Lotus Europa, VW Quantum Syncro, Chev Suburban LOON, TCVWC, MAC
pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

BRAKES, Caliper sleeves

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Subject: RE: Euro-spec Europa (U) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 07:08:47 -0800
"Peter M. Blackford" <
pmbsab@naples.infi.net> Anyone on the List know of any replacement calipers in aluminum or SS? At worst, yours may need to be resleeved (White Post Restorations has been hignly recommended by others...)


No need re-sleeve these calipers. The piston seals against an o-ring located in the caliper bore. The actual bore surface in the caliper has no sealing function, and as long as it is clean will not interfere with piston movement.

BRAKES, Converting

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Aaron: > I'm considering converting my dual-line non-servo Europa to earlier single-line so that I can get a new MC with a smaller bore (0.62").

Like others probably will tell you, I recommend staying with a dual circuit system. It is worth having the safety of brakes if one part fail. I like SAABs system they have used since the 60's- diagonal circuits.

BRAKES, Fluid

Keith Gustafson <gusmach@shore.net> Subject: Re headlights & brake fluid Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 13:43:19 –0400 This same conversation keeps coming up about silicone brake fluid. I have been running silicone in my +2 for 14 years, covering about 65k miles in that time, with NO problems. It bleeds fine, works fine etc. etc. I have no idea where this info comes from.

Robert Tufts <rbt@frontiernet.net> Subject: Re: Re headlights & brake fluid Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:18:59 –0400 You have to be very careful installing the stuff. Because of the viscosity it traps micro air bubbles. You wouldn't want to take a can that got shaken real good and try to bleed it and when overheated at the track all these micro air bubbles expand. It is also not compatable with all seals (check on indivual basis). also it's not recommended on some ABS systems because of different viscosity. On a daily driver (brakes not heated like the track) it could be just fine, but it could be expensive and a lot more problems than it's worth for a car used occaisionally at the track (bleeding often anyway). To each their own but I'll choose the cheaper DOT 3 FORD Heavy Duty and bleed as required for the track. (bleeding often removes moisture buildup).

Robert Tufts <rbt@frontiernet.net> Subject: Re: ABS brake fluid Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:22:42 –0400

Here's one article: http://www.houston-bmwcca.com/articles/avoiding_brake_problems.html. Another:
http://www.c-edge.com/shotimes/SHO4brakes.html. And another: http://www.cardone.com/news/may5.htm.

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> I would stick with Castrol brake fluid. It works very well, is pretty cheap and will not cause problems with any seals. I think it is a good idea to flush your brakes once a year anyway – silicone or no.

From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> It is a good idea not to use silicone brake fluid nonetheless. The standard seals ARE natural rubber. Currently available aftermarket replacements probably are, too. Use Castrol LMA. It won't hurt your seals, it absorbs very little moisture, and its dry boiling point is high enough for anything short of repeated banzai racetrack runs.

BRAKES, Inboard rear

From: SJMARCY@aol.com In a message dated 6/16/99 7:55:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Briggs1@ix.netcom.com writes: Wondering if you would be good enough to share your knowledge on changing the rear brakes to discs. I have been thinking about it for a while and curious if you've decided on which ones to use. I know Banks sells a conversion kit but I would expect that there is a more economical way to go.


That comes later I am sure that there are a number of good ways to do it. I'd like to eventually do it inboard, so I am allowing for that possibility from the outset. Therefore my discs might be flat racing style designs with a series of bolts which retain the disc to a "hat" sized as required. Or else a cheapey OEM style disc from a small car. To go inboard the inner yoke would need to have disc mounts fitted to it. And a caliper mount would be needed too. I am not positive if the transaxle turns accurately enough for such an approach - to avoid knockback and runout issues. Conventional outboard discs could be mounted over the stock hub with an allowance for the offset change. I want to keep the offset stock so that wheel choices aren't complicated. Minor hub mods can allow such an offset. While I am at it I want to ditch the stock built-in threaded section on the Special (and all europa) stub axle. By cutting it off and retaining the hub via drilling and tapping the stub axle to accept an alloy steel bolt. This gets rid of an area that has been known to fail from metal fatigue - which leads to a wheel
coming off.... For calipers, something small and light such as a wilwood alloy piece, vette rears, or similar may be used. For caliper mounts some of the stock car places sell stamped steel pieces which can be welded onto the steel suspension arms. I really don't like disc front drum rear since the two systems apply and release differently. And I have heard that rear drums for the Special are hard to find. I have done brake upgrades to a number of different cars so I am not too worried about it.

BRAKES, Master cylinder

If no fluid pressure makes it to the wheel, your master cylinder might need a rebuild. If the MC does look suspicious, buy some brake line plugs (does anyone know the thread description?) disconnect the brake lines from the master cylinder, plug the holes and push the pedal again. If you have pressure there, reattach the front brake line and try again. Then add the rear brake line. If you get no pressure with the lines plugged, definitely rebuild the MC. Ken

Need a new MC that has a larger bore? I've seen a racing unit, made by 'Howe' that can be bought in 3/4, 7/8, and 1 inch bores (singe MC) that would work nicely...

Actually, to reduce non-boosted pedal effort, you might want a *smaller* bore on the MC (or larger on all the brakes). More pedal travel, less effort. Based on volumetric displacements. Jay Mitchell's notes are a good guideline on S2. The S1/S2 (non-boosted) setups are about right. S1 had single and S2 had dual MC / circuits. The dual MC's have two seals -- a middle and an outer. If the middle goes, the whole thing operates like a single and you still have all four corners working. If the outer seal goes, the plunger hits the shuttle and drives the inner piece carrying the middle seal -- so it is supposed to keep one circuit (two corners) working. There is this "tipping valve" that is also supposed to light up the brake fail warning light... which is also wired to light up if the piggyback reservoir float gets low enough. But then, who knows if the wires are OK? A buddy of mine went to the trouble of mounting a pair of singles, with a short "balance bar" between them, and the pedal linkage pushing into mid-bar. The proportion is a simple matter of geometric ratios -- leverage. The mounting box is more work, and you won't have room for the spare tire anymore. //ken

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> All the comments re overhaul of Europa MCs, calipers, etc., have
reminded me of some serious caveats. These apply to brake hydraulics in general, and there's nothing about Lotus brakes that makes them immune. Here goes:

  1. Honing ANY brake cylinder or caliper is not a good idea. The honing process increases the inside diameter of the cylinder – it must in order to remove pits - the result being that replacement rubber cups are much more likely to turn over when the piston moves (possibly when you first reassemble the part). All cleanup of bores should be done with 600 grit sandpaper, with sanding debris being washed off with brake fluid. If there are pits or scores too deep to completely remove using this method, the cylinder in question should not be considered rebuildable. Wheel cylinders or calipers with rust pitting or deep linear or circumferential scoring should under no circumstances be reused, as early failure of the rebuilt part is virtually assured.
  2. Dual circuit MCs should be replaced rather than rebuilt. Even if the bore is in excellent condition, the odds of turning one or more of the cups as you reinsert the pistons is great. In my 20+ year experience with dual circuit MCs, I'd say that successful rebuild odds are 50-70%. And that's just the odds of the cylinder working long enough to bleed the brakes upon reinstallation.
  3. S2 MCs have been discontinued by Girling since 1987. I currently have an ATE unit for a 1973 Super Beetle on mine, but that requires a bit of modification to the car. The simplest solution is to fit a single-circuit MC purchased from a racing supply house. Units from Girling, Tilton, Wilwood, and Lockheed all have bolt spacing that matches the holes in the chassis, and the changeover will only require that you remove the brake linkage box from the car and fit the new MC, along with some simple replumbing to combine both brake circuits. The requisite fittings, tubing, flare tools, etc. are all readily available from aforementioned racing supply houses. These MCs will generally be rebuildable one or two times, and kits are also readily available.


I know there's some interest in maintaining a car's originality here, but, IMHO, it's far more important for my car's brakes to stop it than to have them in their original configuration. Keep in mind that non-Federal Europas all came with a single circuit braking system, and that the dual circuit system is not generally more reliable than a single circuit one. My $.02, Jay

If memory serves, the OEM bore is .625". The MC I used is 19mm (.75"), which raises pedal effort noticeably but reduces the required travel. Between this change and the installation of braided brake flex lines, the pedal is wonderfully firm and brake modulation is outstanding. Even though I presently have a dual circuit MC, I will go to the single circuit variety the next time a MC is called for. Jay

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Would you like a copy of the lucas assembly drawing that comes with the rebuild kit? or do you have that? Are you are referring to the "tip valve" it inserts from the outside of the cylinder, with the cone end down, and is held in by the allen set screw "which is hollow". You have to put both pistons in first however as the tip valve holds the pistons in until you get the rod and plate in with the clip. Kind of tricky beings the pistons are spring loaded. So you have to devise a way to hold the pistons in far enough until you put in the "tip valve" and tighten the allen set screw. Then carefully release the pistons and then put on the rod and holding plate. Hope this helps, all going from memory though. If you need any one part, I have a few spares from the kits I've used. make sure you coat things with the red grease and bench bleed the cylinder before installing into the car.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Björn-Anders Haverstad wrote: For the master brake cylinder; do I have to split the clevis from the piston locknut?


You have to remove the linkage box with the MC still mounted. This requires removal of the chassis closing plate, which links the lower front of the chassis to the body. All that's required inside the car is to remove the clevis pin from the brake pedal.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> For the master cylinder, you either remove the whole linkage stuff- or remove the circlip holding the pushrod into the master cylinder and take it out. You need to remove the whole works to pull the body anyway, and it would be a good idea to take the linkage all apart and lube it too. Remove the pin from the clevis on the brake pedal, all four bolts on the linkage- I believe the 'closing plate' - and it should all come out. Make sure not to put pressure on the nose when the closing plate it off.

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2000 LotusDriver@att.net wrote: Is the removal of the master cylinder from a 1974 Europa T/C a body-off task? It appears the steering rack must be removed or at least displaced a bit to access the upper bolt for the master cylinter. However, removing the bolts appears to require access inside the front chassis bulkhead. Is there an easier way than removing the body to accomplish removal of the master cylinder?

Taking the MC off is no easy task, as you've indicated. It is possible to remove it without taking off the body or removing anything. You'll need some shortened open-ended wrenches (don't remember the size(s), but I needed two different ones). Very tedious, indeed, but keep working at it and it'll come off.

From: Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Have you removed the closing plate (six 1/4 inch bolts)?? It is a pretty easy operation if you remove that and the left front tire. After the two nuts are removed, you might have the large upper nut, which requires a ground down box end wrench IIRC, you disconnect the clevis at the brake pedal, and unscrew it from the shaft, then everything comes out the front after you undo the two brake pipes that is. Careful when trying to remove the reservoir if you are rebuilding it, it is no longer available and is very hard to remove, don't if you can avoid it.

From: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> I do not know about Twinks, but the Lotus 65 Series 2 has a dual-circuit
master cylinder. The base therefor is held to the frame with four bolts. Of course, in the S2 you can work from above. In any case, the bolts can be removed with a socket on a long extension. Yes, removing the bottom closing plate is good. Disconnect the brake rod from the brake pedal. Remove the four bolts which hold the master-cylinder base to the frame. Remove the entire assembly forward, withdrawing the brake rod from the clearance hole. On the S2, the four bolts go not into welded nuts, but into a "tapping plate". This is a thick steel plate with two large clearance holes and four holes tapped to accept the master-cylinder-base bolts. The frame is sandwiched between the master-cylinder base and the tapping plate. When you go to reassemble, put the plat in and insert all four bolts. Then drill a small hole through the frame and through the center of the tapping plate, between the clearance holes. Fasten the tapping plate to the frame with a pop-rivet in the newly-drilled hole. Then remove all four bolts, feed the brake rod thought to the foot-box, and fasten the master-cylinder base with
the four bolts. The master-cylinder base hides the pop-rivet. I expect the Twink is prett much the same except that you can't work from above.

"TOM BERKELEY" <TBCEI@AOL.COM> John Abram asked for details on my tandem brake cylinder and pedal
assembly. I sent John some details - is anyone else interested? If so, let me know. Tom Berkeley Type 74 - 4605R

BRAKES, Master cyliner rebuilding

"Bloom, Mike" <MBloom@roseville.ca.us> Subject: Europa MC Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 09:56:33 –0800 I just rebuilt the brakes on my 73 TC last month. The MC was badly pitted and needed to be bored and sleeved. I read the excellent article on changing the MC bore by Gerald Rude on the Golden Gate Club site and used it as a guide although, since my boosters work fine, I didn't have the bore reduced. I called the brake shop in San Jose that Gerald mentioned in the article and was told that they do not do the actual boring and sleeving themselves but send it out to Sierra Specialty Automotive in Quincy, CA. I called Sierra Specialty and spoke with Joe the owner. For $95 including return postage he bored and sleeved the MC. One big caution. Be very careful with the reservoir. The retaining clip on the rear is almost impossible to remove without destroying the reservoir nipple that fits into the seal. The reservoir is almost impossible to replace. The article by Gerald Rude describes a process to remove the reservoir by drilling and grinding the ring. I had to drill three holes into mine as the ring had rusted itself solid to the MC. If you gently turn the reservoir after removing the screws holding the front of it you will be able to remove the allen head screw which retains the valve assembly and disassemble the MC. The piston can be removed by gently tapping the MC on a piece of wood. If the MC is pitted and needs boring/sleeving the shop you use should be able to remove the reservoir without damage. Joe at Sierra has a tool that he uses to reach in and open the retaining clip. I wish I knew that before I drilled mine. The full particulars on Sierra:

Sierra Specialty Automotive
3494 Chandler Road
Quincy, CA 95971
530 283-1886

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Subject: Re: MC removal tips? Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 21:58:28 –0600 It's not difficult, just ackward.

  1. The push rod is attached to the master cylinder with a snap-ring. In order to remove it, you need to be able to pull the MC forward far enough to gain access to the back side. In it's assembled condition, the linkage doesn't allow that much motion.
  2. To get the range of motion you need, disconnect the push rod at the brake pedal and unbolt the rubber gaiter (aka diaphragm, aka bellows) that seals the hole where the push rod passes through the wall of the foot well.
  3. Un-bolting the MC is a test of patience. Access is not good... so what's new? A set of shorty wrenches (Sears) or a pneumatic or electric, angle-drive wrench would help. Otherwise just tough it out.
  4. Retention is by a nut and bolt, so you will need to reach into the chassis to get a wrench on the second hex. There's a removable access panel in the boot (trunk) and a rubber grommet in the front face of the chassis
    crossmember.

It helps to have an assistant with slender arms and multiple elbows working from the top side while you turn wrenches from below. I've done the task alone three times, but I was younger then and more flexible. You may have an advantage on that point.

BRAKES, Pistons

Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> ken.landaiche@nokia.com wrote: Last night I finished one of my Europa's front calipers. I have now rebuilt both at least twice over the last few years. So what is the procedure for reassembly?

I highly recommend that your "procedure for reassembly" include new SS pistons. Only did this procedure once, over 8 years ago... and counting. I got my pistons from friend & fellow lister Keith Gustafson (
mailto:gusmach@shore.net ) who I regard as a machinist extrordinaire - his as-machined pistons have a better finish than plating! He may make 'em commercially now & sell through http://www.rdent.com and/or others, though. Get his, from whatever source, if you can. At the time, they cost very little more than the much-shorter-lived chrome plated iron ones.

BRAKES, PDWV

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> The PDWV's only function is to warn you of a circuit's low pressure. It is simply a small piston with a groove where a micro switch ball bearing sits so if the piston moves so far, it pushes up on the micro switch making the circuit. I plumbed mine without this switch and without the boosters such that there is only one line going rearward, but I still have the two circuit system. I figure I can tell when I loose half the braking capability of the car!! Another alternative can be to move the switch forward, next to the master cylinder, that way minimum plumbing and still an indicator. The only reason the switch was in the rear was the boosters were back there too.

>
phil72@snet.net wrote: Now that I know that the chassis fits the body shell I'm ready to run the brake lines. But before I start I was wondering what purpose the PDWV serves other than to turn on the dash light when one circut has lower pressure than the other. Does this valve actually seal the lower pressure circut due to caliper/cylinder failure? ..providing the failure is downstream of the valve.

BRAKES, Rear disk

From: "Betsy" <betsy@malpas12.freeserve.co.uk> There has been some discussion over a rear disc conversion for the Europa. I've been chatting to one of the specialists who uses Ford Sierra hubs & the smaller (but just bolt on) Ford Escort discs. The Sierra hubs are rears and were fitted to anything above a 20i and can be commonly found in breakers. (this says something about Ford product). This combination fixes the wheel offset and rim size problems.

BRAKES, Rotors

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> Subject: S2 Europa Cross Drilled Brake Rotors Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 21:23:54 –0400 Just got a pair of cross-drilled brake rotors from Moss Motors. In conjunction with the May 1 New Jersey Britfest 99, I got the pair from Moss at 15% discount with free Priority mail shipping! All in all, a decent deal I think. And prices for all Moss stuff will go up soon. These are Spitfire discs of course, and are identical to Lotus-Lucas discs. These discs have a beautiful golden, corrosion free surface. And they weigh 4.5 lb each. The Lotus-Lucas disc weighs 5.0 lb each.

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> I forgot to add. With the Britfest 99 discount (intended for those attending Britfest 99 in New Jersey), I paid for $162 US for the pair. This included New Jersey sales tax and free shipping. Normally, Moss sells these for about $90 each. I've seen then offered by other Triumph specialists in the $80s. But wait! The manufacturer/supllier is: Autospecialty of Carson, Ca. Part #s EBR-065L, EBR-065R. Maybe a better price can be found.

The Moss Motors web site has a picture of the rotors

http://www.mossmotors.com/britishaccessories/mechanicalsystems/brakes/crossdrilledrotor.html. Could you comment on the quality of the cross drilled holes. Were they nicely chamfered or stress relieved? It would be a shame if they were to develop cracks! Cheers, Ross

"Bob Weber" <gcthree@optonline.net> Regarding rear discs: Banks in the UK offers a complete rear disc set-up for the ungodly sum of $850. Not sure of the source of the rotors or calipers. You can find it at: www.banks-europa.co.uk/

BRAKES, Rotors (rear conversion)

Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> The hotter version of the Ford Sierra is what came to the states as the Merkur XR4Ti - remember that? nice car... hope this helps

>From: "jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> I still can't find the info that I printed. However, Ford Sierra comes to mind. I don't know what that is or if it is even a Ford product. It could be a Euro name for a non domestic Ford. There is probably a way to cross-reference that and find out for sure.

> > -----Original Message-----
> >From: Brian Martley <
brian.martley@tesco.net> Date: Saturday, February 26, 2000 1:25 AM Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Re: Rear Brake conversion. In a recent post you mentioned that the Banks conversion uses Ford parts. Do you happen to know which model and if it's a complete "kit."

"David H Putscher" <David.H.Putscher@usa.dupont.com> The Merkur Scorpio has the rear disc brakes the XR4Ti has drums. The Scorpio has 5 lug hubs and the European Sierra versions had 4 lug. Spyder bases their rear disc conversion on the Sierra/Scorpio and I assume the Banks setup is similar.

pboedker@image.dk> In Europe from 86 to somewhere mid 90'es, Ford Germany sold a Scorpio, which was the European top model (a bit like Sierra, only bigger). The car had discs all way round, and was named Granada in UK, Scorpio elsewhere.

"John Abram" <john.abram@jci.com> I looked at the photos Banks has posted for their rear brake conversion. It appears that the calipers used are a single piston design with providions for a mechanical parking brake. If this is true the caliper may be similar to the ones fitted to the Ford Contour SE and SVT models sold in the US. The bracket for fitting the calipers appears pretty straight fowarded. It looks like a steel plate (quarter inch?) designed to bolt on to the outside of the hub carrier. The disks used are four bolt redrilled to redue the bolt circle. I would assume Banks used something that came off a car fitted with 13" wheels. I wonder if a Triumph Spitfire front disk would work on the back. I don't have a spare front disc at the moment but the next time I work on the brakes I'm going to take one of the front discs and try it on the back. If it fits Moss Motors has new drilled disks available for about $90 with the right bolt circle.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> From: "John Abram" <john.abram@jci.com> The disks used are four bolt redrilled to redue the bolt circle. I would assume Banks used something that came off a car fitted with 13" wheels. I wonder if a Triumph Spitfire front disk would work on the back.

I believe this has been done many times and there are kits to do it.

Peter Blackburn wrote: > I have a 1969 S2 and I am converting the rear brakes to disc. Does anyone know from which car the rear drum brakes originate from?

The shoes, cylinders are TR Spitfire, have to assume the drums are too. Only the TC Special had the Ford Capri larger drum setup. Jon 65/1023R 50/0139N

BRAKES, Sources

As several have suggested I'd go through and redo everything. The hardest part about doing the brakes is taking everything apart. Once you've gone through and done everything yourself you'll see how easy it is. Keep asking for direction from anyone if you hit snags but for your own piece of mind and your safety it's worth redoing all. You can get most parts from Triumph catalogs (Moss motors, The Roadster Factory and others). Briggs Pletcher, 72 S2

BRAKES, Tubing

davea@quasar.engr.sgi.com (David B Anderson) europa, brake pipe Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
>Let me clear up what I ment by copper-nickle brake tubing. I originally saw it in a Moss Motors (nice MG/Triumph/Healy parts) catalog. It may have been imported from Europe, but it isn't copper, its an alloy. Its supposed to be easier to bend and won't rust. That's all I know. Moss (
www.mossmotors.com) sells this material as a 'set' for a particular car. Not as plain lengths of pipe. (Could not find on line, called 1-800-235-6954, toll free in USA, to talk to a human being.)

whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Subject: Re: Cu-Ni (Monel) brake tube, Bean Thu, 18 Mar 1999 20:26:56 -0500 (EST) The copper-nicle tubing that Moss caries is "equivalent to C70600 (90% copper, 10% nickle)." The product they sell is manufactured in the UK and made to fit cetain cars (none of which are Lotus). They claim that this type of brake tubing is "used by Volvo, Rolls Royce, Lotus (!), Aston Martin, Porsche, and Audi" and they add "so you know its good." They also say that the brake lines are for the _high pressure_ part of the brake system. Any listers know where I can get this kind of brake tubing here in the US?


Adrian Rose <
Adrian.Rose@triad.plc.uk> Subject: Re: Cu & Cu-Ni brake tubes Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:34:59 -0000
A UK supplier who might be able to help you US folks: According to their catalogue, Demon Tweeks do both Copper and Copper Nickel brake pipe. They claim the copper tube is slightly more malleable that the copper nickel, and is tested to 10,000 psi – apparently double SAE specs. The Copper Nickel is 60% higher than this and meets German TUV specs.


They list it as


copper, 3/16 * 25ft GBP 11.14

copper, 1/4 * 25ft GBP 16.84

copper nickel, 3/16 * 25ft GBP 13.32

copper nickel, 1/4 * 25ft 28.84

all plus 17.5% VAT for UK and shipping.


Their number is +44 1978 664466, and they are set up for international orders. Web site at:

http://www.demon-tweeks.co.uk/

"Jeff Cocking" <jeff@cocking.com> Subject: RE: Cu & Cu-Ni brake tubes Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 08:35:49 -0600
I was reviewing an article in a 93 issue of Your Classic. It had a big ad for a company called Automec. They specialize in Copper Brake Pipes. They sell premade sets for Loti as per their ad. Their address is as follows:

Automec Equipment & Parts

36 Ballmoor

Buckingham MK 18 1RQ

Tel: 0280 822818

An alternative to copper nickel and copper might be stainless steel, available from Pegasus Racing. Am considering this for a new project car - a replica 26R (I have enough spares for a complete rolling chassis), and might use the AN tube-end fittings as well. Andres Manila

traff@ICON.HMSD.UFL.EDU writes: > Maybe I'm repeating old info, but there are a few interesting tech articles at the Dimebank web site. I found the one on brake tubing of interest. http://www.dimebank.com/tech/

BRAKES, Tubing flare

As I recall from Europa brake work about 6 years ago, the brakes need bubble flares in 3/16" line. Is that right? At the time I bent the lines then talked a brake shop into flaring them. It was tough to convince someone to just do the flaring. I gathered it was because of the liability they assumed in helping a customer do his own brake repairs. Ken L

I use a Snap-On flaring tool. It makes fine double flares with relative ease, and I have found a trick to allow it to make pretty good bubble flares also. I did not find that the "stop after the first step of a double flare" advice from the dave bean catalog worked very well, so I took a close look at Mike Ostrov's ISO flaring tool and used what I learned. Basically if you turn the Snap-On tubing holder upside down so that you don't bend into the flared recess and leave about twice as much tubing sticking out as you normally would, you get a pretty decent bubble flare. This is basically the way Mike's ISO tool works - there is no recess to smush into. The flares do not look the same as the ones on my stock brake lines, though. Mine are more "square" on the non-sealing side of the flare. If anyone knows an affordable tool which makes smoother bubble flares, I would like to hear about it. –Jon '72 Europa T/C

I find that one capable of producing a double flair is best and does so without tearing the pipe. Don't buy a cheap unit, you'll waste a lot of brake line and time trying to use it before you buy a proper expensive one. (My cheaply sits in my old toolbox to remind me of my folly.) An alternate to buying one is to measure out your lines, take along the fittings (replace with new as required) and having a pro do it for you. One has to ask how many times will you be using that new expensive double flair brake line tool? My $0.02 YRMV Harald

dan.morrison@autodesk.com I bought one from NAPA. Can't vouch for the results yet though. I haven't driven the car yet.

CARBERATERS, Alternative

whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Subject: Re: Twink carbs – federal Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 19:32:05 -0500 (EST) I never thought that SU's could go on a Europa, but I don't see why not!:-) Moss Motors sells a lot of SU carbs and they prive SU HS6 carbs (two of them, 1 3/4", says they will fit an MGB) for $700. That's *much* cheaper than Webers, and there's no machine work required. Does that sound like overkill, or does the twink like smaller carbs? Banks (in UK) sell Dellorto carbs for about $400 a pair, the last time I looked. Are the Dellortos (original size for Euro-spec) any better?

ClassMaker@aol.com Subject: Re: Twink carbs – federal Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 06:47:15 EST Because SU's (& Strombergs) are "variable venturi" carbs, they have a more flexible operating range. You can use a big throat carb like that, yet get the advantages of more torque (as from a smaller venturi) while taking off from idle and so on. With Weber or Dellorto, you are stuck with a "fixed choke" (main venturi) and you have to choose... optimize either the low end (torque) or the top end (power) -- you can't have both.. Compared to Webers... Dellortos have more progression holes--passages that drop fuel into the main venturies (also called "chokes"--but not to be confused w/starters). This provides a smoother transition between idle and main fuel circuits. Lotus was part of the Dellorto development process. In fact, the later the model (of either brand) the more progression holes you'll find. The earlier Webers started with 2. Early Dellortos had 3 (I've got those). The last of the Dellortos had 6 (six!). Richie Longo has experience in drilling extra holes in earlier carbs... but you've gotta know it is tricky. The SU's (variable venturi) are your least costly and most flexible option. And, if you ever get bit by the autocrossing bug, you'll be able to run in the SCCA "A Street-Prepared" (ASP) classes, a near-stock category.

CARBERATERS, Airbox

I have a Special with Strombergs. It came to me minus the stock air filter. A friend identified the foam sock thing as a Ford tractor filter. It worked, but just didn't cut it, aesthetically. So I bought a couple of K&N round filters and the die cut Stromberg bases to match. I first attached them to the carbs and bypassed the air box. But I kept wondering about rain having such a direct path into my engine. They sounded great, though, with quite a
howl right behind the ears. So I eventually put the box back on, glued the two filters together (the covers, not the elements!) and fabricated a way of attaching the assembly to the air box. I still get a nice howl, though muted, the rain has to try harder, and I don't have to detach anything when I remove the luggage compartment. I too read and heard of the air box having a beneficial effect on the operation of the Strombergs at the time I worked on this. What continues to confuse me is that each carb is individually shock mounted through thackeray washers and an O-ring, then bolted together to a not necessarily straight fiberglass box. Now they shock about with a heavy weight on the end. And yet, they run great. Ken.Landaische@nokia.com

CARBERATERS, Checking

Correct me but I remember you saying you had stromberg carbs on your car. For what its worth get complete carb rebuild kits which includes float valves. You may also need new floats. If car has been setting for long the carbs are probably all varnished up and will need a complete soaking in carb cleaner. Get a good magnifying glass and check the metering needle for any flat spots (worn) and check the jet hole to see if it is perfectly round. If either the jet or metering needle is worn the car will run very rich and you will have to do them any way. There are manuals for the stromberg carbs available through R&D and BDE. Do it right the first time, not like me, did it in two trips rather than just one.

CARBERATERS, Crossover tubes

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Europa Update Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 20:17:09 –0700 I removed the butterflys and shafts, made a small plug from aluminum and pressed them in. An easier way would be to remove the butterfly and grind it down such that its equal in width to the shaft except at the ends so the shaft won't slip out of the manifold. The shaft will give minimum resistance yet look functional from the outside. Your choice. As you're pretty clever, other solutions may present themselves. Just keep the holes plugged in some way. If you grind it down and replace the screws, make sure you loctite them in so they don't drift into the cylinders.

> 3) To remove the 'evaporative loss' stuff, I just undo all the hoses, right?


Uhh, no. Cap where you remove them from on the air box on the carbs, and the vaccuum lines to the carbs. The ones that lead to the gas tanks should have a long tube each leading down alongside the tanks to a small filter (like on your gas powered RC vehicle's fuel filter) to act as a flame trap (right Ken?). This is what I used on mine, can't see it, and it's light.


CARBERATERS, Manual

Steve Brightman <Steve.Brightman@dalsemi.com> Subject: Fuel Pump OK Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 11:07:42 –0500 Although you'll never find a Haynes manual for a Lotus, they do one on Stromberg carbs. I found it useful during those years I was unfortunate enough to own Strombergs.

CARBERATERS, Needles

If the piston/damper gets hung up, not quite closing, or the needle does not get down into the orfice as far as it should, then the orfice will be letting out more fuel than should be needed. If the butt shank of the needle is set too deeply (high) in the piston, it won't make it down into the orfice far enough to pinch off the fuel. XEERS, ken r.

The empty damper shouldn't have any effect in a steady state condition. The dampers are for modifying the acceleration characteristics of the carbs. If the jet had been set too low in the orifice, that might cause too rich a mixture. But I'd think you could compensate for some jet incorrectness by moving the needle in the right direction. Maybe you just have to adjust the carbs five or ten times until you figure out all of the tricks that aren't written down! Ken

JerTigger@aol.com Subject: Stromberg carb jets Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 23:23:45 EST I recently replaced the needles and jets in my carbs, couldn't get the tool to remove and replace jets. It was suggested to install the new jets by using a punch. This didn't look like it would work. I found that an 1/8" pipe nipple fit over the bottom of the jet and was able to drive them in perfectly, except one went in to far. OOPS! Now how too drive it back down without distorting the port. I ground down the threads down on the end of the nipple and it fit the circumference of the jet perfectly. Runs pretty good now.

Fjcoop@aol.com Subject: Re: Help - Carb Tuning Woes Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 00:06:58 EDT Another issue is needle wear. Over time the needle may rub and wear down the original profile, thus changing the mixture.

JerTigger@aol.com The jets tap out easily with a drift punch, to go back in an 1/8 inch pipe nipple fits nicely over the bottom of the jet and you end up applying the driving force squarely on the shoulder on the jet so you dot have to worry about distorting the jet.

"Landaiche Ken (Nokia/PL)" <ken.landaiche@dlcc.com> Subject: RE: Help - Carb Tuning Woes Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 12:10:49 –0700 The Stromberg needles are turned to an accuracy of 1/10,000". So it can be pretty hard to see or measure wear that affects emissions. On my last CA smog adventure, I ended up changing the jets and needles. It was the only thing that allowed the mixture to be set correctly. And as Mike described, the idle was sweet. Until the smog tester leaned it down to nothing!

Warren Pearce <pearceww@rmi.net> Subject: Re: Help - Carb Tuning Woes Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 18:36:07 –0600 Along with needle wear that Foster mentioned, is jet wear. As we all know, the Strombergs have a spring loaded needle that rubs the side of the jet. After a few years, the wearing of the circular hole in the jet to an oval was easily seen. I have replaced my jets at least twice. My thoughts would be to replace both. Also, I was able to pass the Colorado Smog testing by just leaning the mixture a bit and making sure the timing was right on. I have gathered that it is a good idea to retard the timing a bit, but I've never done any testing. It should be noted that on my TC, the sole purpose of the vacuum diaphragm on the distributor was to retard the timing by 5 degrees at idle. Once you came off idle, the vacuum advance went away.

Jon Lexau <jon.lexau@eng.sun.com> Subject: Re: Europa TC Carbs Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:38:15 -0700
kmccormick@cgsinc.com said: > I have a US spec 72 TC with Strombergs that again need attention. The car is running so rich it is fouling the plugs at idle even with higher heat range plugs. The problem is most likely the needle/jets but have not taken it apart for inspection yet. My questions are:

> 1. Can you replace jets and needles in the Strombergs if the once circular hole is worn oval ?


New jets and needles are available from all of the usual suppliers. The jets are pressed in - I had someone change them for me, but I think with some care, it shouldn't be to hard to do it yourself. Several needle profiles are available - stock US, stock European, as well as several higher-performance shapes.

> 2. I have been told that you can replace the Strombergs with Sus without changing the head. Anyone know which ones to use, linkage, etc. ?


I have a set of SU HS-6's which I plan to swap in once I get them cleaned up. These are the same 1-3/4" diameter that the Strombergs are. They have the same 4 bolt pattern which mates to the thin adapter plate which then bolts to the inlet manifold. I do know of one person in the Portland area who is planning to try SU HD-8's (2" diameter), but I do not know if these would be bolt-on or not. I believe that the main difference between the HD and HS series is the way fuel is fed to the jet. As far as linkages go, I currently don't have any. There is a local place that sells used SU bits, so I am going to try there to see what I can find that will work, or perhaps just make my own. Apparently there is an old Lotus West technical article on doing this conversion, including jet and needle recommendations. I am working on getting a copy.


> This head has oversized exhaust valves (1.41 39mm), runs with a SE-2 exhaust cam (uprated), and has no cross-over pipes (big board headers) - not sure if this will make a difference.


Shouldn't cause any problems.

Jon Lexau <jon.lexau@eng.sun.com> Subject: Re: Help - Carb Tuning Woes ken.landaiche@dlcc.com said: > Did you do the replacing? And if so, what's the way to ge the right > depth?


I had mine replaced by Rich Kamp at Kampena Motors in San Francisco. Before I took the carbs in, I measured the depth of the jets to be 0.0875" from the bottom of the piston chamber to the lower part of the "step" at the top of the jet. Rich Kamp suggested that the new jets would be better if pressed in slightly further - he uses 0.050" to the top of the "step".


Bad ASCII art:


Carburetor

now 0.05" ^ -- -----+ +----- ---

V --------- |+-+ +-+| ^ - was 0.0875"

|| | | || V

|| +-------+ || ----------

     

|| jet ||

I found this note that I saved from Jerry Rein a while back about how he was able to change the jets ...JerTigger@aol.com said: > I found that an 1/8" pipe nipple fit over the bottom of the jet and was able to drive them in perfectly, except one went in to far. OOPS! > Now how too drive it back down without distorting the port. I ground down the threads on the end of the nipple and it fit the circumference of the jet perfectly.

Warren Pearce <pearceww@rmi.net> Subject: RE: Help - Carb Tuning Woes Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 17:42:07 –0600 Yep, Volvo jets work for the carbs. I used them some years ago. I used a depth gage to measure the depth of the original jets and then pressed the new ones in to the same depth. I agree that I didn't use a micrometer although that might have been a good idea. Rather, I used a vernier caliper. My feelings were (perhaps wrong - I'm sure I will find out now!!) that considering all the other variables, that I didn't need to seat them to a thousandths. I will save the other message with some precise measurements - glad to get that. Also, the bottom of the carb is set up to you can screw in a standard pipe and use an end cap to slowly move the jet in. As I remember (it was a long time ago) I put a lubricant on the jet to help press it in. I think (vague memories) that I used anti-seize compound.

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.sun.com> jertigger2@cs.com said: I know how to adjust the needles but how can I tell between to rich and to lean especially since both banks of cylinders dump into a common exhaust pipe?

I have had good luck using a ColorTune sparkplug which has a quartz "window" so that you can see into the combustion chamber. The color of the spark changes with the mixture. rd-ent and others sell them for about $30.00 IIRC, or you are welcome to borrow mine for a bit. The other alternative seems to be lift the piston slightly with a screwdriver and listen for the idle to change up or down - I forget which is lean/rich. There are several web pages on the subject - I have used:
http://www.team.net/sol/tech/su-tune.html in the past, which is for SU carbs,
but the basic principle is identical.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> I just got mine semi adjusted. Which color springs and which needles have you installed? This helps. I went through a number of changes with mine, and I don't think they'll be exactly right until I get ahold of a Air/Fuel meter. But to get close:

  1. Pull the piston out, and adjust the needle base so its flush with the piston. Note that you should have 1 1/2 turns down (lean) and about 2 turns up (rich) travel. Install the pistons back in, screw the idle trim screws all the way in (rich). Check the color of the springs. Red is the stiffest, it will run richer. Blue is the emission spring, and is quite a bit weaker than the red. The natural color spring is the weakest, it is the european spec spring. The B1G needle (stamped on the side of the needle, near the base - some aren't stamped at all though) is the euro spec needle, supposed to work with the natural springs. The B1Y spring is the federal emission needle to work with the Blue spring. With the CD carburator, you are supposed to proceed after balancing the carbs, tune up, etc:
  2. With the engine running, take a small, narrow screwdriver, and place it under the piston on one of the carbs (air cleaners removed). Carefully raise the piston between 1/32 and 1/16 inch. If the rpms go up, the carb is rich, you need to turn the needle adjustment CCW to lean down the mix. If they go down, it is lean, and Clockwise turns will raise the needle to richen the mix. If they raise just slightly then lower slightly and remain at about original rpm, its just right. The trouble is, with mine, the neutral point can be ellusive. A CO meter is better but that will minimize emissions only, and the result is a slightly lean mix. The Air Fuel ratio meter is best, as far as I can determine right now, others may have better ways. Ken Richie seems to have good luck with the Gunison, but he is still under emission rules.
  3. If you can't seem to get the carb to the right mix within the span of control of the needle screw, then you may have to change springs. Red to richen, natural to lean. In my case (I have richer needles recommended by Bean for TCs with mild cams), the red was too rich, the blue too lean, so I stretched the blues a little, using a small balancing scale, to a tension mid way between the natural and the red springs. This brought me to the right mix at 1 turn up (rich). Your carbs WILL be different. My jet base was set at .057 down from the floor of the carb in the carb body, just for your reference.
  4. After you reach the right mix, then lower the rpms to the right level (800-900 rpm) and adjust the idle mix screws for the best idle. Note that screwing them out leans the mixture. Check the plugs after running for awhile to insure the engine isn't running too lean, they should be a light to dark tan in color, though with today's gasoline its hard to tell sometimes.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> I mixed up the B1Y and B1G needle reference:

FYI on a couple of other needles, per Dave Bean catalog:

"Dan Morrison" <lotusman@wa.freei.net> Here is a URL that has popped up in the past. Maybe it will offer some tips. http://www.vtr.org/maintain/carbs.html

CARBERATERS, Oil

"Landaiche Ken (Nokia/PL)" <ken.landaiche@dlcc.com> I have always used ATF, with reasonable results. Some Lotus types I respect highly use the recommended 20W50 motor oil.

CARBERATERS, Rebuilding

Aaron the first thing I had to do is rebuild the carbs. My car sat for about 4 years. Lots of varnish etc. I ordered rebuild kits and installed them, but didn't replace the needles and jets the first trip. I did the second trip. Complete carb rebuild kits are available. I have stromberg carbs. If you do the now jets can be driven in by using a 1/8 " pipe nipple Just fits around the circumference of jet and doesn't distort the jet opening. Jerry Rein

JerTigger@aol.com Do yourself a favor and put new metering jets and needles in while you have the carbs apart. The needle wears on the side of the jet and wears them both down at the same time too small to see but makes a very big difference in running. Order complete rebuild kits plus needles and jets, the needle has a number on it if you pull out slightly the bottom.

CARBERATERS, Replacement

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Subject: Re: Twink carbs Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:06:42 –0600 >My Federal Europa has Stromberg carbs on it. I've heard that they can be troublesome.


Replace them with new SUs. I'm serious. They are better-designed and more tunable. Should bolt on to the head designed for Strombergs, which is more than the Weber and the Weber-clones will do. Also, this keeps you legal for the A Street Prepared class in most USA autocrossing. The machine work needed to put a Weber on your head or the swap to a proper Weber head is not allowed.

CARBERATORS, Stromberg

Rude, Gerald" <GDR1@pge.com> Subject: Strombergs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 08:31:27 -0700
When driving back from Morro Bay on hwy 101, 46 and eventually 41 through the heat of the valley (100+ temps) everything went well, the car actually behaved itself, but when I stopped at home and let it set idling for a few minutes, the throttle cable froze. The teflon lining actually melted. I had the cable routed next to the frame opposite the SS headers, about 4 inches away. So a word of warning to all you Europa owners, route that cable away from the headers! I also removed the Strombergs to replace the jets in the body of the carb because of it not fully adjusting down in CO% when at the shop last. The jet height measured .057 in both carbs. Measured with a caliper, not a depth gage. I pressed out the old jets using a small press, I don't recommend using a hammer, as damage definately could result, they were quite frozen in place. The new jets, marked 100 as the old, were .002 inch larger than the new. This is interesting as simply pressing them in as is could result in cracking the carb body! So using my small lathe, a small file and emery paper (400 grit) I lightly removed the excess, put some light oil on the jets and pressed them in. I was able to get them to .056 depth, both identical. Using a dial indicator with the press helps. I then inspected the pistons, mine are from a 73 europa special which have two screws holding the needle bodys, and found the forward carb piston to be still flush with the needle body (the other needle was 1.5 turns down and the car was running 4.5%CO, somewhat rich). Apparently the screws were mixed, the allen and the spring loaded slotted screws holding the needle body in the piston. The allen was loose so as to permit the adjustment of the needle, and the slotted one tightened down. But the adjustment screw was just moving the star washer up and down in the piston, not moving the needle at all! In inspecting the holes for these screws, the hole for the allen screw is simply a threaded hole. But the other, for the spring loaded screw, doesn't thread all the way down, but the screw actually bottoms out and the spring loaded plunger which guides the needle body, protrudes thru to the needle body. Apparently if you swap the screws in their respective holes, the slotted screw will now prevent the needle from moving. So be careful with these two screws when assembling the carbs! Just for safetys sake, I left the allen screws out, as earllier versions of the carbs didn't use them, and they must have been there to prevent "users" from adjusting their federal emmission carburators. I then removed the temperature compensators, found the paper from the web telling how to syncronize them (on the triumph's web page), and did the hot water thing. It actually worked quite well, and now they are both full open at about 140F. All things are back together but I didn't have time to start the car and adjust the carbs, but things are progressing well!

CARBERATERS, Temperature compensators

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> As a side note, I found an article on adjusting the Temperature Compensators on the Triumph Maintenance Site. If interested: http://www.vtr.org/maintain/index.html will get you there. there are also articles on other british maintenance which applies ( brakes/touchup/washing/polishing).

CARBERATERS, Webers

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> I found the notes I took when I cleaned out my S2's weber. These are the bits that came with the car when I bought it from the PO. So I don't know how close it is. It seems to run alright, if a bit rich. I'll likely start tuning it when I add a header. It is a 32/36 DFAV.


Primary Idle Jet: 60

Secondary Idle Jet: 50

Air Corrector Jet (Primary): 165

Air Corrector Jet (Secondary): 160

Pump Jet: 55

Main Jet (Primary): 137

Main Jet (Secondary): 140

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> The cheapest new Weber stuff I've found is from the Performance Parts Warehouse. Surf around for Weber carburators. Or email the boss, Buddy Crowley <perfparts@worldnet.att.net. They have legit Weber stuff, but rather than K&N, they'll have a cheaper, repro filter unit (almost as good, depending on your point of view).

ClassMaker@aol.com Phil, pethier@isd.net writes: Some fine day when I have devised a throttle setup at which the proprietor will not laugh, I will bring it the dyno shop to have the Weber side-draft carb set up properly.

I had a home-brew linkage. Now, I highly recommend (as a new user) the *beautiful* Weber-brand, anodized, bolts-right-onto-a-DCOE-carb linkage kit. Takes single or dual throttle cables. Has two return springs. Comes with your choice of topside or bottom mounting bracket. Nifty! A nice tangent-cable crank mechanism gives very linear movement. Includes appropriate throttle shaft fittings for twin-carb setups also. I have a 1 x 45DCOE based Hermes kit, and the linkage fit under it, between the carb and the headers. I have a sheet-metal aluminum shroud arching over the headers, to act as a make-shift heat shield. Over USD$100 but well worth it. Got mine from Ray Psulkowski, RDE.
http://www.rdent.com/ -- site has web pages for specials, books, etc.

CHASSIS, Closing plate

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> If you have a used plate, the bent edges go down. One side will have three equally spaced holes, closest to the slight bend in the plate. That is the rear. Three 1/4 UNF screws go up into the frame (I would recommend you install SS bolts here as they tend to rust in!) which have nuts welded on the inside of the frame to hold them. The front will have, IIRC, 6 holes, three for attachment (use fender washers) to the fiberglass, and one for the ground point (on the passenger side, just to the rear of the attachment bolt). There are two other 1/4 inch holes, for which I have no idea what they are used for.

the plate that goes under the anti-sway bar and steering gear should be made out of steel, or stainless steel. It supports the nose of the car- aluminum would be too soft and wouldn't support it. Never lean on the nose if that plate it not there. I had a new one made at the local sheet metal shop for about ten bucks or something. Painted it with Gavlon. If it ever rusts, I'll just blast it and paint again. Mark hollingsworth

"Jason Rowan" <jrowan@ix.netcom.com> On my S2, there are only two 1/4 inch (approx.) holes at the front of the closing plate. So I guess Warren's plate was designed for all versions. And there's no extra hole for grounding on mine.

I too would strongly recommend using the stainless bolts for future peace of mind - the ones on my car broke off in the chassis during disassembly! Had to drill out the old internal nuts and weld in new ones, not an easy job. I'm using stainless hardware and synthetic water repelling grease during assembly. Bob S.

Warren R. Hartenstine whartenstine@earthlink.net The closing plate is cut 14" x 20 1/2" of 16 ga. steel (or galvaneel because it is paintable and rust resistant). Three holes are drilled along the 20-1/2" length, centered 7/16" from the edge and at left-to-right intervals of 1 1/4", 9 3/16" and 17". Three holes are drilled along the opposite 20 1/4" length, centered 1" from the edge and at left-to-right intervals of 1 1/2", 10 1/2" and 19 3/8". One hole is drilled along the edge with the holes at 1 1/2" from the edge, 3 1/2" in from the 20 1/2" length and 18 1/2" to the right of the left edge. The 14" sides of the sheet are then bend 90 degrees up (considering this hole pattern) 3/8" in from the edge of the 14" length. The pattern piece is rusted and deformed but appears to have holes 1/4" in diameter. I drilled the holes at 5/16" to allow fitting room, as tolerances for this piece, a bolt-on plate, are not very critical.

CHASSIS, Fitting

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> > From: phil72@snet.net Today I set the Tc body shell on the Spyder chassis and noticed that I have some gaps between the chassis and a few of the body mounting points....About 1/8"-3/16 at the front under the boot and the same for the two points under the dash, the rear is ok. I have to tighten the 2 Bolts under the dash about 1 1/2 turns beyond finger tight to get the seatbelt bolts to thread in easily which still leaves about a 1/8" gap. My question is should I just put a few washers in these gaps or is there enough flexibility in the fiberglass to pull the bobbins down to the chassis and not worry about it pulling out the bobbins or fracturing later due to road vibration etc.?

Definately shim those babies. That glass will flex some, but eventually crack IMHO.

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> Shim it. My S-2 had many shims, which were plain fender washers. The shim pack was thicker on one side than the other (I don't remember which). I don't know why either...could have been to account for an uneven mold, or to level the body. And don't forget to use a closed cell foam or similar insulator on the backbone. I would not recommend using the felt that the factory installed, since it holds water very well.

CHASSIS, Identification

sean murray <snmurray@iol.ie> Subject: Lotus Archives Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:19:05 GMT
Everett Stephens wrote: Several people have noted that they obtained info on original color, assy date, etc. on their Elan. My PO knows very little about the car except what he did to it, and I happen to be an inquiring mind... How do I go about finding out more? Write, with chassis number, to the Group Lotus archivist at this address :

Mr. Maurice Storey

Database Controller

Group Lotus Ltd.

Hethel

Norwich NR14 8EZ

England

"Rude, Gerald" <GDR1@pge.com> Subject: RE:Europa JPS Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:01:44 –0800 I too was mistaken about having a JPS. Mine is even the right color (Black/Gold) but to be a "real" JPS, it has to have a plaque on the dash, giving the number. I believe 100 were made for the US market, 100 domestic. It was another sales gimmick at the time which resulted in the Europa Special as we have. I really don't know any other difference between the JPS and the Special. Anyone else out there that can offer up some advice? Jerry Europa Special VIN 4005R

whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Subject: Re: Europa JPS is Special (U) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:55:56 -0500 (EST) That's correct; the car does have the Big Valve engine. I do know some of the car's history. It was bought in May 8, 1974, in San Fransico. It was new. The documentation I have lists the car as VIN 4153 R, the color as Sable, and the interior oatmeal. Besides that, I can only find 3 other owners besides me, the last owner being my cousin. When he bought the car, he had it transported here to North Carolina because he was moving back. The car was dropped off at his mom's house and was simply never picked up!:-( Five years later I aquired the car from him (that was a few weeks ago). :-) Cheers, Aaron '74 Europa Special 4153 R

CHASSIS, Number

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> JOHN ZENDER wrote: I don't think Lotus put chassis numbers on the Europa Frames.

My S2 has the chassis number stamped on the outside surface of the right rear fork, forward of the detachable crossmember. I was unaware of this until Phil Ethier provided this information.

COOLING SYSTEM Auxilliary radiator

I did get a few degrees improvement but the final results aren't in yet on the aux radiator that I put inside my type
65's rear grille (on the heater core's circuit.) I forgot to add a bleeder valve to the radiator, and will need to do that
this weekend. Plus I've got only 30% antifreeze in the mixture. I believe that's enough, but does anyone disagree? It never really freezes in Phoenix. It was 105 degrees F over the asphalt on my 22 mile highway commute. My swirl pot got up to 95 celsius. Jeff Mills in Phoenix

In making sure I don't run her too hot this blistering summer, I got a small 10"x19" Ford radiator, put both 5/8" couplings to one side and added a baffle between them, soldered shut the cap aperture, mounted it just inside the rear grille and ran my heater hoses to it. It took 8 hours. Tomorrow we'll see how it affects my temp, as the weather should run close to one hundred degrees here in Phoenix. Jeff Mills in Phoenix

From: Jeff Mills & Tammy Gee <jeffandtam@inficad.com> Subject: Europa Aux Radiator and Engine Bay Airflow Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 03:24:25 –0700 Thanks for the replies, I did get a few degrees improvement but the final results aren't in yet on the aux radiator that I put inside my type 65's rear grille (on the heater core's circuit.) I forgot to add a bleeder valve to the radiator, and will need to do that this weekend. Plus I've got only 30% antifreeze in the mixture. I believe that's enough, but does anyone disagree? It never really freezes in Phoenix. It was 105 degrees F over the asphalt on my 22 mile highway commute. My swirl pot got up to 95 celsius. Not bad. As to bleeding the system, all I did was idle it at a ~15% incline and open the front radiator's bleeder while topping off the swirl pot. Does anyone see a problem with that? I think I have read conflicting reports on the actual flow directions in the engine bay. Anyone know the definitive answer? The truth is out there.

I have nearly 10 degrees C improvement in swirl pot temps on a hot day, so I figure that's around 10 degrees C improvement in the reactor core. This has been great at reducing pinging-under-load, which happens when the swirl pot reaches ~95 degrees C. It was cheap and simple. The radiator shop sold me a re-cored Ford 10"x19" radiator which I had them put two 1/2" hose couplers on one side, and a baffle between to direct the flow through the radiator. They soldered a piece of sheet metal over the cap and painted the whole thing. Cost: $60 U.S. It all fit perfectly just inside the rear grille, hoses opposite side from the exhaust, intake on the bottom, outlet on top. Since it had a mounting flange with holes, all I needed to mount it was two L brackets and a strip of rubber car mat. No trouble reinstalling the rear luggage pan. 12' of 1/2" hose was more than enough, which ran forward to the bulkhead, then doubled back between the distributor and the engine, to connect where the heater hoses had connected. I ran fresh water through the heater core and its hoses, and will leave them open to the air until the Phoenix summer dries them out. A little more cooling might be had with a bleeder petcock. Placed as close to the top of the aux radiator as possible, take care that:

  1. Placement doesn't interfere with the fit, and
  2. Can still be reached after installation.

The reason for both of these cautions is that the top of the aux radiator is hiding in fibreglass body. Grand total: $75 and 8 hours from conception to completion, after which I climbed to 7,000 ft. to Flagstaff AZ. Jeff

COOLING SYSTEM, Bleeding

Jeff Mills wrote: >> As to bleeding the system, all I did was idle it at a ~15% incline and open the front radiator's bleeder while topping off the swirl pot. Does anyone see a problem with that?

I usually just jack the front drivers side, the outboard edge seems a bit higher than the bleeder in my car. I get it high enough to be the high spot, but still able to compress the passenger side spring to get some
rocking going. Scott Mitchell


COOLING SYSTEM, Cassette pump

"Rude, Gerald" <GDR1@pge.com> Subject: (U) Cassette Water Pump Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 12:25:51 -0700
I just got off the phone with Ken at Bean, and the new cassette water pump, complete with new timing cover, new back plate and new cassette (with 907 innards) is to be shipped to me later this week !!

COOLING SYSTEM, Coolant

whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Subject: Coolants and Ignition Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:38:07 -0500 (EST) Today I saw an interesting product: Called propelene glycol, it is a type of coolant supposedly used in race cars. It has a boiling temp of more than 300 degrees and is said to transfer heat better than water. Another property being it doesn't create steam pockets around cylinders. Does anyone on the List use it? I don't know if it would work well in my Europa, but would keep it cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter. Its also non-corrosive and non-toxic.

COOLING SYSTEM, Fan

After writing about my success in replacing that heavy, rusty Ducellier motor on the radiator fan (and shrouding the ring, too)... I found this in my notebook: Radiator Fan Motor: "OEM # 4-9851" Now that's an old number, circa 1971-1972, but it may cross reference to something. It runs much faster than the Ducellier, is 1/2 the size, hardly 1/3 the weight. It was real cheap, and real generic. Apparently real well made, too, as it runs just as well today. I've got the original leaflet somewhere around here... Cheers, ken r.

Actually, you can do that, but it might not be necessary. Here's an easy fix: Replace that heavy, slow, current-hogging Ducellier fan motor (that rusts up). You can buy a modern, low profile fan ring (and save weight)... or you can do what I did -- if you can find the right motor. I just replaced the motor (only) with a generic, lightweight, fast, efficient unit [[I've got the flyer from the box]]. I did one more thing... I "shrouded" (hooded) the fan ring to the radiator, so that 100% of the radiator's active surface is pressurized by the fan. These steps made the cooling work better than new, with original plumbing. A tip on shrouding: The shroud only seals the forward edge of the ring (furthest from the radiator) to the radiator cutout like a tent. Then cut some arches in the ring where it sits on the radiator... to spread out the airflow and pressurize the full surface of the radiator, more than just the part covered by the ring. Or jack the ring up on "standoffs" to leave room for spreading air, and you don't have to cut anything. I got carried away... I moved the fan ring *far* from the radiator. It now sits between headlamp and turn lamp pods, way forward. I have a home-made airbox fully ducting the fan to the radiator. [[S2 TESTIMONIAL ==> original cooling except fan motor + shroud:]] No water wetter. Never flushed it. 50 to 75% glycol. Ye olde pumpe. With this, I've trundled into traffic jams, on tarmac, in summer heat. I can leave it idling "forever" -- and it takes care of itself, thanks to the thermo-switch & relay. I did the fan trick while the motor was still stock, so I don't attribute the cooling to hotter cam, more overlap or richer mix. Thus, when we got stuck in NYC traffic in July, the car kept its cool. Next, we spent the summer in Biloxi Mississippi, and then moved to Omaha, Nebraska. *Hot* summers there, plenty of days over 100 F. I commuted to work -- motor was fine -- driver got hot now & then ;-) [[END TESTIMONIAL]] Fix the fan/ring first. Then see how it fares. Should be fine. This may seem like heresy -- or "Stage 0" -- but it works. Sounds like everything else is in excellent order already. > Jason > 1970 Europa S2 #0077R Ken R. 1970 Europa S2 (built 1969 -> # 65/2218) + Hermes Kit.

zigglu@us.ibm.com Subject: RE: Europa blower fan('72) Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 12:21:45 -0400
The fan I used is from late 1960s - early 1970s Mercedes 220 with Air Condition. They were equipped with a wonderful BOSH pusher fan which has cast aluminum shroud and very powerful plastic bladed fan. The fan is the same size as OEM fan. With Europa marginal cooling capability, this fan creates enormous flow through the radiator. I used also a dual position thermal radiator switch from Audi. There are very reasonable. I used a resistor in series for the first (low) speed and no resistor for the second (high) speed. I also used heavier gauge wires to make sure that there are no problems Lucas OEM wiring (just wanted to make sure that fans would work as designed). Because of the current requirement of the fan I used Bosch 30 Amp relays (donations from junked BMWs or Saab relay boxes) to switch the fan. Fan, relays and relay sockets did cost me $ 25.00 total. The fan operates mostly on Low, but knowing that it has capability to run on higher speed provides an extra measure of security. I also did run a switch to his dashboard which is configured to run the fan on full power as an added pre-caution.

Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 04:38:48 –0000 From: "Bob Weber" <gcthree@optonline.net> Subject: Big Surprise- electrical problem I've just switched from the original radiator fan to a later design, flat motor fan (bought it from Banks). I've wired-in a relay to preserve the motor over time, as well as a thermostat. My problem is
that the fan turns at, perhaps, 1/3 speed. I've bypassed the relay, and yet, I still have the same, slow results. The fan is OK, as I've tried it on a spare car battery, and boy, does it blow up a storm. I'm confused. Any help? Bob Weber ‘72 Twin Cam #2467R>>

Sounds like a wire size issue to me. The stock fan couldn't pull near the current as your replacement so the designers put in a small wire to supply it. Your new fan draws MegaAmps by comparison so you're getting a Mega
voltage drop as if youn added a resistor inline. Try it with a big wire and feel the flow. Steve
gt6steve@aol.com


COOLING SYSTEM, Gauge calibration

david.mirylees@freeuk.com I had doubts about the temperature in my type 74 and around 1980 asked the factory (Lotus) for info. on the running temp for my car. They informed me that the markings on the (Smiths)gauge were thus: between 50 and 90 indicated 75 and the mark between 90 and 140 indicated 105. They advised that normal running was halfway between the marks either side of the 90. They also informed me that the gauges are ±7˝°. The pressure cap is 7lb. (AC Delco RC1 K7) and I use an 82° thermostat. I was worried whenever the gauge showed more than 90 - I shouldn't have been!

COOLING SYSTEM, Heater control valve

This is the heater valve I used on my Europa. I tossed the factory one and put this on on. It cannot mount in the originals position, but I moved is slightly to the front and lower and just tie-wrapped it up. It works fine, shuts off, and works with the original heater cable. Stant Heater control Valve 20405. That is what is on the box. I think it was the one that said for a 1972 Dodge van, with 360 engine (passenger van). I still have the box, so if anyone needs any more numbers, just let me know. Mark Hollingworth

COOLING SYSTEM, Hoses

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Subject: Europa S2 hoses Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:53:43 -0700
I have a couple of numbers that work for S2 Europa coolant hoses:

Radiator to transfer hoses: Dayco 70932 (I used them in opposite 'directions' trimmed to fit)
Rrear transfer tube to water pump: Dayco 71159


Thanks to Harald- '86 Caddilac 2 Litre Cimmiron, lower hose - a slight trim to fit, but works wonderfully, neat compound bend. I haven't found any heater to transfer tube hoses, but I'm going to use a Dodge van heater controller- cheap and avaliable (probably will work better too).

From: Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> Don't know about the Twink but for the S2 an excellent substitute for the RHS coolant hose (the one that contains the thermostat) is from a 2 litre Cadillac Cimmeron. Yes, you read right Cadillac Cimmeron. I believe that there were a host of other period GM clone cars that had the same engine & body but I can't remember their names. The hose fits like it was made for the Europa S2 (and Gordini), thermostat and all.

From: "Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: RE:Europa TC heater help needed Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 07:41:25 –0700 >Yes, I know I dot need a heater now but it gets cold here in the winter, 40-50.


40-50 cold? Gimme a break! That's shirt sleeve weather, and I don't even live close to Ethier and the Loons... ;<)

I've checked and flushed my system prior to putting in the anti-freeze by removing the two hoses at the engine end and driven water from a garden hose through the heater, valve and hoses staying out of the cockpit area entirely. The flow in a good system is hardly restricted at all and will pass a large volume quickly. These systems are pretty simple and if you have an internal block this is an easy way to find out. I'd check the valve first, simply because it's easiest to get to and check, the internal heat radiator second. BTW, the engine gets most of the water pump output and the heater is already restricted by tubing size, so almost any small internal blockage will severely reduce heat output. Garden hose pressure can either flush out or cram in particles, so you should first run the water into the heater outlet side, the tube that does NOT come from the water pump high pressure side. This will back-flush and tend to drive particles back out the direction they (presumably) entered. The last time I did this the Europa heater was working pretty well and I still got a ton of junk out in the first 15 seconds, and it cleared entirely in under a minute.

COOLING SYSTEM, Oil cooler

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> While looking at Bob Wells Europa autox car at WCLM it occured to me that his oil-to-water heat exchanger is almost identical in shape and size to the heat exchanger that is standard in Toyota MR2's. The MR2 exchanger is mounted on the rear bulkhead between the cockpit and engine and is a tubular affair about 18" long with water connections out either end and oil connections at right angles on either end. It would fit easily, and similar to Bob's, alongside the engine, inline with the right hand water tube. The water tube would need to be shortened to bring it up further forward than its present position and a 'sandwich' adapter applied to the oil filter to bring out the oil lines. Very small, light possibility.

COOLING SYSTEM, Otter switch

Steve Brightman <Steve.Brightman@dalsemi.com> Subject: RE: Otter switch Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:43:36 –0500 > How tight should the fit be between the otter switch and the grommet in the radiator? In the course of my rebuild, I was just about to pour coolant into the radiator of my Plus 2, when I noticed that I could remove the otter switch with no more force than using my fingers. <


That sounds about normal - mine has always come out quite easily. Thats why there's a spring clip to hold it in place - which IMO is way too flimsy to rely on and so I always put a safety wire around the switch. In spite of the fit I've never had any leaks there. Dry joint? No idea, unless they think if you add any lubricant it will let it slide back out easier or impede heat transfer to the sensor. In my business a dry joint is a definite no no!

The grommet for the otter switch that turns on the Europa radiator fan on, Lotus p/n A036K6027Z, does not have an interior lip. FYI, the Volvo grommet for the same type of switch, p/n unknown, does have an interior lip and the same ID and OD, thus appears suitable as a substitute. The interior lip should provide more security against having the otter switch "blow out" of the radiator. whartenstine@earthlink.net

From: "Mark MarKell, Sr." <Type46@micro-engineering.com> I've built a replacement for the Otter switch in common use on our cars. I had a machinist make a brass plug that is a snug sliding fit into a copper plumbing 'tee' (1 inch I think) with a NPT internal thread. We silver soldered the brass plug in the tee, cut the original tubing and inserted the tee with tubing and clamps and did away with the original Otter switch port entirely. The thermostats (done two of these) were chosen from a Carquest catalog based on the same opening/closing temperatures and have bayonet connectors. These were inserted where the otter switch was in both an S1 Esprit and a 504 Elite. I plan on putting another in the Europa in the forward radiator hose path.

From: "Mark MarKell, Sr." <Type46@micro-engineering.com> I've built a replacement for the Otter switch in common use on our cars. I had a machinist make a brass plug that is a snug sliding fit into a copper plumbing 'tee' (1 inch I think) with a NPT internal thread. We silver soldered the brass plug in the tee, cut the original tubing and inserted the tee with tubing and clamps and did away with the original Otter switch port entirely. The thermostats (done two of these) were chosen from a Carquest catalog based on the same opening/closing temperatures and have bayonet connectors. These were inserted where the otter switch was in both an S1 Esprit and a 504 Elite. I plan on putting another in the Europa in the forward radiator hose path.

Replace the otter switch while the water is cold you will only loose about a pint to qt of coolant if you dont do it quiclkly not a difficult task cold there is very little pressure if any. Jerry replaced mine recently Rein

I just replaced my otter switch, which was a reasonably new one to begin with. I had a heck of a time getting it out, the rubber seal was really stubborn, but it was only a year or so old. The old one came out much easier, but it was original equipment, hopefully yours still is. When you buy a new switch, check the on/off temps to make sure its right (put in pot with thermometer and use ohm meter to see when the contacts close/reset). You'll have to drain the system, and don't reuse the old seal. You have to remove the switch, then the seal, insert the new seal, then the new thermostat. Make sure everything is very clean and dry and don't use gasket sealant. I wrapped a safety wire around the switch thru the radiater as a safety measure. And make sure the epoxy between the brass and the plastic is intact on the new switch (if thats the type you get, some don't have it) and the plastic doesn't rotate. Thats what happened with my new one, which failed within the year. The switch works on a bi-metallic disk which is in a concave orientation, which sets in the bulb. A small rod sets against the disk, and next to the contacts. When the temp changes, the disk trys to go flat, pushing the rod which closes the contacts. The distance the contacts are from the disk is critical, and if the plastic moves, the switch loses its calibration. Jerry Rude 73 Europa Special

COOLING SYSTEM, Overheating radiator

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Scott wrote: >Now, I'm not so certain that the radiator is good. The radiator should be heating up fairly evenly, right? The inlet/outlet side is much hotter.


That's definitely a problem, and a major one. I bet that, once you fix that, your car will stop overheating.


>Before you say it, yes I know about the separator plate separation that is described on the gglc site. It happened to me before. I haven't probed the plate just yet, but the tank doesn't look to have bloated.


Core blockage is an additional possibility.


>I'm guessing that too much coolant is bypassing the core.


NO coolant that enters the radiator should be bypassing the core.

>What checks can I do with the radiator in the car?


You've already established that the radiator has to come out and apart. It isn't working, that's for sure.

>out of the car?


Remove the end tanks and examine the core tubes for blockage, in addition to checking the separator plate. Or replace the radiator with one that is known to be good.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> An old trick to see if the radiator is cooling evenly is to spray it with a light mist of water and watch if it evaporates evenly. The areas which won't evaporate the water are the plugged tube areas. If the radiator is too hot at the inlet/outlet piping, then it does indeed sound like the seperator plate is missing.

COOLING SYSTEM, Pipe cleaning

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Try using a bottle brush intended for cleaning baby bottles. Cheap and works better than a coathanger. Available in most supermarkets.

COOLING SYSTEM, Radiator removal/installation

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Björn-Anders Haverstad wrote: No big success... How do I remove the radiator without cutting in the body?


You did completely remove the luggage compartment cover, didn't you? Also, did you remove the headlight on that side? Until you do that, there's not enough room to get the radiator out.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> To remove the radiator you also have to remove the bonnet and the right headlamp pod. I can't remember if the fan needs to come off too or not. Isn't there two bolts in the wheel well?

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> I _finally_ finished my radiator today! :-) I ended up attaching the frame with a silicone gasket goop called "the right stuff." I bought a large quantity of it (half of a caulk tube, fits in a caulk gun) after reccomendation by the clerk at the auto supply shop. It stuck to both surfaces well, and cures to a nice rubber substance.

COOLING SYSTEM, Routing

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Europa TC heater help needed Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 19:28:22 -0700 JerTigger@aol.com wrote: My 72 TC has the heater valve missing, there is antifreeze in the heater core. Does anyone have a diagram that shows the connections, flow for the heater I > think something is missing the car heats up but doesn't blow hot air. I think something is missing.

The heater circuit is just a simple loop from one tube to the head on the exhaust side. There are two tubes, inside the frame, 1/2 inch tubing, which go from the engine compartment to the heater, making a 90 degree up angle just in front of the dash. From there there are two rubber hoses connecting the tubes to the heater. My PO had a valve installed on the drivers tube, by cutting the hose and inserting it in series. Check to see if yours has the same.

COOLING SYSTEM, Swirl pot

ClassMaker@aol.com JerTigger@AOL.COM writes: Forgive my ignorance but what is a swirl pot?
A cleverly designed coolant header tank. Coolant enters at the top, offset from center, so the stuff tends to swirl -- the pot is never actually full, maybe 2/3 so. This action is supposed to help bring bubbles to the center (centrifugal force throws heavier liquid outward) so what gets sucked out by the water pump is less aerated than it might have been otherwise. Pretty cool design, huh? Simple and efficient.

COOLING SYSTEM, Temperature

kmccormick@cgsinc.com My 72 runs between 95-105c. The radiator fan kicks in at 100. Standing traffic sends it a little higher. I use Red-Line "water wetter" coolant also, which trends to keep it a little cooler on hot days.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Toddbrace@aol.com wrote: As a first time TC owner (Special), what should I deem a reasonable running temp. on a 90 degree day at highway speeds (55-65)?


Todd, I just had mine up and running (73 special) and it runs at about 75 - 80C with a 85C (180F) thermostat. When I drop down to idle at the stop light, the fan comes on at about 90C and it stays there. This is on a 100F day here in Balmy Fresno Ca.

I added a bottle of RedLine Water Wetter to my S2 last year and it also helped a little. However, I think Scott Mitchell tried it without seeing any difference. Jeff Hovis JeffH@biowhittaker.com

Jeff Hovis wrote: I added a bottle of RedLine Water Wetter to my S2 last year and it also helped a little. However, I think Scott Mitchell tried it without seeing any difference.

Yep, I didn't see much (if any) change with the Water Wetter and a fresh (maybe) 40% mixture. Though I met a guy this weekend who said he saw a 20 degree improvment on his MG(?). I'm still sceptical. But the closer you
get to pure water, the more I'll believe it helps. 'Course I have a friend that turns up his nose at Water Wetter, and
suggests dishwashing detergent instead... I dunno about that. Scott Mitchell

COOLING SYSTEM, Thermostat hose

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Thanks to Harald, I now have a engine to transfer tube hose. Dayco # 71159. I think it is the lower radiator hose from a 86 Cadallac Cimmaron- 2 litre. I haven't tired it on yet, but it looks like it will work great.

COOLING SYSTEM, Water pump

Alan Watkins <awatkins@cerf.net> Subject: Re: Europa Waterpump Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:30:00 -0800
At 10:29 PM 3/29/99 -0800, Jerry Rude wrote: As all europa owners know, the dreaded water pump is the most dreaded fear of all. It requires removing the engine/trans and removal of the head and oil pan to access the front timing cover/water pump case.


Not so fast. I've had the timing chest off a Europa (Special 5 speed) without removing the engine block, for exactly this purpose (rebuilding the water pump). It's a little tricky but it's not impossible, and it's CERTAINLY easier than removing the transmission OR the engine (not to mention both), which I've also done several times. My recollection is that the only real clearance problem is with one of the coolant pipes, which simply needs to be temporarily bent out of the way and then bent back (or shortened and replace with a longer rubber coupler hose). Unfortunately (I guess) I sold that car about 6 years ago, so I'm relaying all this from memory. However, I didn't invent that disassembly and reassembly process; my recollection is that it was well known in the Europa community at the time, so I'm sure someone else can back me up.

"Alan Watkins" <awatkins@cerf.net> Subject: RE: Europa Waterpump Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:44:54 -0800
As I said in my earlier posting, yes I've done it, and I don't think it's any particular secret in the Europa world that it can be done (despite someone's earlier incorrect assertion that the engine must be removed). My recollection is that the only direct interference to the timing chest coming off is from one of the coolant pipes, which you can gently bend out of the way. However, I would advise not attempting this unless you've already done the associated disassembly and assembly on a TC engine where you *could* see what you are doing, since in the Europa you would be doing it with very poor visibility of the many fasteners, etc., that you'll be dealing with. Aside from the clearance and visibility problems provided by the Europa the procedure is well documented in the various shop manuals and books (e.g. Wilkins) that cover the TC engine.

It is usually _possible_ to remove the front cover, and thus replace the water pump, on a Twin Cam engine without removing the engine - indeed, if you're really determined you may be able to wriggle the cover off and back on with minimal disturbance to head or sump. However - even with the engine dismantled and accessible on a stand, getting all the parts aligned and sealing properly is not trivial - I think the chances of the finished result being oil-tight diminish with every short cut you take. Clive

"Rude, Gerald" <GDR1@pge.com> Subject: Europa Waterpump Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 06:15:25 -0800
You are correct that you can change the waterpump without removing the engine, (it was me that said you must remove the engine), however, I would not recommend such a task. IMHO, after rebuilding the entire TC, that to try such a task is a bit sadistic :-). I really don't see why removing the engine is harder. Actually, removing this engine, where everything is accessable, is quite a pleasure in contrast to others I've done.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: RE:Europa waterpump Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 08:31:36 –0800 Pulling the engine and transaxle as a unit is not tough in a Europa and would allow you to A.) become more familiar with your new vehicle and B.) allow you to better evaluate any drivetrain problems and correct some things that may get much worse if the car is driven. If the car has sat for such a long time you may find the clutch is frozen to the flywheel, which is not uncommon and the Hooke joints at the axles may very well need replacing or at least lubed (a failure there is not fun!). It would allow close inspection of the shift mechanism and the flexible brake lines at the radius arms (excellent time to replace with braided lines). In any case I'd bet you'll feel safer if you've had the whole works out once. OTOH, try not to let such an occasion mushroom as it's very common for new owners to pull the whole works and get so involved in upgrading this and that as to not get it back together for years (yes, I've been there). Driving one of these cars, even not completely restored, is a delight and a great motivator!

My US$.02: I would agree with doable, but I'll never do it that way again. I'll remove the engine from now on. Hours (seems like) under a dripping in-car-engine is just no fun. davea@sgi.com

So you probably have the jist of the waterpump delima, you can do it in the car, but not recommended. I didn't know it was recommended to remove the engine with the trans to work on the trans though. Perhaps, but it seems the trans should drop down in the rear enough to permit its extraction though I haven't tried that option (I may have to as I didn't rebuild it, just inspected as much as I could without splitting the cases). The trans is really light considering all it has to do, quite a work of art really. Let us know how you fare with the removal. What is the problem with the sun gear? did it have to do with the last thread on the subject re: play in the spider gears/output shafts? Jerry Rude Prather CA

When I did my water pump, the cassette type was out of production and no one had any. I understand it is quite expensive, and you have to send your timing chest in as a core. If you do go that route, and if you can afford it at the time, buy a spare cassette. That way if they are out of production, you will have one to drop in, and can then rebuild the one you just removed. I also understand there are two or more versions, one you can rebuild with a std TC waterpump kit, and another has a larger bearing for longevity. Please, if anyone has more info on this, I'm sure there are many who would appreciate your experience/knowledge. Jerry Rude Prather CA

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> There is potentially less tension on the Europa TC water pump pulley because the tension is factory-designed if you use the correct pulleys and belt. There is potentially more tension on an Elan TC because owners and mechanics can over-tension the belt by swinging the generator out.

brian.scally@philips.com Subject: Twink water pumps Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 10:48:11 +0200
I have engaged Burton Power of the UK in a conversation regarding the replacement of the twin cam water pump (on an Elan) to help improve it life and serviceability. Here is there response...<Water pump failures are a common problem on the twin cam engine and there is no easy solution to the problem. However, we have remanufactured the complete water pump/front cover assembly so that the water pump itself is a removable module unit that can be easily remove to change the seals. Cost of this is 397.33 inc vat.> The price is in UKP and their email address is
mailto:burton.power@dial.pipex.com. The specialise in tuning and performance mods to European Ford engines.

robinso2@world.std.com (wallace robinson) Subject: RE: Twink water pumps Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:37:58 –0400 The previous owner of my twin cam bored the water pump housing out to take a larger water pump bearing from a Pinto. I bought a new Pinto water pump (very cheap) and pressed out the bearing, then pressed the bearing into the twin cam housing, when I wanted to replace it. Perhaps this bearing is more durable, certainly it is cheaper.

Keith Gustafson <gusmach@shore.net> Twink front timing cover/water pump removal Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:36:48 –0400 Whatever you do, Do NOT put a screwdriver in to pry between the timing chest and the timing chest rear. Lots of people do this and destroy the sealing surface THere are O rings around the water pump, and the area around them is all corroded and stuck together. Try some penetrating oil right in the area around where the water pump sticks through. Be patient! I think the reason they tell you to pull the engine is so that you can really get a grip on the pump and yank the sucker out. Stay away from the damn hacksaw! Remember that you want that cover to seal up well when you are done, so much caution is called for. I think the first time I did this, I used a large screwdriver, carefully cushioned, and applied pressure from inside the timing chest, first one side, then the other, penetrating oil, a little heat, pressure, repeat. It takes a while, but you won't ruin the case. Again DO NOT try to drive a screw driver between the cases, you will destroy the seal and earn yourself a good TIG welding bill. A few hours of patient work, a little care in reassembly, and you won't have this nightmare again.

COOLING SYSTEM, Water pump Gilmer drive

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Subject: Re: Twink rebuild—update Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:54:47 +0100 Aaron Hines wrote: Has anyone used the toothed drive belt (sold by ???) that lowers the tension needed to drive the water pump, hopefully prolonging its life?


Yes, but only on race engines. Works fine, but make VERY sure that nothing comes into contact with it, particularly oil pipes! Neglect of this caused me once to go backwards down Silverstone's GP circuit instead of forwards round the Club circuit -- and an overnight repair session to get the car cleaned & fixed for the next day's race :-( For your Europa, I don't think it's worth it. Because the alternator is driven off the back of one of the camshafts you just don't have to put the tension into the water pump drive, and an ordinary V-belt should give sufficient drive with low enough tension to drive the water pump without loading it up. On a Europa TC I'd expect the pump to last at least 60k miles, not the < 30k that an Elan can do.

DASH, Installation

rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> IKneer@aol.com wrote: Unfortunately my car came with the facia and dash out, and not having seen a Europa in one piece since '73 I'm struggling a bit.

  1. The two center most chrome bolts that hold the facia on go into holes in the fiberglass that supports the dash. The outer two seem to go through the facia and the vinyl of the dash but nothing else. Is this correct or is something missing where these bolts go through?
  2. As I recall when I did mine, all the upper through bolts went through the dash into the fiberglass. A flap of dash cap material is sandwiched between the wood dash and the fiberglass. So when the dash is torqued to the body the trapped material holds the cap in place.

  3. How/ What supports the steering column/wheel?


There's a metal plate needed as I recall. Maybe someone else can answer this as my car is not close by (in storage) to look.

> I thought that the four holes in the steering column bracket above the steering column would line up with holes in the Facia and that the Facia would serve this purpose but only the inner most two seem to line up. Am I missing a part or does the lower black vinyl trim strip somehow serve this purpose?

DASH, Lettering

Both Banks and Bean sell lettering about $10.00 or $12.00 as I recall. Joe Irwin

> From: Daren Stone [mailto:dastone@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 6:17 AM Europa dash lettering? am having a second dash re-veneered for my Europa (1970 S2), and was wondering about the lettering that identifies the various rocker switches. Whether or not lettering was used on the S2, (neither of my old dashes had any lettering) I would like to know what type of letters people have used (decals, rub-on, adhesive-backed), what font size, type & color, and where one may source suitable letters.

At 08:21 AM 08/30/2000 -0700: Dash lettering - original type face and wording - is sold on the sheet. I just bought mine (Type 74 but one size fits all as far as I can tell) for c. $12 from Ray at R D Enterprises. Warren Hartenstine 3642R

DASH, Structural support

g ford <gmfmo@mweb.co.za> I was surprised that the instrument panel forms a structural member and if indeed this is correct will alter my thinking on how to replace the rotten plywood. The dash facia is indeed a structural member, though maybe not much more than a stiffener for that part of the body. I think it provides a tie between the windshield and the frame and doors to stiffen things and prevent scuttle shake and the like. Note that there is a steel band which bolts to the bottom of the dash and goes all the way across the car, and the bolting to the frame behind the ashtray. Marine plywood should be strong enough, if you can find it in the right thickness, but then you have to veneer it also. I think mine is a maple hardwood beneath the mahogony veneer, having about 5 or 6 plys. You can buy the whole dash panel, complete and finished. It would save you alot of work. In looking at the panel with the gages and everything out, it is very flimsy. I think the steel band and the center section the only real structural parts. Jerry Rude

DIFFERENTIAL, Wrench

I use a special 'socket' designed to remove the front bearings on GMC 4wd's, with a minor mod to the hub. This tool has two tangs that stick out to engage slots in the Chevy. On the Europa nut I removed one of the little cogs and another one 180 degrees away to make a wider slot for the tool. Used an impact wrench with a low setting to remove and a torque wrench later to re-install. The tool is available from NAPA, Carquest, etc. You'll recognize it when you see one. The down side is the contact is only at two small points, so if the PO has used Loctite on that nut neither this nor anything else will help...Seriously, the nut is held in with an interlocking tab and, once clean, is easy to remove and install. Mark MarKell

It is a 2" kpipe coupling, use grinder file or saw tyo make cuts to match the dogs on the nut, I screwed a 2" pipe nipple into mine and then used a pipe wrench to do the torquing. Jerry up on jack stands and apart again Rein

You can fabricate a wrench from PVC pipe. You need the patience to cut the castlelated grooves. Do you have a Dremel drill? A machine shop (high school shop?) can easily do this from any handy stock, including metal.
Paul
http://home.sprintmail.com/~paulzielinski

I made a diff tool by taking a 1" washer ( 1" id , 21/2" od ) cutting 18 radial slots to match the fins on the trans nuts
and welding that to a 1/4" drive 11/4" used socket that I picked up at a salvage store. Works great, I'll send a pic if you like. Don't use force on the fins, they are alloy and will break easily. John Abbott Amarillo, Texas ‘71 Europa S-2 Hermes
http://users.arn.net/~jdaarch/

With PVC, I actually filed it freehand. I made the template I mentioned before, glued it to the end of the pipe, used a triangle file to mark each cut (before the template disintegrated) then cut each slot deep enough with a 1/8" round file. The depth was only about the diameter of the file. It was all pretty easy. Good luck with it. ken.landaiche@nokia.com

DRIVE SHAFT, Installation

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> >From: Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> OK, I give up, how does one re-install the drive shafts in a Europa??


This is way more than you asked for, but you may enjoy parts of it:

=============
\\\\\\\\\\\\rear bearings, Europa


All Europa rear outer, Lotus #036D6017. This same part is used also as the inner on the TC Special.

FAFNIR 206PP

MRC 206-SZZ

SKF 6206-2RS $5.97 at Tri-State

New Departure Z99506

FAG 6206-2RS

WTW 62062RS <- This one was in Phil's car's outers

ID 1.177 ~30mm, OD 2.440" ~62mm, T .629" ~16mm

Renault-Europa S1-S2 rear inner, Lotus #046D6003

SKF 6006/31-2RST

F7868

<- This one was in Phil's car's left inner. ID 31mm, OD 2.167" = 55mm, T 13mm?


These next are for the non-Special Twin Cam cars rear inner. They can be used for a Renault-Europa S1-S2 rear inner if the shaft is machined to a 30mm diameter in the region of of the inner bearing. This is Lotus #A074D6001Z.


FAFNIR 9106PP

<- This one was in Phil's car's right inner ID 30mm, OD 2.164" ~55mm, .510" ~13mm

MRC 106-KSZZ

SKF 6006-2RS $10.01 at Tri-State

New Departure Z993L06

FAG 6006-2RS


It goes on to say, "Bearings are cheapest when purchased from bearing suppliers. See yellow pages under 'bearings'."

Tri-State Bearing

721-2463

3418 E 25th Street

Minneapolis, MN 55406


Open Sat, 8-12


The bearing-to-bearing spacer for S1 and S2 models is 1.250 ID, 1.500 OD and 2.125 (+/- .005) length. The bearing-to-hub spacer for all Europa models is 1.188 ID, 1.500 OD and .375 (+/- .005) length.


It goes on to say "A spacer which has distorted will be obvious on inspection - the ends will not be flat. The solution is to machine spacers from a harder material. The stock spacers are not hard enough to measure on the Rockwell "C" scale, so any material that does is adequate. Suggested material is 4140 chrome-moly, heat-treated to the mid-thirties on the Rockwell "C" scale." I should think that the Lotus parts guys are selling harder replacement spacers. I would if I were them! Call them up before you start a machine-shop operation. Here is a list of places I know about:


Cory Carpenter May 11 '92 at 11:18 am –420 RE: Help w/'71 Europa S2 (message addressed to
hinckleys@h8700a.a1.ca.boeing.com) Scott Hinckley > I helped a friend work on a '71 Lotus Europa S2 today and we could use some help. It goes like this... We were planning on replacing the rear wheel bearings (parts came with the car when he bought it some time ago.). We removed the wheel (badly corroded lug nuts), removed the hub (brake housing), unfastened the tie rod and shock from the suspension arm, unbolted the suspension arm, used a puller to pull the spindle out of the arm, and discovered that several bearings were missing from one of the runs! (no wonder it pulled so badly). Since the old spindle was kind of chewed up we went ahead and took apart the lower U-joint, it shows some wear. Here are the things we haven't been able to do:

> 1) Remove the drive shaft, we removed the split pin, but it won't slide off. You may want to take a closer look: There should be *two* roll pins, nested, retaining the halfshaft. The outer one is 7mm, inner 4mm. If you're sure that the retaining pins have been removed completely (my outers were cracked and broken), there should be nothing to keep the shaft from sliding off: Use more persuasion.

> 2) Find a replacement U-joint (don't know where to look, old part has the following on it: 21287 GKN 99). I was able to get a replacement at the local NAPA store. These are apparently a pretty common U-joint. However, I've been told that the best ones to get are the permanently lubricated kind, that aren't drilled for a grease fitting: They've got more meat to them, and are stronger.

>If you have tips/tricks/hints on any procedures relating to rear suspension/drive shafts, please send them to me.

I would suggest using new hub spacers in the reassembly, since these will compress lengthwise with re-use, and result in the chronic "loose-hub" problem. (New ones are very reasonably priced, but mine had to be ordered from Hethel, and took a month to get to me. Alternatively, you could have them custom made from a harder material than stock -- Rockwell hardness #7 comes to mind as the desirable number, but I don't recall for certain.) NO, mid thirtys on C scale? If possible, don't use the hub nut to pull the bearings into the housing, as this can result in stripped threads (as I found out to my detriment). Another thing to consider is the bearing size: The stock I.D. for my '69 is 31 mm, an uncommon bearing size. My spindles have been turned down to 30 mm, which is much easier size to come by. Cory Carpenter Aug 5 '92 at 10:33 am –420


As to MYROPA. It came back from the mechanic last night. The outer bearing in the left rear hub carrier was in 3 pieces. We replaced the bearings and the carrier. Looks like we have a little previous owner syndrome here. After hot- tanking the hub we find hammer marks. Looks like an attempt to remove the hub sans hub puller. It may have warped it. This may be causing the run-out at the wheel. I will have to tell Tim (new owner) what we found. As the book I was reading last night says "when buying a used Lotus the only thing to be sure about is you will not be able to find all the problems before purchase."


mikej@wv.mentorg.com I'd call that inexcusable! (OK, OK, so it was F.O.S. -- nothing's too outrageous. Reminds me of the TTL-level electrikludge system in Phil's Europa.) Granted the specified puller is probably only available as a "special tool" from the factory, but it wasn't too difficult to kludge up an alternative using part of my big three-jaw wheel puller and some heavy welded-link chain. In fact, I'm surprised that the hub carrier wasn't cracked if the guy was pounding on it: I was pretty amazed at how thin those castings are.


lotus-cars%netcom.com@medtronic.com Europa rear hub and bearings, help lotus-cars@netcom.com


I know that this is a subject done to death, but I just got this far... I set up my left rear assembly to remove the big nut. I held the outer U-joint yoke as lightly as possible in my big vise. The threads are not that visible, and I wanted to make sure I was not looking at a left-hand thread. Checked the books again to confirm that right and left sides are the same. Procured a 1.5" socket. Heated the nut to melt the King Kong Loctite I have been told is used here. (This makes sense, as there is no keeper or pin to hold a right-hand nut on the left side of the car.) After a great deal of propane torch and massive application of torque, the nut came loose. Although Mike Johnson spoke of finding hammer marks on a hub, and there is a center-drill in the end of the shaft for a puller, I had no trouble at all removing the hub by hand. I was surprised to find the area well-lubricated with what smells like hypoid oil (sulfur). This made sense on my Midget, wherein the wheel hub contained ball bearings and was lubricated by splash from the differential. It seems oddly out-of-place in the hub area of a Europa, as the bearings are reputed to be sealed units and the area is isolated from the transaxle by U-joints. It did keep the hub from sticking to the stub-axle spline, but anti-seize should do that, as there is no lubrication required. It only took a couple of minutes to press out the dinky stock wheel studs. I will have to grind the heads on the half-inch bolts with which I am replacing them, to clear a brake-shoe spring. There is room to install the spring on the back side of the shoes, but I fear that it could be a major hassle to install that spring during brake changes. I looked at the new spacers sent me by Daytune. They actually seem a bit thinner than the hammered one that is in there. This spacer can't be all that critical, as the only dimension it really controls is the fit of the brake drum over the shoes. The reMarque reprint says .375" (+/- .005) for these. One of the two I got from Daytune is .381", the other is .386". The one that was in there was .395", and did look a bit mushroomed. I am more concerned about the bearing-to-bearing spacer, as these are non-adjustable bearings and the distance between them is critical. Stop me if I am wrong here: The outer races are positioned by the alloy hub carrier, each being supported in a counterbore from opposite sides of the carrier. The inner races are separated on the stub axle by a spacer. If the spacer is too short, the tightening of the stub axle nut will cause a pre-load on the bearings which will destroy them. If the spacer is too long, the bearings will not seat solidly in their counterbores, and transitional cornering forces on the car will cause them to hammer themselves to death on the counterbore bottoms or destroy the alloy hub carrier, which could get really spendy. I suppose Chapman figured adjustable tapered roller bearings would allow too much variation in the placement of the brake drum. Nah! Any truth to the rumor that the rear bearing and spacer setup is all Sunbeam Imp? See the quote from a Lotus Ltd reMarque reprint at the end of this message for bearing and spacer lore. One thing that startles me is that the two bearing-to-bearing spacers sent me by Daytune are obviously different lengths, even though both are supposed to be part number X046D0148Z. I didn't notice this until now. The reMarque reprint says it should be 2.125" (+/- .005). One of the new ones is smack on 2.125", the other is smack on 2.000". The one that came out of my hub carrier is 2.075"! A former owner told me that one stub axle had been machined to 30mm to use the more-readily-available Twin Cam inner bearing. He did not know it for a while and couldn't understand the bearing problems he had been having. He eventually replaced it with the 30mm bearing. (I believe both of Cory Carpenter's stub axles have been so modified.) This must be the right side, as this left-side one still measures 31mm at the inner bearing. The stub axle did not want to come out of the bearings and alloy hub carrier. I figured I did not want to damage anything, so I put the assembly on the bench, held it by hand and whacked the end of the stub axle with a plastic-faced hammer. Repeatedly. Nothing. OK, I will take a few small taps on it with a brass hammer. Nothing. So I walked away. The next night I carefully used a big puller, and it came right out. The inner bearing stayed stuck on the stub axle. The outer bearing came out of the alloy hub carrier easily. I put it back on the stub axle in the same direction. Are these bearings directional? I can't tell. Cory Carpenter warns "don't use the hub nut to pull the bearings into the housing, as this can result in stripped threads (as I found out to my detriment)". I take this to mean that the bearings fit really tightly into the alloy hub carrier. I understand this. If they were to spin in there, it would be a really expensive noise. But mine are not that tight. I should mike them and check for play. Once you have it all apart, what about putting it together? How can you be sure you have the bearing-to-bearing spacer exactly the right length? Plasti-gage? Start with it just a little long, Plasti-gage it, then have it ground to length? How about putting the bearings, spacers, wheel hub, washer and nut on the stub axle without the alloy hub carrier and tightening it up. Then you could measure the distance between the outer races and the distance between the counterbores in the alloy hub carrier. The difference between these two measurements is the change in length needed for the bearing-to-bearing spacer. What am I forgetting here?


more from Cory, 4-21-93 Andyh apparently said: The factory manual says that you use stud and bearing mount (Loctite Red) on the splines to keep the hardened splines from trashing the \alloy hub. I believe this is critical. I don't think so. See section "G" of the shop manual (Hubs, wheels, tyres). Under Additional Information, the following appears in my manual:


G.7 - Rear Hubs


Commencing at chassis no. 0218, selective assembly has been adopted in production to ensure a good fit between hub and shaft. It should be noted that the L/H hub is most susceptible to loosening, therefore a rotational free play NOT XCEEDING .005 in. (.127 mm) measured at the wheel stud, should be maintained between the hub and shaft. Smear faces of tab-washer with Loctite 'AV' and tighten the hub nut to the torque loading given in "Technical Data."

I now believe that to be the case. I have measured the gap between them and come up with the same 2.075" as the spacer. This means, of course that the inner and outer races of the bearings are the same thickness. This makes sense. The the distance between the counterbores is just a few thousandths less than the spacer. I think the original spacer and counter bore distance was 2.125", but there is one side that was worn down buy a spun bearing.


****************************************************************
1. Can the uprights exert side loading on the bearings? Let me just repeat a diagram so that we have some context:

\This is a representation of the real suspension:


\
\ --><-----><-o======= halfshaft & stub axle

\ |

\ | upright

\ |

\ ____________0 lower control arm

\
\Now simplify this to:

\
\ ============O===========

\ |

\ |

\ |

\ A____________o

\
\=== is a shaft

\O is a bushing free to slide on the shaft

\| is an arm connected to the bushing

\o is a pivot

\____ is an arm connected to the first arm.

\
\If we apply a force at A, what will we see at O? We will see the same force. Ergo, the bearing carrier can transmit side loadings. Is this simplification correct? I think that ignoring the pivoting of the U joints is valid if we want only to discuss the horizontal forces on the bushing. It is sort of like assuming that in the pivoted case, any torque will be countered.

****************************************************************
2. Do they exert side loading? Phil's analysis is best summed up (for me at least) by these paragraphs: OK, what if I cut out the middlemen. Simply take a foot ruler out of your desk right now. Hold it vertically with the 12" end down. Put the 11" mark on the edge of your desk. Push away from you at the 6" mark, and pull back towards you at the top. The top is the wheel center, the 11" mark is the road, and the 6" mark is the lower control arm. Notice you are pushing harder at the 6" than at the top. The force you are putting on the desk is the total force from both your hands. Lots of it cancels out. >Every car with upper and lower control arms is like this. On the outside suspension in a corner, the lower control arm is in compression, the upper one is in tension. The only thing confusing this situation is that the upper arm is rotating and separated from the spindle by bearings. Those bearings have to transmit lateral force. They are lucky, and only have to do about 25% of the work. The lowers get stuck with 125% of the work, because in addition to doing their own, they have to cancel out the 25% the uppers are doing the other way.

I think that we need to consider the downward force on the tires as well: The resultant force vector, at 1g, would be 45 degrees up into the suspension. This modifies the ruler model so that instead of just pushing/pulling horizontally at the top and 6" marks, we need to do something different so that there is a normal force equal to the lateral force. (Phil's model is right if the car was flipped up (sort of on its door) and supported by the middle of the tire tread.) New diagram:


--------><=O========
| I
| I
-----------o I
I
I
\
\
\ <-- this is supposed to be a 45 degree force vector


I've added I's to represent the tire and wheel, down to its center of pressure.


>From o up to O, out = and down I, can be considered a solid unit. This unit pivots about ><. If the extension of the force vector passes left of ><, the lower control arm is in compression; to the right, the control arm is in tension. The closer it passes to ><, the smaller the magnitude of the tension/compression. The stress in the control arm is exactly the side loading of the bearings on the alloy carrier. Now we need somebody with a tape measure. I'd bet that the design places the vector outside the pivot up to 1.2g. That lower control arm just isn't that beefy and I have an adjustable pair with 5/8" rod ends that wouldn't like lots of compression.


****************************************************************

3. How much load is on the spacer and where is it coming from? I'm now confused on this one.


PHIL writes: I'll get to this when I have time, which is not now, but I do suggest you drop the vertical gravitation out of the equation. Virtually all of it is taken by the coilover unit, which is jointed on each end and takes no horizontal force at all. The bearings don't get any lateral force from gravity, so it is just a confusion factor. Ok, they get some due to the offset of the shock mount. I am starting to think that the bearings may not be taking the side force I described. It is clear that there is tension on the halfshaft and U-joints.

JerTigger@aol.com In a message dated 7/7/99 11:49:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM writes: I pulled the assembly through the hub mostly by hand, except for maybe the last quarter inch. I figured, just put the hub back on and when I crank down the big nut it will pull everything tight. Well, silly me, 450 lbs of impact wrench won't budge a thing. Is there some trick to this?


Are your bearings the same dimension as the old ones? sounds like one of the bearings or both have too wide races or they are not set in the same depth as the old ones, the inner side of shaft has a seal and steel ring , hanging up? I had to use a pipe nipple as a spacer when I used the nut to pull the shaft through the hub assembly.

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> Thanks for all of the suggestions - yesterday I was able to get both shafts installed to my satisfaction. It turned out to be a combination of several problems, I think. First, I did not realize that there is supposed to be a small gap between the outer face of the yoke on the outboard shaft and the inner face of the trailing arm. I was expecting the outboard shaft to end up further outwards than it really is supposed to - I guess that's why I need a digital camera to take pictures with when I take things apart! Also, I suspect that there may have been some bit of extra metal or rust that I was hanging up on. I cleaned up everything with a ScotchBrite pad and things went together more smoothly. Finally, I think it is important to pull the stub axle tight before putting the hub back on, and not try to assemble it all at once. At least I had much better luck this way. I used a short section of plumbing pipe and a couple of large "mechanical bearings" from Ace Hardware. I have not Loctite'd yet, but will after I have let it settle in a bit (as dave bean's catalog suggests). I have not decided whether or not to use the tab washer; for now it is in there. The sadder new is that now that the axles are back in I could shim the output yokes and try it out. Unfortunately, no amount of shimming is going to fix up my transaxle, so Mark MarKell and I pulled it yesterday (not a bad job with two people). I am taking it to a local Renault specialist next week to see what they can do.

DRIVE SHAFT, Removal

ClassMaker@aol.com dinardo@en.com writes: > Removed inboard u-joint & used a gear puller & the yoke still wouldn't budge.. I'm hessitant to apply heat to the yoke because of the diff. seal. Anyone have a suggestions ?

Buy new seals. Set up the gear puller and add some heat. It is not uncommon to find a yoke with red or green LocTite on it... to make up for some slop or wear. New seals are in order anyway... you wouldn't want to do it again sometime soon, just because the seals decided to leak next month! Don't overcook it. Just warm it enough to release it. Check the yoke to make sure you didn't stretch the cup holes for the u-joints. But, if the yoke splines are worn badly... better find a new yoke instead. Finally, use top quality u-joints. Hardy Spicer, or NEAPCO. With or without grease nipples. Just don't forget to pack the new cups with good grease (I suggest AMSOIL synthetic). As shipped, they only have a light assembly grease.

ELECTRICAL, Alternator

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa TC charging circuit help needed Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 21:27:35 –0700 JerTigger@aol.com wrote: I recently put the instruments back in the car. When I start the car and run it about 1000 rpm the charge indicator lite is on and the ammeter doesn't budge. Rev the car up to about 2000rpm then charge lite goes out and ammeter shows charge. Let car back down to 1000 rpm and lower it still charges. Shut car off restart and it doesn't charge again until it revs up again. I don't know how it worked before as the old ammeter was bad and I had to have the alternator repaired I don't think the charging lite worked before either.

Jerry, which alternator do you have on yours? Lucas (yuck) or the Delco? Mine came stock with the Delco, and seems to behave itself. I understand some of the Lucas type get mixed up and some get the lower rpm versions. If Lucas, check the S/N or Model No. to see if its the right one.

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> If you are not familiar with the voltage regulator, I would take the whole alternator to your local auto parts store, as most will check it out for free (in US, anyway). I don't know if they will give you a diagnosis, but it may tell you something. You can try to bypass the VR, to see if it will charge below 2000 RPM, but I am not familiar with the Lucas design (some switch the ground and others switch the positive supply to the rotor).

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> The TC Delco one has a solid state one. But different from the typical Chevy/GM alternator one. I understand you can swap them though, I think there is a Lotus Ltd article in their Europa manual. The fact that he can charge at the lower rpm following a high rpm burst may suggest loose/broken connection somewhere also. They come apart rather easily, and have internal connections which could be suspect.

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-SP)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> I agree that the external connections could be loose, but if it is like the typical GM alternator, the internal connections are bolted, which IMHO would be less prone to vibration/loose connections.

ELECTRICAL, Diagnosis

While it's running, check all wiring & connections for hot spots. When you find a warm wire, replace it with a heavier one. When you find a hot connection, re-do until it isn't. Also, the relay may be the culprit - what's the amp
rating? Are the contacts themselves getting warm? It's got to be one of the above, even if you have to trace the
wiring a ways... Pete Blackford

How is your grounding scheme? Have you run a fat wire from the battery directly to the fan to test the wiring, or measured the voltage at the fan while it is running? Voltage losses in the wiring would affect the fan speed. I mention it because my battery is up front and grounded to the car at a bolt on the front right corner of the frame. This Spring I cleaned that one ground contact and have totally transformed the starting behavior of the car. Ken Landaiche

ELECTRICAL, Ground

EUROPA7T@aol.com Subject: B-B-b-bad Horn (U) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 03:20:27 EST
>Steve Shipley wrote: Everything works. I'd never have figured out the bad ground that kept the horn from working. And now I've got a tach, speedo, and hand brake.

>and Harald Freise wrote: I have been wrestling with an intermittent bad ground on the steering column of 54/2713. I found that the electrical ground for the horn is actually the steering shaft itself, carried by the steering rack to the chassis. The horn is functional only when the gear, on the end of the steering shaft, makes contact with the rack. Over the years I suppose that the rack or gear has seen better days. I haven't tried fooling with the shims yet as the car seems to steer quite well with no slop in the system. I have as yet to figure out how to complete the circuit short of R&R the steering rack and rebuilding it. I don't really want to add another electrical ground wire to the system either as this is only a short term solution. Any pearls of wisdom from the combined wisdom of the Net?


I too have a problem with the horn on my Europa. I traced the missing ground to the U-joint at the bottom of the column. In talking to guys at the last GGLC meeting, I determined there is a ground strap around said joint. Needless to say it must have broken and fallen off, as I can see no trace of it. It's been awhile since I looked at this, but my reaction at the time was; how do I get to this thing. My question for the experienced group is: how does one go about making this repair. Does the column have to be removed to get to the U-joint, or does the rack and column have to be loosened and slid forward. In other words, what's the deal? I need pearls of wisdom also. TIA also Tom Carney 70 Else Europa Burlingame, CA, USA

Tom Rollins <tom@ntcs-inc.com> I don't know about all of these Items, but there is one thing I ran into when working on my front suspension that might help. The front wiring harness grounds into the front skid plate that covers the gap between the nose underside, and the "T" section of the frame. Since the ground wire connects to the plate, and the plate to the chassis, you have to make sure you have a good connection. After I repainted my front suspension parts, including the front skid plate, my lights, front fan, turn signals and dash indicators didn't work properly. I ended up sanding the paint off of the ground connection and one of the bolt holes and then assembled with dielectric grease. I also ran into similar grounding problems after reinstalling my engine and gearbox. I think that many of your problems might be traced to bad connections/grounds. Tom Rollins 1974 Lotus Europa Special 4158R

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> MANY, if not most, of the electrical problems in these cars are caused by bad grounds due to the annoying notion of the time that the chassis was a fine grounding point. I had similar problems as you've described and spent a half day with a Dremel and rotary brush just cleaning connections, including the inside surfaces of each and every light socket and push on connector. The rear lights in the S1 had been factory wired with the ground going to the light mounting bolt and ignored the grounding tab directly beside it. None of those lights worked, but all worked after fixing the ground. The flashers may start to work fine once the lights themselves work, as they depend on the proper number and size bulbs being attached in each circuit. Too few and no flashing occurs, too many and the flash rate is very high. Don't even worry about either the flashers or hazard lights till after all lamps work. Remove the flasher (make a drawing if it's not in a socket!) until all the lamps are working. Then if it doesn't work replace the flasher last. Dashboard problems are also often grounding problems as the instrument grounds are often attached to the instrument mounting screws instead of grounding ears. The tach, at least, has a separate grounding ear that may need cleaning. The car originally had a small horn forward. The air horns were probably an aftermarket addition and may or may not have eliminated the original. It's a good idea to run air horns through a relay to save the horn button contacts, so look for one and see what was done. A quick and dirty method of looking for grounding problems is to get about 10 feet of heavy (18 ga) stranded wire and attach one end SOLIDLY to the negative terminal at the battery. Then go around testing things and manually ground metallic parts of things that don't work such as the window motor, the rim of instruments or the case of taillight pods. Any change of operation implies a bad ground somewhere. It's really important to realize that bad connections often only appear bad when significant current is being passed through them. Either a power or a ground connection may look fine with a meter until the circuit is energized, so test with the appliance in question turned on and a voltmeter rather than using the ohmmeter on a dead circuit. Those points that are on the ground side of any appliance will read a higher voltage under load if the ground is bad as the ground point is 'floating'. BTW, someone mentioned dielectric grease. If your local parts dealer doesn't have any (or know what it is) just try a local electrical contractor or electrical supply store (non-automotive) as it's commonly used in house wiring (by code requirement) on high current aluminum wiring at residence entry.

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-SP)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> Head lights and front markers use a common ground (on my S2 anyway), which is usually attached to the steering column bracket, so first thing would be to check for corrosion, etc. Also check the little bullet connectors up underneath the front section (removing the bonnet makes this easier, but is a two person job, unless you are very careful, or rig a rope up to your garage ceiling). You can also run a wire directly from the negative battery terminal to the ground wires (black) to test if the problem lies with the positive or negative side. The bulkhead light (interior) uses pin switches on the doors which supply ground. First check the bulb, then the pin switches. They get corroded and do not make good contact...you can sometimes get them to work with a wire brush. Does yours have a manual on/off switch? If so, and if it still doesn't work, supect the bulb, or positive supply. Also, the PO may have disconnected them, in a poor attempt to disable the chime/buzzer.

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> Anyway, my Europa had EXACTLY the same problem. It came from a bad ground and/or connections in the front. The main ground was attached to the temp sensor/plug in the radiator. I haven't permenately fixed mine yet, but I have found the problem. Try hooking a suitable wire (14 Gauge, at least!) to the neg. terminal of the battery and putting an aligator clip on the other end. Make your lead long enough to reach to the front of the car. Look for black wires that aren't connected and try hooking the test wire to them...but one at a time. Also, try unhooking the bullet connectors and removing oxidation from them. Put dielectric grease on them before you reconnect them! Hope this helps!

From: Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> The front electrical ground(s) does indeed clamp to the closing plate,
however, you might want to run a #10 black ground wire from the closing plate ground to the instrument ground to the rear frame ground at the diagnal braces. This functionally bypasses the frame ground and will help keep things running better, longer. Also, when attaching the ground in the front, you will need to grind down to bare metal around the hole, then use anti corrosion paste and clamp things together. The paste will keep things from corroding and rusting. Then if you like, you can spray paint over it if you wish. I used SS 1/4 inch bolts and nuts to minimize corrosive action up there, as it does really get wet if you get caught in a rain storm.

ELECTRICAL, Regulator

ClassMaker@aol.com In a message dated 4/19/99 11:35:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov writes: > What might cause this? Ive cleaned the relay contacts in the regulator, and > checked the main wires and terminals for corrosion, etc


I used to have the same problem, in my 1970 Europa S2, then in my 1976 Elite 503. (I think it is rough modulation in the regulator.) I simply *replaced* the regulator. It was generic, cheap, under $10. On the Europa, I'm actually on my third regulator, counting the original, factory unit. Those contacts don't hold up forever. My Elite uses the Chrysler alternator & regulator (also 3 terminals, but solid state, no relay points). A *good* solid-state regulator (Borg Warner) cost me more... over $20, IIRC -- but it works well. hope this helps, ken ritchie atlanta

The first one was a MOPAR (Chrysler) compatible brand-X tin can on the parts rack at JCPenney (JCP automotive long gone. Sold out to Firestone.) The JCP part # 1730 is probably no good, but the cross-reference was for a "1961 to 1969 Chrysler/Plymouth with standard alternator." When that one got rusted/pitted, even the alternator needle oscillated. Second one came from who-knows-where, but a much nicer quality unit. That one is still going (and I replaced the power relay at the same time). So, I haven't tried a solid state unit yet. Atlernator is familiar, Motorola. cheers, ken

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> I had a regulator failure and ended up going to the local auto parts
jobber. I wanted a direct replacement for the unit that failed in the car. I ended up with a Wilson #62-03-2600 which certainly looks the part. Additional markings on the body are M107 71941A C524. Black body about 2.5" x 1.5" x 1 3/4", one terminal for FLD, the other for IGN with a base ground. I thought it was NOS mechanical unit with a coil and contacts but, curious me, peeked inside and found the guts to be simple electronics. I remember that they were very inexpensive @ CDN$10.40 each last year. The cross reference is early '60's Chrysler products and was intended to be installed on the firewall. The fluorescent orange warning label has all sorts of Warnings about proper grounding of the base but including: "DO NOT ATTEMPT TO POLARIZE a charging system that uses an alternator." This HAS to be old technology! :0 Harald

ELECTRICAL, Replacement switches

I found almost all comparable Europa switches at a marine (Boat US Marine Center) supply store. They are a little glossier than the ones that came out of the car, but after 27 years who knows what they may have look like originally. There are a wide variety of switch options - momentary rocker, on-off, on-off-on. They look identical and are the same size as the originals in my S2. Briggs Pletcher

ELECTIRCAL, Window motors

From: g ford <gmfmo@mweb.co.za> This explanation of my problem which was self inflicted may stop others repeating my stupidity. The Motor has 2 spade lugs on it. It is a split series motor. Each lug is connected to either end of the field coil. The switching is arranged to put power on to one coil end for up and the other end for down. return current path is via the armature and the earth of the motor case. Powering up both ends of the coil is virtually a dead short. This results in burnt finger and flash marks on my everyday car battery terminals. When all else fails read the book !

ELECTRICAL, Wiring color coding

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Electrical Problems Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 20:49:17 -0700
Aaron Hines wrote: 1) When the key is turned to the 'I' position, the small indicators between the tach and speedo come on like the lights are on. But the lights aren't on. The front and side indicators light up (outside), but nothing else.

Sounds like the lights are feeding back thru other devices to find a ground. Also, the light switch is probably not all the way off. It is a two stage switch, you pull it out for parking lights, then twist clockwise and pull it out further for the main lights. It is probably in mid position. See the owners manual for a full description.

> 2) When you turn on the lights, the rest of the dashboard lights come on, but the indicators go off, along with the outside indicators on the front. The rear indicators come on like they should. Brake lights do work at all times.


Fix the grounding problems first, (the closing plate in the front) or jumper the ground to the frame to test things).

> 3) When I try to activate the horn, I hear a high pitched tone coming from under the driver's side dash. Also, a light behind where the ash tray should be comes on. The same happens when you try to flash the high beams.

The light behind the dash is probably a dash light which is located above the defroster/heater knobs. It usually slips down when fooling around with the wiring. Check the electrical section of the workshop manual, it shows the light and how/where it should be located. The tone under the drivers side could be the windshield washer motor, sounds like someone has switched the horn/washer motor wiring.

> 4) There is still a loud tone that comes from a peizo-buzzer when the bottom fuse is in. If I unplug the wires going to the buzzer, almost everything stops working.



What color wires come from the bottom fuse? As I recall:

Green is for the ignition switch items

Purple is for the always hot items (door light, buzzer, etc.)

Red is for accessory lighting

>5) There seems to be another horn (electric) wired into the nose in front of the driver's side wheel. Is that original?

Yes, really a poor attempt at a horn.


> I can't find anything about it in the workshop manual. The air horns make a click when all the fuses are in, but there is that annoying sound from the buzzer...


The air horns were an option. They have a small motor which powers them, sounds like the motor needs to be freed up.

>6) The turn signals don't work. They make a click from a relay somewhere, but thats all. The hazards don't do anything at all.


The two flashers are behind the dash, just above the frame, in the center of the car. They are small square and aluminum colored. You can still buy them, one was bad on my car too.

>7) The fan in the front of the car stopped working when I put the in-line fuse in for the radio. At least the radio sounds great...


The ground is missing for the fan (closing plate), when that is restored, it should return to functioning.


> 8) The passenger's side window doesn't roll down. I've checked the swith (which is fine) and the ammeter on the dash doesn't show any current when the switch is pressed. Doesn't work with all the fuses in, either.


Check for broken/unhooked wiring. Test the circuit for continuity with your multimeter, when you push the switch. Could be something simple. Just chase the wires, the problem should surface. Bottom line, pull the door panel, and pull the connections off the window motor, and see if you are getting 12 volts there. Could be another grounding problem also, the ground is connected to the bar which serves as the lower part of the dash.

>BTW, how do I remove the wiring for the seat belt light and switches?

That might be one of the problems. Its an involved system, there is an interlock for the ignition, buzzer, seat switches, seat belt switches, etc. There is a smiths "black box" above your left foot on the drivers side, mounted on the fwd bulkhead. Remove that, and trace all the wiring and remove them also. It can get involved. I did it to mine, but I had the console out, the seats out, and the engine out at the time. I hand traced all the wiring also. IIRC the only change, besides removing the wiring and box, was to tie the yellow/red wire from the relay next to the engine to the white/red wire from the ignition/start contact. The relay connects the battery (brown) to the solenoid hot (white/red) side.


If you have autosketch I can send you wiring diagrams next week, before and after.

ELECTRICAL, Wiring diagrams

ClassMaker@aol.com Subject: Tech article - Lucas colours IN COLOR Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 13:56:58 EDT
I found a way-cool *colorized* colour code chart, a derivative of the Dimebank info, from an MG nut...
http://www.mgb.bc.ca/service/lucas-colours.html "Lucas Wiring Guide" -- that chart, printed in color, is the best version I've seen yet. They also list the address for British Wiring Inc (in Illinois, USA) and a couple other vendors for appropriate wires.

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Subject: RE: Electrical Problems Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 21:52:42 -0700
I have replaced several Lotus harnesses with new reproductions when the existing harness was baked/burned/hacked sufficiently to warrant new, but the majority of the time spent was actually in repairs to "appliances": corroded contacts in lamps and connectors, diagnosis of faults extraneous to the harness itself, innumerable PO "fixes", etc etc. In other words, electrical malfunctions are rarely attributable to the harness itself unless it had experienced a meltdown (caused by an extraneous short) and/or bad previous repair attempts. So a new harness, whether original spec or home-made, is probably not necessary and certainly not the efficient approach in Aaron's case. Note that Lucas color-coded wire and bullet connectors, lamp plugs, grommets, harness tape, clips & sundries are all available for authentic repairs. My favorite supplier (in North America) is British Wiring near Chicago, phone 708-481-9050. They also stock harnesses for Elans, Europas
and some other Lotuses.

JerTigger@aol.com When I got my car I had the same problems with the electrical system. The first thing I did was stand on my head and try to figure out the electrtical system Ha Ha what a joke!! A suggestion is first to get the repair manual theere are wiring diagrams in it that are very close. Gave me a good start. Then I removed the dash so I could see what I had. Lots of extra wires. Hooked up everything without the dash got out my test light and VOM It is amazing how much easier to trouble shoot if you can see. Get Numbered wire markers before you start, also ran a new 6 gauge ground wire up from the battery and r grounded everything in front.


daren stone <
dastone@cisco.com> Subject: Great US source for wiring, was: Europa wiring Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 10:50:25 –0700 For those of you who've seen John Zender's Europa in its latest incarnation you may have noticed that the wiring harness has the application embossed every 4 inches on each wire (ex:headlights, brake lights, etc.). Thus, in addition to being color-coded, you don't need a schematic to know what wire goes where. John got this wire from a place I found at one of the local Hot Rod shows, which in addition to selling the wire in bulk, they will happily make up a kit for you to re-wire the entire car. Having installed one of these kits on an heavily modified old truck I have, I have to say their quality is top-notch.


Enos Custom Components

840A Capitolio Way

San Luis Obispo, Calif. 93401 USA

Note: although they do have standard colors for each of the applications, they will make up custom color/application wires upon request.

ENGINE, Alternative

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> I have a type 65 with an 807-13 Gordini. I will tell you that it is not a one-for-one switch. There are a few minor differences. The Gordini engines are from front engine cars. The R16 was also for a front engine car but all the modifications were done by Renault and Lotus. The Gordini still has some pulleys that need to be removed and sealed. The battery will need to be moved because the carbs or fuel injection will interfere. I did find that the header I installed has more room and has much more clearance from the starter than in the R16. I advise anyone who wants to install a header on an R16 motor to either buy a starter shield or some header wrap. When a header is installed on an R16 engine, it almost touches the starter and is
very hot. It will actually cause the starter to overheat and it will not work until it cools. The Gordini will bolt right to the 336 transmission without any modifications. Also, I think that it is possible to bolt a Gordini head to an R16 but I think some modifications may be necessary. I think that the crossflow head will also help the engine run a little cooler. Finally, the stock 807-13 engine puts out 120hp. I changed pistons, valves, cam and added a header and should be able to show at least 130hp which is the main reason I and others have made the switch. I must also say that I don't have the skills to perform an engine rebuild myself and have paid a professional racecar fabricator to do the work. He doesn't take any shortcuts and everything that can be replaced with new parts has been done. The result is an engine that looks new and is very well built but very expensive.

My type 54 flamer car is running an 1830cc Cosworth BDR at around 160-180HP (never dyno'd it) with an Turbo Fuego transaxle (NG3). The 365 should also be able to handle this power with no problem, but the NG3 is probably good to 260-280. I installed a TC chassis in the car to make the engine swap easy. You can also fit it into an early chassis, but you will proably have to notch the "Y" to clear the oil pump. It's a great motor. Lots of low end torque, and it screams on top. It also looks correct in the car being of the same vintage. My car is running cast iron crank and rods so is limited to about 7000 RPM. Rebuilds are extremely expensive and of course it's an old-tech motor. I'm considering updating to a Ford Z-tech 2 liter since it's more modern, less leaky, and more dependable. My only problem with the Z-tech is that it doesn't look quite correct in the car being a modern design. The Toyota motor is probably a great choice too, but I'd never consider a Jap motor in my car - it just ain't right!

A slight correction on my last note. My BDR in the Flamer is 1730cc (not 1830). Also, everyone is talking about how much HP a tranny will take. Remember, the strength of a tranny is actually determined by the amount of torque it will handle. A highly tuned 1600 or 1800cc 4cyl with 300+ hp probably doesn't have enough torque to snap an NG3. John Zender

> Can anyone tell me what Zetec engine will fit a 73 TC Special. Mike Greco 73 TC 2812R
To my knowledge they all will fit. Joe 3927R

Ken Landaiche wrote: > With all of the talk about changing carbs to get more power, I haven't heard about installing some of the old race engines like the BDA. I believe that engine was one of a series. What's the scoop with these?

There were indeed a number of Cosworth BDx engines. The BDA preceded the Toyota engine in Formula Atlantic, so there's a healthy population of cores out there. Chris O'Donnell has a BDx (I believe BDA) in his once-dominant D Modified Elan, Karen and Ron Babb have a BDP in their more recently competitive D Mod Elan, and a number of other Lotus competitors in D Mod run these engines. They have found their way into a number of Sevens used for various types of competition. The BDA, like the Lotus Twin Cam, was based on the Ford Kent block. As time went on, Cosworth developed an alloy block, but that engine is still physically compatible with ex-Ford applications, ergo it's a bolt-up in a Lotus that had a Twink originally. You might have second thoughts about a conversion if you saw what an overhaul on one of these engines costs these days. A much less expensive and physically compatible alternative is a Toyota 4AGE engine, which was based on the BDA. Jay Mitchell

I have seen and taken pictures of John's "Ultimate Europa" and among other mods he does indeed have a BDA installed. The alternator powered by a pulley connected to the intake cam. Here is the link to the article about
his car:
http://www.gglotus.org/ggtech/ultieuropa.htm John Hammond Houston

Here is a link I found with some info on the 4A-GE and its relatives. http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/phil.bradshaw/4AGE%20into%20RWD.htm Although it mentions the BDA, it lacks usefull comparison information. Interesting in its own right however. Perhaps Jay has more/better information. Tom Rollins

Try this: http://www.onthenet.com.au/~billzila/4agstock.htm and this: http://www.club4ag.com/ Jay Mithell

EINGINE, Camshaft replacement

Good news! The R16 cam has been reground to Isky Gordini Cam specs and ships out tomorrow 2nd day UPS. To recap...the original Gordini cam broke a tooth when we turned the engine. So we sent the original R16 cam to Isky and they were able to regrind it to Gordini specs. Maybe I'll make to to British Motorcar Day afterall. Jeff Hovis JeffH@biowhittaker.com

ENGINE, Camshaft & lifter wear

ClassMaker@aol.com paulzielinski@juno.com writes: > So I ran the motor three minutes today at 1500-2000 RPM. This is good. LUNATI's Tech Note # 4 (on Camshaft and Lifter Wear) has big red letters warning: Do NOT let the engine go below 1500 RPM during the break-in period! (They also describe break-in procedures, a 30 to 45 minute series of running cycles, varying speeds.) http://www.dragnbreath.com/LunatiRacing/Lindex.html (frames) Then go to "technical info" and pick "How to Prevent Camshaft and Lifter Wear" --or-- go straight to unframed page... http://www.dragnbreath.com/LunatiRacing/TechNotes/TN4CamLiftWear.html I didn't have this info when I rebuilt mine, and it has survived many years and many miles. They explain why reusing the old lifters (with a new cam) is also a "no-no" (I may have done that, too).

ENGINE, Crossover tubes

My Europa came to me without the crossover tubes so i can't offer a comparison. But reports are that removing the tubes and blanking the port they connect to, then removing the secondary butterflies makes just-off-idle performance much better. With the tubes, the air/fuel from the carbs has to travel quite a distance before reaching the engine. It makes sense as well. I'd do it given everything I have heard. So please report the differences if you make the mods. Ken Landaiche Sebastopol, CA

You're on your own. The tubes' port on the intake manifold just needs an aluminum cover plate. You might be able to unscrew the secondary butterflies from their shaft. Then you won't have to plug the shaft holes.

>> 5) While looking at the engine, I noticed two breather tubes that run from the exhaust manifold to the intake manifold. What does that do? I thought you didn't want exhaust gas in the intake.<<


This is a fuel preheat to get the fuel vaporized before it goes into the intake. Emission control ala 70s. At low throttle levels the fuel is routed through the spacer you see between the head and the carbs, through the tube over the head, through a chamber (?) in the exhaust manifold where it is heated, back through the other tube to the intake manifold spacer and then to the head. The spacer contains butterfly valves that separate the in and out of the fuel mixture. At larger throttle openings the bypass is "cut off" by the path of least resistance and the fuel mixture flows past the butterfly valves in the spacer and is routed directly through the spacer into the head. I've heard drivability can be improved by removing and "plugging" these tubes (remove the tubes and blank off the intake side) and either removing or wiring open the butterflies. I did it on one of my cars, and many other people have done the same. Dan

"Michael Johannes Ditz" <mditz@bndlg.de> Stromberg people, I think that they did a lot of trial eand error at Hethel in those days, and I would not suggest everybody to repeat the procedure. Note that a TC with Strombergs with or without crossover pipes does not run properly with the original distributor, which was only used to satisfy the federal requirements. According to M.Wilkins a Stromderg TC does need much more advance. I would say that the crosspipes work as a big air leak at idling. It is not the length of the duct that is wrong, for it was retained in the domestic setting. By the way the setting is the one of the Stromberg Elan S3, which, with steeper cam and higher compression, proved almost as fast as the later domestic Sprints on Webers. With no air leaks the car runs fantasticly until the damper oil is approx half way gone, and can be adjusted down to 1.5 CO, best at 2.5 CO.

"Robert D. LaMoreaux" <Rob_LaMoreaux@compuserve.com> Subject: RE:Cross over pipe removal Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:24:10 –0500 >As a test I disconnected the linkeage for the crossover butterflies and wired them
>fully open. By doing that I had a hard time keeping it running. What am I missing? What other adjustments need to be made to the carbs etc?

My engine did not come with the stock manifold so the crossover pipes are useless. The butterflies had also been removed. If it is idle that is the problem you might block off the vaccum going to the vaccum retard on the distributor. I replaced the needles and springs with the european spec ones, and I am making a closing plate to block off the pipes going over to the exhaust side. I've talked to a number of people who said the easiest thing is to go to european spec with the crossover adapter kept in.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Cross over pipe removal Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:11:39 –0800 References: <e4.e431a1.25c398ec@cs.com> 001801bf6a3e$a9d9c0c0$f7cf5fc2@bologna I'm trying to tune my stromber CDs also. I've installed new seats (fixed) and new needles (adj) and am using the color tune method, however, am still unsure of the outcome. I have the weaker springs (natural color) which are new, installed grose jets, and a pressure regulator. I think it is running a little lean, as the plugs show a light tan on the electrode, but the tip of the electrode shows like a blistering. The insulator is clean, white almost a rose color. The plugs are NGKs. The car runs fine, seems to pull fine, no missing, recent rebuild. I can't do the lift the piston test, as it continually reacts like it is too lean. If I install stiffer springs (reds) I can balance the lifting the piston routine, and the plugs will go to a tan color, but it seems to run rich on the top end, when crusing. I am thinking of buying a CO tester, but can't correlate the CO mix to A/F ratio.

Michael Johannes Ditz <mditz@bndlg.de> Re: [lotuseuropa] Cross over pipe removal Sunday, January 30, 2000 12:21 PM As I did the mods some years ago, I can give only vage descriptions. I went to England and bought the parts for little money, because the British detest the Stromberg cars. You can get a head for as little as 100 Pounds. So I got the duct with the upper ballance pipe and the 40953 distributor for 90 Pounds. Plus a red camcover with the holes to fix the trottle cable for 80 Pounds. So get them before they are all thrown away. I kept the original Strombergs with the fixed needle and also retained the jets. My car had run 65k miles without wear at that point. I changed the needles to 2 BAR floating (readily available) and kept the natural springs. As it is in the original drawings, I added a second starting device to the posterior carb, which helps starting considerably, but makes the choke very stiff to operate. Then I went through a nightmare with air leaks, because I am a non-professional and wanted to retain the original screws and the flexible mounting. The engine used to suck the O-rings after ca 100 miles, once it did so at idling. Experts have told me later that everybody up to the early Esprits screw their carbs down as tight as the spanner would allow. After a carefull syncronisation I adjusted them by ear and ended up with a far too rich mixture. Unter CO testing the car ran properly down to 1.5, with the federal (little effect) adjustment screws "allowing" 1.0 to 6.0 CO figures. Needles and jets are flush with the Stromberg body as described in the OM. The whole thing starts at the first crank and pulls immediately. As I said, it does so untill half of the damper oil is gone. I use 20-50 engine oil as recomended. Richard (Banks) said to me once, if you have problems at tickover, try different damping liquids. But IMO there is no such influence as the smallest air leak. No chance to get the engine running.

From: ken.landaiche@nokia.com My Stromberged TC cam to me without the crossover pipes. It is otherwise
stock and can be made to run quite well. I have had the most success in tuning it by using a quad mercury vacuum gauge. Well since it has four tubes, I measured vacuum before and after the butterflies and was able to
balance the carbs very nicely. As one lister recently noted, any air leaks will kill the tune. But you can
keep the vibration isolation effect of the 0-rings without having leaks. I tightened the thackery-washered nuts to give about 2/3 the gap recommended in the manual.

ENGINE, Distributor

You don't need to take off the carbs. There is a cinch bolt/nut on the dist, just loosen that and the distributor should pop right out. It only goes back in one way, but make sure to mark it first, just so you can get it close. I would like to add: I was fearfull of pulling the distributor, when I owned my Europa Twin Cam, but it is no big deal, and sure simplifies working on the points. You need to make sure of where the ignition rotor is pointed, and which direction it turns when you pull it up. The trick would be to place the rotor in the 'spot' it was in after it moves when pulling, before reinstalling. That way, when you slide it back in, the gears meshing will turn the rotor back to where it should be. Ed & Ruth Young, Moline, IL

ENGINE, Emissions

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> Friday I took my all-stock Federal R-16 in for emissions-- it's due this month-- and it was twice the limit for hydrocarbons at idle. Last year it passed very well. So I drove it around and got back in line for a second test, tweaking the air and petrol screws, and still no luck.>

When I had to take my Europa into NJ inspections every year, it always failed emissions the first time around (until I figured out the trick). It didn't matter if I just put in new points, plugs, and overall tune-up. Since they only test at idle, I would lean out the idle mixture till the car barely ran. It would pass emissions no problem, and at which point, I may have opened it back up (I really won't admit to doing this, but somehow, it must have worked it's way loose:-)). Anyway, this was true for both the Solex carb AND the Weber downdraft replacement.

ENGINE, Fire wall insulation

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> I used some insulation called "The Insulator" from Aircraft Spruce & Specialty. The stuff is used in aircraft and is FAA approved, and said to provide "optimium" protection from heat, sound, and moisture. Good stuff... See http://www.geocities.com/aaronhines

ENGINE, Head

Or if you don't have the capability to weld, get two *long* bolts of the proper size from the hardware store. Cut off the heads. Saw a slot into the tops (for a screw driver). Grind a taper to end if you have a grinder, else file off sharp edges. Install in opposite corners of the block. Use as guide to install the head and keep the head gasket in place. In stall head bolts. Use screw driver to remove "guide bolts". Install last two head bolts. Do all the remaining steps of putting the engine back together. Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA

Tim is of course, correct. The bottom end is basic early Ford Pinto, the head is the special thing. When you talk to the machine shop, you need to make sure that they understand that the valve clearances are set by shims that reside under bucket tappets. That the valve stem heights are critical, since the shims only come in certain thicknesses. One suggestion might be to check the valve clearances before disassembly and to make a note of it for the machine shop. Also, make sure to keep all parts segregated, so that the same bucket is re-installed in the original hole. Egg cartons are perfect for such things. Make sure to tell the machine shop that valve guide knurling is a definate NO, and that bronze valve guides are available and desirable. Ed & Ruth Young

Fjcoop@aol.com Subject: Re: (U)Europa Twin cam engine rebuilding Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:59:38 EDT
One absoluete no-no concerning the head (actually 2): Do not bead blast!! Do not hot dip - cold dip only to clean it up!

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Just don't forget the oil return tube? What type of gasket sealer? I used Kopper Koat spray on this time. The well seal was OK I guess, but the copper flecks seem alittle better, especially if you have any small scratches or flaws. Important thing is not to turn the cams independently of eachother without watching for interference (bent two the last time) and make sure the pistons won't be hitting the valves when dropping the head on. And use the guide rods, it makes things so much better.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Warren Hartenstine wrote: > By the way, Jerry, I used wooden dowel rods for the guide rods. Seemed to work fine! Price was right! Was it you who cut off some bolts and cut a screw slot into the bolt shank?

>Warren, just don't forget the oil return tube? What type of gasket sealer? I used Kopper Koat spray on this time. The well seal was OK I guess, but the copper flecks seem alittle better, especially if you have any small scratches or flaws. Important thing is not to turn the cams independently of eachother without watching for interference (bent two the last time) and make sure the pistons won't be hitting the valves when dropping the head on. And use the guide rods, it makes things so much better. That is the standard way to do it, learned of it on the list/and in the manual.

ENGINE, Head gasket

Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> My trusted Renault expert recalls that the heads & head gaskets are the same, just different liners & pistons.

> From: Jean Giroux <jean.giroux@videotron.ca> In the process of assembling parts to cure an oil leak at the cylinder head of my non-federal europa (renault 697 engine, 1470cc), I'm being told that the head gasket is interchangeable with the larger bore federal europa.

ENGINE, Header ceramic coating

"Type46" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Took the Esprit header down for ceramic coating this week and in the ensuing conversation it became clear there are two general forms in use. The more common is the 'popular' coating that is cosmetically pleasing and has about 50% reflectivity, but the more functional and less pretty form has about 80% reflectivity. I opted for the latter as the main idea was to remove the heat from the left motor mount on the S1, not look showy. BTW, the coating works by reflecting the heat inward from the surface of the pipe. It doesn't reduce the heat or conduct it into the block, just delays the point at which it heats the pipe. The Catalytic converter following the header can be expected to run hotter, which actually helps its process, and the surrounding area needs to be able to accomadate that extra heat.

ENGINE, Manual

Brian.Martley@tesco.net writes: If you're going to do any work on the engine - sounds like you're heading that way - have you read/got the book by Miles Wilkins called the "Lotus Twin-Cam Engine" ? It's better than the factory manual, with lots of "how-to" bits in there and practical advice from someone who's built lots of engines.

ENGINE, Miscellaneous

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com>


>3) Do any of the parts dealers sell aluminum water lines for the twink, or should I fabricate them myself?

Clean the steel pipes with water & cat-tail brush. Have a radiator shop pressure test them when they flush out your radiator. Replacement steel tubes are expensive and your aluminum alternative would be worse, so try to preserve the originals if possible. The steel pipes will not rust any more if you re-paint the exterior of the tubes, use top-quality antifreeze with corrosion inhibitors (and flush & renew every few years), and smear a light film of Sil-glide or equivalent lube on steel/rubber hose joints to prevent electrolysis and ease removal later. New paint on parts is only as good as the preparation. If you clean rust with a wire brush, go back over it with some sandpaper to dull the metal and wipe down with lacquer thinner before painting. Ideal prep is sand or bead blasting. Special coatings on steel exhaust is nice but expensive - excellent inexpensive alternative is VHT paint in spray cans if used as directed.


>4) Would it be worth my time to take apart the head to clean it good? It looks like a lot of trouble, but it would be clean...

Machine shops have specialized cleaning solvents and equipment, and do this for a small fee. Just do not let them glass bead blast it - beads will remain behind inside passages no matter how well they think they can clean it out, and they will get into the oil and wreak havoc on the bearings, journals.


>5) When I go to buy new exaust studs, I would like to use something that won't rust. Ever heard of SS studs? Maybe I could just bolt the manifold to the head? (If you haven't noticed, I _hate_ rust with a passion)


No need to use SS studs, don't use bolts. Use steel studs, with blue Loctite into the head, coat the protruding threads and tip of studs with anti-seize paste (get a tube of this now and use it on virtually all threads except inside engine), use brass nuts or copper-plated all-metal locking nuts available from Lotus suppliers.


>Most of my time involved with this partial rebuild is going to be cleaning things good and painting the block and oil pan (oil pan might not be save-able. Its rusted really bad). Hopefully I can get the water pump and housing off by Monday, but that's probably asking too much.


For authenticity, paint the engine with NAPA Universal Gray #626 Engine Enamel.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net>

>My question is, other than changing all of the fluids what should, how should I proceed before trying to turn it over. I've heard that there are some products out there which you put in the cylinders and let it sit for a few days and then drain off that help to minimize damage on start up. Does anyone know of any?


I would remove the plugs, fill the cylinders with Kroil, or the like. Let it sit for several days- suck out the remaining oil in the cylinders - then turn it over by hand with the plugs still out. After you turn it over several times- put a bit of motor oil in the cylinders, then crank it a bit more by hand. Then I would finish draining the oil, put fresh stuff in. Crank it over (still no plugs) with the starter until you get oil pressure. Then put in plugs and fire it off. I think I would flush the fuel tanks and clean out the carbs and fuel pump before trying to start it also. If the car has been sitting in a heated garage, you probably could just put a few cc's of motor oil in each cyliner- turn it over by hadn a few times, then crank it with new oil filter with the starter. Then fire it up with the plugs in. The first method is the parinoid method, but I think you would be fine with the second, in your case. Make sure to crank the engine over with no plugs until you get oil pressure no matter what method you use. If your clutch is stuck, I have some methods that will probably work to free it.

ENGINE, Miss diagnosis

ClassMaker@aol.com Jason Rowan asked... > Jeff, Have you had any replies about your mild misfire yet? I'm interested because my car seems to have a similar problem. Mine goes away after 15 minutes of driving (long after the water temp has reached normal), and is associated with a "pinging" sound - no, the pinging isn't preignition. Pulling the choke out a bit makes it more drivable during this period, but the "pinging" doesn't go away for the same 15 minutes. After 15 minutes, the engine runs perfectly. I'm leaning towards a vacuum leak on my car. My theory is that the "pinging" noise is the sound from one combustion chamber, and the leak cures itself as things expand into place.

Hi, Jason -- vacuum leak is one possibility, but where...? Heat-sensitive, could be one runner on the intake manifold, which could affect two cylinders. Which motor, what carb(s)? Have you checked the manifold-to-head joint for good seal? If you have soft-mounts (large o-rings) under the carb(s), that is a source of a one-side leak when the o-rings are old or the Thackery washers aren't set to a good working tension. One other possibility... the intake manifold (or air filter box) usually scavenges the crankcase blow-by gasses... and as the motor reaches operating temp and the oil thins out more it can generate more blow-by... just enough to tweak the mix. Whether blow-by is oil and/or water vapor, both can have enough effect to soften a slightly-too-lean burn. Mileage? Here's most of the note I sent to Jeff, with some additions:

In a message dated 1/10/00 2:06:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jeffandtam@inficad.com writes: > Right now it misses mildly when it's not accelerating and running between 3,000 and 5,000 rpms. I've not found the problem yet.

Can you put a CO meter (Gunson or similar, or state smog check) into the tail pipe and see if it is leaning out? That might be it. You might try this... get it up to the missing point, hold it there briefly while you open up the idle mixture screw(s). What happens? If it smooths out, you've discovered a lean spot in the original mix. [[NOTE: To pass state smog checks, some folks over-lean the idle mixture adjustment screws... don't forget to open them up.]] The steady-state (no accel or decel) carburetion is a blend of three or four overlapping mixture curves...idling circuit + progression circuit + main circuit + hi-speed enrichment circuit (on Weber, thru accel jets) [[NOTE: SU & Zenith-Stromberg "constant-depression" carbs
operate under different principles, and have fewer circuits.]]. Every tuning may exhibit some lean spot where one curve
falls off just as the next one is ramping up, and together they don't quite add up to the ideal mix at that point. Usually this is found in the cross-over from progression circuit to main circuit. The auxiliary venturi has a lot to do with that, combined with the main venturi, emulsion tubes, main fuel and air corrector jets. Messy, huh? If you are running the original [[S1/S2]] Solex carb (not bad) you could easily switch to a Weber down-draft [[better!]]. Jay Mitchell has run one on stock intake manifold. The Solex might have a clogged teensy-weensy passage.

Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> Always check the obvious first - run it in the dark, & visually check to see if those new parts (wires...) are really better than the old ones... look for the telltale glow, etc. of electrons on the loose!

SJMARCY@aol.com Have you confirmed in-spec valve clearances? This can lead to all sorts of weird, variable symptoms.

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> When looking for potential air leaks, include the butterfly shaft journals. They tend to wear, get sloppy and leak air into the throat.

Tammy and Jeff <jeffandtam@inficad.com> My mild missing seems to have gone away. A day after returning to 92 octane gas. That's an obvious one if it's the real one, but I'm just glad it stopped. But also at the same time I had changed octane, I tightened an emissions hose and tweaked the idle mixture up.

ENGINE, Number

You can find the engine type number on a plate which is located at the top right angle of the cylinder bloc, above the starter (or under the exhaust manifold). Not easy to read on the car. Daniel Herrero EUROPE S2 1968 - 54/0724

Look under the thermostat, on the casting right above the motor mount attachment studs. It is stamped in large letters right into the rough casting. Funny place for numbers, which are normally stamped on a machined surface. Jerry Rude 73 Special

ENGINE, R16

From: rgvivace@aol.com In a message dated 02/29/2000 10:33:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, lotuseuropa@onelist.com writes: > Just for information sake.... What years was the R-16 imported and what
did it look like?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Renault 16 was a ground-breaking design, and European Car-of-the-Year at its introduction, principally for its unique packaging: a front drive hatchback with fold-down rear seating in a very upright and angular body. This was at a time when many small cars (apart from the Mini and Saab) still featured a rear-engine/rear-drive layout. The original years featured column stick shifting. What made its engine/transmission suitable for use in a mid-engine car was that, in front drive form, its transmission was in front of the engine, with the ancillaries above the transmission. One of the R16's least-mentioned features was its torsion bar front springing. Unlike a VW, Porsche or Saab 92, which had "over/under" bars, the R16 had longitudinally staggered bars. This resulted in one side's wheelbase being a couple of inches longer than the other! In the French manner, the R16 offered a very compliant ride, with armchair-soft seats. I test drove one when they first came to the US and remembered its steering as being very heavy and low-geared. It also had a vinyl-ly new-car smell unique to French imports like the Renault and Simca.

pboedker@image.dk> Thought I had A pic of a R16 lying around, but found instead this link:
http://www.users.wineasy.se/katriina/ Look in the Gallery in the range 1947-1997 and find the requested Renault cars there.

"Matthew Bowden" <matthew_bowden@msn.com.au> Also, if you are interested in Renault 15/17's, check out:
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/9730/Reg/main.html

John Pels <pelsfam@ev1.net> The R16TS, not available in the States was only a mild upgrade from the standard R16 (available 1965-1972). It sported a compression ratio of 8.6 to1 and 87.5 HP, torque of 90ft.lbs. of course with the cross-flow head. The R17 imported to the States from 1972-1979 I believe is the only interesting 807 series engine of interest. The injected version with 10.25 to 1 compression made I believe 115 HP. Following that model at least in the States was the Fuego which in its final iteration I believe had grown to 2.2liters and as the Turbo-Fuego I believe had about 140 HP. This is an interesting prospect as it does away with carbueration and points and uses Bosch L-Jetronic Injection, a system popular in the mid 80's, widely copied (licensed) by the Japanese. These cars sometimes still show-up in junkyards, but be advised that you should hear it run before buying. The weak link in 807, 821 and 843 engines is cam oiling. Under most circumstances the system is bulletproof. However if oil and filter are not changed regularly and trash gets onto the cam journals which are integral with the aluminum block you've bought 150 lbs of junk. At least pull the head and inspect this area before buying. Other than that the engine is infinitely rebuildable. As some of you know, my solution for a better powerplant for the S2 Europa is a conversion I am working on using the Toyota 4AGE 16v injected motor. Many aftermarket parts are available, HP to 250 in Formula Atlantic trim, and they last virtually forever. If its not going to be original it may as well be fast and reliable with a decent engine management system.

Jeff Hovis <jeffh@biowhittaker.com> r_goodburn@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [lotuseuropa] Renault 16TX
> I neeed some advice. I have just heard of a Renault 16TX for sale, 1978, 58000 miles. Is it worth buying for the engine/transaxle? Is there any difference in the fitting of the 16TX unit? If not, it looks like a cool deal. Just lift out the old, drop in the new. If there is/are differences, its not worth all the hassle?


I recently installed an 807-13 R17 with crossflow hemi head. It is not a drop in procedure. Although, the R16 engine was built for a front engine Renault car, it was specifically converted and uprated for the Europa. Any other Renault engine was built for a front engine vehicle and will require some minor modifications. There are going to be pulley's for controlling A/C and other things that will need to be removed. Also, you'll need to find a seal to close this area. After that, it is pretty straightforward and the 336 box will bolt right to the engine. You can also upgrade to an NG3 with a few mods. You can get an LOTUS alloy rocker cover from Banks that looks pretty nice.

ENGINE, Rebuild

For $10-15K I can buy a fully rebuilt race ready TC. For $5-7K I can get a blueprinted street TC. Ballpark pricing for parts - just add labor to assemble + R&R engine:


Head/valves: $1800 - 2500 (includes new valves, springs, tappets, seats; completely set up and ready to install)
Carb rebuild: $200-400

Turn/Balance Crank: $200-300

Balance Flywheel/Clutch: $100

Clean/Bore/Hone Block: $300-400

Straighten/Balance Rods: $100-200

Parts (pistons, bearings, seals, waterpump, gaskets) $600-900

Best case: $3300

Worst case: $4800


Labor will vary depending upon the care & time taken to build, degree cams, etc. If you eliminate the balancing and blueprint you can save a few dollars, but get a poorer running engine. Kiyoshi

Personally I find engine building really fun and rewarding! There is nothing like the feeling of pride & joy you get the first time a fresh engine comes alive! Definitely a MOTORHEAD kind of thing!!! There are many of us on this list that can coach you through building a TC. I would however make the following recommendations...

  1. Don't do the head rebuild yourself. There are plenty of experts out there that do great work and good prices. Do take the head to someone that's VERY familiar with the TC.
  2. The bottomend is pretty common and most any good performance oriented machinist can handle it.
  3. Have someone press in the waterpump.
  4. Do invest in having the parts balanced. Do harden the crank & rods.
  5. While it's possible that you have stuck rings which explains oil burning and low compression... it's just as possible and MORE likely that you have worn valve guides (oil burning) and burnt valve seats and/or worn rings (low compression). The later is only cured by an engine rebuild.

Rebuilding a TC engine is NOT difficult and a great education!!! In fact my daughter helped me with the rebuild on the engines in my Elan and the Lotus 41 race motor. So, if she can do it... (she probably knows more about an engine than most of the boys she hangs with!) Kiyoshi

> We are planning to fill each cylinder with 'Marvel Mystery Oil' to help free up the rings. The number 1 plug (closest to the cabin, as I later found out) had been removed, we think, because it wasn't tight. To my dismay, there was *water* in there! :-( The piston was at TDC, or close to it, so there wasn't much in there. Since the head had water sitting in it, I'm hoping the mechanics let the water in last week while they were checking the compression. Oh, by the way, they turned it over by hand, > and just checked the compression incorrectly. Luckily, all other cylinders are bone dry.


Do turn the engine over by hand. Pull all the plugs. Drop a peanut light (a small 12v light bulb into the cylinder thru plug hole. This will light up the inside of the cylinder (turn the engine to get the piston at BDC). You'll be able to look inside each cylinder and do a quick inspection of the pistons tops & cylinder walls. Look for scoring & rust on the cylinder walls, bare metal or white areas on the pistons tops. Do this before you drop oil into the cylinders.


The water is a concern. Inspect that cylinder closely. What condition is the spark plug? Do all this and then check back before continuing... Kiyoshi

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa Update Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 21:38:51 -0700
I would not recommend you send the head to anyone except a shop that does these things on a regular basis. Ask me, I just had mine done by what I thought was a "qualified" man. It took 6 months, and I had to redo the cam buckets after. Send it out.. Ask Ray at R&D or Don Tingle at Tingle Lotus..... you will be money ahead in the end.... The block, however, and pistons, etc. can be done locally. It should be done, however, by a british mechanic as the tolerences are tighter than on some american iron. The headlight problem can be traced to a bad ground, very common in all brands of cars. The "MOST" you can bore a TC block is .040 inch. Do not try to go further, overheating and distortion will result!!! You can sleeve the cylinders, however, but make sure you purchase the right sleeves and have them installed by a competent shop. Don't get the "cheap" sleeves most shops offer. Get them from a reputable Lotus dealer and have the machine shop install them per the instructions with the sleeves. That way, when it comes time to replace the sleeves, you can pop the old out and in with the new. Also, when doing sleeves, skim alittle from the head surface to make sure things are flat. Check the rod bores. Mine were out on one rod. It really makes a difference in oil pressure!!

ENGINE, Removal

Fjcoop@aol.com Subject: Re: Europa Engine Removal Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 12:27:55 EST In a message dated 99-03-31 09:55:05 EST, whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: > What's the best/easiest way to remove the engine?


Depending upon your facilities and equipment, you may want to strip the engine down to the block before removing it (as well as when you out it back together). This means removing the head as well. To install it, it helps to make up a couple of guides (weld some thin rod to the threads from a bolt of hte proper size to screw into the block in place of the head bolts. Much easier this way if you are doing it by yourself.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Here's the photo referred to below. http://www.micro-engineering.com/S1enginepull.jpg Sorry if the one is hard to see. Too much low contrast.

"Matthew Bowden" <matthew_bowden@msn.com.au> Aaron wrote: +>From what I saw in your pictures, you just unbolt the bell housing and engine mounts and go up, correct? Seems as easy as dropping out the bottom except you have to unbolt the transaxle/clutch housing or either take out the brace. BTW, you don't have to remove the brace holding the shocks to get it out the top do you?


Well, you'll need to move the transmission back to clear the input shaft - so you'll have drop the rear suspension, drive out the roll pins on the driveshafts and pull them clear, disconnect the gearlinkage/speedo cable/reversing light leads, release the rear gearbox mount (5 speed may be different, I'm talking 4 speed transaxle) at least. I don't know about others on the list, but I'd be tempted to pull the gearbox/engine as a complete unit, as I would say it would be just about as easy! You could then inspect the gearbox/clutch/thrust bearing/gearbox input shaft oil seal for wear and tear. Remember, always replace the gearbox input shaft oil seal when you split the engine/gearbox! It doesn't cost much, and can save a lot of heartache (and a slipping clutch) Probably the twin-cam crank oil seal would be good to check as well. I'd pull the bellhousing off the transaxle and inspect the box for visible wear/tear/water intrustion. Check the dif for missing teeth, I've seen a few
go that way with exuberant driving!

"Michael R. Downs" <mrdowns@worldnet.att.net> Hi, I've been following this thread for awhile and just have to put my 2 cents in. I bought my first Europa (a 72 Twin Cam) as a basket case with the engine disassembled, all of the brakes stuck, and many electrical problems. I was able to get the car on the road fairly quickly (about 6 months) but still had a list of problems to sort out as I drove it around. It took about 4 years and more money than I want to know about to get the car completely sorted. A Lotus project car is not for the faint of heart. That said, a Lotus project such as a Europa is a fairly simple car to work on. Everything is fairly straight forward (except for the twink water pump) and easy to get to and understand how it all works and goes together. I would highly recommend the Twin Cam book by Miles Wilkins if you plan to go through the TC. I recently went through a TC for my Elan and believe that I spent somewhere around $3k for all of the head work, machine work on the block, and new parts. I had a local machine shop do the head work the first time on my Europa and was never satisfied with the performance. Since then, I have sent the Europa head and the Elan head out to JAE and let them get the head work done with very good results. On my Europa, I took the engine and transaxle out the top of the car the first time and then out the bottom 2 other times. Taking the engine and transaxle out the bottom is much easier!! I have a small roll around moving cart that I put under the engine and then lower the car down onto the cart. I disconnect the motor mounts, rear suspension, and transaxle mounts and then raise the rear of the car up with a chain hoist and roll out the engine and transaxle. I have done this by myself in my garage with no problems. A well sorted Europa is a very fun car to drive. You will enjoy the car once that you have it completed but it will take a large commitment from you to get there. Good Luck!!

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Dad Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 11:04:12 -0700
Yes, the cross brace needs to be removed, but that's really pretty simple. There's a number of wires, linkage and other bits to release first and once supported it is easiest if at least one motor mount is entirely removed from both the support and the motor. Some folks have removed transaxles separately, but my experience says to take both at once. In my shop I built a 2' x 4' table about 18 inches high (completely free standing so I can drag it around) and use it for all my motor work (up to the point I need to rotate to the oil pan at which time I use an engine stand). This table allows me full access around the entire engine and transaxle as a unit. Makes things much easier at assembly time. If you're going to pull the engine and transaxle borrow a clutch alignment tool (request it on the mailing list) as it will really make re-assembly much easier. I have a tool
I'd gladly send, but it's for the Renault engine. Check with Jerry Rude. The tool is inexpensive, usually plastic, and the usual problem is just finding the correct part number for your local part supplier. Someone on the list may be able to supply that number.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Twink E(U)ropa removal Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 22:47:42 -0700
The engine is really fairly easy once you get the knack. I just pulled mine Saturday in about 4 hours, and that was taking my time. This is the sequence IIRC:


Remove the hood by using a small drift on the pins, make sure you drive them out the right direction.

Remove the luggage compt.


Disconnect the ground side of the battery.


Disconnect the wiring to the distributor, starter, transaxle,alternator, water temp sending unit.

Remove the ground strap to the frame (may be around the motor mount or from the frame to the starter).


Drain the coolant by disconnecting the lower radiator hose up front.


Disconnect the oil gage line, loosen the top coolant hose, the front coolant hose.


Disconnect the fuel line, and the throttle/choke/heater cables.


Remove the diagonal braces from the frame to the shock support bracket. Mark them so you can get them back the way they came out.


Drain the engine and the transaxle. Remove the speedometer cable from the transaxle.


Disconnect the shift linkage at the rear of the transaxle, should be a roll pin to drive out.

Then disconnect the shift linkage from the side of the engine by removing the 1/4 inch bolt going vertically, be careful not to lose the bushings when you slip the yoke out sideways. Tie the linkage up and to the side.


Disconnect the clutch cable and tie it up to the side.


Remove the reverse/5th gear indent cover at the rear of the transmission.


Now move the car inside (if not already) and jack it up supporting it under the frame rails as close to the axles and boxed section of the frame with jack stands with short (8 inches or so) pieces of 2 x 4 between the frame and the jack stand. The 2 x 4 may have to be made a 2 x 3 to fit right. I use a floor jack on the rear transmission support to get it high enough, and then slide the jack stands in.


Now get a nylon sling about 8 feet long and wrap it around the engine and trans in a figure eight configuration. It has to be close to the engine to keep from hitting the ceiling when lifting the engine/trans high enough to clear the rear of the car.


Punch out the inner axle joint roll pins using a 1/8 inch drift punch, carefully, you don't want to round the heads. Then remove the lower links to the transaxle at the inner points. You may have to lift the tires up or down to get them to come out. Don't try to force them, when things are aligned, they will come out fairly easy.


Remove the upper shock bolts, and then the shock mount bracket. These bolts (4) can be difficult and remember how they went in.


Remove the muffler.


Place the cherry picker under the car and take up slack on the engine trans. Be careful the nylon doesn't touch anything that will bend, especially the alternator pulley. That cam is a really expensive piece of steel!!


Now the fun part. Remove the 4 bolts to the inside of the rubber motor mounts. Two probably will be stubborn, but if you play with the cherry picker carefully (watch you don't pull the car off the jackstands!) you can get it where the bolts will slip out.


Then remove the rear transmission mount bolts.


Now the engine trans should be free, but still not clear of everything and it won't look like it will go up, but it will. Please be patient and take your time now as you will tend to get in a hurry at this point.


You will need to pry the rear of the transmission down at the rear, clear of the rear mount. Then push the transmission to the drivers side of the car, keeping it clear of the rear mount etc. It will then become apparent that things will clear and the engine/trans can come straight up.


I thinks I got everything. Actually very few items need be gotten from on your back, which is really great.

I have a clutch alignment tool if you want to borrow it.

Warren Pearce <pearceww@rmi.net> Subject: Re: Twink Rebuild--Help Needed Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:09:54 –0600 On several occasions (including now for a new water pump/block rebuild that should be completed in a week or 2) you can drop the engine - gearbox out the bottom of the car. As I remember, there are the basic steps:

  1. Pull the starter motor, head, and exhaust system.
  2. Set the car up on 4 good chassis stands.
  3. Disconnect all the things that attach to the engine - gearbox except for the motor mounts, water hoses, axles, gear box attachment bolts to the frame.
  4. Put a good chassis jack under the center of the gear box and support it.
  5. Pull all but 2 of the bolts attaching the bell housing to the block.
  6. Loosen the remaining bell housing - block bolts.
  7. Loosen but do not remove the 2 bolts attaching the motor mounts to the frame.
  8. Remove the nuts on the bolts between the rear of the gearbox and the frame.
  9. Support the gear box with the chassis jack.
  10. Remove all the remaining bolts between the gear box and the chassis/engine block.
  11. Carefully, tilt the engine/gear box assembly down so the rear of the gear box is below the frame. You will need to really loosen the nuts on the motor mount bolts so they can tilt enough.
  12. Carefully, slide the gear box away from the block and lower it to the ground. The axles will slip off the gear box. Don't drop the gear box! If you do, you may cry a lot.
  13. Place the jack under the block and support the engine.
  14. Carefully, remove the water hoses and then motor mount bolts.
  15. Carefully lower the block. Don't drop it! If you do, you may cry a lot.

ENGINE, Timing


That's what I've just done. My manual (for a 67 type 36 Elan) indicates the "timing position" as drive shaft: TDC; camshafts: with marks pointing in and at the level of the top of the head. This means the camshaft lobes on #4 should be pointing at each other. The jackshaft powers the fuel and oil pump and makes the distributor spin. All you've got to worry about is getting the distributor in the timing position. That part I get to solve this weekend. Corrections heartily encouraged! Frank Ashford

As for the jack shaft, doesn't matter, as long as you insert the distributor with the rotor pointing at the proper position (#1)... Tim Mullen Chantilly, VA

Shouldn't matter since the distributor is free to change orientation. When I did mine, I just put the distributor back in after the head and cams are done with the rotor pointing to whichever post I wanted to be #1 when the #1 cylinder was at the top of the compression stroke. That's when the long portion of the cam lobes for #1 are pointing outward (3 o'clock and 9 o'clock).


I had a tedious time getting the cams back on and the sprocket marks to line up. You'll want to get them close to the right place when you move the flywheel up to 10 degrees BTDC or else there is a chance that some of the valves could come in contact with pistons. The trick is that the timing chain will still be off so it will be hard to keep the cams in the right place since the valve springs will want to move the cams around. Another OOPS I had was that the valve clearance shims on a couple of valves shifted around when I reinstalled the lifters so those valves never closed. The second time I pulled the cams and put them back was much faster than the first :-). Good luck. Louis

It's been a long time since I put my TC together, but I don't think the jack shaft plays any part in the timing sequence of the engine, so I don't think it matters what the orientation is. In the cross-flow/non cross-flow, it did matter. As long as you reinstalling the head, you may also want to consider degreeing the cams since they are probably off from the factory. From what I hear, this can net you some increased power. The usual sources sell offset cam dowels specifically for this reason. There is an article on the GGLC web site (http://www.best.com/~gglotus/ggtech/index.htm#Twincam called "Dialing in Cams" that runs through this procedure. The dowel pin kits also come with instructions.

ENGINE, Exhaust tuning

ClassMaker@aol.com, Subject: Re: Europa Exhaust Tuning notes (U), Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 10:02:18 EST
Andy wrote about Colin Campbell's data, > What wonderful information (from Campbell's book)! Just to be sure, the lengths that you give for exhaust end at the muffler, right?


If there's a muffler, it should be included, as it does participate, albeit with damping. Example: Jay Mitchell added a "stinger" tail pipe to his S2 (after the muffler) and reported dramatic improvements. BTW, I noticed Campell's book was revised in 1969 and reprinted in 1970 -- exactly the same vintage as my Europa (built in 1969, sold in 1970 model year).


[page 59] The silencer –


"For maximum power, we require a straight-through system. The use of an absorption type silencer (glass-pack or hollywood) provides the system with the lowest pressure drop, but the effectiveness as a silencer is often in doubt, especially in the low-frequency end of the audible note range."


[page 59] Ramming exhaust pipes –


"With a straight-through silencer only a small fraction of the amplitude of the original pulse is damped by the absorption material of the silencer, although the amplitude of the pulse does become of negligible size after three or four reflections."


That's what I'm running. A generic, welded "bullet" Walker brand. At first, I used "Thrush" (hey, they were *cheap* and *light*) but they were made like a tin can -- squared ends are less efficient, and the thin sheet metal rusts out as quickly as the rolled seams. Cheers, ken

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net>, Re: Europa Exhaust Tuning notes (U), Tue, 2 Mar 1999 08:21:05 –0800 ClassMaker@aol.com >BTW, I noticed Campell's book was revised in 1969 >and reprinted in 1970 -- exactly the same vintage as >my Europa (built in 1969, sold in 1970 model year).

That is an excellent book. I have the 1978 version, but I don't know what was changed. I have a new book called 'The Racing Motorcycle, a Technical guide for constructors' that is excellent also. While it is for motorcycles, many things are applicable for autos also. The sections on aerodynamics and suspension are fascinating. I'm have a Carbon fibre muffler (from a Ducati) I'm going to try out on my Europa. I may be way too loud, but I'll see. Certainly is light. Mark

Tammy and Jeff <jeffandtam@inficad.com> Subject: Jerry Rein, I have your Europa timing info Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 11:39:49 –0700 No one I've seen has publicly answered your timing questions from last Monday, so, armed with the wisdom of the ages passed to me from our gracious lister benefactors, here's my 2 bits: (Static timing does mean with engine off.)

  1. Rotate a rear wheel in 4th gear until the timing mark is at between 0 and 4 BTDC (The manual, for all its virtues and there are many virtues, contradicts itself in word and illustration, and is flat wrong in places e.g. direction of distributor rotation. Plus atrocious copy editing.) Be sure you are on #1's compression stroke.
  2. Connect a 12V bulb between the low tension terminal on the distrib. And ground. Turn the ignition sw. to "on."
  3. Twist the distributor body counterclockwise until the bulb extinguishes. Then twist clockwise until it just lights.
  4. Clamp down your distributor.

Any questions?

ENGINE, Turning

I would fill each cylinder with Kroil first- let them soak for a few days. Then drail the oil and refil with something cheap. I'd start draining the trans oil, after the few days of the engine soak, put the plug back in and install good trans oil. I'd change that again pretty soon.


Can't help you there, but make sure to turn the engine over by hand first. Don't turn over by the cam pulley, use the flywheel (if you can reach the teeth) or the front pulley.

The points have been replaced with an electronic device driving a booshe blue ignition coil. It all still looks stock. The vacuum retard is still in place. Ignition timing with it disabled is set at 7 degrees BTDC at 800 rpm. I
re-curved the centrifugal advance for a total of 25 degrees (was 14). That makes a total of 32 degrees BTDC at rpm. Counting the -10 degrees of retard, that makes a total of 42 degrees of advance. Thus, the car's timing with retard connected is 3 degrees ATDC. The car also has an electric fuel pump, feeding the Strombergs. Why the re-curve. I imagine that the fuel today is worse. The car idles at 850 rpm and can be set in motion by simple letting the clutch out. But it now revs to 7000 rpm with no hesitations at the top end. In other words, I finally got both ends of the rev band working good. It is very easy to drive. And it always shuts off without running on.

I did it myself. http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn/lotuspics/advance.jpg My friends told me if screwed up, they'd re- weld material back on it. Basically, this is the part that advances due to the weights flying out within increasing rpm. The hook looking part that is pointing back at us in this view of it, needs to ground off. On mine the stock 14 degree of advance meant this hook cleared the stop post by .150 inch. Do the math: that's about .0107 inch per degree. 11 more degrees would be 11 times .0107; .118 inch to be ground off. I hope this answers your question. Marc rc car person http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn 74 TC Spl

ENGINE, Valves

From: Kiyoshi Hamai <khamai@tsoft.com> Subject: Re: HELP - Need twink advice Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:39:43 –0700 In-Reply-To: <0FDF002KDV8QVU@mail.hac.com> As Dr. Rod has diagnosed the valve clearanced on a fresh twink do settle in after 300-500 miles. It's common to see 1-2 thou reduction. When check valve clearances do:

  1. rotate the engine by hand in the correct direction
  2. measure the clearance with the cam lobe pointing away from the bucket tappet
  3. clean the feeler gauge before inserting, wiping off excess oil

ENGINE, Valve shims

dan.morrison@autodesk.com Chris Munson and Mark Markell found some at the Detroit Diesel dealer. Emails below. It never fails to amaze me that access to the people on this list have such a diverse knowledge that someone can almost always come up with simple solutions to finding parts for 30 year old designs. Who would've thought of going to Detroit Diesel for Europa parts??! Went in to the Pacific Detroit Diesel office in Portland and picked up all the shims I needed. My Lotus sources were quoting $1.25/shim, these were $.24/shim, in stock. They are indistinguishable from the shims that came out of the car, except they're a lot shinier! 8<)))One correction however, the original list had the same number twice. See the correction below.

Chris Munson wrote: The shims used for adjusting the blowers for Detroit Diesels ( inline 71 ) are of the required dimensions, come in .002" to .010" packs and work fine. They are readily available from Detroit Diesel parts counters. Try these part numbers with them. They should be current, but if not they should be able to reference them from these ones.


3.4090 - shim, blower rotor gear

5150372 - shim .002"

5153938 - shim .003"

5150856 - shim .005" incorrect. Should be: 5150855 - shim .005"

5150856 - shim.010"


EXHAUST, Custom header

ClassMaker@aol.com, Subject: Re: Europa Exhaust Tuning notes (U), Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 01:24:37 EST
Paul wrote: I will use a custom header and straight pipe exhaust in place of the cast iron manifold/muffler.


Excellent. Putting in a 4-2-1 or 4-into-1 header will give you much better extraction. Let me recommend, even with straight pipe, that you make it a little longer than just going straight out the back. Do a lazy "S" curve across the transaxle (above it, below the trunk basket) and exit next to the opposite tail lens. You may notice a significant improvement if you do some experiments! PS: This works for Twin Cams, too. Check those lengths! Here are some notes I've shared with Jay Mitchell (S2). Well, I found my notebook. So, now I can relate actual measurements and reference. Actually measured in 1974... Intake run about 16-1/4" from valve to trumpet. Exhaust run approximately 80" (depends on tip). Both of these tend to maximize ram at 5700 RPM. Here's the book reference...


Colin Campbell, THE SPORTS CAR - ITS DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE, 3rd Edition (revised) 1969, Reprint 1970 Hardcover, 305 pages, Chapman and Hall, Ltd (London)


Chapter 3 "The Engine: Induction and Exhaust" Page 56 shows a graph for intake ram, Figure 3.15

5000 RPM maps to 19"

5500 RPM maps to 17"

6000 RPM maps to 15+"

So that's where I interpolated my 5700.


He notes that the DBR1 Aston Martin has an induction pipe length of 17" - giving 5500 as a maximum ram point, and finding (dyno) peak of power curve about 1000 RPM higher. The rule of thumb is to maximize ram just BEFORE reaching the PEAK POWER, etc. etc.


Page 64 shows a table for resonant exhaust pipe length. He notes that 4 into 1 and 4-2-1 collectors are treated equally, provided cylinders are paired so 2 & 3 combine, as do 1 & 4.


At t=270 degrees, here are the translations:


4000 RPM at 115"

5000 RPM at 92"

5200 ~ 88." (guessing curve)

5400 ~ 84.5"

5600 ~ 81.5"

5800 ~ 79."

6000 RPM at 77" (actually 76.5" in the text)

7000 RPM at 66"


My 80" measurement interpolates to about 5700. To hit 5500, it looks like something close to 83". Campbell's data is empirical, and does not account for valve timing, valve and runner diameters, and so on. Still, it seems to "validate" the general dimensions. Close enough to have fun on a budget. Someday, I'll get to fool with a dyno. Cheers, ken ritchie, atlanta

EXHAUST, Muffler

Steve Shipley <shiples@home.com> Subject: Re: Europa Engine Removal Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 07:01:03 –0800 There's a procedure in the shop manual. Tell me you have a shop manual! You do have the shop manual, right? Have you considered a SuperTrap for a muffler? They're tunable I understand. While tuning for performance, you might find an exhaust note you enjoy.


I have a carbon fibre muffler I'm going to try on my Europa. It will probably be too loud, but I'll check it out. Nice and light. It is from a Ducati 900ss. Mark 72 Elan Sprint

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> I have a carbon fibre muffler on my Europa. I haven't driven it enough to say it if will be too loud, but it sure sounds nice and weighs very little. It is from a Ducati.

sjmarcy@aol.com In a message dated 3/2/00 2:57:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, jeffh@biowhittaker.com writes: If anyone else on the list has a comment about Supertrapp, please speak. However, I must preface this by saying that the Gordini header is longer than the R16 header was and my Turbo muffler doesn't fit. Also, I tried a Walker Muffler that was a little too long to work with as well. >>

Some years back Hot Rod magazine did a muffler group test. They plotted torqe and Horsepower along with some dB readings for 10-15 different mufflers. Supertrapp was the least efficient, although it is adjustable. You can't get quiet without lots of restriction. The best ouput (but loud) was a Borla XR-1 I think. The most efficient muffling came from large format reverse flow designs. Having read the above at the time I went out and bought a Supertrapp. A 3 inch in / out 5 inch body stainless unit. I set it up as the tail pipe on a dual-purpose car. That way, at the track or at some but not all autocrosses I could remove ALL of the end plates so as to have effectively zero muffling and restriction from the S-T. A muffler and cat further upstream of the S-T provided enough mufling to meet local regs. Then for the street it could be made quiet albeit with some output loss but still just fine. One time at Lime Rock I was black flagged for noise at a club event. It was nice to slap on about 15-20 plates and yet lose only about 5 minutes of practice time. For a 'ropa I wouldn't suggest using one as the only muffler if you want the
car to be quiet and fast at the same time. A light stainless reverse flow deal might work well. Or for cheap a generic reverse flow of mild steel. If you really want to max things out you need to tune the carb or injection to suit the exhaust if you change things around muffler wise. Usually with lower restriction you tend to lean things out if you don't retune.. Backpressure follows the torqe curve since this follows the air flow curve. That is restriction is not necessarily highest at peak HP. You can test back pressure fairly well with a fuel pressure gage.

Kevin Swart <kgs113@mail.a-znet.com> I installed a flowmaster on my 843 with just a stock manifold. Had to cut one corner of the muffler to fit around the chassis. LOUD. No back pressure and you could feel the exhaust pulses from 10 feet behind the car. Only drove the car 6 miles before parking for the winter then the garage fell on it so I haven't had it near a Db meter yet.
FASTNERS, Nuts & bolts

ClassMaker@aol.com scott@fortner.com writes: Also, where can one find brass metric nuts? I'd like to use them on the mainifold. The local auto shops have brass only in std. And the hardware stores are useless for metric stuff. The local marine supply doesn't have much of anything unless it is coarse thread std. I hate to mail order for 8 !@#%^ nuts.


Maryland Metrics (USA)

800-638-1830 or 410-358-3130

www.mdmetric.com

Lee Sacks is there (ex Motorsport East). Lee kept his Weber license, and supplies all things Weber. They also have drawings and a license to manufacture new jets, etc. They have all kinds of metric hardware. ...plus: Whitworth fasteners and tools.

If it fits... an easy replacement: a nice quality *brass* tee, some rubber fuel hose, some "Ideal" brand hose clamps (you can find those at some of the auto-parts stores) -- I like the quality and finish (and slotted hex head screw) of the Ideal brand clamps -- better than the look-alikes. Renew rubber fuel hoses every two or three years for safety. Cheers, ken

I have a carbon fibre Ducati muffler on my Europa. It is incredibly light but noisy. While I'm using it daily now, it is not very fun for longer trips. I got it used with a bit of damage on one section- but it doesn't affect how it works. If you like, I can ask around on the motorcycles lists I"m on. Markh@olympus.net

> Am I missing something? Doesn't Pep Boys, or equivalent, sell a glass pack muffler for something like $20?
I bought a 2" Walker Turbo muffler from NAPA for about that. It muffled, weighed less than 7 lbs., and didn't cause noticeable restriction. I'm sorta like you. What's all the fuss about? Buy a muffler and put it on. Jay Mitchell

FASTNERS

> I seem to have it in my head (left over from being a teen in the 50s) that Brit stuff was different from American stuff. Whitworth or metric or something.

Lotus used SAE fasteners, mostly NF designation. The steering rack was made by Alford and Alder, and it could possibly be Whitworth, but I'll bet it's SAE as well.

>Is the thread set up on the Europa SAE except for the engine which is metric???

There are several parts of Renault origin: engine, transaxle, radiator fan, and parking brake handle come to mind. Any fasteners that are part of these assemblies are gonna be metric. Everything else should be SAE. Jay Mitchell

FLYWHEEL, Aluminum

farberjf@us.ibm.com I started the thread. I am keeping a list. I have been in conversation w/ Bean about aluminum flywheels for Renault powered Europas. This will fit a stock street clutch. If we can get 10 guys (approx) he will produce them inhouse. The cost will be $498 US. Saying yes means you want to put down a $250 deposit now. Flywheels to be delivered in approx 30 days.

FRAME

S1 frames are just about non-existent any more. I've been looking for quite awhile. The nearest to riginal is a sheet metal chassis from Banks in England. If you're not into restoring exactly as original a good alternative is the Spyder chassis, also fromEngland. I know of no good sources for chassis's in the US. They are also very difficult to change, being heavily bonded into the bodywork. If you do find a good source please let me know. OTOH if you would consider a joint effort at the manufacture of several let me know also, as I have been contemplating that and have the resources to do so. What is your chassis number and the history of your car? I have chassis #131 and #217 in the Porland, Oregon area. Mark MarKell

FUEL, Electric pump

ClassMaker@aol.com whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: BTW, what kind of flow rate do I need for an electrical pump?


Check the Bean (DBE) catalog -- get one if you don't have one. SU "AUX" series (prefer lifetime electronic over mech. points) is rated sufficient to 150 HP. That's plenty for a street twink. Fuel pressure delivery at 3 pounds +/- 1/2 pound should do it. I've got the SU electronic in my 1976 Elite, 2-liter "907" motor. I've got a Bendix/Facet upright shuttle pump in my 70 Europa. Both have been super reliable.

FUEL, Fittings, Emissions

It was common practice for Lotus (and others at the time) to use a plastic tee in the fuel lines between Carbs. If that is what is in there Run, Don't walk, it over to the nearest trash bin! It has been the prime cause of a lot of engine fires. Replace the gas line with a modern high pressure line and find a brass tee with barbed ends to replace the plastic ones. The most common place I've found this type was in a good hardware store rather than an automotive place. Use small hose clamps as well as gas is not nice if applied freely to a hot engine. Regards, Mark MarKell

Harry <traff@ICON.HMSD.UFL.EDU> Subject: RE: Europa Update Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 17:02:14 -0400
1) There is a rubber piece that splits the fuel flow into the carbs. It was cracked, so we tried to find a replacement. No one has anything that will come close to working. Where can I get one of these at?


At the auto parts store, you can get brass fuel line fittings and a 'T' block. Screw it all together and you'll probably have what you need. Don't trust the plastic fittings. Many a Lotus has been lost to fire because of these. If the fuel lines are stiff and dried out, you may want to replace these, also.

> 3) To remove the 'evaporative loss' stuff, I just undo all the hoses. right?


A short speech about removing emissions equipment. In states with emissions testing, cars will fail the visual test, if things have been removed. Before Florida had this testing, people would remove this equipment. Now these cars won't pass the tests, and if you want to keep the car, this stuff needs to reinstalled. Also, any cars with missing parts are not easy to sell. As much as I'd like to buy a modern classic, if the PO has removed the emissions parts, I could not buy the car. Also, consider the legal ramifications; It is a Federal offense to remove emissions equipment. I'm not preaching, but just stating the obvious. For my Eclat to be legal in Florida, I will now need to reinstall the evaporative charcoal cannister and hoses, the fuel filler restrictor plate, and have a working catalytic converter.


I also need to comment on your desire to restore and resurrect this Lotus classic. I applaud your resolve, especially considering that most people your age would want to have some "hot wheels" Honda or something just as horrible. It will be a labor of love, something you'll be able to brag on for many years to come. Your friends will not understand "The Lotus Position, "Lotus tool #1", nor why you just want to go out and sit in the car and caress the steering wheel that will somehow transfer Lotus history into your bones, so you will be forced to come to us to tell of your triumphs. We understand. We know the joys and frustrations. We are here for you. Good luck. Harry '78 Eclat


FUEL, Gas octane

Ken Landaiche <ken.landaiche@dlcc.com> RE: Europa JPS is Special (U) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:32:37 –0800 How did Lotus make the compression ratio change? Was the federal head thicker than the ROW head? (What an interesting question.) And would it be worth increasing the compression on my stock 1974 Europa Twin Cam?

BTW, I read an interesting article in one of the car mags. It argued that the USA 93 octane wasn't much different from the European 98 octane because each region uses different methods for measuring octane, R+M/2 in the USA and M in Europe, if I remember correctly. The difference in octane between the two regions, if using the same scale, is around one point, 93 to 94 octane. IF that is true, then would increasing the TC compression run into any problems?

FUEL, Injection

Ron Dawson <dawsonr@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Subject: Europa TC Fuel Injection Date: Fri, 30 Jul 99 07:17:07 EDT
A fuel injection kit for the Stromberg Twin Cam is being sold by QUORN ENGINE DEVELOPMENTS,
http://www.qednet.demon.co.uk/.

FUEL, Injectors

Jeff wrote: >So now I've got to find new injectors for a Bosch L-jet system from a Fuego or throw that stuff away and buy a manifold and carbs. Go to: http://www.carparts.com/index.asp Select a 1981 Renault 18i, then fuel systems, then fuel injection parts. They show two different injectors - Carter and Delco - available for L-Jetronic injection. Jay "hope this helps" Mitchell

Here's another link: http://www.cskauto.com/ They show both new and remanufactured injectors. Jay

I think those should be the same as used in the Porsche 914. Try Automobile Atlanta in Marietta, Georgia. Ton of spares. Just where are these leaking from? Mark MarKell

FUEL, Lead additives

Lorne Mason <l.mason@dial.pipex.com> Subject: Re: Leaded petrol & Water injection Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 11:31:47 Additives to replace the lead will be available soon: Zero Lead 2000, Red Line, Millers VSP Plus and Valvemaster. All 900 series engines will run on Super unleaded. Twincams and Renaults won't. (Source - Club Lotus' Technical Adviser).

ClassMaker@aol.com OTOH, I believe the R16's do run OK on Super. They have aluminum heads. The seats are steel. I buy BP "Super Unleaded" here in the US. (93 pump octane, average of RON & MON) I've used other 93's, Texaco, QT, Chevron. I run a Federal 907 (but Dellortos) and a high compression (11:1) R16 Europa motor which also has a 3/4 cam (288 degrees) and a Weber 45DCOE. Perhaps overlap is helping, but I've never had any knock. The timing is *not* retarded on either car. They run at least 45 degrees full advance. Idle "CO" readings are 3.5 to 4.5 % and I set them up around 1100 rpm. ...and I drive the snot out of both of them!!!

With steel valves and seats don't you need to run unleaded for lubrication? I thought that unless you replaced the valve guides and seats with bronze you would eventually have wear problems. I was anticipating carrying massive amounts of lead additive everywhere I went. Not that it'll be going anywhere soon - (unfortunately) but I was mentally prepared anyhow.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> The superstition wrt unleaded gas and valve seat wear never ceases to amaze me. ANY engine that is equipped with hardened steel insert valve seats - i.e., almost every engine with an aluminum alloy cylinder head - can run unleaded fuel with no ill effect. The effects of running unleaded fuel are actually very positive: Since the engine oil is not being contaminated with combustion byproducts specifically caused by lead, the oil won't degrade nearly as much or as rapidly. Additionally, all major brands of modern unleaded gasoline have very effective additives for preventing carbon buildup. Your engine will stay much cleaner and wear less as a result of use of modern fuel.

ClassMaker@aol.com Plus -- the plug cones don't glaze over like they used to with lead!

Marvin Wong <marvinw@proaxis.com> Subject: Re: Leaded petrol & Water injection Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 21:02:51 –0700 The US changed to strictly unleaded a long time ago and besides the octane of the available fuel getting less, there was an issue for older engines without hardened valves & seats. The lead provides some lubrication for these. Unleaded will decrease their life, at least that's what we were told on this side of the pond in the '70s.

bobm@ttseagle.com Subject: Re: Unleaded juice in a twink Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:25:49 -0600
I've had two good old TC engines (one Europa, one early Elan), and both ran for years in my typical use: aggressive driving when permissible, city driving when it couldn't be avoided, and screaming around the traffic cones at race events and solo contests. Both were run on unleaded premium with absolutely no additives whatever -- no octane improver, no lead "substitute", no lead -- and have experienced no valve seat problems at all. Latter-60s metallurgy pretty much obviated the problem that earlier cars had with unleaded fuels. However, pre-regulation, Amoco sold unleaded gasoline in the US and there was no swell of engine problems back then. In the TC engine, there is more problem with valve guide wear and valve tip seal leakage from normal aging than there is with valve seat problems from unleaded fuel, at least in my two-time experience.

FUEL, Octane

From: farberjf@us.ibm.com I have run on 92 octane unleaded for years. One of my cars has a 10.75 / 1 CR. We did a bunch of tests on a rolling road dyno. The conclusion was that if you want to avoid detonation limit advance to 31 degrees max. I dont run octane boosters.

FUEL, Pump

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> 'Don't get in too big a hurry now. It will save you lots of time and money later. On the fuel pump blanking plate, you can leave the old pump in to fill the hole till you do have time to build one or buy one. Just disconnect your plumbing and stick vacuum caps over the ports. If it's entirely shot it won't try to pump air anywhere, and it will rob a miniscule amount of power from the cam. I'd recommend the Facet pump as well. Have never heard anything bad about it. Whatever electric pump you get, be careful where you wire it in. The wrong place will kill the tach operation. If it fits... an easy replacement: a nice quality *brass* tee, some rubber fuel hose, some "Ideal" brand hose clamps (you can find those at some of the auto-parts stores) -- I like the quality and finish (and slotted hex head screw) of the Ideal brand clamps -- better than the look-alikes. Renew rubber fuel hoses every two or three years for safety.

ClassMaker@aol.com gmfmo@mweb.co.za writes: I have also found an original petrol pump which has 3 connections as shown in the w/s manual. One goes back to the tank sender unit. What is it for?

Return for excess pump output. Limits pressure. Otherwise it could over-power the carb float valve, or rupture the diaphragm of the mechanical pump. Electronic pumps don't have this problem. They slow down as the pressure builds up.

FUEL, Pump (electric)

From: Mark Reichert <markr@lightlink.com> >There's nothing magic about those pumps unless they're the type that sit in the tank. I don't think yours does. Find a Rabbit or similar production car of roughly the same year and displacement and you'll probably find a good pump. When my 914 pump died, also an L-Jetronic, I replaced it with one from a VW. Has to be from another FI car however, as the fuel pressures are considerably higher...
Weren't the old VW systems K-Jet based? I seem to recall that these ran even higher pressures than L-Jet. I would probably avoid trying to run a K-Jet pump in an L-Jet system. I don't know what the L-Jet regulator would do if it were presented with fuel pressure that far out of spec. Any L-Jet pump should be fine.
>... and there is a path for re-circulating unused fuel to kill vapor lock and to cool the pump.
Definitely. The unused fuel must go back to the tank.

From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> jeffh@biowhittaker.com wrote: Today, I went to the shop and
> looked at the Bosch manual. The pump pressure is 36psi +/- 3.
You need to make sure you use a D-jet or K-jet pump. The K-jet (CIS) pumps put out closer to 60 psi.
> Will any in-line Bosch fuel pump work?
See above. Cars that came with D-jet or K-jet from that era include VW Variants (Squareback/Fastback), VW Beetles 75-79, Porsche 914 (VW 911/912 engine), Volvo 140 series (optional in '72, standard 73 on), and some BMWs (3.0si, 3.0CSi). The Parts Place for VWs (248-373-2300) shows a recycled fuel pump, 75-79 Beetle, for $100.00, rebuilt for $150.00, and a new one for $199.95. I'll bet you won't find one for much less.
> and does anyone have any suggestions for returning the fuel to the tank?
Run a rubber fuel line from the bleed output of the fuel pressure regulator to the return line that's part of your fuel sender assembly.

From: Mark Reichert <markr@lightlink.com> He's putting in an L-Jet system from another Renault. He should use an L-Jet pump. L-Jet runs at 2.5 bar. The D or K Jet systems will be far enough out of spec that his L-Jet regulator probably won't be able to compensate. The K-Jet systems run at a high enough pressure that it might cause a spectacular failure in an L-Jet system. That is, if his tank has a fitting for a return line - mine didn't
(dpo?), and if the fitting is large enough to handle the flow without causing a restriction which could increase the pressure back at the injectors. Of course, he should make sure to use a fuel line that is rated for fuel injection pressures.

From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> To sum up: a K-jetronic fuel pump - more commonly referred to as CIS –is NOT suitable. The fuel pump from any fully electronic Bosch EFI system - D or L - WILL provide the correct pressure range, with the final system pressure determined by the regulator.

I can handle the wiring part of the answer, from personal experience and help from Mark Markell. If I remember correctly, the tach is wired in series between the ignition switch and the distributor. It works by counting the frequency of the pulses to the coil (and hence the distributor). If you wire the fuel pump from anywhere downstream of the tach (the most obvious place being the coil), every time the fuel pump pulses on it will confuse the tach. In my car, above a few thousand rpm, the fuel pump would be pulsing on and off so often that the tach was useless. The solution is to run a wire from the coil to a new relay. Then run a new fuse protected wire from the battery through the relay to the fuel pump. That way, when you turn the key on, the coil will be energized, thereby energizing the relay and the fuel pump. My fuel pump is mounted at about midway up the height of the tank, on the rear wheel arch, just by the swirl pot. It works fine, and has never needed priming. Jason Rowan

In a message dated 00-05-10 18:08:34 EDT, jrowan@ix.netcom.com writes: > My fuel pump is mounted at about midway up the height of the tank, on the rear wheel arch, just by the swirl pot. It works fine, and has never
needed priming.

I put mine (a Bendix, now Facet "shuttle" pump) in exactly the same spot. One nifty feature of this is that after you switch on the ignition (which I wired similarly to Jason's advice) you can hear the pump as it restores pressure. As soon as the float valve closes, the pump slows down to a lazy tick rate. Add an inline fuel filter between the tank and the pump inlet to catch crud. If you can't get the 3 pound return spring, add a fuel pressure regulator between the pump outlet and the carb inlet. If you have Weber / Dellorto side-draft carbs, make sure you don't overpower the carb's needle valve... A worn one will let fuel by. A fresh needle or the 2-ball "Grose Jet" works. Somewhere, I recall reading 2.5 to 3 pounds was a pretty ideal pressure for a Weber 45DCOE, which is what the Hermes kit used. Since 1972 or so, when I installed mine, it has *never* failed to work well. ken ritchie, atlanta 1969-built "70" Europa S2 with Hermes 1x45DCOE

If you look at my website, you can see where I mounted the low pressure Facet type pump (just next to the fuel tank, on the left). A dial type fuel pressure regulator is just out of sight below the Webers. I wired it using a relay. It does not interfere with the tach. If you're interested, I can go to the garage and check exactly how I did it. These Facet type pumps are now marketed by Purolator, or some biggie like that. You can buy them at Advance Auto Parts, maybe other auto supermarkets. Summit Auto sells a nice fuel pressure gauge. I may get one of those. I also plan to do an inertia cutoff switch sometime. Just in case you get into an accident. So that the pump does not continue to pump gas while your car is about to burst into flames. This has been a mandated safety feature on new cars for at least 15 years. You can also wire in a low oil pressure switch that will kill the juice to the pump. This is mostly for racing applications, or when you BLOW your motor. OR if you loose the line to your oil cooler. So that your engine does not continue to run on low oil pressure. This switch takes a little more thought and planning to wire in, because you will need to make the pump hot when you crank the motor (zero oil ressure). But easily doable. At least one lister thought that the Facet type pump "sucked". But hey, they are like MacDonald's hamburgers. A trillion-billion sold, but only a few heart attacks. But really, I wish I could have just kept the MECHANICAL fuel pump. VERY EARLY Gordini engines used a cam with a drive for the mechanical pump, just like the R16. JEFF HOVIS: Since you are now using the R16 cam reground for your Gordini, you now have the opportunity to use a mechanical pump. Or at least, bolt on the mechanical pump. So that it is there if needed as a backup. Paul http://home.sprintmail.com/~paulzielinski S2 Europa-Gordini

I use a Facet 'interrupter type' pump (silver top) - it delivers 23 GPH at 2 psi and will develop 4-5 psi, also installed a 'Filt-O-Reg' pressure regulator downstream of the pump. I located the pump on the right rear of the engine bay in front of the rear axle. I installed the pump vertically with the removable end of the pump facing up to make access to the filter easier. I wired the pump from the ignition switch and also installed a toggle switch hidden up underneath the dash - cheap anti-theft device. The pump is available from 'pegasusautoracing.com' for $80.99, don't remember where I got the regulator. When I rebuilt the engine, I cut the dummy camshaft off at the rear of the middle bearing (rotate the rear cam bearing shell in the block to block off the oil gallery to that bearing) as the rear was no longer needed to drive the old fuel pump. The remaining part of the dummy camshaft drives the distributor. I installed an aluminum cover plate over the old hole where the fuel pump was installed on the
block. Tom Berkeley 1974 Twin Cam - 4605R

Some of you asked how I wired my electric fuel pump. I took the white lead off the alternator relay. The tach will not be affected by doing this. By the way, last summer I learned that the black ground of this alternator relay must be good. A poor ground here was the cause of my 28 year annoying ammeter bounce when no load was on the system. After looking at my website and the picture of the Gordini engine, some guys asked what were the unidentifiable bits. The rectangular box to the left, close to the tank, was part of the stock emission system. It functioned as the fuel tank overflow reservoir. And it still does. And I think it looks good to safety inspectors (although my guys don't care). But I may remove it someday and replace it with something smaller. I have removed the cylindrical carbon vapor canistor. If you look carefully, below the Weber air cleaners, you will see the battery. I moved the battery to the bottom of the car, just in front of the wheel. The stock setup had the battery on the upper ledge, just below where the Weber cleaners are now. But the battery would not fit with the Webers in place. Thanks to other Lotus Europa listers who suggested that I move it to its present location. And I really DO believe that I sense improved handing. I mean, I moved a 30 lb object 12 inches closer to the road. And I have a small battery. Your battery may weigh 43 lbs. And these boards adds regidity and strength to the suggested, factory jacking position. First, I glassed in a 1 inch pine board (weather treated). Then, I screwed another board (or two, don't remember, weather treated) on top of the glassed in board. Then, I screwed a plastic marine battery holder in place. So everything can be removed, except the first glassed in board. And the battery lives there. COVERING the battery, is the bottom of a rubber office waste bucket. This protects the battery, so that if you drop metal tools on top of the battery, the anode and cathode cannot become continous. A hole in cut in covering is for proper ventilation. Paul http://home.sprintmail.com/~paulzielinski S2 Europa-Gordini FAX 718-887-1398

FUEL, Tank

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> Don't know if this has been mentioned before, but I found another Whitworth bolt on my Europa last night. The drain plug for the gas tanks is a perfect 5/16 BS or 1/4 W, according to my socket set.

FUEL, Tank cleaning

Mark Reichert <markr@lightlink.com> > Can anyone reccommend a gas tank cleaner/etcher/sealer that > works good?

My experience is that the stuff by Kreem is not so good. The POR-15 brand seems to be working well. (
www.por15.com). You might also be able to find something good from Eastwood. Good luck, --Mark

My tank sat for a few months after applying the Kreem coating - while I hunted down a replacement fuel level sender (Big thank you to Don Tingle). When I was finally ready to put it all together, I observed that the Kreem coating had detached from the tank and cracked in several places. Removing it, most of it came out in sheets. It might just be that the Kreem stuff wants to see fuel sooner in its lifetime, but I'll never trust it again.


>Mark Reichert <
markr@lightlink.com> >> Can anyone reccommend a gas tank cleaner/etcher/sealer that works good? My experience is that the stuff by Kreem is not so good. Why? It is working OK for me. Or so I think. The POR-15 brand seems to be working well. (www.por15.com) I'd expect that. The paint is great. You might also be able to find something good from Eastwood.


Hmm. I thought they sold Kreem. Phil Ethier
pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

I had the same result with Kreem on my europa tank. Perfectly clean inside, full Kreem treatment. A month or two later, it was coming off in sheets. I never had fuel in it. On my elite, I barely cleaned it out, tossed in just the Kreem, and put fuel in it as soon as I could. I haven't had any problem with that.

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> >Try Aircraft Spruce and Specialties. I think they have a web site, but I don't have the url handy. Not surprisingly it is: http://www.aircraft-spruce.com

zigglu@us.ibm.com Subject: RE: Gas tank cleaning Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 16:17:22 -0400
You can use heavy duty paint stripper to loosen up the gunk from the bottom and wash it off with water. Any loose rust can be knocked by putting a few bolts inside and shaking the tank vigorusly... You can order the Gas Tank Liner Coating from JC Whitney... see
http://www.jcwhitneyusa.com/ for contact info. JC Whitney carries couple different kits: 1. Liquid Liner Kit with tank prep kit - part# 97-5714NF price: $26.95 (I never used this kit, the advertising does not state that it is alcohol resistive... you are on your own...) 2. Gas Tank Sealer (alcohol resistive) - part# 12-8316Y price: $22.92 (I always use this one and I am happy with the results. One container is large enough to coat both tanks with at least two coats....)

Also check out http://www.por15.com They have products for gas tank sealing (and rust preventive coatings for outside the tank). I have heard good things about on the coating (por15) but have no real info on the gas tank sealing stuff other than the catalog (which is online). davea@sgi.com


HAND BRAKE, Cable

The cable is one of those fun things. I supported the frame from underneath, then used a fairly sharp pry bar
and a hammer to open the crimped clamp. I don't really know of a better way, since there is so little room. Make sure to support the frame directly under where you are putting pressure - it is very thin. I think I put a piece of wood under the clamp, and another under the frame. I also don't think I had to use the hammer very much, I could mostly turn it and pry the clamp apart. But I would figure on a bit of hammer action. Removing the bolt with the grinder is no big deal, as long as the bracket on the frame is ok- opps, you are changing frames too...I don't see a problem. I installed one of the linkages from Ardvaark- it really really works well. They are not cheap, but very well made. You can update your original one (if you have a late S2 car) to very similar, but it is still
better. If the cost is worth it to you? I can't say. I do know my car shifts very well, no slop at all, very short travel and I never have problems getting any gear I want. Ok, reverse is still a bit shove- but I don't have a problem with that. Mark Hollingsworth

HANDLING

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> A guy on the autox list just ran a lot of tests with some data-acquisition gear. He proved what I have suspected for a long time. SIFO (slow-in fast-out) works so much better than most people believe that over-braking into a corner and entering at too slow a speed costs you virtually nothing in lap times. Entering too fast, and thus botching the exit, always cost you big time. Lesson: Don't enter a corner too hot. Err on the side of caution on the entry. It won't hurt you nearly as badly as the alternative.

>My natural reaction is to add power to pull the tail around, but the more power I add, the worse the push.

Welcome to the Europa. If you want the tail to come around, lift the throttle.

>The end result is that I have to back off the power to stay on the course, and the transition between understeer and oversteer is quicker than the steering and my reflexes can manage!

Stay with it. Gentle inputs. Let the car dance. Don't force it.

>I am hoping that adding more toe end on the rear will help the transition be more manageable.

I'd recommend you stay real close to zero on the rear toe.

>I'm not sure what to do about the front push other than to be a little less aggressive.

The quick way to dive a Europa is to make VERY small movements with the wheel. Here's how: Brake straight and hard. Do this by squeezing on the brake, adding pressure as the front end loads and can take the braking. Do not slam on the brakes; the fronts will lock because you have not transferred any weight onto them. Release the brakes quickly. At that precise instant, turn in. The idea is that you turn the front wheels in the magic moment when the brakes are released and there is still weight on the front wheels. They are being pushed into the pavement by the front springs. Note: if your dampers are set too hard on rebound, this will not work, as the front tires will unweight instantly. Once you try this, you will realize that the Europa will turn in very quickly. This allows you to do most of the turning in a sharp radius in the first part of the corner. Now get on some power. This will catch the rear. Keep adding power as you unwind the steering. (With practice, you will see that the steering-wheel movements to do this are less than required to go around the same corner tracking). The car will move from oversteer to understeer. When the understeer get to be too much, stop adding power (don't lift, just stop adding) and continue to slowly unwind the steering. By the time you are out on the straight, you will be at full power and the wheel will be straight. It will become obvious to you that the only line that works with this is a late-apex. Compared to a central-apex line you:
Turn in later.
Turn sharper in the first part of the corner.
Add power before the apex.
Turn the car less as it goes faster.
When you get this right with a Europa, it is an exhilarating dance through the cones and provides you with a real jump on the straight.

>It is interesting to note that when I skidpad tested the car a while back, the limiting factor on my cornering speed was the above mentioned power on understeer. Does this sound right?

Yes. Off-throttle = oversteer. On-throttle = understeer. You can control which you get.

marc j <jrmsn@goodnet.com> I remember having cars that lift-throttle oversteered. I usaully found the differial was not working. If that is the problem, it would do it more on TC since weight distribution is more to back. The serinaro is: the front is light and the inside rear wheel can push the front; as the throttle lifted the understeer effect goes away, and turns into oversteer because you cannot keep up with the change and the front tires gain a lot of weight. And of course when you come back onto the throttle it saves the car for the very same reason it pushed in the first place. This is how a go-kart is driven, normal handling, also Sprint cars. Also, keep in mind that how much a differial slips is different under power than on the jack!

"Guthrie, Conrad" <cguthrie@velaw.com> Trailing throttle oversteer is a problem common to many vehicles, front, mid, or rear engined. The first time I lifted in the middle of a turn in a '66 Elan, I was 18 and stupid, and thought there was something wrong with the car because it came around at only 65 mph. When you lift, weight is transferred to the front, just like when you brake, the rear-end becomes very light and will come around in a heartbeat. The effect is even more pronounced in rear engined cars and is legendary in Porsches. Mark is very correct in that it is a very useful tool in performance driving. I've used it to defeat understeering in tight corners in an ITB VW Golf; just a quick lift to tweak out the rear and get the front pointed, then back on the power hard to pull out.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> I've seen Minis do snap spins, as well as 911s. I've also seen a very poorly set-up road racing Civic that couldn't turn in without spinning. The problem isn't generally incurable, though. The physics are basic and well-understood here. Maybe I should have made a more of distinction between simple lift-throttle oversteer and a snap spin. In the former, the rear tires develop a greater slip angle than the front. This does not imply that the car slides, however. In a snap spin, all control is lost. Some cars will not snap spin when you lift the throttle. My E Stock 85 GTI was a perfect example. You could always tighten your line by lifting off the throttle in a turn. Making a well-setup A2 Golf spin when you lift requires a major mistake. M Making a Twink Europa spin, OTOH, is much easier. I can lift (more accurately, feather the throttle) in my S2 while cornering at the limit, and the car won't spin. It WILL turn in more tightly. I'm afraid that Tom can't presently do the same thing in his Twink without leaving the course arse-end first. You can improve some vehicular vices through judicious suspension setup. Ask Porsche.

HELICOIL, Removal

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> > In a message dated 7/30/99 2:30:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ken.landaiche@nokia.com writes: So how does one remove a helicoil, grab the last coil and unwind it from the hole? >>

I've removed them many times. What you do is grab the coil with a pair of needle nose pliers, and twist while pulling slightly. I will unravel quite easily, even with the red loctite on it.

HINGES, Door

From: "Brian Martley" <Brian.Martley@tesco.net> I had to replace both hinges on my car - one was seized solid. I left both hinges soaking in Plus-Gas release fluid, and could undo the door collars in order to adjust the door, but couldn't get the hinge pin out through the sill. I had molegrips and even a stilson wrench trying to get some movement, and after a week I ended up cutting the pin above/below the door with a hacksaw blade. The other door - I tried once and when it wouldn't move went straight to cut it off. No body/door damage and off in a couple of hours. In view of these experiences I would recommend you replace using a stainless steel pin - it's standard bar stock. I recall someone also made a replacement pin kit which could be greased as well. I also modified the top section of the pin to accept a small plate to ensure that the pin cannot turn in the body bushes - when the body bushes wear although you can adjust the door it will rattle over bumpy roads.

 

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> The door pins on my Europa were seriously rusted. One I cut apart with a cutoff wheel on a die grinder. But the other one I did a different method that worked a lot better. First, I soaked them in Kroil well. Great stuff. Next I screwed in the proper bolt to the bottom of the hinge pin (5/16 ?) -- I used a nut on the end of a bolt, so that it would only go in an inch or so. The car jacked well up of course. Then I put an impact wrench onto the end of the bolt. This spun the hinge pin. (you may have to work it a bit with vise-grips or the like to break it loose). After spinning it for a bit, I could then hold a small wrench on the top side of the bolt head, and put downward pressure on the pin. It took a few times of going down, then up, but this pulled the pin out with minimal effort. The one I cut off was definately more work, but I really can't imagine doing it with a hacksaw, like many people have done. Nothing like a small cutoff wheel and a die grinder...

dsrgr@aol.com Just sharing a little info. Got the door into position and the rod installed. Had to tap it in. Looks like such a tight fit that I don't need a cotter key but have put one in anyway. With the door closed, I put a level on the door against the glass and jacked the car up. Front on jackstands and jack under the trans mount. I jacked
until the level was level. Then I opened the door, both adjusters were still loose. I propped the door on an ice chest and pieces of wood. I made it level again. Then I tightened the adjusters. The door fits when I close it.

HISTORY

From: Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] AJC Article Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 07:30:52 –0500 Heck, I don't think the author will mind a "reprint", especially with credit & his book promo attached...
"Old Wheels: Lotus Europa not a hit despite original design"

"Racing heritage: Car is remembered as the first midengine model offered commercially."

Bill Vance – Special

Friday . February 18

"Englishman Colin Chapman was a gifted and innovative engineer. His Lotus cars were the essence of good engineering practice, efficient in their use of space and materials. His philosophy was to reduce components to the minimum that would achieve their usually multiple purpose. After successfully building and racing cars based on mundane machinery such as Austin Sevens, Chapman launched his modest Lotus Engineering Co. in 1952 to build tiny kit cars. It became Lotus Cars Ltd. in 1959, by which time Chapman had progressed to making competition cars that were challenging the world's best. His midengined racers became formidable competitors in both Formula 1 and American open car racing. Lotuses carried drivers to Formula 1 titles in 1963, '65, '68, '70, '72 and '78. And Jim Clark's win at the 1965 Indianapolis 500 in a Lotus-Ford, after his second-place finish in 1963, finalized the Indy midengine revolution and put the last nail in the coffin of the traditional front-engined Indy roadster. Although mounting the engine between the rear axle and the driver had become the racing norm, Chapman's road-going Lotus Sevens, Elites and Elans stayed with front engines. That changed with the introduction of the Europa in 1966. When Renault introduced its front-wheel-drive 16 model in 1965, Chapman saw the possibility of converting its power unit for use in a midengined car. He envisioned reversing the longitudinal engine and placing it and the transaxle unit in the rear. A deal was struck with Renault for powertrains, and Lotus began creating its first midengined road car, the Europa. For the Europa, Chapman followed the Elan's form by using a steel backbone type frame. It was forked at the rear, with the engine mounted between the two legs. The Renault 1.5-liter, 58-horsepower, overhead valve, aluminum inline four was tuned by Renault to produce 78 horsepower for the Europa. The radiator was mounted in the front of the car ahead of a small luggage compartment. There was also a rear luggage compartment behind the engine. Power went to the rear wheels through a four-speed manual transmission. The fiberglass, two-passenger coupe body stood only 42.5 inches high, which gave it a sleek profile but made entry and exit awkward. Once inside, the accommodation was snug, with the driver and passenger wedged between the high central frame and the doors. The sharply tapered hood, grilleless front end and headlights set in scoops gave the Europa a clean, stylish appearance, as well as aerodynamic efficiency. At the rear, the "flying buttresses" that extended from the roof along the tops of the fenders earned it the "bread van" nickname. They severely reduced rear visibility and were lowered in 1972.
When Lotus unveiled the Europa late in 1966, it was intended for Continental Europe. But by 1969, it was made available in Britain. By the early 1970s, Europas were imported to North America. Road & Track tested a Europa S2 with the 1.5-liter engine, which was listed at 82 horsepower. The magazine reported that the 1,460-pound coupe would accelerate to 60 mph in 11.2 seconds, which it noted was slower than other coupes such as the Datsun 240Z, Opel GT and Volvo 1800E. It reached a top speed of 109 mph. To improve performance, Lotus installed the larger Renault 16TS' 1,565-cc four for 1970. But the real boost came for 1972 when the Lotus-Ford 1.6-liter double overhead cam four was fitted. The Lotus Europa was discontinued in 1975, replaced by the midengined Esprit with lines by the famed Italian designer Giugiaro. This wedge-shaped coupe was faster and more expensive than the Europa, and it marked Lotus' move to more upmarket cars. Over the car's lifetime, approximately 9,200 Europas were produced. Bill Vance is a syndicated columnist and author on automotive topics. His book, "Reflections on Automotive History," is available from Eramosa Valley Publishing, Box 370, Rockwood, Ontario, N0B 2K0. Soft cover $18.50; hard cover $28.50, plus $4 shipping.

From: ClassMaker@aol.com JERTIGGER2@cs.com writes: I am trying to track down the history of my 72 Europa TC 2224R. The only thing Lotus has in its archives is the car was sold to Lotus East. Is Lotus East still in existence, was it taken over by someone else?
Gone, but not forgotten. I've been there. Dutchess Auto, a/k/a Lotus East, Millerton, New York, just across
the western border of Connecticut. You might get some help from Frank at Sports Car World, Evant, Texas. He does have some *original* factory or distributor logbooks for "classic" Lotii. However, don't expect much else
from the records, other than build (completion) date, despatch (shipping) date, VIN, engine number, original color,
and options.

IGNITION, Electronic

I just finished installing a Lumention electronic ignition in my T/C Europa and figured I should report in. The installation went pretty well. I did have to cut down the points mounting pin as mentioned in the instructions in order for the chopper to clear the pin. I have ordered another vacuum plate from dbe and plan to mount the points and condenser to that one so that a swap would be easier, if I ever need to do that. As suggested by Jerry Rude, I mounted the power module on the fiberglass next to the ignition coil. This is certainly better than making holes in the frame, although it was quite a challenge to drill the holes and get the bolts in. I hope I don't need to remove it soon (or ever!). The engine seems to run a bit better now, and the timing appears to be more stable. And with the optical trigger, it should stay that way. The electronic ignition also seems to have helped a couple of long-term problems I have had. One is occasional run-on (dieseling) when you try to shut the car off. This now seems to be mostly eliminated; I certainly hope so. I also used to get a lot of exhaust backfiring on over-run which now also seems to have stopped. I don't quite see why, but am pleased none the less. Unfortunately the tach is mostly not working right now; I will try the extra turns trick and see if that helps. Right now it jumps all over the place and has very little resemblance to reality. One problem still remains that I would like to solve. I have tried several times in the past to remove the vacuum advance line from the rear carb to the capsule on the distributor with no luck. Every time I remove it and re-set the timing and the idle it seems to be working fine. Then I rev up the engine and it takes forever for it to come back down to idle. It drops down to around 2000 - 2500 RPM and then hangs out there for 20 seconds or more before slowly dropping down where it belongs. It does the same thing while driving around which can be kind of exciting when you shift into 4th gear and the car speeds up without you pushing the gas pedal instead of cruising along at the speed you wanted. With the vacuum line connected as soon as you close the throttle, the engine speed drops right back down to idle like it should. Since I already had the distributor apart, I cleaned the grunge off of everything including the weights and springs. It all seems to move very smoothly now, not that it was all that much worse before. Any ideas? For now, I am going to have to put the vacuum line back on to make the car driveable. Thanks, -Jon

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> Subject: Re: Lumention installed & distributor problem Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 20:19:11 –0800 gdrude@pacbell.net said: > It sounds like a vaccum line leak, how did you cap the hose inlet, with a plastic/rubber cap? You might also screw down the distributor plate solid, so it won't rotate. This will prevent any bounce or such due to play in the plates pivot bushing.


I just used a little rubber vacuum cap on both the carb and the distributor vacuum capsule. I thought about making sure that the vacuum plate can't rotate relative to the base plate. I doesn't seem like anything would prevent that from happening. I will have to try that next.


gdrude@pacbell.net said: > PS. thank you for the update on the system. sounds like it wasn't too bad to install. Also, let us know of the tach solution. Mine has no visible loop to increase, must be inside the tach, but mine seems to work fine so yours will no doubt also.


Yes, the loop is inside the tach. There is a small donut with many turns of hair-thin wire around it. The pickup for the tach is a large wire which is threaded through (around?) this donut. Mine already had two turns when I took it apart, so I just added one more turn and put it back in the car. It seems to be much improved, but still a little jumpy at idle. Unfortunately, even to get three turns, I had to remove the little plastic retainer for the donut. The pickup wire is too short to do any more. Has anyone gone to more than three turns (I thought I saw someone had done 5 once) and if so, how? Did you splice a bit of wire into the existing pickup wire to make it longer. I don't really want to mess with this too much. I already broke on of the tiny wires and had to splice it.

Jerry Geil <jlgeil@qnet.com> Subject: Lotus Electronic Ignition Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:10:50 -0800
I have been reading with interest the letters about the Lumention ignition system and how listers have dealt with the installation. When I planned to install an electronic ignition in my Europa, I asked the List for advice. Another Lister recommended the Pertronix "Ignitor". I checked out their website and called Pertronix. It turns out that they supply the device to JAE and JAE retails it for $99. Many thanks to the Lister who recommended it. I put it in last Sunday. The car started quicker, idled smoother and accelerated quicker. Installation was a breeze once I got the distributor off. The could have been better, but JAE was very helpful. The "Ignitor" mounts right on the base for the points. Two leads come out and hook to the coil. No other module to mount. You have to look twice to determine it is not stock. Just start it and time it like usual. If any other listers are thinking about an electronic ignition, you should check this one out.

"Michael Lye" <mlye@risd.edu> Subject: Re: Lotus Electronic Ignition Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 07:52:37 -0500
I have the Ignitor on my Europa too. I like it a lot but be aware that there have been problems with the ring (fits on the end of the distributor shaft) that holds the magnets that trigger it. This came apart while I was drivng leaving me stranded one of the few times ever! It wasn't actually very hard to fix but of course it happened late at night so it was hard to figure out what happened. The first two replacements I got had the magnets installed incorrectly, but once I figured that out I reglued them in correctly and have been fine ever since. This was a couple of years ago now and the problems may well have been solved by Pertronix. I still carry a spare with me, though, just in case my glue job fails.

ElanS4 <elans4@erols.com> Subject: Re: Lotus Electronic Ignition Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 09:46:59 –0500

Another Lister recommended the Pertronix "Ignitor". I checked out their website and called Pertronix. It turns out that they supply the device to JAE and JAE retails it for $99.


The only problem with the ignitor is that you can't use the stock mechanical rev limiter. But JAE has a solution for that also. They sell an easy to use, easy to install electronic rev limiter that attaches to you coil (although I'd prefer the other version with mounting holes) that you can add on also...

To answer your questions... I would look at the ring closely to make sure (if it's two parts) that they are still securely fastened together. If it seems like there is a seam and it's at all loose I would be concerned. When I had a problem with the replacements I used another magnet to check the polarity of the four magnets and found two were one way and two the other. I had a 50-50 chance and popped one pair out switched them around and tried it that way. I want to say I got it right the first time but ISTR the engine not firing at all. I switched the orientation of all four and tried it again. This time it worked fine. I then reglued the magnets in place. I can't say which pole faced out (I didn't have a compass handy) but there are only the two possiblities. If the two parts are coming apart I might try to disassemble them and glue the magnets in place now while it's still working. Just make sure the orientation stays the same for each one by using another magnet or a compass. I don't remember what glue I used now, but it may have been a cyanoacrylate (sp) as I didn't know what the plastic was. Be careful with the magnets they are small but *very* powerful. If they stick to each other they are hard to get apart. Hope this helps,
Michael

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Subject: Pertronix Ignitor "magnet tricks?" Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 11:02:00 –0700 Ken inquires: >I've bought the ignitor for my Europa S2 (Ducellier distributor). Presuming the same problem may appear in the magnet dohickey, what should I inspect for?


Here's my story: I bought mine in 96 and followed the instructions putting it in. It warned very specifically against removing the green tape around the periphery of the magnet ring, so I didn't. Car ran great the first event. Revved cleanly all the way to valve float, which it had never done before. However, at the second event, it quit in the middle of my first run. That was and is the only mechanical DNF the car has ever had. I pushed the car back to the pits and checked it out. As it turned out, the magnets had all come adrift. I collected the parts and reinstalled the points (yep, had the foresight to keep 'em in my toolbox) for the remainder of the event. Once back home, I figured out why they didn't want you to remove that tape: it was the only thing holding the magnets in. I reassembled the ring using tape as a temporary magnet retainer, reinstalled the system on the car, and cranked it. I thought I had gotten all the magnets the same, but one was out. I pulled plug wires one by one to determine which one was out. Then I took the magnet ring off, corrected the erroneous one, and firmly epoxied the whole mess back together. No problems since.


>What is the right way to glue them?


Just take 'em out one at a time and epoxy them back in, making sure to preserve their polarity.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Luminition and Tachometers Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:08:32 –0700 For those of you who have been having Tachometer problems with an aftermarket ignition system, the following is text from Denaploy, the manufacturer of Luminition. I was directed there by a Luminition person after enquiring about a Tachometer problem observed in Jon Lexaus S2 Europa and observing the tach line with an oscilloscope. Further details and a drawing not include here are on their website under 'Faqs' at http://www.denaploy.co.uk/autocar


***************************************************************************************************
Smiths Tachometers and Lumenition


Most British vehicles that were fitted with a tachometer as standard were fitted with a Smiths Instruments device. These units come in three general types depending upon their triggering method. The first is mechanical and usually driven from the distributor shaft and has no electrical interface. Common in sports cars of the 50’s and 60’s.


Before 1974 (approx.) the electronic tachometer were current impulse triggered. This means that the tachometer sense wire is connected in series with the ignition coil, usually between the ignition switch and coil/ballast positive as in Fig 1. Sometimes the power for the tachometer was shared internally with the ignition switch end of the sense wire giving only three terminals. Smiths unit of this type can be identified by the letters RVI on the face of the tachometer. Designed in the days of contact breakers, they give inconsistent results when used with electronic ignitions. Many installations will work but some will produce erratic or no movement of the indicating needle. Some suggestions for rewiring the ignition circuit to eliminate the problem have been tried with limited success.


Later electronic tachometers are voltage pulse trigged and the single sense wire is connected directly to coil negative as in Fig 2. Smith unit have the designation RVC printed on the face. As far as we are aware there are no problems using this type of tachometer with our Optronic ignition.


It is important that owners can tell the difference between the two types of tachometer as incorrect wiring of the unit can cause damage to the electronic ignition module. If used the tachometer sensing wire(s) must be connected as appropriate for that particular design of tachometer.


As mentioned above some owners have tried alternative wiring for the sense wires with RVI tachometers with limited success. Out recommended solution if you wish to retain the benefits of electronic ignition is to: replace the RVI tachometer with a later RVC model if available or aftermarket equivalent or have the existing RVI tachometer converted to the later internal electronic. In both cases a minor wiring change must be made to the vehicles normal ignition circuit. The company in England that we usually recommend to carry out conversion is:


SPEEDY Cables, The Mews, St Paul Street

Islington, London, N1 7BU UNITED KINGDOM

Phone 0171 226 9228

Fax 0171 704 9542

NOTE: All of the above refers to negative earth vehicles.

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> Subject: Re: Ignitor? Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:46:58 -0700
ken.landaiche@dlcc.com said: Isn't the Ignitor the one with which several people have had tachometer problems? And has anyone definitively solved the twitchy tach problem? It's the last issue keeping me from getting one. Well, that and the time to install it!


Actually, I think that the Ignitor works OK with the tach (although I could be wrong). I know for sure that the Lumenition ignition does not work well with a current-sensing style tachometer. I am going to try replacing the sensing coil and front end of my tach with an LM2917 frequency to voltage converter and see if I can make that work.

ElanS4 <elans4@erols.com> Subject: Re: Ignitor? Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:20:52 –0400 I recently had a discussion with Jeff at JAE about tachs. I was actually calling him to find out if he had any spare tachs for sale so that I could send it out to be converted for electronic ignition. Jeff talked me out of it. It's been his experience that if you already have a bad or marginal tach, it will bounce around with the Ignitor. If you have a good or recently rebuilt tach, it should work just fine.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Posting to the Europa list. Probably of general interest. If you have electronic ignition and a current operated tach you've got serious problems with accuracy. Jon Lexau and I are looking at that problem now and looking for a reasonable solution. There will not be any way to fix this with more or less loops, so don't go there yet. The best present solution as recommended by the makers of the Lumenition is to exchange the current operated tach for the later model voltage sensing style. That is also my recommendation for now. The distributors, both Bean and JAE seem to be glossing over this problem, but trust me, there isn't any other good solution presently that will work over anything but a short range. The problem stems from the fact that the current operated tach (standard Europa tach) was designed to operate on clean pulses with rapid rising and falling edges. The tach reading is basically an integral over time of the energy under this pulse and is relatively linear with respect to pulses per second as RPM rises. The electronic ignitions however do not generate a 'square' pulse, but rather a pulse with a rapid leading edge and a trailing edge that tapers off with a much longer slope. The area under the curve is no longer the same. To make matters worse, the trailing edge extends almost to the next pulse at idle, and at higher RPM is truncated by the following pulse in a non-linear relationship, so a simple change of the loop will not compensate over the entire operating range correctly. I'd recommend you spend your time elsewhere for awhile and see if we can come up with a reasonable cure. Presently you can either find and buy a later version $$$ or have it 'converted' which is even more $$$$$$. Putting some type of filter or wave-shaping circuit in the main line will adversely affect the ignition system and shouldn't be done.


>The tach will only get up to about 4k revs. Kind of floats around that number.


By 4k the pulses have run together so badly it doesn't ever see an off condition. It's what is called 'Saturated'.

> So you would think that a weak signal (have the electronic ignition as you saw at GGLC) would be the culprit.


This isn't a weak signal problem, despite what the parts vendors think, but a pulse distortion problem.


>The puzzling part is that at idle, about 1k rev, the tach will only get down to 1.5k,


That's because even at idle the area under the curve is much greater than the unit was designed for due to the trailing edge distortion.


> and I'm out of adjustment with the pot.


No doubt.

> Are there more than one adjustment on these?


Nope.

>I guess I'll put another loop around the ignition wire to the coil, and see if that helps, though I'm convinced that is the only problem. What do you think?


I think another loop MAY steady the display, but won't address the inherent inaccuracy over range. I wouldn't bother.


IGNITION, Plug wires

zigglu@us.ibm.com Subject: Europa Plugwires Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 23:24:55 –0400 >Now for a question: are there any plug wires that are better than the >originals? I am thinking about silicone wires from Crane, but I don't know what wires are best.


Try MAGNECOR wires. They are one of the best, better than Crane and Jacobs. Check more details on:
http://www.magnecor.com/magnecor1/overview.htm and http://www.magnecor.com/magnecor1/frequent.htm

IGNITION, Timing

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Scott wrote:
So check me here... OK.
The static advance for a Renault Europa is 4 degrees on the crank. Keerect.
The centrifugal advance kicks in around 900 rpm and peaks at 3000. Yep, but those are DISTRIBUTOR rpm. Double those figures for crankshaft rpm. I seem to remember the upper distributor rpm figure specified by Lotus as something less than 3000, but I don't have the shop manual with me here at work.
It goes from 7.8 to 18 degrees of distributor advance across that range. 1 degree of distributor advance is 2 degrees on the crank... right? So, in stock configuration, my tests should show 20 degrees advance at 1000
rpm and 40 degrees at 3000+ rpm? No. You should see only static at 1000 rpm (500 distributor rpm), i.e. 4 degrees; static + (7.8*2)=~ 20 degrees at 1800 rpm; and static + (18*2)= 40 degrees at 6000 rpm. That's with the vacuum advance disconnected.
Also a friend gave me an old Sears 'Ignition Analizer' that measures rpm, dwell, etc. Unfortunatly he didn't have a manual for it. And I can't get one from Sears. Anyway I hooked it across the two coil connections... it seemed to work if inaccurately (the tach read under 1000 and it read >around 1500... yes it was set for a 4 cyl). The dwell was reading under 50 degrees, but the manual says it should be 61 +/-3 degrees. If the dwell reading is correct, your point gap is too wide. It's easy to do that. When I set points, I won't get the correct dwell unless I set them so that I feel a slight resistance when I move the feeler gauge between the point surfaces.

INSTRUMENTS, Nisonger

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> 08 Jan 00, John D. Abbott <jdaarch@arn.net> wrote: >Hello Everybody, Does anyone have the address / telephone >for Nissonger (sp?) Instruments?

I haven't tried these addresses in a long time, but they used to be:

Nisonger Corp.
35 Bartels Place
New Rochelle, NY 10801

and

5220 W Jefferson Blvd
Los Angeles, Ca 90016

INSTRUMENTS, Speedometer

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Subject: Re: Talking about speedos... Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:11:43 +0100
References: <
199906231233.FAA09736@lists1.best.com> David Salvador Flores wrote: Anyone know how difficult it is to calibrate these things? Like many on this list my '86 Esprit's spedo. reads about 10mph faster than I'm really going at 60mph (says I'm doing 70).


If it's also ten mph fast at 70, and 80, and 90, then it's the needle position on the shaft that causes the error and you can take the speedo apart and re-set it. If it's 12mph faster at 70 and 14 mph faster at 80, etc, then it's a gearing problem and there's not a lot you can do without a suitable supplier of nylon gears or a machine shop with gear cutting equipment.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Re: Talking about speedos... Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:12:38 –0700 Before you take the needle off the shaft be aware that there is usually an adjustment point available on the small helical spring to that returns the needle to zero. Removing the needle or faceplate is generally not required for service and can be difficult to get back where it's supposed to be later.

INSTRUMENTS, Tachometer

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> What would cause the tach on my Seven to read 20 percent high (as compared to a dwell meter)? It is a Smith's tach of the current type and I do not have electronic ignition.

Have you added any electrical appliance such as an electric fuel pump, amplifier, stereo or other item to the Ignition wiring such that the appliance only comes on when the ignition is switched on? The tach is current-operated, so adding loads will increase the average current the tach sees if these loads are added 'downstream' of the tach which will make it read high. A previous lister had added a fuel pump and as engine revs went up and corresponding fuel demand went up the tach would get erratic. The solution is simply to change where the new appliance is hooked onto the same circuit.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> From: John D. Abbott <jdaarch@arn.net> My tach, although accurate up to 3500 rpm, is not after that. >

Here is something I wrote in 1993 which may help:
==================
...took the tach (you recall it reads 8000 RPM all the time) out to the instrument place.

APT Speedometer Specialists
9632 Humboldt Avenue So
Bloomington, MN 55431
(612) 881-7095

This place is amazing. A house and garage in an area that is generally generic industrial park. The garage is really a shop. There are disassembled instruments everywhere. The owner is a young guy who (all my friends will find this hard to believe) can out-talk me by a ratio of about five to one. I have a habit, when showing the Lotus project to anyone, of giving them the five dollar tour. This guy surpassed my finest efforts. He showed me dozens of projects. The two most unusual: A 191? Studebaker speedometer that works on air pressure from a tiny fan run by the speedometer cable. It was completely unlike anything I had ever seen in a car. Looked like old submarine instruments. It appeared brand new. The other was a faceplate for a Harley upon which he had reproduced the biker's scorpion tattoo in full color. The shop was full of fifties speedometers that had been recalibrated for higher speeds, but in the original typefaces, and instruments from antique cars that had been totally restored right down to repainting the numbers on the odo dials. He opened up the Smiths tach. He found a coil that had expired from heat. It had jammed the movement so it could not move. How it got to 8000 is a matter for conjecture. He told me that he could fix it, but it would cost a large amount of money. I should either try to find another one, or let him put in different guts. He told me that there were several disadvantages to the original induction tach: They are often inaccurate (the one in my Midget was wildly optimistic). Since they depend on the ignition components of the car, they can change. There is no way to calibrate them in the shop, it has to be done in the car. If the coil opens up in the tach, your car stops running. He said he could modernize the tach and it would look exactly the same as original and be accurate. The new method uses electronic circuitry to count the ignition pulses. He would: Clean everything. Repaint the inside of the can white and the outside of the can gray. Refinish trim parts as needed. Build a new movement using S-W or other parts. Install the electronics. Calibrate with a square-wave generator. Guarantee the lot for one year. Cost: $135. The cheapest I have seen a new one is $200. I could probably find a cheaper modern one to fit, but then it would not look right. Have to have that Smiths orange and red pie look. So I told him to go ahead. Trouble is, if he gets it that beautiful, the speedo will look dingy.
=====================

The result is amazing. The tach works great and looks brand-new. It does, in fact, make the speedo look a bit old. I suggest that if you have a few bucks to spend and want your Europa to look perfect, you send all your instruments to this guy.

INSURANCE

Peter Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> For reference, 'cause we talk about insurance rates here on occasion, I just checked what i'm paying here in Florida, for full coverage, unlimited "pleasure" mileage, and $500 deductible collision: $561 / year ('70 Europa S2). This makes looking into a specialty company less of a priority... and without going into "stated value" land, they peg it at just over $5k which I feel is fair.

jertigger2@cs.com I went with Parish for starters, they quoted me $275 2500 miles per year and $12500 value.

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> There has been some recent threads about insuring Europas in the USA. I got antique car insurance from Condon & Skelly via St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. Actually, I just picked them out via their ad in Hemings. My local insurance agent that handles our daily drivers/home insurance takes care of all the paper work. So my Lotus Europa insurance in New York State is $104 per year. And that has been the rate for the past ten years. I am limited to 2,500 miles per year, for club related events, or TESTING. So when I have breakfast with my car buddies, that is a club event, or TESTING. When I go for a drive on the weekend, I am TESTING. I have the car insured at $8000 (cost is $56). You pick the value. You pay $7 per $1000 valuation. I also have $500K bodily injury/property damage for $14. Medical payments for $5K each person for $2. Uninsured motorist $500K for $29. NYS surchage $1!! If my 1565 lb. Europa destroys a bus full of tourists, my regular car insurance will kick in. I am told that some people experience broken odometers during the driving season. But really, I don't do more than 2500 miles a driving season in my Europa. Antique car insurance companies actually do quite well with these policies. They have very few claims, since we are so careful, paranoid
drivers when we are near SUVs. Antique car drivers are the most insurable drivers in the USA.

Jeff Hovis <jeffh@biowhittaker.com> I've got to agree with Paul, I've got my 1970 S2 insured with State Farm for $10k and I've spent almost twice that much since August, 1997, including the purchase price. I have antique car insurance and my total premium is $85.60 and Atlanta, GA is rated an expensive auto insurance area. I don't know why, we're all excellent drivers. As far as annual mileage, I've driven my car less than 3,000 miles since August, 1997.

INTERIOR, Carpet installation

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Use the 3M spray designed for carpet. Don't use the extra heavy stuff for vinyl tops, but the lighter duty stuff for carpets. Its easy to use, and if you overspray I have a full can of the stuff to remove it and can send you a small sample, which will be more than enough to fix any mistakes, its kinda expensive ($30). I think I used 3 cans of the spray stuff, large cans. I haven't found anything better as yet, and 3M puts out quality stuff. The cheaper brand, I think it was Mar-lyn?? isn't as good.

> From: "jeff hovis" <
jhovis@mindspring.com> In my previous message, I said that I a got a new carpet set but forgot to ask if anyone had any suggestions on installing it. Should I use velcro or some sort of glue?

From: Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> The carpet must be glued in. Use spray contact adhesive. A good-looking and long-lasting carpet job requires that the pieces be installed carefully and glued down completely with the exception of the footwell floor pieces, which are held down with "invisible" carpet snaps. These snaps are available from suppliers like Bean but probably also from auto upholstery shops and perhaps even large hardware stores. A pronged ring pushes through the carpet and hides in the pile. It is bent over a snap socket on the back side, which snaps onto to a snap stud screwed through the floor. This is the way they were done by Lotus, and allows one to un-snap, remove and shake out the floor pieces. Another hint: remove the door seals, install the carpet and cut flush with the door opening, then carefully reinstall the seal pushing it over the body flange and carpet.

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> Cement anything vertical or near vertical. I used 3M Super 77 spray adhesive on both sides (leave until tacky) then another coat, on one surface only, before fitting press in place. Foot mats, with the foam underneath, are good enough for friction fit. I used double sided carpet tape to keep the console carpet in place and the tunnel accessible. No problems for over 5 years.

INTERIOR, Custom seats

Scott Mitchell <smitch@erols.com> Today the local Lotus Ltd chapter had a Tech Day at Kevin McGovern's. I took the opportunity to do a custom seat for autocrossing the Europa. With a helmet on I need a bit of extra headroom, and a bit more legroom couldn't hurt. The trick part of the seat is the two part Polyurethane Foam that I got from Pegasus. Though I don't think there's anything special about it, I'm sure you could get the stuff cheaper from some Industrial supply. From Pegasus, a quart of each part costs $41. I ended up using about half of that for this seat. So I pulled into Kevin's Garage, and removed the drivers seat. Everything went pretty much according to plan. Measure part A and part B, mix them, and when it starts to heat & expand pour it into a large trashbag, put the bag into the chassis, and sit on it. It took three small batches, but what I've got is pretty good. I had expected to make two parts, but a single lawn & leaf bag (39 gal) made a seat from mid-thigh to armpit. Most importantly I gain about 2" above the helmet.. and my C.G is definately lower in the car. The seat has good support, nice bolstering up to the arm pits, and amazing detail... nice detents for my wallet, belt, belt loop, and you could even make out my Jeans pocket and stitching. There are a couple minor quibbles...It isn't quite semetrical, and it may be laid back too far, so a 2.0 version may be necessary down the line. I still need to fiberglass the mold for durability and to meet ASP rules I need to make it 'fully padded and upholstered'. But that shouldn't be hard. Then the beta testing begins. ;-)

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> Today, I took out the passenger seat and took it down to Automod to compare it to the Corbeau seats. The only seat that is close in size and seat back rake angle is the Clubman which is also the least expensive at $220. I have already placed it in the car to see how it fit. Height wise, it is about two inches taller which is no problem. I will have to make some adjustment to the seat back rake. It is still a little too straight and I'm going to try adding some spacers to the front mounting bolts to tilt it back a little more. We compared the S2 sliders to the seats while in the store and they look like they'll work fine. Finally, if anyone else is looking for competition seats, these are very nice but if you're over 6ft, I don't think you'll be able to get in and out over the side bolsters. I'm 5'10" and it was quite a chore to get in and out with this seat. I'll have to put my helmet on inside the car. A clarification about the seat height. When I said the seat is about 2 in. taller, I was referring to the seat back. I think that the actual seat is a tad lower if anything.

INTERIOR, Dashboard glue

Everett Stephens <everettstephens@pol.net> Subject: RE: wood glue Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 03:27:44 -0500

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Subject: wood glue Someone was talking about a good waterproof glue they liked. I need to glue the veneer on my Euorpa dashboard (finally). New wood. I tend toward Titebond II, a big competitor to Elmer's. Elmer's has recently introduced a glue called ProBond, which I have not used but have hard good things about. Everett S. 70 Elan S4 SE (as if an Elan wasn't enough to keep me busy, I play at cabinetbuilding also.)

"Briggs Pletcher" <Briggs1@ix.netcom.com> Subject: RE:Wood Glue Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 06:27:54 -0500
To do the job right I would suggest a two part epoxy. I used marine grade stuff. It was a two part with one part being a powder. When mixed it turned into a paste and was very easy to work with. Just make sure that you have more clamps than you need and press it against another flat board to spread the pressure and get a smooth finish. Mine turned out great. Will absolutely last a life time. Briggs, 72 Europa

Mike Carrick <mcarrick@ford.com> Subject: Wood Glue Date: 15 Mar 1999 06:23:20 –0500 A thought or two. Marine grade glue (resorcinol) such as Cascophen is excellent stuff; the major repair work I did on my boat over 20 yrs ago is still OK. However, it's expensive; for other than the most extreme marine use, it's overkill and fibreglass resin is quite adequate. Also, it's brown in colour and will spoil a decorative finish. Potentially it could soak far enough into a thin veneer to be noticed. If fitting a dash panel (eg veneered plywood) I'd suggest fibreglass resin; but whatever you use, ensure the wood is finished first ie varnished or polished or whatever. Any glue getting onto raw wood is going to ruin the appearance. If putting on a veneer, I'd suggest hot melt sheet glue. I've used it with great success on loudspeakers; I bought it from the veneer supplier, it just irons on. The point is, as mentioned above, you don't want a liquid glue getting on the face of the veneer or soaking through any porous bits, as it'll ruin the raw wood. Just my 2p's worth.


INTERIOR, Dash replacement

rodbean@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: Elan S4 - Dash pad removal and replacement Thu, 18 Mar 1999 17:55:30 –0800 References: <004e01be719c$35467780$95140518@c58868-a.plano1.tx.home.com> Jeff Cocking wrote: From what I can tell the dash pad is glued down. Has anyone removed it? Any suggestions. Would like to keep it, as it is in great shape, and re-install later.


The early Elans (S1 and S2) dash pads are definitely glued down. The foam is glued to the fiberglass (bodywork). I'd suspect this is also true of later Elans (S3 through Sprint).

Ken Landaiche <ken.landaiche@dlcc.com> Subject: RE: Window finishers (and other adhesive applications) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:32:48 –0800 I considered this tape for the fiberglass door sill trim panels on my Europa Special. But those have to come off once in a while. What sort of two sided tape would be best for that application?


Tim Engel [
mailto:tengel@isd.net] Transfer tape is all adhesive with no thin plastic film carrier. It comes with a peel strip on both sides. Pull off one peel strip and press the tape onto the part. Then peel off the second strip and press the part into position. VHB stands for Very High Bond and is a structural adhesive. After a 24 hour set-up, you will have to destroy the plastic strip to get it off again.

"Brian Martley" <brian.martley@tesco.net> There's a metal bracket bolted to the back of the dashboard and the column bolts to this. If you have the parts manual, it's shown on section HA – if you haven't email off list & I'll scan it for you.

INTERIOR, Heater fan

rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> Hi, Do you want a heater blower? Try what I did. Use a 6 inch 12 volt computer fan, two in series if more air volume is needed, and attach them which long screws to the heater intake hole in the front luggage compartment. Arrange a switch and presto!. Heat. They do protrude into the compartment but it works ok.

rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> ken.landaiche@nokia.com wrote: If you want to engineer that a bit more (we do own Lotuses, right?) consider this. I saw one of our network servers open at work. The processor had a 3"x5" heat sink on it and two fans in series as Rod suggested. The tech told me that the first fan runs at 9000 RPM while the second runs at 14000 RPM to accelerate the already moving air. Rod, did you attach them where the plenum fan usually goes or right at the bulkhead opening?

I attached mine at the bulkhead, but what's wrong with the same arrangement on the plenum. Then you'd have hot and cold running air! Cold at the Dash vents and hot on the feet.


INTERIOR, Roll bar/harness

Type902@aol.com Try Les Twigg at www.cars.u-net.com for a roll bar and solve the harness problem.

INTERIOR, Seat loosening

From: IKneer@aol.com Success!! Drivers seat removed! I removed the access plug for the upper A-arm bolt, inserted a chain around the A-arm back through the seat cushion, inserted screwdriver in chain and twisted, pulling the seat forward as the chain shortened.

INTERIOR, Seat belts

Rich Sheya <canyon@wolsi.com> Subject: re:racing harness in a Europa Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:26:16 –0700 Several years ago I installed a 6-point racing harness in my S-2 Europa. I attached the left shoulder belt to the stock location and the
right to a "sandwich" made from 2 pieces of 1/8" steel about 3" square. I ran a bolt through the belt attachment bracket, the inside piece of steel, the firewall and the outside piece of steel. The lap belts mounted to the stock seatbelt location, the anti-submarine strap I bolted through the floor using the same technique as the shoulder belts. I always belted up before driving, which some people thought absurd. One day I was making a left turn with a left turn arrow and a guy driving a Taurus ran the red light coming the other way. He impacted the right side of my car just behind the right front tire. The cops figured he was doing about 55mph. Anyway the racing harness did it's job although I did have some bruises on my shoulders and hips from
the belts and a few cuts from flying glass. Other than that I walked away. Of course the Europa was a total loss, there wasn't one undamaged part on the whole car. But the belts held and did their job.

INTERIOR, Steering wheel

Rob LaMoreaux <RLaMoreaux@BTE-US.com> Subject: RE: Europa steering wheel Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:22:33 –0500 Here is a link to a place that sells leather steering wheel covers for $28.00 + $4.00 S&H, and they will provide cusotm sizes at no charge. http://www.dccarcare.com/wsorig.html This is where I intend to get a new cover for my Elan since the original vinyl is split, and the cheap vinyl cover over it was ugly.

INTERIOR, Upholstery

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> The basketweave pattern vinyl used in Europas and later Elans has long since gone unavailable. There is a VW/Porsche/Audi vinyl with a somewhat similar pattern that is available from any auto upholstery supplier.

JACKING

1) How are you supposed to jack the car up? The manual show four designated jacking points, but how can you get the car up on jackstands?

At the rear place a floor jack under the gearbox (with a wood block for a pad between jack & gearbox). At the front, DO NOT place the jack under the Tee section of the chassis! You can lift the car from that position, but ONLY with a wide jack pad. An alternative is placing the jack w/ pad under the chassis just below the lower A-arm pick point.


> I'm planning to jack the car up and use a 2 X 4 laying across the jackstands to better support the car.


YES.

kmccormick@cgsinc.com Subject: Jacking Points on TC Europa? Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:28:11 -0400
I have used the following jacking points on my 72 TC. To lower and raise the car with hydraulic jacks use a small piece of wood (3x5x1/2) to cover the metal jack end first. Placement is under the rear of the front wheel well being sure to place the wood so that it straddles the vertical fiberglass, the floor portion and the turned in inner section (the inner section where all three meet is the strongest point - picture a cube, where the jack is placed under the bottom corner ). The rear I lift the same way using the FRONT of the rear wheel well (same placement strategy as with the front). I was originally using the factory recommended placement behind the rear wheel well, until the body started to crack at that position. Once the front is lifted, 2 jack stands can be placed under the front end. There is a metal frame brace directly between the wheels (I believe it is behind the removable panel - don't remember ?). It is only about 3 inches wide so be careful when placing the jack stands. I use the rear frame (bent bar) transmission mount for jack stand placement in the rear. I have not had the car up on all 4 jack stands at once. I have used 4 hydraulic jacks at one time which worked just fine. When I did my suspension, I did one end at a time. I found that I needed to use a hydraulic jack under the suspension components when reassembled, to place enough load on them to reattach the sway bar under the shocks.

ken.landaiche@nokia.com Subject: RE: Jacking Points on TC Europa? Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 00:22:11 +0300
For my TC Special, I jack in the back at the transmission/engine joint then put jack stands under the wishbone legs. In front I ... don't really remember, it's been so long. I have used the factory recommended points just behind the wheel wells.

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Subject: RE: Jacking Points on TC Europa? Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:10:56 –0700 Whenever possible jack the car from the frame, not the body. If your jack will not reach under the nose all the way to the front crossmember, drive or push the car onto pieces of wood or other 'shims', a couple of inches thick should do. The jack should then reach. Raise the front and place jack stands under the crossmember at each extremity next to the lower wishbones. Go to the rear and jack from the rear transaxle support tube (if accessible, depends on transaxle) or under the lower links inner pivot bracket. Place stands under the frame legs just aft of the driveshafts. This position requires tall stands - get taller stands rather than try to support the car somewhere else. Don't place stands under the box-section trailing arms or under the lower links - they bend easily and the car will not be stable. Make certain that the car is very stable on the stands - not rocking, tilting, or leaning.

Warren Pearce <pearceww@rmi.net> Subject: Re: Jacking Points on TC Europa? Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:07:50 –0600 If you look at the bottom of the body just to the rear of the front wheel wells and just to the front of the rear wheel wells you will see an area that is flat and parallel to the ground. That's the normal place to put a jack stand for holding the entire car without having a jack stand on the frame/engine/gearbox. I always put a small piece of 2X4 between the stand and the bottom of the body to spread out the load. As often as not, I will place the stands under the frame at the front. Putting the stands at the rear locations keeps them as far as possible from engine/gearbox parts if I am working there.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Jacking Points on TC Europa? Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:10:10 –0700 During my restoration I used the following guidelines: The use of the body for jacking is not the best idea, and should be used with caution, and only in emergencies (flat on the road using stock jack, etc.). To jack the rear, I use a floor jack on the rear frame hoop where the transaxle rear mounts bolt to. Then I insert jackstands under both frame sides using 2 x 4s between the frame and jackstand. They are about 6 inches long, and I trimmed them down to about 2 x 3 size to fit. Put them as far forward as possible, just behind the axles. In front of the axles is better, but much harder to negotiate. Don't sit in the car with the rear jacked by the floor jack only, as this places alot of stress on that sheet metal frame. In the front, I use a floor jack, jacking in the center of the box section between the wishbones, or a little farther back. Use a full size 2 x 4 again, about 8 to 12 inches long as this is jacking up against sheet metal again. Leave enough room for the jackstands to be placed just inside of the wishbone (A-arm) attachment bolts, again using 2 x 4s between the jackstand and the frame. This gives a very stable car when working on all 4 wheels at one time. If removing the shocks, you can then slip the floor jack under the lower part of the rear hubs or trunions in the front to move the shocks up just enough to remove the bolts.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Björn-Anders Haverstad wrote: I am also a bit worried about the jacking points and chassis stands; I feel the body crack when I jack the car on the referred places.


I've never used the body jack points either to jack or to support the car. I place jack stands with wood pads under the front "T" section and under the backbone section just forward of the fork. I also use the transmission as a support point, if I don't need to remove driveline components.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Invented, or more likely reinvented, a neat trick today. As some of you may know, I am slowly getting around to removing the myriad layers of paint from my Europa. Today, I wanted to jack up the front of the car to better reach some areas around the nose. I have a 2x4 padded with closed-cell foam on the top and with a round knob on the bottom designed to replace the saddle on my floor jack. Assembly enters from the front, and centers under the frame cross-piece. The front gets raised by the jack, then two jackstands take over and the jack is removed. Problem: When the car is on the floor, I don't have room under the car for the jack to fit. When the car is ambulatory, or I have a few folks around to help push, this is not a big deal. Rolling the front end up on 4x4 ramps is enough. I could not meet those requirements today. Jacking on the body is not an option. I have seen what's down there, and I don't trust it. That's when the inspiration hit me. I got down my "belts and straps" box. Got out a pair of Omni shoulder straps I pulled out of the car before we torched it (repeatedly) for a corner-worker fire school. Sometimes it pays to save stuff. Each of these straps can be oriented to have a metal eye on one end and an adjustable buckle on the other. This particular belt is luckily arranged so the adjustable buckle terminates in a tab with a square hole in it. First I arranged each belt in front of the front tires, the fixed eye rear-facing. Then I rolled the car onto the belts. Behind one front tire, I placed a welded jackstand with the upper part removed. I held the eye over the top of the jackstand and dropped a bolt through the eye and into the throat of the jackstand. I rolled the car back until the strap was tightly pulling down on the jackstand, then put the car in gear and chocked the opposite rear tire. I have a small trolley jack I picked up at Pep Boys (yes, they have made it to Minnesota now), I removed the rotating saddle and thus revealed a vertical hole intended for the retention of said saddle. Placing the business end of the jack in front of the tire, I held the seat-belt tab over the hole in the jack and dropped in another bolt. Then I tightened the belt adjuster as much as possible and carefully started jacking. As the jack pulled up on the strap, the tire rotated slightly on the wheel bearing. The car could not move back so the strap started raising the car at half the rate that the jack rose. When the jack threatened the car body, I put a board under the tire and fully lowered the jack. Then I tightened up the adjuster as much as possible and lifted again. Soon I had 5 inches of wood under the tire. I put a second jackstand to work on the other side of the car and applied the trolley jack to that belt. Of course, this side responded more easily since the other side was taking some weight. Soon there was 5 inches of wood under this tire also. With even more clearance than I was used to, it was a simple matter for me to install my big floor jack and raise the car to accept jackstands in my usual manner.

That is the saddle that replaces the ugly toothed cup on the action end of the jack, right? I'll have to see if such a replacement would let my ancient Sears jack get under the front crossmember. Ken Landaiche

A good jack to get under and lift the front of a Europa has always been a bit of a problem to find. As the list proves, many of us have different ways to do it, some are cheaper than others. :-) I have a Lincoln jack that I bought at a tool shop in my area. If you have a K-119 Tools, or a Tool-Land in your area you can get one from
them. THey aren't cheap (I think I paid about $265 for mine) but they are the lowest hydraulic jack I've come across (from pad to floor) and in addition to the front, they will fit under the inner suspension pick-up points under the gearbox on the rear of a Europa, even with saggy springs. The front is a little trickier but I've found that it has always done the job. Most of the time I'll slide the jack under so that the pad clears the sway bar and reaches the "T" section of the frame, and then I'll slide a 2X4 onto the pad and raise it from there. Or, I sometimes push one front tire up onto a 2X4 and that gives it enough tilt for the jack to slide under far enough. I can give you the product number and the min and max height as well if anyone is interested. Like I said, it's as low as I've seen a hydraulic floor jack get, and it'll get your Europa up pretty high as well.
Scott@mini.chicago.com

Go down to your local junk yard and get a siccor jack for $5 out of any car. Use it from behind the back of front wheel on the A-arms. Let's not give our money away. Marc rc car person http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn 74 TC Spl

LEAKS, Sealer

SJMARCY@aol.com This stuff is awesome: Loctite's PST: pipe sealer with teflon. Unlike plumbers pipe dope, this materail really seals. It completely fills the gaps between the male and female thread like regualr loctite and yet doesn't lock it solid. It seals better than teflon tape too , with no worries about loose bits clogging up something. i haven't tried it on the threaded

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> A TC owner recently gave up attempting to remove the carrier nuts after breaking several teeth off them, even with the special Renault tool I loaned him. I had to heat the nuts to 200F to get them to move – the threads had been smeared with what looked like Permatex #2 gasket sealer. This was a big headache and I would stay away from anything but a teflon thread sealer such as Stan recommends.

LIGHTING, Headlights

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> As mentioned on this list earlier, I had to replace one of my headlights on my Lotus. Instead of getting an el cheapo sealed beam, I ended up replacing both units with Bosch H4's. For me, it was a choice between the Hella's and the Bosch. The Cibie's had good recommendations from other listers, but they were more than I wanted to spend. Not being able to determine any performance differences between the other two, I chose the Bosch, simply because they are not as flat-faced and I thought they would look more appropriate on my car. Performance: They are a BIG improvement over the sealed beams. I am using the standard bulbs 60/55W, and the light output is excellent (even though I should add a relay because I'm getting a 2 volt drop, but it's still impressive). I was afraid the sharp cutoff would be bothersome (less diffused light to see road signs on low beams), but these have a sharp rise which does a good job of illuminating the shoulder. The light pattern of each lamp shining on a wall looks something like
-------/
------------/
The only drawback I noticed with this pattern is on turns, the shoulder light is high enough that it might bother the car you are following until the turn is complete. Overall though, I would recommend them (technically they are not street legal, but no one seems to care anymore). More people sell the Hella's than Bosch; I found the Bosch units at
http://www.starprises.com/BOSCH7H4.htm and would recommend them.

LIGHTING, Headlight covers

Phil Ethier and Mark MarKell have both posted pictures of one of the headlight covers taped in place on their cars. Phil's S2 has the high fender line typical of late S2's and Twin Cams. Mark's S1 has the low fender line typical of S1's and early S2's. Between the two of them, they "cover" the field. In both cases, the quickie installation (taped on) illustrates how they would look if trimmed over-size to overlap the headlight bucket. That's the easiest method. They can also be trimmed to set into the headlight bucket flush with the surrounding fender surface. That's more difficult to get right... a uniform, minimum gap. It also requires some ingenuity to come up with a mounting bracket. Small angle brackets are usually used. Hobby shops sell small nylon brackets and small screws for use on models. DuBro is one brand. Metal brackets would lend themselves to bending for a better fit. The covers are molded out of thin (1/16 inch, 1.5 mm) and cuts relatively easily with sharp, quality scissors or aircraft sheet metal shears. A faint reference line is molded into the part. The edge can be sanded smooth and flame polished (practice on cut scraps!). Work slowly. You can't cut it larger again. Soft vinyl edging can also be used to trim the
edge. Please visit the following sites to checkout the looks BEFORE ordering. Be sure you want them before you commit. I'm just passing on costs and won't have a profit margin to support a "returns" program. All sales will be
final. Mark MarKell's lo-fendered S1 <
http://www.micro-engineering.com/Type46> and use the 'Covers' button.
Phil Ethier's hi-fendered S2 (also typical of Twin Cams) <
http://www.ememories.com/pf/default.asp?PF=94989184AEC2A393&PFR=650086> Tim Engel

13 Nov 00, Tom Berkeley wrote: Date: Monday, November 13, 2000 9:56 PM Subject: Re: Europa Headlight Cover Installation Discussion Group? >Got my headlight covers today. What type of plastic was used??
> (Snip)...


The covers are vacuum formed in Lexan. It's GE's brand name for Polycarbonate. Tough stuff and more chemical resistant than acrylic (aka, Plexiglas, Perspex, etc). The raw sheet stock was .060" thick (1/16" or 1.5 mm), but it thins out a little bit as it stretches during vacuum forming. Be aware that plastics like polycarbonate and acrylic do not have the scratch resistance that glass has. Plastic windshields work good on aircraft, but planes normally operate in a much cleaner part of the atmosphere. Cars and headlights work down in the grunge. Be careful not to rub the covers when they're dirty. Flush them with plenty of luke warm water and mild detergent. Wash gently with a soft rag. DO NOT SCRUB or use brushes or squeegees. On the other hand, you don't have to be totally paranoid. Most modern cars use custom headlight assemblies molded in polycarbonate or acrylic. They survive. Polycarbonate does not tolerate petroleum products... it's a character flaw. DO NOT LET GASOLINE SPILLS REMAIN ON THE COVERS. Do not use petroleum based solvents to clean polycarbonate. If you must use a solvent, isopropyl alcohol is safe. Campatible Cleaners listed on the GE slip-sheet include:
Warm water with mild soap or detergent.
Fantastik
Formula 409
Hexcel
Joy
Lysol
Mr. Clean
Neleco-Placer
PineSol
Top Job
Windex

Tim Engel

LIST, Subscribing

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Lotus Cars Mailing list Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:38:29 –0700 Typical problems in subscribing to this list have to do with the fact that the posting address and the subscribing address are not the same. Send a note to the following address (try just double-clicking on the link rather than re-typing it) with 'subscribe' in both the subject and body (I don't think both are necessary, but won't hurt). Note this address has 'request' in it whereas the posting address you probably have does not. Once successfully subscribed you must post (E-mail) to the posting address shown below the subscribing address.


Subscribing address: Subscribe/unsubscribe to
lotus-cars-request@lists1.best.com

Posting address: Send submissions to lotus-cars@lists1.best.com.earing adjuster (yet) but it should fill the bill.

LOCTITE

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> I've always been a bit fearful of using loctite in a Helicoiled thread. I'm always afraid the Helicoil will come out with the bolt. But I suppose this is less of an issue with a stud. If you're gonna do it I'd suggest using the blue and certainly not either red. And yes that 'right angle bit' isn't a reliable retention device. That 'tang' is ment to be knocked out after installation and it is notched for just that reason. I wouldn't put any faith in it.

SJMARCY@aol.com Absolutely, but use Threadlocker (blue), not any of the more aggressive stuff. Blue Loctite leaves the part removable without heating, so you won't be causing a possible future owner any unnecessary grief. One tidbit about loctite. The strength seems to be much higher if there is a steel/steel interface, although I don't have a lot of data on this factor. Steel/aluminum can be much weaker. I have seen figures for steel / alum of about 1/5 to 1/3 the strength of steel / steel. One example for loctite bearing retainer showed 3-4000 psi steel/steel and about 600 psi for alum./steel. Even so if you consider the surface area of the threaded diff bearing adjusters, this is still pretty strong.

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> The hub is normally installed with an anaerobic adhesive like Locktite Retaining Compound. Shear strength on the good stuff (RC 635 or RC 680) is about 4000 PSI. Look at the surface area in the hub's splines and do the math. You could lift the world with that stuff. Properly installed, it's necessary to heat the hub up to over 300 degrees F before the adhesive will let go. If someone attempted to pull the hub without heating it... really tried... with gusto... the ear(s) on the hub will pull outward. Been there, done that. Felt dumb.

A while ago some of the listers recommended Loctite 518 to seal pretty much any casting like the gearbox halves/rear cover. 518 doesn't become a sealer untill you torque the parts together, which causes some kind of reaction in the stuff. Probably wouldn't work for the drive shaft pins... Aaron Hines '73 Lotus Europa TC Special #4153 R

LUBRICATION, Front end

dan.morrison@autodesk.com The only "grease" fitting I am aware of is for the trunnions. It is located on the inside of the upright. And at the risk of starting a big debate, you should only use 90 wt gear oil for lubricating these. If the fitting is missing look for a plug in its place. This needed to be removed and a suitable dispenser used to inject the oil. I used a plastic syringe and bent the tip under a little heat to make it easier to access.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> It's a heck of a lot easier to buy a cheap grease gun and fill it with oil.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> There should be a zerk in the lower trunion. You can use gear oil or high-quality modern grease. Any grease that may harden over time could be dangerous here. The upper ball joint is a permanently-sealed Spitfire unit. The inboard stuff is all rubber-and-steel bushings.

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> I've used nothing but grease in my trunions since I collected my Europa from US Customs......in Baltimore.........in 1971.

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Subject: Re: Europa front suspension question Date:7 May 1999 22:26:00 –0500 You didn't miss anything. The only "grease" fittings in the front suspension are on the vertical axis of the trunions, and they are plugged with little bolts. Replace the bolts with grease zerks and pump them full of EP 90-140 gear oil.

MIRRORS

Subject: "mirror, mirror on the car..." (Vitalonis) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 08:50:35 EST From: ClassMaker@aol.com
>> Yes. The North American distributor for Vitaloni is Torino Industries in Bedford Park, Illinois (I believe it's just outside of Chicago). Their phone number is 708-496-0805. Very friendly people. >> Brian Elkins >> '72 Europa S2

"Paul V. Gregory" wrote: > > Do you know of a vendor or catalogue featuring the Vitaloni line of door-mounted rearviews mirrors? One of my two on the Europa is unserviceable. Model type is called "California" I think.

...and Torino's fax is 708-496-0816.


Indeed, they have a "Californian" -- AND a "Sebring" style. FYI: Their "Sebring" is TM'd. No flames from Talbot folks.

"Sebring Mach/1" (matte black)

STYLE: Racing Mirror, Reversible, flush surface mount

Silver Plate Lens (4 1/2" x 3") -- not Vitaloni's blue filter

# 473 - Flat lens [$21.50 list/$16.25 dealer]

# 474* (* Wide Angle Lens) [$22.50/$17.00]

"Californian" (matte black)

STYLE: this has a hinged stem, leans out away from surface

"Visual Filter" [blue non-glare] Lense, 5x3" oval

# 5784 L side [$26.65/$20.12]

# 5789 R side (flat lens) [$26.65/$20.12]

# 5783* R side (* Wide Angle Lens) [$27.65/$20.87]


Suggested list and dealer prices subject to change. They also have a confidential Jobber price sheet, if you know some one who wants to stock hundreds.


FITMENT NOTES:

The "Sebring" mirrors would be the "correct" style. In fact, the S2's had them on the driver's side only. On my Europa S2, I have the "Talbot" style mirrors mounted over the wheel arches. Something I did in 1972, instinctively, not to be particularly "correct." ((Remember that I drive mine, it is not "concours.")) However, I was fascinated to discover old pictures of 47's in action, [Robinshaw & Francis' Europa book] with the very same mirror style and placement. Even more so, since I have taken a fancy to the 47 GT look.

2) Were there gas struts holding up other engine lids in '74? The ones that were on the car are totally shot, so I've already taken them off to get them out of the way. They don't look 25 years old...


I found some struts that fit my car. To aid you look for about 30 pound struts. I tried 20 and 30's and settled on the 30's

3) While sitting in the car, I decided to push the brake pedal...and when I did it went to the end of its travel with little force. I looked at the brake lines and they all seem to be there (at least the ones I can see). Does it sound like there is something wrong with the master cylinder?


You can try and put it off, as I did, but I will bet you will find both brake boosters leak.

4) While looking at the engine, I noticed two breather tubes that run from the exaust manifold to the intake maifold. What does that do? I thought you didn't want exaust gas in the intake.


These are emissions tubes. Preheats the intake air for better pollution control. Most everyone will tell you to remove them. I may but I am trying to get my car back to normal before I start making changes


NUTS & BOLTS, Grade specification

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> Metric 8.8 same as SAE Grade 5.


SAE Grade spec.

0-1-2 Low Carbon Steel 74,000 psi

3 Med Carbon Steel 100,000 psi

5 Med Carbon heat treated Steel 120,000 psi

6 Med Carbon Tempered Steel 133,000 psi

7 Med Carbon Alloy Steel 133,000 psi

8 Med Carbon Alloy Steel 150,000 psi


Metric
Class
4.6 Low or Med Carbon Steel 58,000 psi

4.8 Low or Med Carbon Steel 61,000 psi

5.8 Low or Med Carbon Steel 75,000 psi

8.8 Med Carbon Steel 120,000 psi

    1. Med Carbon Steel 131,000 psi

10.9 Med Carbon Alloy Steel 151,000 psi


Thread pitch can be from .20mm to 6.00mm

Am M6 bolt usually has a 1.00 nominal pitch

Bolt Size Pitch

Coarse Fine

6mm 1.00 0.75

8mm 1.25 0.75
10mm 1.50 1.00

12mm 1.75 1.50

14mm 2.00 1.50

16mm 2.00 1.50

18mm 2.50 1.50

22mm 2.50 1.50

24mm 3.00

OIL

Check out the competitive wear test charts, http://www.amsoil.com/products/tro.html. shorter scar length = better protection:

0.514 mm. AMSOIL

1.474 mm. Mobil-1 (15W50)

1.493 mm. Quaker State

1.513 mm. RedLine Synthetic

1.765 mm. Havoline Formula 3

1.861 mm. Valvoline Synthetic

1.955 mm. Castrol GTX

2.070 mm. Amoco Ultimate Gold


Hmmm... where'd the Syntec go? I've got another chart somewhere. ken ritchie atlanta

davea@quasar.engr.sgi.com (David B Anderson) Subject: Oil Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT) On oil, specific engine: I have heard from more than one source that synthetics are not so good for Early Esprit. (mine is 79 S2). Rumors of oil leaking out(inadequate sealing)... Don't know if the rumors or the sources are correct. With 72 Europa TwinCam, on the other hand, RedLine synthetic leaked *less* (significantly less, leaks basically stopped) than Valvoline non-synthetic for me!

Warren Pearce pearceww@rmi.net Subject: Re: Oil Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:17:02 –0600 I've got over 130,000 miles on Castrol GTX with no real wear on the crank. I have replaced the bottom end bearings 2 or 3 times.

OIL, Change & additives


(
carsecrets@igs.net).
OIL CHANGES FOR LONGER ENGINE LIFE and THE TRUTH ABOUT MIRACLE OIL ADDITIVES By: Corey Rudl

Beware of low-priced oil change bargains. You will notice that the price will drastically go up with the addition of useless additives and extra services not included in the package. Simple things like a $5.00 hidden oil disposal charge, or an extra $3.00 for the 23 point chassis lubrication, etc.


Also, most shops have a tendency to include the chassis lubrication that they advertised but forget to check all fluid levels. Make sure to remind the shop manager or mechanic.


As a few side notes on making your car last longer, most manufacturers recommend the engine oil be changed approximately every 5,000 - 7,000 miles (7,000 - 10,000 kilometres).


CHANGING THE OIL EVERY 3,000 MILES (5,000 KILOMETRES) OR EVERY THREE MONTHS HAS A DIRECT EFFECT ON YOUR ENGINE'S LIFE!


Even the AAA agrees with this. Also, ask any taxi cab driver; they put hundreds of thousands of miles on their cars and they swear by this.


It is now more important than ever. Today's engines are much smaller, work much harder, and have less oil capacity.

Synthetic oil is also a very good idea for engine longevity. It is much more expensive and harder to find but doesn't break down like regular mineral oils; therefore it offers much better protection and you don't have to change it as often (usually double the length of regular oil changes). Users have reported as much as 50,000 miles between oil changes (not recommended) and there was little evidence of wear on engines that have logged 250,000 miles.


Synthetic oil has been used in the aircraft industry for over 20 years -- they were the only oils that could take the heat and high rpm of the jet engines without breaking down. I have raced professionally for four years and have seen how synthetic oils have gotten me through a race where mineral-based oils have broken down under severe loads and caused engine or clutch failures. This is not to say that mineral oils are not good for everyday use; they are great. It is just that synthetic oils are so much better. Your engine will be better protected against wear, especially if you are hard on it (performance driving, towing a trailer, etc.) For example, any new Corvette or Porsche comes right from the factory with Mobil 1 synthetic oil.


People are becoming more aware and synthetic oils are becoming popular. Today, most places stock them. I personally use Mobil 1 or Castrol Syntec, but any fully synthetic oil is acceptable as long as it is the class and weight for your engine (stated in your owner's manual).


Whether you choose to use synthetic oil or not is your choice, but whatever you do...


DON'T USE LOW QUALITY OIL!


Your car is probably the second biggest purchase you will make in your life. Some of the cheap oils still state "meets or exceeds all new car standards." Sure it meets all new car standards when you pour it in, but for how long? These oils do not have the additives the higher quality brands do and break down very quickly. That is why your oil gets so black only a short while after your oil change. You have a lot of money tied up in your car, don't put this "crap" in it.


Also, as another pointer, only use pre-oiled air filters for your car. This reduces the dirt that gets into your engine which destroys cylinder walls (and eventually your engine).


Make sure you determine the brand, weight, and quality of oil you are using. Not all oils are alike. Some can increase fuel economy, some are of better quality, and some are designed for hotter or colder weather conditions.

Do not let anyone overfill your engine oil. It is common practice for mechanics wanting to sell you another quart. Extensive damage to your engine can result. The crankshaft can strike the oil and whip it into a foam (air bubbles) and that deprives parts of adequate lubrication.


As a side not, used oil from a single oil change dumped on the ground can ruin one million gallons of fresh water -- a years supply for 50 people. Americans that change their own oil throw away 180 million gallons of oil every year. This would provide 113 million gallons of renewable oil if it was recycled!


What about miracle oil additives advertised on T.V.?


Most of these product have solid lubricant called PTFE (short for polytetrafluoroethylene). Consumers know this better as Teflon, Dupont's brand name for it. PTFE particles evidently adhere to the metal inside the engine and provide a super-slippery coating to prevent wear. There is some controversy as to if the PTFE particles can adhere to metal with the extremely high temperatures most engines are running.


PTFE provides better "slipperiness"; but lower fiction and superior anti-wear properties of a motor oil can be different. Let me illustrate in an everyday sense. Just because one vitamin pill a day is good for you, it doesn't mean that five vitamin pills per day is five times better.


There are so many different engine and oil treatments advertised nowadays. Many of them do not live up to their claims. However, there are a couple of good ones out their like Slick 50 and Duralube. But most companies make their products look amazing through a bunch of circus tricks. Many do not even have evidence from an independent lab that proves their treatment makes the engine last longer (or whatever it is suppose to do). But the people that make and sell them sure do their best at implying that. (I might point out that Dupont does not endorse the use of Teflon in motor oils.)


Here are some of the tricks.


One of these company's implied proofs is that as a result these additives, your car produces better fuel mileage. That circus trick is as easy as changing your regular engine oil to a EC or EC II rating (EC stands for energy conserving) and you too will get up to 2.7% better fuel economy without any miracle additives.


Another implied proof is how the computer in the car has to adjust to the new "engine environment". This is absolutely true. But what they don't tell you is that adjustment may be due to the contamination of the car's oxygen sensor from the new additive. That's right, what was presented to your as a wonderful benefit actually may be doing harm to your emissions control system and...


MAY EVEN VOID YOUR EMISSIONS WARRANTY!


But you say, "Corey, what about those infomercials showing this miracle lubricant allowing an engine to run an amazing 30 minutes without any oil." It does not require a miracle to make an engine run 30 minutes without oil. Actually, if the engine is prepared properly before starting and is run in a `no-load' situation, it is easy. This is even easier if the engine has been fitted with oil-impregnated bearings. Again, no miracle here.


Just keep one thing in mind. Some of these treatments are $20-$40 and usually have to be added to every oil change. If you are changing your oil every three months, that is $100-$160 per year added to your car expense. Is this expense worth the benefits you are getting from the product?


There are so many products out there that it is difficult to class them all as ineffective without trying all of them. It is a jungle out there. There are so many gimmicks to make the test look misleading, it is very, very difficult to tell the good from the bad.


I recommend you stay with a proven product like Slick 50 or Duralube. Although they can make the product sound like an absolute miracle, it is not. However, they do live up to most of their claims and you will be very happy with the results if you use them. They have been tested and proven by independent labs and some of the big oil companies.


One question that probably comes to your mind is "If there is an oil additive that gives you longer engine life, better fuel economy, reduces emissions, and your car will run smoother; why wouldn't every major oil company start producing a similar product and sell it worldwide? Also, why wouldn't the car manufacturers start adding this additive to the oil in every new car to increase its engine life? They could offer a longer warranty at very little cost to them.


The scary answer is: If the oil companies introduced a product that would allow you to increase your intervals between oil changes and make your car last longer,...


OIL SALES WORLDWIDE WOULD PROBABLY DROP 15% -- A COMPLETE DEVASTATION TO THE INDUSTRY!


By introduction a better oil product, the oil companies would actually be cutting their own throats. As far as the car manufacturers, why would they want your car to last longer? They need your car to break down so they can supply parts and servicing... that's where they make their money!


OIL, Penetrating

ajhuang@hpbs1974.boi.hp.com (Andrew J Huang) Subject: Re: Kroil (was: [lotuseuropa] Europa plans & questions) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 17:23:22 -0600 (MDT) Kano labs (aero Kroil) 1000 S. Thompson Ln, Nashville, TN 37211 (615)833-4101

"Atwell Haines" <atwell.haines@xrxgsn.com> Subject: Re: P. B. Blaster Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:48:56 -0500
Lately I've been using ArmorAll as a rust penetrant. Smells better, but can make the tools hard to grip. Seriously. Really. Honest. A guy on the Triumphs List reported that the ArmorAll freed up the mounting screws on his windshield frame that he had been trying (sporadically) to loosen for 25 years.

OIL, Synthetic

ClassMaker@aol.com whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: > Did you see my message about synthetic gear oil in steering boxes and > trunnions? Do you think that something like AMSOILs sythetic gear oil would yeild any benefit for these items?

Should benefit. probably less susceptible to acidification. Data shows the synthetics have much lower "volatility" and they don't evaporate (condense) as quickly as dino-juice nor do they react with other stuff as easily. AMSOIL is all i use now. wish i'd started using them in 1972.

OIL, Viscosity

"Paul Lushey" <plushey@worldnet.fr> Subject: Re: oily rags Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:16:52 +0200 Always go for the synthetic oils. Mobil 1, BP Visco 5000, Esso Ultron, Shell something?, Castrol something?, Duckhams something? As for the xWy factor, try to ensure x is <= 10 and y >= 40, these numbers indicate how the oil performs at low and high temperatures. A 15w50 oil is mainly intended for summer use but a 5w50 oil is for all year round use.

PARTS

Dave_Bean_Admin How do I purchase the $6 catalog with Europa supplement? Just give us an address to send it to. You can either provide us a credit card or send a check for the invoice amount. As I mentioned, the cost of the catalog is redeemable with an order, and we include a coupon to handle the accounting details of that. I would prefer you give us credit card details via fax if that's your choice. Our toll free fax order line is 800 469-7789. After that, you can place any orders via email ... your cc info will then be on file. (I don't totally trust encryption.) Hope we can be of service. Roberta

SCW: Catalog is every part on t/c ,line art pictures,to order either email credit card or fax or call.$15 lmk thanks Frank

We went to WalMart last night to get some stuff. While looking for an oil filter, I decided to look in a cross-reference book.
I refer to you again the GGLC site and encourage you to check out the part interchange list for the Europa. It's quite extensive.

SOURCES

Robert Murray Address 2

Phone [1] 804-276-0296

Ashland, VA

Frank E. Lawson, III

Antique Auto Woodworking

3135 Ramblewood Road

Sophia, NC 27350

Phone [1] 336-861-1418

Shop: [1] 366-475-1867

Dave Putscher

Bonzai Motor Works

Phone [1] 302-994-8077

David.H.Putscher@USA.dupont.com

Dave Bean Engineering

636 East. St. Charles Street

San Andreas, CA 95249

Phone [1] 209-754-5802

Fax [1] 800-469-7789

admin@davebean.com

http://www.davebean.com

Mr. Jean A. "Drew" Tibcken

Heritage Woodworks

475 Payne Road

Andrews, NC 28901

Phone [1] 888-255-3523

Fax [1] 828-321-3523 State

http://www.heritagewoodworks.com

JAE

375 Pine, Unit 26

Goleta, CA 93117

Phone [1] 805-967-5767

Fax [1] 805-967-6183

tomeck@rain.org

From: rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> Try http://www.jaeparts.com/jaehome.html

 

Kampena Mortors

140B South Linden

South San Francisco, CA 94080

Phone [1] 650-583-5480

Fax [1] 650-583-3573

http://www.wenet.net/~kampena

La Monza Motors/NJ

Phone [1] 201-529-1300

Fax [1] 201-529-1303

Detlef Cladius

Lotus Prepared by Cladius

17411 Studebaker Road, Unit A

Cerritos, CA 90701

Phone [1] 562-865-4439

Fax [1] 562-860-9240

lotuspbc@pacbell.net

http://comm.gwp.com/lotus/

Raymond D. Psulkowski

r. d. enterprises, ltd.

290 Raub Road

Quakertown, PA 18951

Phone [1] 215-538-9323

Fax [1] 215-538-0158

rdent@rdent.com

http://www.rdent.com

Sports & Classics

P. O. Box 1787

Darien, CT 06820

Phone [1] 203-655-8731

Sports Car World

Route 1, Box 21

Evant, TX 76525

Phone [1] 254-471-5539

Fax [1] 254-471-5617 State

scw@centex.net

http://www.centex.net/~scwlotus/

Don Tingle

Tingle's Lotus Center

1615 Shawsheen Street

Tewksbury, MA 01876

Phone [1] 978-851-8370

Fax [1] 978-640-0889

tingletlc@aol.com

Hayes H. Harris

Wire Wheel Classic Sports Car, Inc.

6781 North Old Dixie Highway

Ft. Pierce, FL 34946

Phone [1] 561-595-3000

hharris07@aol.com

http://www.wirewheel.com

www.banks-europa.co.uk

"Vivian Meazza" <vivian.meazza@lineone.net> Subject: Re: Contact at Lotus Date: Fri, 02 Jul 99 13:46:03 PDT

Jeff Lane asked: Can anyway supply me with the name and number of an after-sales contact at Lotus. Once again dealers seem to be letting the side down! >>


Try Neil Turner. Ring 01953 608000 and ask.

Tony Churly <Tony@churly.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Contact at Lotus Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:06:03 +0100

Neil is the service guy. You need someone whose first name is Heathcliff (yes really!) his second name is double barrelled and I cant recall it - Usual Lotus factory number 01953 608000 [011 – 44 – 1 – 953-608000 from North America].

"Peter Taylor" <pete63@ozemail.com.au> Subject: Re: Contact at Lotus Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:53:02 +1000

Heathcliffe Robertshaw. I have spoken to him and had a couple of emails over the past 6 months and he was very helpfull in resolving a few outstanding issues with my Elise that the local (Sydney) dealers were not very interested in.

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Subject: New Lotus books Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:14:00 +0100
While at Collectors Carbooks last week, a scan of the shelves revealed some new books about Lotus: William Taylor's Lotus Book is now issued in "Series Two", ISBN 1 902351 00 2, 256pp GBP39.95. Lotus Elise - The Complete Story, by John Tipler, Crowood Press, ISBN 1 86126 213 2, 192pp GBP19.95. Lotus Elise (road tests) Unique Motor Books, ISBN 1 84155 186 4 82pp GBP8.95 and a couple of older ones. Elan & Plus Two by Robinshaw & Ross is now offered at GBP14.99. There are many excellent photos of Lotuses at Le Mans from 1955 to 1967 in British Cars at Le Mans, by Dominique Pascal, Foulis 1990, ISBN 0 85429 872 X. Collectors Carbooks can be contacted at
sales@collectors-carbooks.co.uk -- and I hope it goes without saying that have no connection with them at all at all. No, honestly. Look, I *really* *really*, don't.

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> My '73 Special was originally sold by BMCD. The only info on my car is the "service voucher book" and it has the first owner's name and BMCD's address:

British Motor Car Dist. Ltd.
1699 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94109

PARTS, US Customs

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Aaron Hines wrote: Customs called about clearing my shipment (know what that means?)

Yep. It means you tell 'em what is in the shipment and give them a value for it, then you pay them duty on the value.

>My brother told them to call back but they haven’t. Does this mean my parts will be shipped back to England,or just sit in Customs for years?


No, not right away. I would try to find out where the shipment is being cleared (what city), then call US Customs in that city. You may need to contact a customs broker as well. The folks at US Customs will tell you what you need to do.

PEDAL, Rubber

Had no intention of rushing to find rubber pedal pads but noticed a line of products in a local parts store (Salvo) called Pedal-UP. Their Ford parking brake pedal pad #20736 is a perfect fit for clutch and brake at $3.99. My right foot dosn't even hurt anymore. Eddie (life insurance paid up) Zuskin 72 TC 2068R

PERFORMANCE, Enhancement

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> Subject: performance upgrades Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 10:42:43 –0500 Saw this on the Se7ens list... unbelievable inexpensive horsepower gains and performance upgrades! "Looking for cheap power gains? Check out http://www.angelfire.com/nc2/mycoffeecan/. They also show suspension mods guaranteed to out handle a Lotus!"

PLATING, Chrome

Scott Mitchell <scott@alwaysthinking.com> Since I have non-adjustable front shocks, when I get around to
cornerweighting the car for the upcoming autocross season, I've got some shims for the springs. But I want to do something about corosion. But due to the loads they carry, I don't expect much out of paint. So I was thinking about getting them plated or galvanized. And then I ran across the DIY zinc plating kit in Eastwood. Does anyone have ane experience with it? At $60 it probably isn't too far off what I'd have to pay for plating. And it would allow me to do some other parts.

From: "Elton Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net> Subject: Home Plating? Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:05:41 –0600 Yet another supplier of some intriguing home plating equipment. http://www.caswellplating.com/nsindex.htm

Steven Shipley <shiples@home.com> Subject: Re: Home Plating? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 17:24:44 –0800
I haven't used the Eastwood kit but I did buy and use the "Copy Cad" kit from
http://www.caswellplating.com/nsindex.htm It's been a while but plating is basicly chemical solutions at certain
temperatures while passing a current through an anode that gives up metal that is deposited on your part. The Copy Cad kit is zinc if I recall. Cadium is apparently a little too dangerous to sell to the average Joe. This is one of those processes, like welding, that looks easy when done correctly, but you have to follow instructions, and get the process right. My kit used batteries to provide the current and the manual recommended used batteries as fresh batteries can provide too much current which impacts the quality of the plating job. The other variable is the temperature of the solution. The Caswell kit provides an aquarium heater which needs to be adjusted to get the correct temperature. The first time I attempted to plate something (throttle linkage) it was so cold in the garage that I had a hard time maintaining the correct temperature. Took most of the weekend to play with the process but I got my parts plated. The plater would have plated a bucket full for $110 and I plated a dozen pieces for $60. The kit will plate a lot more until the consumables need replacement. If you're interested in the process, go for it. If you're REALLY in to it, you can copper/nickle/chrome at home but the process gets more complex and the variables get more critical. And the price goes WAY up.

"Dean Bolton" <deano@enterprise.net> Subject: Re: Home Plating? Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:49:48 –0000 Just one point to note if you are doing some DIY plating, don't plate anything that you consider to be a critical part, plating causes weakening of the part through hydrogen enbrittlement and other such nasties. I generally stick my parts in the oven for 2 hours at 200 C as it helps remove some of the hydrogen but you can never make the part as strong as it was.

Adrian Rose <Adrian.Rose@triad.plc.uk> Subject: Re: Home Plating? Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:33:19 –0000
Carroll Smiths' books recommend "chemical Nickel" - i.e. no electrodes, just a hot dip process. Supposed to be less brittle and also better at not building up thick layers on sharp edges IIRC.

RESTORATION, Advise

"Mike Carrick" <mcarrick@ford.com> Subject: Rebuilds Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 16:26:02 0000 As I spend more time disassembling my thing than driving it, here goes.

  1. Take notes. Plenty of notes. In a book you won't lose. It'll get messy and mucky and oily ... let it, it's a "working* book. I don't give marks out of 10 for neatness but I'll take them off in a BIG way for useful info not noted down !!!!!!
  2. Allied to this - don't assume you'll remember *anything* when you come to put it together again! This could be in a few months after working on lots of other things. So sketch, make notes etc and mark everything.
  3. Clean things. Buy some rolls of kitchen paper and a gallon of white spirit.
  4. Inspect things. Note the results in the book; i.e. 'looks OK'; 'needs new seals' ; 'needs new bushes' ; 'to be replaced'. Then see about getting a parts order together for when you need them.
  5. Mark things. Masking tape is useful but put tape right round so it doesnt fall off. Again, don't assume ANYTHING ! Esp, take care to mark the LHS and RHS part - and use a standard convention, that's as you
    look forward. Yes, mark all lh/rh parts.
  6. Nuts and bolts - typically, put in jamjars for each application, and label the jar.
  7. Brake bits: take extreme care! If left open to the air with brake fluid on, they will *RUST*. So get them squeaky clean then keep them warm and dry. Or *full* of clean fresh fluid and sealed up.

Fussy? Yes - it'll save you hours and hours ..... BTW, an example of *why*. A nice guy rebuilt his brakes OK but couldn't get them bled properly. Tried all the ways, all the gizmos, spent a lot of time to no effect. It turned out he'd swapped the calipers L -R so the bleed screws were at the bottom and the air would not come out. I've given you the process to avoid such things - it's up to you whether you follow it ...

I bought a 1970 S2 type 65 in August, 1997. Mechanically, it was in pretty good condition and almost all original with 53000 miles. I paid $6,600 for it then and since then, I have spent another $14000+ on it. Some was necessary and some wasn't. Here's a list of things I've done and approx cost:

If you can get a good look at the car, check the following:

  1. Chassis, this is the only place that rust can really hide on a Europa
  2. Suspension, make sure it is straight
  3. Cooling system, make sure you drive it on a warm day if possible. Drive it at least 20 minutes and keep an eye on engine temp and oil pressure.
  4. Doors, the hinges on the Europa were weak and the doors can develop a serious sag. This can be repaired with new aftermarket stainless steel hinges.
  5. Wheel Bearings and U-joints are another weak point on a Europa. If possible, check them for wear. These parts are easy to find if necessary. \
  6. Also, when driving the car, go through some curves. A good Europa will stick like glue if the bearings and bushings are good.
  7. Also, the the bushings in the trailing arms can definitely have an effect on the handling. Again, these are readily available from suppliers like RD Enterprises, Dave Bean and Tingles.
  8. Check the shift linkage. The linkage is long and bulky and is anything but perfect. However, a properly maintained car although vague, should be able to hit all the gears. Also, the transmission serves as an important suspension connection point. So check the rear suspension lower links. Stock S2's didn't have adjustable lower links but you can buy them relatively cheap. This way, you can adjust the rear camber.
  9. Most S2's will now have an aftermarket carburator such as a Weber 32/36 DGV downdraft. This is a very good and simple carburator for the S2. Others, like Hermes and Else Europa's will have side draft Webers, headers and hotter cams. Hermes and Else were Europa specialist shops in the UK. Their conversions could be bought as a kit and added by the buyer or done at their shops. They greatly enhanced the performance of the Renault powered Europa's.
  10. As for the Renault engines, I think they're really solid. They weigh less than 200lbs and are easy to work on. Parts are getting difficult to come by so make sure it is in good running order.
  11. If you buy the car, joing Lotus Ltd and buy the Europa Tech manual for $15.
  12. A really nice S2 can be purchased for under $8000 and a total basket case for $1500. If you're familiar with Collin Chapman, you'll know that his philosophy was to build a car as light as possible. This allowed the use of smaller engines but handling was awesome. He was also quite cheap and his own people have said that he would use parts that would last as long as the warranty and anything else was too expensive. But he was an automotive genius.
  13. Finally, this list is probably the best source of Europa info but if you like books, there is one called "The Lotus Buyers Guide" by Graham Arnold. It includes a section on the Europa and I recommend it.

Jeff Hovis Atlanta 70 S2 Gordini


ROLL CAGE

John Zender. The design and construction of the full cage in my Type 54 is described in the "Ultimate Europa" series which is now on the GGLC website under tech info-Europa. My cage does include rectangular tubes that run behind the seats just above the floor, from the bottom of the main hoop, across into the backbone. Tube tubes are 1" x 2" with .065 wall and just fit without moving the seats forward. The tubes bolt into threaded plates that are welded to the backbone. This is actually an excellent connection point since the original Europa chassis incorporates a bulkhead inside the backbone where the Chassis begins to "Y" (that the shifter and water pipes pass through). The rectangular tubes attach at this point near the bottom edge of the chassis. The combination of the bulkhead, lower horizontal surface of the backbone, and the bend in the sheetmetal to create the "Y" makes this one of the strongest chassis points in the lateral direction. Of course you could beef-up the bulkhead even more by welding another crossmember inside the chassis, but I don't think this is necessary.

I too have a roll bar on my special, its made by safety specialties, a UK firm. I don't know if they still make it or not, but last time I was on their web site, it was listed. Twin Cams only, but the concept would work for the S1/2
versions, providing they have the side seat belt plates. The bar consists of a hoop, from outer seat belt bracket, over the rear window to the other side, and then a bar between both sides, just below the window. It then has two outriggers, which go back to tie into the frame just in front of the shocks. It fits very neatly, no restrictions in seat movement, nor rear visibility, and seems to make the frame more rigid. I had to remove the seat belt rachets and
install belts which bolted to the roll bar. Jerry Rude

I think that I may be able to help! The company that you seek is probably SAFETY DEVICES they took over Aley Bars the UK roll cage manufactures some time ago. The UK telephone number is 01353 624624. I haven't checked to see if they have a web site. david mirylees

Jerry Rude sent me the address for Safety Devices, which is the company that made his roll cage.
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/pdpr/safety/safety.htm. They only list the Twink, but based on Jerry's description below, do you think it would fit an S2 as well? Jason

Safety Devices makes, or made, a cage, and I believe Demon Tweeks carries their products. Demon Tweeks has a web page, but they don't really have an online catalogue (they do have a nice hard copy one though). I also had a look at a very nice cage at Banks when I visited there in February. They can supply this in kit form. It is not shown on their website. I can't remember the exact price but I think it came out to about $800 U.S. I can't say if it meets the specs for competitions in North America, but I'm sure Richard would happily let us know the tubing dimensions etc. Stewart McNair

There's been much chat on roll bars. Here's what the Calgary Vintage Racing Club rule book says about dimensions of piping. the pipe should be seamless and of good quality. Don't use exhaust pipe! So is depends on the weight of the car essentially. I wish I had a digital camera to post pics of my external roll bar. Maybe later
Regards rod farnsworth

"The minimum tubing dimension according to vehicle weight without driver is as follows:

Up to 1500 lbs 1.375 inch diameter x .095 mild steel (Wall thickness)

1.375 x .080 alloy steel

1500-2500 lbs 1.500 x .095 mild steel

1.375 x .120 alloy steel

2500 and over 1.750 x .095 mild steel"

SET-UP, S2 vs. TC

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> The more I learn about the differences between Twinks and Renault-engine Europas, the more I am convinced that Twinks require altogether different suspension setup.
Here are some of the differences:
1. Weight distribution: S2 46-54 F/R, Twink very close to 40-60 F/R.
2. Front swaybar: the Twink's stock front bar is significantly thicker than the S1/S2 bar.
3. Wheelbase: S2 - 91", Twink - 92".
4. Total weight: S2, under 1500 lb. curb, Twink: 1550-1700 curb.
5. Rear suspension geometry. The Twink's setup locates the coilover lower attachment point further inboard and incorporates longer upper links (halfaxles), 15 3/4" (from Dave Bean) vs. 15 1/4" for the S2 (measured).
I heard from Bob McClenahan, who took a Twink to Nationals in ASP in 93, that he could never get the tail of his car to stay reliably behind the front until he put substantial to in (1/4") in the rear. Tom's recent experience tends to reinforce this. Both cars - Bob's and Tom's - have 6" rims and the same size tires at all four corners. Given the weight distribution of a Twink - very much in the expected range for rear-engined cars like 911s - it's not surprising that the factory setup is heavily biased toward steady-state understeer. Several general ideas come to mind:
1. To get less steady-state understeer, the roll stiffness of the front needs to decrease relative to that of the rear. This can be accomplished by fitting a smaller front bar (or reducing the effect of the stock one), softer front springs, stiffer rear springs, and/or adding a rear bar, in order of my preference from greatest to least. This needs to be an incremental process, as going too far can make the car almost undriveable. Before experimenting with roll rates, I would suggest adopting the factory-recommended rear toe settings (1/8" -1/4" toe in) and getting camber as optimal as possible for the tires being used. With street radials, the optimum camber value may not vary over a wide range. The best way to set camber would be with a tire pyrometer and a skidpad. The more a tire tends to roll over due to sidewall flex, the more it will tend to heat the outer portion of the tread when it is the outside tire in a corner. To combat this, you need to dial in more negative camber. This is a relatively subtle point, and it may not be readily addressed (if you haven't done modifications to make camber adjustable) anyway.

2. A Twink may well work best with larger rear tires. This would cause some prominent disadvantages, including less predictable handling on cold tires and inability to rotate tires, but I can't rule it out as a viable option based on what I know so far. Every manufacturer that makes cars with this much rearward weight bias - including Lotus - fits wider tires on the rear.
3. To combat lift-throttle oversteer, a transient condition, damping at the front should increase relative to the rear. The Europa's rear suspension has very little dynamic toe change, in stark contrast to the semitrailing design used on 911s, so it should be very straightforward to tame this problem. Phils' driving advice should be kept in mind as well. Even an optimally setup car can be made to do a snap spin by driver inputs alone.

SHIMS, Drive line

From: jertigger2@cs.com In a message dated 3/28/00 1:43:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, retters@aol.com
writes: I have my TC half shafts off the transaxle and am trying to get to the shims. There seems to be a steel spacer on the splines and I assume the shims should be behind the spacer? I can't get the spacer to slide off the
splines...am I missing something?

If you want remove the steel spacer you will probably have to unscrew the seals and remove them so you can get something on the side or behind the spacer to pull it off. The O ring behind it is squished into the splines and has it partially glued on. If by removing the yokes you don't see any shims there aren't any. As they go on the outside of the spacer.

From: Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.sun.com> The shims should be outside the spacer. The spacer can be removed - the spacer is tough to get out because there is an O-ring on the output shaft which holds it in place. If you do take it out, it can be pretty tricky to get it seated properly again. I think it was Phil Ethier's suggestion that
you put the drive shafts on without the roll pins and use the force of the suspension pushing in towards the transmission to seat the spacers. Even so, I had lots of problems getting mine back together.

From: "Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> 28 Mar 00 The shims are definitely outside the spacer. When you remove the halfshaft, they should be sitting right there staring at you... or they're stuck to the end of the halfshaft... or there aren't any there. Shimming the axles is not a tough job. More of a pain-in-the-@ job than a remove the adjuster nuts, seals, spacers, o-rings job.

"Michael Johannes Ditz" <mail@mditz.de> The technical drawing of the shims area is now under eurshims.jpg among the general files, by courtesy of the Lotus Drivers Club.

SHIMS, Engine

"Mark MarKell, Sr." <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Below is a response from Chris Munson with respect to shims. I subsequently went to my local Detroit Diesel office and bought an assortment. They are the same part and work well and about 1/10 the cost. Something like $2.50 for a package of 10? Think I bought a package of each size for $10...


Chris Munson The shims used for adjusting the blowers for Detroit Diesels ( inline 71 ) are of the required dimensions, come in .002" to .010" packs and work fine. They are readily availbe from Detroit Diesel parts counters. Try these part numbers with them. They should be current, but if not they should be able to reference them from these ones.
3.4090 - shim, blower rotor gear
5150372 - shim .002"
5153938 - shim .003"
5150855 - shim .005"
5150856 - shim.010"

SPARK PLUGS

ClassMaker@aol.com I tend to use NGK BP6ES plugs. They have worked fine so far. Ken Landaiche NGK "bible" for Elan 72 - 65 (years) and Europa Twin Cam 74 – 67 lists BP7ES and a 0.025" gap. However, I've gone to Champion Gold instead... results even better! For the BP6ES, try the Champion Gold 2415 (or 2405, slightly warmer). There is another CG plug between the 2415 and 2405, and there is another one a half step warmer than 2405. The NGK catalog crosses the 2415 & 2405 both to a GR4. The point is that while the NGK may have a wider heat range than a "plain ol' Champion" (N9Y...) the Champion Gold has the NGK beat for anti fouling. Try them under $10 for a set of four Golds, even at NAPA.

I use NGK's with very good success. Also, if you have high comp pistons, try the non-extended reach BPxS series.. I've used BP6S to BP8S depending on conditions.....try http://www.ngksparkplugs.com

ClassMaker@aol.com gdrude@pacbell.net writes: I think it is running a little lean, as the plugs show a light tan on the electrode, but the tip of the electrode shows like a blistering. The insulator is clean, white almost a rose color. The plugs are NGKs. The car runs fine, seems to pull fine, no missing, recent rebuild.

Until you are confident of the mixture and progression, try a colder plug. There are various opinions regarding the validity of plug readings, however I would not want to run a plug as hot as you have described. One "trick" setup I have heard of is to run much colder plugs, using an anti-fouling type (Champion Gold, for example) and let them run a much darker brown. Makes sense. Especially when you start running your car harder, and in summer. A cooler tip has less chance to detonate or pre-ignite, and the charge may be ever-so-slightly cooler, therefore slightly denser. Be sure you are running a good spark. Lucas Sports Coil is fine. No need to do the MSD or modern mega-blaster to keep it going. As an example, an experienced Lotus mechanic installed Champion Gold 2415's in my NA 907. Dark, but very good. No fouling even while idling for a long time, traffic jams, etc. The 2415 is the catalog plug for the (hotter) Turbo-Esprit. I also ran the slightly warmer 2405, just to compare them. NGK are good, and they have several types. I tried a "GR" v-groove plug and found the particular range got too hot on hard runs, yet started fouling during long idling tests. Just the opposite of what I wanted. Back to Champ Gold! Some other NGK types might have worked like the Champ, but I really didn't want to mess with a good working setup.

SPEEDOMETER, Calibration

JERTIGGER2@cs.com wrote: > I just took my 72 Europa TC with 352 4 speed on the road, the speedometer
> seems to read high. On the road in 4th gear

> at 6500 rpm the speedo showed about 123 mph

> at 4000 rpm the Speedo showed 80 mph

> at 2000 rpm the speedo showed 40 mph>

> I would rather trust the tach, from others experience how does this relate.Here's a couple of calculators that might help:

http://pw1.netcom.com/~sgalaba/mph.htm#GearSpeed

http://www.tolan-hoechst.com/cars/tirecalc.htm Sanj

STEERING, Rack & pinion lubrication

ClassMaker@aol.com JERTIGGER2@cs.com writes: > My manual indicates that the steering rack and pinion are to be lubricated > but doesnt say how or with what.

Gear oil. Remove the hex cap on top of the pinion box. Some folks fit a grease nipple to the cap. Just as with the trunnions... Gear oil works best. Grease doesn't "migrate" or flow easily enough. I use a cheap (free) oral medicine syringe.
Just suck up the oil and squirt it down the hole. Repeat until rack is full. Replace the cap nut.

JERTIGGER2@cs.com I can get at the hex nut by removing the drivers side wheel and having
the front end jacked up, I cant get at mine from the top either.


STEERING, Rack removal

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.sun.com> scott@alwaysthinking.com said: I looked at rack removal yesterday. And I'm a bit confused. How are the rack bolts held for removing and reinstalling the nuts? I mean I don't see how one could get a wrench onto it without the body off. Are the bolts tacked in place or is there a welded tab like on the shift lever/primary tube joint? Are there holes in the body beneath the carpet?

Don't you wish it were that simple!! It took me a couple of hours to get those bolts out (and someone had reversed two of the four with welded nuts inside the chassis - don't ask me how they did that). I did it all through the access hole in the front of the chassis cross section, which is way too small for me to get my whole hand into - if you could, it might help a lot. I tied a string to my socket wrench, so I wouldn't lose it, and put a mark on the handle with some tape so I could know the orientation once it was inside where I couldn't see it and fumbled around for a LONG time. One of the bolts had some sort of obstruction next to it so I could jam a screwdriver between it and the bolt to keep it from turning. Also, I took one of the bolts completely out from the inside and I currently have no idea how I am going to replace it. Sorry to be so gloomy, but this has to be one of the worst bolt removal jobs that I have ever had on this car.

"Type46" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> The nuts can be accessed through the hole that opens from the front into the center of the spine (with double-jointed arms and spindly wrists). Possible. I've done it but it is a bit inconvenient! The hole is covered with a rubber plug about 3 inches in diameter. The nuts are not pinned and will fall if released. Just saw Jon Lexau's epistle. He has a TC, I have an S1. Sounds like he has obstructions not in the earlier cars.

Scott Mitchell <scott@alwaysthinking.com> A while back Jon Lexau wrote: "One of the bolts had some sort of obstruction next to it so I could jam a screwdriver between it and the bolt to keep it from turning." I just got to this point this morning. That 'one of the bolts' is the lower, passenger side one. There seems to be a stiffening plate welded inside the chassis box perpendicular to that vertical wall. It is just above that bolt... not close enough to prevent rotation, but not far enough to allow my wrench to fit over it. It may not exist on the S1 chassis, but it does on this S2.

STEERING, Rack & pinion wear

I have found that Europas rapidly wear the bronze bushing in the non-pinion end (i.e. passenger side) of the steering rack tube. To check, grasp the inner end of the tie rod through the bellows and try to move it up/down,
back/forward. Most show quite a bit of play. The bushing is available, but replacement requires nearly complete rack disassembly. When rebuilding the rack don't set the pinion pre-load as tight as the manual instructs. Just eliminate play, leaving the steering action as friction-free as possible. I believe it was Carrol Smith (perhaps reporting Bruce McLaren's advise) who wrote that you should be able to spin the steering wheel freely lock-to-lock with the front wheels off the ground. Friction in the steering system reduces steering feel, which is one of the
great virtues of Europas and Elans. Randall Randall Fehr Restorations Seattle

STEERING, Tie rod ends

Fri, 26 Feb 1999 21:06:42 –0600. On a Europa TC, are the steering rack tie-rod ends the same as a Spitfire? Pretty much everything else on the front end is Spitfire, but my cross reference list doesn't have a listing for the tie rod ends. Yes, tie rod ends are Spitfire. Just about everything outboard of (and including) the ball joints is from the Spitfire, but take care with things like uprights (knuckle) and steering arms, as they did change over the years, with different generations of Spitfire. Don't forget that there are extender pieces in the rod ends. The Europa has a wider track than the Spit. Spit rack and ends are used, so an extender piece is put between the tie rod and the tie rod end on each side. Also, there is a spacer block in the rack to prevent the wheels from turning as sharply. A Spit can nearly turn in its own length, but the bodywork on a Europa will not allow that. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA, Lotus Europa, pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

My local store had a tie rod end for 63-80 spitfire and it showed that that was the correct one for the europa. The old one looks like it had never been off. It screws on by hand easily... the new one goes on about two full turns
easily and then tightens. I know that there are odd threads here and there on Brit stuff so i didn't try to force it. Eyeballing... the threads look the same and the new part doesn't seem to have any damaged threads or dirt in it to cause this problem... It definately feels like it has tthe wrong threads... anyone else run into this problem or
have any suggestions?
Dsrgr@aol.com

Give the arm on the vertical upright a few taps with a hammer around the hole where the tie rod end goes through. This should create enough shock to allow you to be able to lift the tie rod end out without a problem.
Briggs (envious of everyone else's progress) Pletcher 72 S2

The bolt is tapered and becomes a press fit when the nut is tightened. There are pullers made for the purpose - called, oddly enough, tie rod pullers - but you can also get them out by hitting the steering knuckle smartly with a large hammer while pulling on the tie rod end. This technique does no damage and is, in my experience, always effective. I haven't had to fool with the ones on my Europa yet, but I've done tie rod ends on all sorts of other cars. Most mechanics use the impact method rather than bothering with a puller. Jay Mitchell.

The tie rod end is a tapered shaft, and the best way I have seen to get them out is a little device that Harbor Freight (Cheap tools you can't trust with your life, but other times they work) has on sale at the moment for $10.99. It is called a Heavy-Duty Lever-Type Ball Joint & Tie Rod End Remover (part number 81HB2149N. This device is two bars with a u-shaped cut-out in one of one bar and a bolt in the other end. The bolt presses on the end of the other bar whose other end presses the thread shaft of the ball joint out. They seem to work, and are much less likely to break something than a hammer is. Robert D. LaMoreaux BT Electronics LLC 22700 Heslip Dr. NoVI, MI 48375 Main Phone:(248)-348-6560 Direct Phone:(248)-348-6504 Fax:(248)-348-6558 Email:RLaMoreaux@bte-us.com Alternate Email:Rob_LaMoreaux@compuserve.com

The Europa steering tie rod or rack extension is 1/2" x 20 thread. John Abbott Amarillo, Texas USA '71 Europa S-2 Hermes http://users.arn.net/~jdaarch

SUSPENSION, A-arms

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> There appears to be some misunderstanding of the differences in Europa A-arms. Here are some items that should clarify:

  1. The change in A-arms had no effect whatever on suspension geometry. Or ride height. None. If your car has the smaller-diameter front springs (or if you fit such springs), you can use EITHER variety of upper arm - the lower arms are identical across the board - with no change in your suspension geometry or ride height.
  2. The only reason for adopting the Type 65's upper arms was to make more room for larger diameter coil springs. That's it.
  3. For the above reasons, ride height and suspension geometry discussions of S2 cars need not take A-arm differences into account. If your car has the newer type A-arms, there's no reason to go back. If it has the earlier type, it's possible to retrofit the newer ones, but why bother?

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Mark Hollingsworth wrote: The type 54 uses a smaller diameter spring, and a damper a bit different length (from my measurements).

Correct so far.

> Since the front of the car is lower on the type 54 by a considerable amount, and both cars have close to zero
> camber,

I don't beleive the Type 65 with the stopgap longer springs had zero camber. My car didn't.

> Of course, the 54 headlamp pods are different too, so even at the same ride height the 54 appears lower (of course, I'm sure you are discussing suspension- not appearance).

Definitely.

> That said, I've never personally lowered a type 65 and checked the camber, but I can't see how it could possibly be the same. Unless of course, the 65 has improper camber as it was shipped.

Bingo! The longer springs were an afterthought. There was no pretense of the front suspension working properly with those springs in place. I'm looking at the factory parts manual as I type. The LEADING halves of the A-arms did not change from Type 54 to Type 65, only the trailing halves. Ergo, no geometry change, only a relocation of the trailing half to the outside of the chassis.

> While the change in 'A' arms wouldn't affect ride height at all, I think it will affect camber.

See above. With the identical leading half, there's no way the ball joint mounting holes would have been relocated on the trailing half only. It doesn't matter which front suspension you have, the design geometry is identical.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Date: Thursday, March 02, 2000 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa A-arms

> That said, I've never personally lowered a type 65 and checked the camber, but I can't see how it could possibly be the same. Unless of course, the 65 has improper camber as it was shipped.

Bingo. The camber and camber curve on my Lotus 65 were both awful. I had the Lotus-54-style front suspension with the longer springs. Yuck. By replacing only the rear half of the upper wishbone (the front half is the same part number), I was able to put in larger-diameter front springs so I could order them off-the-shelf from Eibach. Camber and camber curve much better now, and the car does not look like a motorboat. Front ride height matches nicely with the rear. The rear has been lowered until the halfshafts

>While the change in 'A' arms wouldn't affect ride height at all,

The upper-arm change does not affect any measure of geometry. Dave Bean was wrong about this. JAE was right.

>I think it will affect camber.

Not the part I am talking about. It affected no measure of geometry. It can't!

>Mark-prepared to be corrected-Hollingsworth

Not sure if I am correcting you, because you may still be talking about something else.

>>Jay Mitchell 1. The change in A-arms had no effect whatever on suspension geometry. Or ride height. None. If your car has the smaller-diameter front springs (or if you fit such springs), you can use EITHER variety of upper arm - the lower arms are identical across the board - with no change in your suspension geometry or ride height.

Correct.

>>2. The only reason for adopting the Type 65's upper arms was to make more room for larger diameter coil springs.

That's it. And I proved it by changing only the rear half of the upper arm. If it was capable of making a change in geometry, it would not fit on the car. Dave Bean's guy told me that Dave told him it would not fit. Didn't stand to reason to anyone with mechanical ability and a parts book, so I bought the parts from JAE. Bolted on with no problem.

SUSPENSION, Bearing replacement

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Re Rear Wheel Bearing Replacement I have a ton of collected wisdom on this subject. I will send it to anyone else who wants it. About 18 pages of plain text. No attachments or anything like that.

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> Don't know too much about twinks but a couple of months ago, I did discover that my handling problems were not tires. My S2 was also losing traction and I was hearing some tire squeal. Aaron will remember it from the skid pad at Road Atlanta. I discovered that the trailing arm bushings were
totally gone and I needed rear wheel bearings. The lack of trailing arm bushings and bad bearings caused my car to be very "darty" and in right-hand curves, the car had a bad tendency to keep going left. However, I could close my eyes and let go of the wheel in a left-hand curve. The bad bearings and worn out trailing arm bushings were the problem. The parts were all available from RD for less than $300.

SUSPENSION, Bolts

> I need a pair of aircraft-quality bolts for my rear suspension. The lower-outer pivot in the hub carrier seems to be a rare size. I tried to > order a AN8-60A from Aircraft Spruce...
Try Coast Fab.
http://www.coastfab.com/ Mark Reichert

SUSPENSION, Handling

Mark wrote: >I purchased a set of Spax shocks for the TC a few years back. I set the front ride height so that a line drawn through the pivot points on the lower control arms were nearly parallel to the ground.

If you want the best possible result, you've gotta go substantially lower than that. To do so, you have to acquire shocks that are shorter than OEM, Mine are Carreras, but you can also get what you need from Koni, Penske, Foxx, and several others. My first pass at shocks involved units that matched OEM in compressed length and stroke. You can't get the car as low as it needs to be with that setup. You'll also need higher spring rates than stock by a large (2:1 or greater) margin. I have all the specs in my notes if anyone is interested.


> This lowered the roll center and roll axis significantly and now, coupled with the 60 series Yokohamas, I get very little roll.

I have the inner pivots about 3/4" lower than the outers and run 13 x 8" rims with Hoosier 225/45 x 13 autocross radials. The roll axis and, much more importantly, the CG, are as low as they can be gotten without moving the pickup points. This is not a streetable setup, but it's what you need if you want to compete in a Europa.


>It was my understanding that the nose of the Europa was jacked up on Federal models to meet bumper height restrictions irrespective of what it might do to handling.


Yep.

> The now extinct Group 44 Racing did the alignment and set the corner weights.


I do my own. I run 0 degrees toe front and rear (that's an S2: Twinks need some toe in in the rear), 2.2 degrees negative camber at the front, and 1.8 degrees negative at the rear. Works very well. If you run bias ply tires (e.g. Hoosier AutoCrossers or Street TDs), you'll need to run quite a bit less negative camber. Jay Mitchell

SUSPENSION, Hubs

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Stan wrote: Okay I have finished getting the Special hub carrier onto my S2 arm. I measured the Special bearing spacer tube and see that it came out to 2 inches. But this is visibly longer than the distance between the hub carrier bearing stops, perhaps a mm.. Could this be deliberate?


I believe it is. The hub carrier inner bearing's outer race (is that clear?) is intended to float. On the S2 carriers, the inner "shoulder" is just the point where they stopped machining the bearing bore and is interrupted by the opening that goes into the "foot" of the carrier. The dimensional matchup is exactly as you describe. The outer bearing is rigidly captured between the radius arm flange and the retaining shoulder in the carrier, whereas the inner bearing's inner race is located by the spacer. The outer race is constrained radially, but not laterally.

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> The spacer should be longer than the distance between the bearing bore bottoms in the carrier so that the bearing outer races are not held apart by the carrier when you tighten the stub axle nut and pull the inner races together against the spacer, which would preload the bearings and cause them to fail quickly. By design, the inner bearing 'floats' in the carrier to preclude this. Use green Loctite sleeve retainer on assembly, tighten the nut to spec (150 ft/lb ?) and let the Loctite cure with the bearing set just where it wants to be.

SJMARCY@aol.com Does anyone know the thickness of the under hub spacer rings on an S2 AND a Special Europa? I have the "special" hub carriers mounted onto the S2 boxed arms. I've modified the special stub axles by cutting off the integral studs, replacing them wih aircraft hardware threaded into a drilled and tapped axial hole. I will be using double row angular contact inner bearings (30 mm x 62 mm x 15/16 inch ) and thinner seals along with the stock 30 x 62 x 16 mm outer bearings. My selected inner bearings are the style of bearing used on modern FWD cars (just one per axle!) and they have high radial and axial capacity. The next size up is used (solo) on modern small formula cars so with the stock outer I should be in very good shape. So I should wind up with a cheap totally bulletproof rig. The double row innners ran 30 something apiece from a local bearing supplier. The hub carrier has enough space for a larger inner, but the stub axle needs to be turned or ground down a bit.towards the u-joint in order to gain some offset. I may be able to lay it out such that the underhub spacer is unused. Or perhaps I'll set it up such that the stock hub position is retained. Which is why I need the spacer thicknesses. I'd like to wind up with as few parts as possible, only hard, strong stuff so that compresssive yield is avoided. So I may be able to leave off the under-nut bend-the-flange washer and the underhub spacer. I have a bit of extra freedom here since I don't have to worry about the rear drums as discs will be used. BTW the Special parts seem to have more generous radii here and there (compared to the S2) which is good practice for strength and fatigue resistance. BTW2, it is easy to drill out the stock stub axles (to accept a stud or bolt) using a drill press by using the hub with reversed studs as a drill fixture. It took me about 45-60 minutes (each) with a 1/3 hp drill press.

ClassMaker@aol.com SJMARCY@AOL.com writes: Does anyone know the thickness of the under hub spacer rings on an S2 AND a Special Europa? About 0.385" according to the S2 spacers I got from Banks (Europa Engineering) recently. Hadn't installed them yet, so I checked them with my el-cheapo plastic dial calipers. I also bought the conical hub-centering washers ...in case.

SJMARCY@aol.com In a message dated 7/12/99 11:21:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, pethier@isd.net
writes: I have not decided whether or not to use the tab washer; for now it is in there.


I recommend that you remove it. Use no tab washer and use the green LocTite. I really don't like tab washers... Some feel that they are an abomination. They are supposed to prevent the nut from backing off but in order to be able to be bent they are somewhat compressible. And in order to use them the threaded shaft has to have a flat machined onto it which weakens the deal and lowers fatigue life since it is a major stress riser. So your nut doesn't back off but you lose bolt tension (which is what you were really after) and the integra stub axlel stud is weaker. Sorta like robbing Peter and Mike to pay Paul. Loctite works best if the surfaces are very clean...brake cleaner or other no-residue solvents may help along with loctite primer.

ClassMaker@aol.com whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: 2) Installation of bearings... They have to be punched out, so do they have to be pressed in? Don't want to bugger things up with a hammer, so what's the usual procedure?

Driving them out with a drift (on the outer race) may work... but it could 'bugger things up' inside the hub carrier where the outer races fit in. Don't press them in. Boil the hub carrier and push the bearings in gently. If the hub carriers are already buggered up (bearing races drop out) you might salvage them by using Loctite "stud & bearing mount."

> 4) More on half shafts... Is it worth the trouble to cross-drill the half-shaft for a cotter pin to retain the hub nut, or are new tab washers enough?

Don't bother drilling. You are going to put *at least* 150 ft-lb torque on. Get a large breaker bar, chock the wheels, and stand on the bar! Read the procedure in Dave Bean's catalog. Tab washers are passe. I bought solid ones from Sports Car World. Other hardened washers will fit -- some use the "D" shaped (Chrysler) ones. Use Loctite, but not until you have gone through the wild-hare driving exercise and re-torqued (as per the DBE description). Lots of fun, really!

SUSPENSION, Hub bearing removal

From: jrowan@ix.netcom.com Clamp it across the yokes, using some hardwood to prevent scratches. First apply a lot of heat (I used a MAPP torch) to break down the loctite. If that hadn't worked, I was going to borrow an impact wrench, which is probably the more "correct" solution.

SUSPENSION, Hub Loctite

Robert "Fast Bob" Scheib <Robert.Scheib@gte.net> When rebuilding the rear hub brg. carriers for my '72 TC [updated to "Spl." carriers/brakes] I was unable to locate the #635 "green" stuff at my local suppliers, and used "red" #271[?] instead at their recommendation. Their comment was that the "red" had superior bearing race retaining qualities, and is more easily broken loose with heat for disassembly - I recieved the same comments from the bearing supplier. I was able to test this as I made a mistake during assembly and had to redo one bearing installation! I used acetone as a preliminary surface cleaner followed by Loctite cleaner/prep solution. You have to work fast as preheating the hub brg. carriers accelerates the cure time for the Loctite. I used the same #271 "red" on the stub axle / yoke splines - again at the recommendation of the Loctite dealer. I bought a set of the "centering washers" [?] but ended up not installing them, also had one last set of "tab-washers that I did use.

"John D. Abbott" <jdaarch@arn.net> I went a little different route on my rear hubs. I used Saf-T-Loc R01 on them. It maybe the same thing as Loctite packaged differently. It's green and expensive! I used new tabs because I didn't know any different. I'm afraid to remove them now and use red Loctite, because it may disturb the Saf-T-Loc. I now have the car about 99% sorted, and I'm very pleased with the result. I redid B*W 2002's for years, saw a Europa at the SCCA nationals in Salina and fell in love. The 2002's are now just too blah for me. I really expected an extremely loud car full of vibration and rattles, but with great performance. Not true! The car rides great with no shake, is reasonably quiet ( a relative term ) and rattle free. The performance is more than adequate, with the illusion of speed being great. I went to my first autocross last Sunday and had a good time. The ashtray flew up and hit me in the face on my first run. I also turned the engine 6000
for the first time. An interesting point ... I put 20# of air in the fronts, 24# in the rears. Way too much, the tires didn't roll under at all even though I let out 1# after each run. I guess I'm not used to such a light car.

danmo@geocities.com I just looked in the Loctite catalog for their product descriptions. The 2xx series products are threadlockers. The 6xx series are for retaining and slip fit of bearings, etc.


270 – For fasteners up to ľ", intended for parts that do not require disassembly

271 – For fasteners up to 1"

272 – For fasteners up to 1 ˝", for as received fasteners, heat and hand tools required for disassembly

277 – For fasteners up to 1 ˝", Will not loosen due to heat shock or vibration, heat and hand tools required for disassembly


Loctite #635 is High strength for slip fits for gap fill (diametral) up to 0.010", shear strength of 4000 psi. I ended up buying #609 because that’s what they had; gaps to 0.005" and 3000 psi shear. #620 is for gaps to 0.015" and shear of 3800 psi. There is also a #603 for lightly contaminated parts, gaps to 0.005" and shear of 3770 psi. They also list other retaining compounds (638, 640, 641, 648, 660, 675, 680) in another chart that may well suffice. They vary from 0.005" – 0.020" gaps and shears varying from 1700 psi – 4500 psi (and not necessarily in order). They are probably fairly interchangeable and I think a lot depends on what the dealer may carry. Some viscosities were listed as "thixotropic". Any idea what that means? Really, really thick?

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> From memory, #635 sounds right. Green liquid, bearing and sleeve retainer

danmo@geocities.com I talked to the local Loctite rep this morning inquiring which product was the best to use. When I mentioned Loctite #35 he laughed.He said that was a very old number. He also said that the #635 is the equivalent and would work, but recommended #680 because it has a quicker setting time (about 20 minutes to aluminum vs. over an hour with the #635). Setting times can be shortened with the use of a primer, although it is not necessary. Both products fully cure in 24 hours. He definitely recommended using a cleaner though. The #680 also has a larger gap filling capability (0.015" vs. 0.015") for those worn hub bores.

Robert "Fast Bob" Scheib <Robert.Scheib@gte.net> The Loctite cleaner / prep is part # "765 - 1154" - "Klean 'N Prime". I bought it at NAPA auto parts ; the can has NAPA, Loctite, and Permatex emblems on the label. The product comes in a spray can and is evil smelling stuff that deep cleans the surfaces to be joined and acts as a "activator" for the Loctite. I should amend my earlier statement to say that the hub bearing carriers I used were in excellent condition, and the bearing fit was very tight -I had to use heat on the carrier castings and press action to fit the bearings. For this reason the red #271 was deemed a better choice, had the fit been "loose" I would have had to use one of the "green" products - ditto for the stub shaft/hub splines. This advice / info was given to me by a Loctite customer info rep. that is a car racer too! [My son, who is an experienced Formula Atl. mechanic gave me the same recommendation - "red for tight, green for loose"]

SUSPENSION, Hub wobble

Kevin Swart <kgs113@mail.a-znet.com> Is it the drivers side wheel? I remember one of the things to watch for is
the hub and spline on that side. When they get a little play, they loosten the nut and it just gets worse. The first year I had mine I filled it with Loctite forma thread. Made it through one summer of fun with a few autoXes thrown in. Took it apart at the end of the season and the form a thread was pretty hammered. I had the hub machined slightly and a cone washer made to center it on the stub axle. I then covered the stub axle with mold release silicone and covered the splines on the hub with Devcon Titanium filled epoxy. Real strong compressive strength. Cheaper than a new stub and hub. Slight wobble at high end but not bad. If you can find the parts replace BOTH. If not, you'll just beat up your new part.

SUSPENSION, Lower links

ClassMaker@aol.com whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: 1) Where can I get new lower links? Does anyone make them from aluminum or SS?


Steel adjustable from Ray Psulkowski at RDE. Aluminum adjustable, Ken Gray (or other sales staff) at DBE. Used ones in like-new, email Don Tingle (
TingleTLC@AOL.com). Check the www.gglc.org "for sale" columns (Golden Gate Lotus Club). I got the DBE aluminum set, complete with rod-ends. You may want to add rubber "seals-it" caps or boots to protect the sperical bearing surfaces of the ends.

> The lower links of the rear suspension are bent, most likely from getting the car here (200 miles...)


Two common bending casualties for the uninitiated: [1] jacking under a link; [2] chaining or hooking for towing or tie-down. Supervise the tilt-bed operators carefully.

"Tony Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net> Subject: Re: Europa Update Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:00:34 -0500
From: Aaron Hines: The lower links of the rear suspention are bent, most likely from getting the car here (200 miles from its former resting place). One is bent pretty good, the other less so. Now, like usual, time for questions: 1) Where can I get new lower links? Does anyone make them from aluminum or SS? Better yet, does anyone have any used ones laying around? Possibly with polyurethane bushings already installed? 2) Are polyurethane bushings availible?


Well, now you've an alibi to do it right and replace the arms with nice light adjustable ones. You can buy them from some of our loyal Lotus suppliers or you can make them yourself with the great stuff available from some of our "Circle Track" friends: Rod End Supply 1 800 284 2902. They have every kind of threaded rod end and both steel and aluminum tubing with internal dimensioning which is the correct tap-size for the rod ends.

ClassMaker@aol.com Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Lower links Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:19:19 EDT
JerTigger@aol.com writes: With all the discussion about lower links I noticed mine are not perfectly straight. Is this a serious problem?


Could be. If (by not straight) you mean some kinks, folds, creases, dents, or whatever (this is mild tubing) then -- yes -- could be a problem. I once met a fella who thought the proper way to shorten a lower link was to "bow" it with several subtle bends. Might be deadly if outer one buckles under compression load while cornering! Tubing should be straight & smooth. Welds should be clean, tidy, and beads laid in nicely.


> Doesn't the trailing arm hold the rear wheels in their proper place and don't the adjustments on the lower links compensate for this when wheel alignment is done?

Three links: trailing arm, lower link, drive shaft. Trailer only locates hub carrier forward and aft and influences toe according to pivot point). A Europa will exceed one "G" cornering on good tires and camber. That might translate into about 2 G's compression in lower link, based on the proportional distances from contact patch to lower link bolt, and from there to hub/driveline center, the dynamic attitude of the car... etc, on 185/70-13's. I'm making ballpark guesses here...let's ask Scott Mitchell, "What do these numbers really look like?" ((Scott did suspension designs.)) IIRC, there was a thread about rod-end strengths not long ago. Some of the guys race Europas.

Scott Mitchell <smitch@erols.com> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Lower links Date: Wed, 14 Jul 99 23:01:31 -0400
Argh, Ken you got me going....

>A Europa will exceed one "G" cornering on good tires and camber. That might translate into about 2 G's compression in lower link, based on the proportional distances from contact patch to lower link bolt, and from there to hub/driveline center, the dynamic attitude of the car... etc, on 185/70-13's.


Roughly right. The lower link takes 1.95 times the load contributed by the tire. Using some assumptions, the lower link of the outside tire holds about 1600 lbs at 1G. The link is a simple 2 force member. And the tubing is 1"... anyone know the wall thickness? Unfortunately, my materials text is at work. But my guess is the lower link is well within the structural requirements. I doubt little bit of bend is going to be a problem. Something approaching a kink would be another matter.

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Europa Rear Suspension Loading By Mike Causer. Posted on the internet (lotus-cars mailing list) in 1993. Slightly cleaned up (not reposted) in 1994.


|< 4">|

 

|
| -----

   
   


| -----

 
 

||
|||
|-----|
A |\\\\\|=

Fd -> O---------------O-----| ---------------

|\\\\\|= ^ ^

Fs /\\\\\| |

| |\\/ ||| 6" |

v |\/ || v

Fl -> O--------------0 | --------- 10"

B __|__

     

| |___| v

| O <-- Fc ---------

| C ^

 

Fw
|
|< 5" >|



This represents the hub, tyre and suspension, let's pretend that it's the RHS looking from the back of the car. The pivotable points are drawn as an 'O' (including the tyre contact point), and have input loads where appropriate - shown as 'F_', and there are some dimensions in inches. This has been very crudely scaled from the diagram on page 5 of Section G of the S1/2 manual. I have simplified a bit to make the spring vertical and the links parallel to the ground, but this does not alter the sense of the loads, just their magnitudes a bit. The hub, outboard shaft, wheel and tyre are considered to be a rigid unit *in this plane*. The load on the driveshaft is 'Fd' and is applied to the hub unit at point 'A' the load on the lower link is 'Fl' and is applied to the hub at point 'B' the load from the spring is 'Fs' and is also applied at point 'B' the ground supports the wheel with 'Fw' at point 'C' and there is a cornering load 'Fc' also at point 'C'. The principle is that the sum of all horizontal loads is 0 and that the sum of all vertical loads is 0 and that the sum of all rotational moments in this plane is zero. If this is not true the car is probably overturning. So, summing vertical loads: (1) Fw = Fs ie Fw has the same value as Fs and they are opposite in direction. Summing horizontal loads (2) Fd + Fl = Fc. Taking moments about point A (3) Fc * 10 = Fs * 1 + Fl * 6 + Fw * 4. Taking moments about point B (4) Fd * 6 + Fc * 4 = Fw * 5. Assume the wheel load vertically 'Fw' is 600lb and that the cornering load 'Fc' is 250lb - so the car is going around a left hand corner from (1) Fs = Fw = 600; from (3) Fl = ( Fc * 10 - Fs * 1 - Fw * 4 ) / 6= ( 2500 - 600 - 2400 ) / 6= -83; from (4) Fd = ( Fw * 5 - Fc * 4 ) / 6= ( 3000 - 1000 ) / 6= 333. Check the result with (2) 333 - 83 = 250 yes, looks good. So in this case the drive shaft takes the greater load; but let's reverse the cornering load and knock a bit off the effective weight say to 400lb Fl = ( Fc * 10 - Fs * 1 - Fw * 4 ) / 6 = ( -2500 - 400 - 1600 ) / 6 = -750. Fd = ( Fw * 5 - Fc * 4 ) / 6 = ( 2000 + 1000 ) / 6 = 500. Check again -750 + 500 = -250 yup, looks right. How about the no-cornering case? Say Fw = 500 and Fc = 0, Fs = 500, Fl = ( 0 - 500 - 2000 ) / 6 = -416. Fd = ( 2500 - 0 ) / 6 = 416. So the shaft and the lower link carry quite a load at all times. And just for fun, let's look at the 1000lb cornering case, and assume that there is also a 1000lb vertical load on the tyre (unless Phil has racing slicks ;-) Fs = 1000, Fl = ( 10000 - 1000 - 4000 ) / 6 = 833, Fd = ( 5000 - 4000 ) / 6 = 166. There are some interesting things here, the load on the driveshaft seems to be uni-directional and is mainly due to reacting the couple caused by the offset of the spring from the wheel centre-line; and the load on the lower link reaches much higher values and switches direction. Ahh now this has an effect on the way the bearings in the hub are laid out - I've photocopied all the pictures showing the rear hubs from Daytune's copy of the shop manual and now see how it fits. However, this is long enough for now, and will give everyone plenty to argue about over their morning coffee & bagels (for those lucky enough to get bagels - and _do_ I envy you!) so I'll explain my interpretation of the hub fitment in another post.

bobm@ttseagle.com Subject: RE: Digest lotus-cars.v004.n394 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:17:24 -0600
Aaron Hines writes: What is the difference between a Heim joint-ended link and a spherical bearing-ended link? The pherical-ended link would be stronger and more durable, correct?

A Heim joint is just a proprietary-named spherical rod end. Their version has a set of dimensions which (supposedly) optimize the degree of freedom and movement of the joint. Also has specific strength per size (nominal 3/8", 1/2", etc.). Other spherical rod ends may need to be "engineered" to ensure suitability for a particular application, although nearly any of suitable _size_ will have adequate strength for the lower arms on the Europa. BTW, this (adjustable lower links) is REALLY the way to go. Also, lower the front of a Federal Europa – so the lower link is exactly parallel to the ground -- and you have slot-car handling and turn-in that you won't believe.

SUSPENSION, Lowering

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> To properly lower the car to type 54 specs, you'll also need to replace
the upper 'A' arms. They are different. You could slot them if you like, others have done so- or fit adjustable ones. A comparision of the ride heights (and headamp pod heights ) is on my web site:

http://www.olympus.net/personal/markh/lotus.htm

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Springs/lowering: If you are contemplating lowering a street-driven car, the lowest you can go in practical terms is to set the inner and outer pivot points of the lower front A-arms
(wishbones) at the same height. This is very close to the non-Federal design ride height, and the additional negative camber resulting from this change - assuming all your parts are straight to begin with - will not be a problem. In fact, it will generally be desirable with radial tires. Go any lower than this and ground clearance will become marginal for road use. Based on period photographs of Europas, Lotus tended to set the rear of all the cars a bit lower than the front. My experience has led me to set my car such that the floor pan is just a bit higher at the rear of the flat section under the seats than at the front of the same section. Set this way, the body has a barely perceptible forward rake. The difference in Type 54/46 and Type 65 upper A-arms is that, on the earlier types, the rear half of the arm fit inside the chassis Tsection. This was necessary with the S1 cars due to a lack of clearance behind the chassis "T". The Type 65/Twink setup was designed for non-Federal geometry, and the ridiculous Federal springs that Lotus installed as a stop-gap measure to meet US headlight height requirements seriously compromised that. Restoring a Federal car to non-Federal ride height with no other modifications is a win-win proposition. From the standpoint of rear suspension/driveline longevity, the best rear ride height setting would place the outer ends of the halfaxles slightly lower than the inner ends. With this setup, the halfaxles will be straightest under power, when the U-joints are transmitting the greatest forces.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> On my type 54 (federal) I fitted Spax dampers with adjustable perches. I had a set of original Armstrong dampers, but measured incorrectly and thought they were the wrong ones. I measured the spring perch, and found that with the Spax perch all the way down, it came to just where the original Armstrong perch was located. So you couldn't lower the car with the original springs at all. I didn't really care about lowering it anymore, since it is at factory settings now but having a bit of adjustability would have been nice.

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> I did use shorter springs. I bought them from Bean, they called them comp/street springs but they aren't nearly as stiff as the ones some of you guys are using on the autocross-only cars. My car now sits at 14-14.5in at the front bumper. I bought the 2.5in 10x140 and 2in 14x115 springs from Bean.

lotusjps@iname.com My experience with lowering my Europa went very well. I'm using the AVO adjustable shocks and springs from Banks. The springs are much shorter and a fair amount stiffer than the stock ones. With the adjustable spring perches I'm able to drop the car way down (too low for street use) and still not have any clearance issues. In fact, for awhile I drove the car with the front sway bar less that 2 inches off the ground (a mag light wouldn't even roll under it). I didn't have any finder clearance problems, though the sight of a speed bump or pot hole made my blood run cold. I'm running the original Lotus mag with 185/60 tires all around. I've since raised it slightly and am still amazed how much better the handling is over stock. Don 74 JPS

ken.landaiche@nokia.com I bought the Banks AVO/spring setup but haven't installed them yet. (Within two months, I promise!) The front springs are 250 pounds/inch. Compared to even the uprated 140 LB ones from Bean, they are much stiffer. I have been wondering if I made a mistake, though I tend to trust Banks.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Ken wrote: he front springs are 250 pounds/inch.

Whoooeeee! That's stiff. My autocross-only car has been doing great with 175 lb/in front springs. I recently raised them to 200 lb/in to offset a reduction in the effect of the front swaybar. With 175 F/140 R and appropriate damping, the car rides more stiffly than I would be willing to live with in a street car.

> Compared to even the uprated 140 LB ones from Bean, they are much stiffer.

What rates are the rears? They would need to be around 150 lb/in or more, or you're gonna have significant understeer.

ken.landaiche@nokia.com The rear springs are 110 LB/in, consistent with other recipes for uprating the rear.

Scott Mitchell <scott@alwaysthinking.com> The front springs are nothing special, so long as you can describe it (rate, free length, & 2.5" ID), you can get them from Hyperco, Carrera, Eibach's racing division, etc. You can get pretty much whatever you want. The rear on the other hand is a bit of an oddball size, so you might have to do some scraping or be willing to go up to the 2.5" ID.

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> I went with 140/115# and can't say anything bad about them for a road car. Way better than stock. Pictures at http://fox.nstn.ca/~hfreise/vehicles/TLA.htm listed under "Tech Bulletins."

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> IKneer@aol.com wrote: All this talk lately of lowering the front suspension-- I thought all you had to do was hack a couple of coils off the stock springs throw them back in and -voila- lowered europa! At least according to a Lotus Ltd. tech manual article.

That's possible, but cutting and resetting springs isn't exactly a fun thing to do, and it's particularly bothersome with the relatively small coils that came on Europas. Add to that the fact that I can buy Carrera springs for about $60 that are guaranteed for life to hold their rate and free length within 2%, and I'm inclined to look for other ways to spend my car prep time.


> Of course I'm not sure what this might do to the handling.

Reducing the number of active coils - which cutting will definitely do - raises a spring's rate and reduces its free length. The question remains as to whether there's a way to get optimal values for both of those parameters by cutting stock Europa springs. It may well be possible, but I haven't ever bothered to do the calculations. It's too easy and not at all expensive just to buy exactly what I want. I do know one national-champion autocrosser who has identified several springs he can get for next to nothing at junkyards and cut down to get the rate and free length he wants. His car is an X1/9, however, and the diameter of the coils is 4" or so. Springs of that size are much easier to play with. And he's got a $1200+ custom-made EFI intake manifold with slide throttles, so he's gotta save some money somewhere. ;<)

> Lower center of gravity and all isn't everything.

Well, it's definitely in first place. But you've gotta have appropriate spring and damping rates, as well as acceptable suspension geometry, to go with the lower CG. Otherwise you won't realize the maximum benefit. And you might just make your car slower than stock. :<( It's happened more often than you'd think.

Front shocks - Carrera 6237, compressed length 8.32", stroke 2.72"
Rear shocks - Carrera 6245, compressed length 9.32", stroke 3.72", with a shaft extension added.
The shocks are threaded aluminum body units and I run them "upside down," i.e., with the shock body attached to the chassis and the shaft attached to the suspension arm.
Front springs - Carrera 1 7/8" i.d., 200 lb/in., 8" free length

Rear springs - Carrera 1 7/8" i.d., 140 lb/in., 8" free length

Front bar - stock bar modified for adjustability, with articulating end links using rod ends.
Rear bar - none.
Jay Mitchell

SUSPENSION, Pin removal

dan.morrison@autodesk.com The wishbone bushings were not rusted to the pins, but I wanted to remove the pins from the chassis, and I think they were rusted to the chassis "bushing". On the front side of the pin, with the lower front wishbone removed, I used a series of spacers, washers, etc., to build out to the threaded portion of the pin, capping it off with a full size non-nylock nut. Then, I applied heat evenly to the length of the sleeve. After heating for a while, I started to tighten the nut and pulled the pin through to the front, adding washers and spacers as needed to take up the unthreaded part of the pin. It was a slow process, but it worked. This may be more difficult in your situation because you will not be able to apply heat to the bushed area, but maybe after soaking for a while in WD40 (etc.) it may break loose.

SUSPENSION, Rear ‘clunk’

Scott Mitchell wrote: My S2 has begun making a clunk during acceleration. It happens during acceleration, mostly when I release the clutch in 1st (and occasionally 2nd) gear. It sounds like something is knocking the fiberglass behind me, rattling the lid hinge.

My money is on the front trailing arm bush - yeah?

I second the motion that the clunking sound might be from the U-joints and/or roll pins when they are worn; usually this only happens during abrupt transition from accel to decel and vice versa. Try getting under the car and pulling on the drive shafts. If they're real bad, you may see movement between the ujoint yokes. But you may have to jack the car up to get the weight off the wheels (Use jackstands). Spin the wheels hard and look and listen for any play.

Just cured one like that two weeks ago. The muffler "slip fit" was slipping its way off the collector, and the elbow was now just close enough to clunk the frame crossmember on the left. At first, I thought the motor was How about the left hand trailing arm pivot? (Mylastic thingie.)


Acceleration drives the pivot bolt forward in the hopefully-captive assembly -- then letting off the gas (or clutch) lets it relax again.


Left hub nut secure? 150-plus ft-lb -- say, 200 if you care to. I use an 18" breaker bar and socket, and *step* onto the handle. Any hub spline slop will make a clunk. Time for Loc-Tite.


Speaking of splines, make sure the roll pins ("tension pins") in the output yokes are not broken -- they will if there's play in the yoke splines.


Check for wheel bearing failure/wear in the hub carrier. Jack to full droop. Grab the tire, up/down, side-to-side, etc. Kick it too. Then, only with a hydraulic floor jack "cup" under the cross member or tranny: push and pull the top of the tire. Yank it hard (not on jackstands, please!). Shove it harder. A good push inward at the top will usually show u-joint slop or a spun/loose wheel bearing.


My verified experience is that the clunk could be a universal joint. This can clunk as you apply power. But before you replace the U-Joint, HOPE that it is something much simpler: The clunk can come from the radius/trailing arm mounting bracket where it is attached to the frame. This is a "Metalastik" rubber mount. Removed the bolt that attaches the radius arm to the bracket. Clean or replace it. Lubricate it. This is a pivot point that is meant to pivot. It is part of the suspension. If you have the weight of the car, motor-trans and suspension properly supported, you can remove this bolt without dismembering the suspension. I've had this clunk in the past (sounded like a loud CLICK) when applying power. It took a while to figure it out, but that was the problem.

Now to add something positive. Having read other posts, someone mentioned "engine mount" This also sounds very plausable to me. But I'm assuming the noise is more of a dull "clunk" - maybe a sort of "thud". A uni-joint sound is much more of a "metalic" sound.

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com>


>Can someone please explain what the different possible problems are and what parts need to be checked/replaced? Is this covered in the manual somewhere?


Been there done that. There are a series of shims that go between the yoke and the transmission. That way the forces are transmitted into the transmission by contact not through the spiral/roll pin(s). If memory serves you can get the shims in 5 & 15/1000s. Someone (tingle?, RD?, I can't remember) has 30/1000s too. You've got to shim that til it is tight. You should also check the pins, they may have cracked. Mine had.

ClassMaker@aol.com said: Check for wheel bearing failure/wear in the hub carrier. Jack to full droop. Grab the tire, up/down, side-to-side, etc. Kick it too. Then, only with a hydraulic floor jack "cup" under the cross member or tranny: push and pull the top of the tire. Yank it hard (not on jackstands, please!). Shove it harder. A good push inward at the top will usually show u-joint slop or a spun/loose wheel bearing.

From: "H. Schrader" <geo@olg.com> Subject: To all YAWROPAS Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:04:01 –0400 I would like to thank the guys that sent me suggestions on how to correct the twitchiness on my Europa. The problem was the transmission mounts. I had not noticed before but, the PO had generously covered the entire mount with undercoat. As I took the old mounts off, they fell apart in my hands! With new mounts the sensitivity in the "yaw axis" is all gone; as an additional bonus, the transmission shifts perfectly!

SUSPENSION, Roll center

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> According to Scott's suspension program, my car's front roll center is almost exactly 3" off the ground, and the rear is around 4 3/16". My suspension is a little bit lower than stock, and the low profile tires drop everything even more, so a stock car's roll centers will be maybe 3/4 - 1" higher. I took pains to get information into the program that is as accurate as possible, so I'm reasonably confident of the above.

SUSPENSION, Shock absorbers

JerTigger@aol.com The Golden Gate Club lists two makes of shocks Spax 195 620 AM and Koni 80-2273. DBE also references Armstrong in their parts book.

ClassMaker@aol.com Carrera shocks -- here in Atlanta! http://www.carrerashocks.com/ order line: 1-800-RACE-4-IT tech line: 1-770-451-8811 fax line: 1-770-451-8086

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> I believe one has to unscrew the top eye from the rod and remove the rubber bump stop in order for the rod to be descended far enough the engage the adjustment slot.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Ken wrote: curious -- the damping rates are...?
Front - 175 lb-sec/in (wheel damping rate of 65 lb-sec/in). Rear - 135 lb-sec/in (wheel damping rate of 132 lb-sec/in). If I use the rear as a reference (i.e., assume it is a good match of damping rate to ride frequency), then I come up with a required front damping rate of 278 lb-sec/in to match it. This results in a wheel damping rate of 103 lb-sec/in.


> Carrera shock models?


Front – 6243. Rear – 6362.

> IIRC, you went from 140/115# to something like 175/140 ???


That's it exactly.

> also, would the damping rates be appropriate with Carrera's original spring rates (140/115)?


They'd be even more out of balance, as the front bar will contribute a larger percentage of the wheel rates with softer springs. Front shocks that are softer than the rears help turn-in, but that's not really an area in which a Europa needs help.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Is there a formula or a rule of thumb for the relationship between the spring rates and shock rates?


Yes. I should have thought about this before I bought the shocks, although revalving isn't expensive compared to new shocks. Based on a second-order linear differential equation that is used to model all sorts of physical systems (spring/mass/damping in mechanics, RLC circuits in electrical engineering, etc., etc.), there are three regimes of damping: overdamping, underdamping, and critical damping. The relationship that determines the damping regime is:


D ~ sqrt(M*K),


where D = damping rate, M = mass, and K = spring constant. The tilde denotes "goes as." Since we're only concerned with proportionality here, there are constants we can leave out and simplify the arithmetic. Notice that increasing either mass OR spring rate will call for increased damping. Also notice that the required damping is proportional to the square root of either value, ergo noticeable changes in spring rates cause a much smaller proportional change in the required damping rates. Using known corner weights (and averaging L/R for each end of the car, since I wasn't interested in different rates left-right ;<), I generated a F/R ratio that would be required for the damping regimes to match exactly. This is the ratio of the WHEEL damping rates. Then, using a rate conversion that is the square of the motion ratio (I know you're listening, Stan ;<) and starting with the rear damping rate as a reference, I arrived at the "match" for that damping rate that should be required at the
front. The sequence:

  1. Determine corner weights, take a L/R average.
  2. Determine (or estimate) unsprung weights, subtract from respective corner weights.
  3. Determine wheel rates by multiplying the actual spring rate by the square of the motion ratio. My numbers for MRs are: F - .609,
  4. R - .988 (i.e., the spring's displacement is equal to the wheel displacement times the MR). Arguments in favor of different numbers are welcome. DON'T FORGET to account for the effect of any swaybar(s). I arrived at a wheel r ate contribution of 33 lb/in. for the OEM front bar.

  5. Pick one end or the other as your reference. I started with the rear because

  1. my experience indicated the front was too soft and
  2. I wanted any net change to stiffen, rather than soften, overall damping.

  1. Multiply the sprung corner weight by the wheel rate, take the square root of the product. Do the same for the other end. Divide one by the other to get a ratio. The end you chose as your reference should be the divisor. Or is it the dividend? You know, the denom... the one on the bottom.
  2. Multiply the WHEEL damping rate (remember, it's the actual rate times the square of the MR) at the reference end by the ratio you got in 5. above. That's the WHEEL damping rate that will match the reference. Then, convert that to the actual shock rate by dividing by the square of the motion ratio for that end of the car.

ClassMaker@aol.com Koni 80-T-2147. They fit later S2's and TC's according to the GGLC parts cross-reference.

ClassMaker@aol.com Dick Rasmussen campaigned a Special to 1986 ASP championship with Koni's in front, Armstrongs in back, IIRC. He added a small anti-roll bar in back, supposedly to dial-in the oversteer for auto-x. I have an S2. Koni D fronts. Armstrong TC (not S2) shocks in back. All 2" springs, original "inside" A-arm top mount. Quite low in front. The TC rear spring perch lowers the back somewhat. Looks good. 185/60 AVS-I in front, 205/60 AVS-I in back, Lotus brand alloys. At the present, no anti-roll bar at all (stock front bar is out for fix). I like it, subjectively speaking. No auto-x experience to analyze. Bob McClenaghan, Florida region, mentioned something at LOG-18 about a suspected bump-stop problem, he wasn't sure at that time.

You might want to take a look at what Harald has posted about AVO...http://fox.nstn.ca/~hfreise/vehicles/tech/AVO/AVO.htm. Based on his experience, it seems a good way to go! Peter Blackford

Banks is also very high on AVOs. They sell them, and suitable springs as well. There is a spring/shock package price if you want both for all 4 corners. I bought a set. Stewart McNair

scott@mini.chicago.com wrote: >I was leaning towards the Konis until I heard that they have some sort of problem when they approach max compression- whatever "problem" means.

My car had Konis front, Spax rear when I bought it. The Konis were set to full stiff, Spax full soft. Duh. I set the Konis to full soft, and the Spax to an intermediate setting. Major improvement. On really bumpy roads, it was possible to get the front suspension to occasionally contact the bump stops. I attributed this to the soft springing, and to the fact that the Koni bump stops were more than 1" long. I never competed with these shocks, as one of the Konis froze up a couple years later. I replaced all the shocks with Carreras.

> I've heard that they're just too stiff for the light front end of the Europa as well.

Mine didn't feel too stiff once they were adjusted correctly. Although they weren't new when I bought the car, the seals didn't leak at all, soI believe they were in reasonably good shape. I can't say definitely if they were the shocks that Koni specifies for the Europa application. Their compressed length and travel were correct, though.

> Does anyone know what this story is?

Never heard it before. I have used Konis on a number of cars, with good results. I've had a number of them wear out, although after a reasonably long service life.

> If not, what's your opinion of the Koni/Europa combo in general?

Since the Europa uses racing-type coilovers, you could get Konis – or Penskes, or Foxxes, or Carreras, or any other racing shock - valved to your specification. I don't know what the commonly-referenced Konis would be for the Europa, but, in general, my experience has been that replacement Konis set to full soft are slightly stiffer than the OEM shocks they replace. Jay Mitchell

SUSPENSION, Shock adjustment

JerTigger@aol.com In a message dated 5/26/99 3:34:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gdrude@pacbell.net writes:
> Have you found out which way to turn the Koni's? I have a couple that may need tightening up some. How do you coordinate the two?


There is an arrow on the side of the shock indicating which way to turn the shock body for heavier dampening. Coordination what's that? I am measuring the turns off the softest setting.

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> I purchased my first set of adjustable AVO shocks, for my Europa S2, just after Mike Causer reported they existed by virtue of seeing their booth at the Birmingham Motor Show (1/7/95) I think. In his post he listed the extensive available part numbers that they had for just about every Lotus model from Sevens to Esprits. They had models for the Europa S2 in both adjustable and fixed spring perch variants. I sought their fully adjustable models for my car. I tried to contact their Canadian and American representatives and it was a waste of time. I did make a purchase of front shocks (AVO part#PG556) from AVO UK / Chassis Dynamics and received good service. I did not know that the stock Europa springs would not fit the new AVO shocks. JAE sent me some 2.5" x 10" 140# springs which some said would be too firm but was the recommended for fast street use. They have proven to be very compliant and just about right as far as I am concerned. The rear shocks (AVO part #PE554) came from JAE who said that delivery in the US was very spotty and they supplied me with 1.9" x 14" 115# springs for these shocks. Both my front and rear shocks have adjustable spring perches and I bought a shock spanner from RD Enterprises. It is the same spanner that fits the Spax brand shocks. I have both ends set on soft rebound settings and with minimal spring preloads. Works for me. If I had to do it again I wouldn't hesitate in doing the same thing. Pictures are available under Tech bulletins at: http://fox.nstn.ca/~hfreise/vehicles/TLA.htm

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> I did some digging and found the AVO webpage. It is at: http://www.avouk.com/. The list of Lotus shocks is at: http://www.avouk.com/avoadjustable3.htm. Standard disclaimers apply.... I don't even have AVOs on my Europa.

SUSPENSION, Spring compression

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Subject: Re: Europa Spring Compression Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 09:28:31 –0800 I built a spring compressor, it was pretty cheap. I used 1/2" threaded stock (two pieces) and two pipe flanges. Turned one flange so the inner hole was just large enough to go over the top spring retainer- I also left a bit of a lip there, to help keep the spring centered. Put the lower flange over the bottom of the damper, run the two threaded rods up through, with nuts on the bottom. Next place the top flange onto the retainer, nuts on top. Crank down on the top nuts until you can pull the retainer out. I use a large hose clamp on the outside, to the spring can't go anywhere, but it really can't do much anyway. This setup cost me nothing, I had the stuff around, but it would only be about $10 for the stuff at a hardware store.

Scott Mitchell <smitch@erols.com> Subject: Europa Spring Compression (U) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 99 17:49:24 – 500 I'm in the midst of upgrading the springs on my S2 to the autocross spec. And I've run into a problem. I can't find a spring compressor that will fit inside the tight wind of the current (stock, I believe) springs. This is on the front. The rear I know is another problem, but I've got a hack similar to what's in the Lotus Ltd stuff. Unfortunately it doesn't help for my current problem with the front. I've tried. I've tried the local parts store, theirs is too bulky to fit between the coils. My local British car shop suggested a nearby bike shop. But they didn't think theirs would work - "Try back monday when the head mechanic is here". Any ideas? FWIW, the bushings all look great and the top pin came out beautifully. I feel no need to replace anything while I'm in there. Scott "The Internet is the worlds largest library, but the books are scattered all over the floor." - John Alan Paulos

Ross Sorci <rsorci@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Europa Spring Compression (U) Sat, 20 Mar 1999 20:34:50 –0500 Try another bike shop. No sense risking potential mayhem by rigging something up. BTW, I also have the front suspension on my Europa apart right now. The bushings were all pretty well shot. While I'm at it I gonna put on new ball joints and tie rod ends, and rebuild the trunnions. Spent this afternoon painting the a-arms with POR-15 paint. Interesting stuff, looking at the ingredients its sort of like a combination of super glue and paint. They warn to get it off anything that you don't want it on immediately, or else its on there for good, including your skin... they're right!


And here I thought I had sent you the entire "Britcar's Progress" series! Here is a quote from 1993:

==================
The spring is held down at the top by an alloy collar built to fit inside the spring with an external shoulder and outside a disk on the top shock absorber fitting with an internal shoulder. This collar has a slot to allow the shock rod to pass through during (dis)assembly. The idea is to compress the spring past the collar, slip the collar out, decompress the spring past the top eye of the shock and lift the spring off the top of the shock. My regular spring compressors are useless on these tiny springs, as the clearance between the coils and the shock body are so close. I had heard that radiator hose clamps could be used to compress them. The rate is only about 100 pounds per inch. I used lots of the little beggars to share the load and had no trouble removing the springs. HUGE DISCLAIMER: DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK! I DIDN'T TELL YOU TO DO IT, AND I WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR INJURIES!

====================

Worked fine. The autocross springs are even easier than the stockers, as they are much shorter. Installing the rears required no tools at all: Compression by hand was enough to pop them in. One of the neat things about the autocross springs is that they are not floppy and do not rub on the shocks. Phil Ethier
pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

I had the same problem, although with me it was less urgent since I was replacing springs and shocks at the time. The solution requires some creativiy and some scrounging, but it's not too difficult. I made a pair of compressors using some threaded rod (1/4" or 5/16", the thicker probably being a better choice) and end brackets of flat steel that have a hook shape. Hook the brackets over a coil at either end of the spring, insert the threaded rod through the holes in the brackets, and use nuts and washers to pull the brackets (and thereby the coils) together, alternating from one side of the spring to the other. The brackets need to have a long flat section that will seat well on the outside of the spring coils - otherwise, when you begin to pull, the brackets will simply try to rotate into the spring.

JerTigger@aol.com Subject: One More question on shocks Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:02:34 EDT I got one of the old shocks off the car and removed the spring, found out it is a Koni. Reason it appeared to be stuck is it was set tight and loaded up with rubber snubbers on the the shaft. If it did want to move it couldn't very much. What is the trick to setting for softer ride? I turned it opposite direction as the arrow on the side and no results.


BTW spring removal was a piece of cake, I had a steel plate 5" square cut a hole in center so shock would set in it, drilled two holes 180 degrees from each other. Cut two pieces of 3/8 threaded rod longer than spring. Heat bent small hooks on one end of each rod hooked the ends of rod onto coils of spring tightened nuts onto the threaded rod to compress spring.

ClassMaker@aol.com JerTigger@AOL.com writes: (about Koni D-types) What is the trick to setting for softer ride? I turned it opposite direction as the arrow on the side and no results.


Take the spring off, push the shock rod all the way into the tube until the inside end of the rod engages the "foot valve" at the bottom of the shock. Then twist the rod either way. Just like setting a screwdriver into the slot on a screw, about 80% of the time you'll have to twist the rod a bit before the foot valve gets engaged.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> Date: Monday, May 24, 1999 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa 1970 S2 UK model . Front spring for new AVOshocks The original Girlings for 2.inch springs are: Fully depressed 7 inches; Fully extended 9.5 inches, i.e. 2.5 inches travel. The new AVO for inch springs are: Fully depressed 6 Inches; Fully extended 8 Inches, i.e. only 2 inches travel.

g ford <gmfmo@mweb.co.za> >From: dan.morrison@autodesk.com The AVO shocks are for 1.875 ID springs. One of the problems is that wire is only available in 8, 8.5, 9mm sizes. The AVO fully depressed length is 6inches. If I go for the original spec free length of 12.75 inches and rate of 100lb / inches and using 9mm wire then the required number of coils is 17.3 and it will be coil bound at 6.12 inches. ie before the bump stop at 6 inches. Using 8.5 mm wire sorts out the coil bound length which is 4.75, gives 100 lb/inch but at 14.2 turns over stresses the wire. To maintain the spec free length using 9 mm wire I have to go up to 126 lb/inch and 15 coils which is mildly overstressed but could be used.

ClassMaker@aol.com Factory S1 and early S2 (1.9" ID) rates were 100# front, 72# rear (per inch). A better balance with F:R at 100:80, such as 140#F, 115#R (available). This is where Carrera has set them. Jay Mitchell has confirmed handling, although he has now upped the rates strictly for auto-x, not for the street.

Lawrence King <lawrence@promobility.net> Subject: Re:Front spring for new AVO Shocks Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 21:52:26 –0400 I haven't had experience with the AVO shocks or Europa springs, but I rave used the following the general procedure for ordering springs. Specify the following:

  1. the inside diameter, this is used by the spring guy to determine what size to wind.
  2. I usually specify that I want the spring ends to be ground flat so that they sit level on the perches, but some types of perch are designed for unground spring ends
  3. the spring rate. 100lbs per inch is probably about the right value. On my Elan the stock front springs are 75 lbs per inch, and my racing springs are 190 lbs per inch. The rate depends upon the mechanical advantage the wheel has over the spring (lever lengths).
  4. the nominal load and length when the car is sitting at the desired ride height. In your case I would guess this is somewhere around 400 lbs, and 10". The load is the force on the spring, not the weight on the wheel.
  5. the maximum length of the spring (shock fully extended). You don't need to specify the free length although the free length should be longer than this length.
  6. the fully compressed length.

Do NOT specify the following:

  1. Wire diameter, you don't care, this is the spring manufacturers decision.
  2. the free length, you don't care since you will never use the spring in it's free position.
  3. the number of turns. Again you don't care. The spring manufacturer uses your other data (like the fully compressed length, and the spring rate), and his wire diameter (and his alloy hardness) to determine how many turns need to be on the spring.

You can compute free lengths from the spring rates and loaded length, but usually the manufacturer knows that his springs don't EXACTLY follow the IDEAL spring laws and will compensate slightly so that the spring gives you the rates you want in the centre area, where it is important.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> I run mine with Eibach springs at 150 pounds/inch on the front and 120 pounds-inch in the rear. Stock front sway bar, no rear sway bar, Koni shocks set full soft. Ride height set so the drive shafts run horizontal. Ride and handling were fine with Yokohama A008RS tires. I could not find the Yokohama A008RS2 tires I wanted, so I had to buy BFG R1 tires. They are too darn stiff.

Mike Causer mikec@mikecauser.org Subject: Re: Spring rates (long, but non-technical) Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 10:31:13 +0100 Andrew Denton wrote:

> I went to a spring maker a couple of weeks ago to get him to check the spring rate of a couple of coil springs I had been given. I expected him to put them in a machine, load them up and take a reading on a gauge. No he never left the office. He measured the diameter. the number of coils and the diameter of the wire and used a basic calculator. Does anyone know the calculation and the spring rate for wire diameter please/


p = ( G * d**4 ) / ( 8 * N * D**3 )

p = lbs per inch of deflection

G = Modulus of Elasticity = 11,200,000 for spring steel

d = diameter of wire in inches

N = number of active coils [1]

D = mean diameter = outside diameter minus wire diameter

* = multiplied by

** = raised to the power

/ = divided by


Most calculators and programming languages should get this right without the parentheses, but why take risks?

[1] counting the "active" coils is that hardest part, they are the coils that are free to move and do not touch either the spring platforms or other coils. There are several different ways to finish the ends of the spring, so you have to look carefully. You can easily get 10% variation in two measured identical springs, there are an awful lot of things that make a big difference to the actual rate of spring. That's why the catalogues of stuff for racers all have a spring testing machine on offer, Demon Tweaks has two models for valve springs and two models for suspension springs. At 6-700 Pounds Stg each.

g ford <gmfmo@mweb.co.za>

S = G x d to the 4th power divided by 8 x D cubed x N excuse the way I have shown it but I do not know how to show cubes etc.

S = spring rate in lbs per inch

G = modulus of rigidity of material in psi. for most steels use 11,500,000

d = wire Dia. in inches

D = spring dia in inches. This is the dia at the centre line of the wire. i.e. inside dia + 1/2 wire dia =1/2 wire dia

N = Number of active coils. Makers add on about 1.5 coils to calculated number to allow for the 3/4 dead coil at each end.

Inside dia +1/2 wire dia + 1/2 wire dia = D

SUSPENSION, Spring shortening

"SMITH, THOMAS B. (JSC-DX)" <thomas.b.smith1@jsc.nasa.gov> Here is the info on shortening springs. This is for stock Federal S2 front springs (13.1/2" free length)...differences in wire thickness will likely require adjusting the time/temperatures. Also, I used a homemade spring compressor which compresses the entire spring (two plates with 4 threaded rods); I wouldn't try this with the grabber models, which don't compress all the coils. Also, you are dealing with a lot of potential energy, so the adequate precautions are left to the reader. Not the least of which is to send the wife out and open some windows, as you will get a fair amount of smoke! My first try was to compress the spring 2" and put it in a 450 degree oven for 15 minutes. There was NO noticeable change in free length. Then I compressed the spring to 7" (coils almost binding) and baked at 550 deg for 20 minutes. This resulted in a net reduction of 1.1/4" to 12.1/4" FL. I don't recall the original height of the car, but because of the front suspension design, you will end up lowering the car greater than the amount the spring is shortened. The 1.1/4" worked great for me, as the car is now visually level. This not exact science and there was a slight variation (about 3/16" if memory serves) in the second spring, so I put the longer one on the drivers
side. And as I said before, for better or worse, the camber will change to a certain degree.

SUSPENSION, Spring rates

ken.landaiche@nokia.com In my reading and asking about uprating the Europa Special's springs, the answers seem to converge around 140 front, 115 rear for street driving. The original Lotus specified rates were 116/75. My question is, what changed in 25+ years to change suggested spring rates and ratios? I assume that Lotus was fairly uncompromising :) in its original selection of spring rates. S2, TC spring rates for reference:

Lotus 116/75 = 1.5467.
Street 140/115 = 1.2174
Autocross 150/120 = 1.25 (Phil's Grace)
Race? 240/200 = 1.2

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Ken wrote: In my reading and asking about uprating the Europa Special's springs, the answers seem to converge around 140 front, 115 rear for street driving.

First, let's be clear: what is optimum for an S2 - with 46/54 F/R distribution - is NOT likely to be the best choice for a Twink, which has ~42/58 F/R and slightly different rear suspension geometry.

> The original Lotus specified rates were 116/75.

For a Twink. For an S2, the rates were 100/72. And keep in mind that the front swaybar makes a substantial contribution – almost half - to the wheel rates at the front.

> I assume that Lotus was fairly uncompromising :) in its original selection of spring rates.

I can only speak for S2s, but my car's ride was downright cushy on its original springs. And, as Stan related from a test of an S2, there was a total of almost 4 degrees of roll at the cornering limit, which is quite a lot for a sports car. As for front/rear balance, the S2 was dialed in for a small amount of basic understeer. Here's a breakdown:

Front spring rate: 100 lb/in.

Front wheel rate due to spring rate only: ~37 lb/in.

Total front wheel rate due to spring + bar: ~70 lb/in.
Rear spring rate: 72 lb/in. Rear wheel rate: ~70 lb/in.
Mass distribution, F/R: 46/54.

Assuming similar roll couples and suspension geometry F/R, the front wheel rate that would result in neutral steady-state cornering for a 70 lb/in. rear wheel rate is approximately 60 lb/in. To match ride frequencies, you'd want about 65 lb/in front for 70 lb/in. rear. So the original setup was not too far from neutral, but definitely on the understeer side.

>S2, TC spring rates for reference: Lotus 116/75 = 1.5467

That's for a Twink and translates to approximate wheel rates of 76 lb/in. front (accounting for bar), 72 lb/in. rear, or 1.1:1. Given the 42/58 F/R mass distribution of the Twink and the same assumptions re roll couples/geometry, a "neutral" setup would have 52 lb/in. front, 72 lb/in rear for a ratio of .72:1. Don't forget that the term "neutral" refers to a car's attitude in steady-state cornering. In order to achieve acceptable transient handling behavior, it may be necessary to compromise the car's steady-state cornering attitude. The required compromise becomes more and more noticeable and objectionable as a car's mass distribution deviates from the ideal 50/50. The Twink's 42/58 F/R isn't far from what you'd expect in a rear-engine car (e.g., 911, albeit with a better rear suspension design than the 911's semitrailing arms), so controlling lift-throttle oversteer takes on a higher priority as compared to an S2. Ergo the greater bias towards understeer in the Twink factory spring setup. And the Twink's rear toe specification of 1/4" (!) negative (toe in).

> Street 140/115 = 1.2174

Check the WHEEL rates I calculated. For a stock S2, they're close to 1:1. Now, calculate the wheel rates for the 140/115 setup, including the effect of the front bar, and you get .76:1. The "ideal" calculated above for an S2 is .85:1, so you're a little closer to neutral with this setup, but now on the oversteer side. IMO, this is OK for a street-driven S2, probably marginally stable for a Twink. Note also that you HAVE to keep the stock front bar for the above setup to be a really usable one.

> Autocross 150/120 = 1.25 (Phil's Grace)

No perceptible difference from the first aftermarket setup: .76:1. Still on the oversteer side. My autocross setup for an S2 is 175/140, or .72:1. This is good for turn-in and steady-state cornering, but I had to revalve my
front shocks quite a bit stiffer to keep the car in line for slalom-type maneuvers.

> Race? 240/200 = 1.2

As the spring rates grow, the relative contribution of the front swaybar is reduced. The above setup yields 122/195 F/R wheel rates, for a ratio of .62:1. This, IMHO, could only function acceptably with rear tires that are substantially larger than the fronts and/or a larger-than-stock front bar. Things to keep in mind when playing aorund with spring rates:

  1. What works for an S2 isn't likely to be good on a Twink. I know what I've worked out for my S2, and I know it works very well on that car. I have no idea what the best setup is for a Twink.
  2. IMHO, the only Federal-specific suspension item worth reversing is the ridiculous front springs fitted to late S2s. Twinks didn't come with these springs: their upper bodies are 1" higher on the floor pan than on the Renault-engine cars, and this isn't reversible by practical means.
  3. Be very, very careful when making wholesale changes to the F/R balance of spring and/or damping rates. A setup that initially feels "quicker" at low speeds can very easily, taken to the limits, turn out to be a setup that bites back. This is livable, if not ideal, in an autocross environment. It can get you killed on the street.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> If you have the early upper arms on the front suspension wherein the rear upper arm passes INSIDE the frame, you need to change to the rear upper arm which passes OUTSIDE, or BEHIND the frame. This is the setup used on the later S2 and the Twin Cam cars. Yes, the part fits perfectly, don't let anyone else tell you it does not. It will only fail to fit on an S1 car, due to the body shape. Here are the part numbers for my Eibach springs: 1000-250-0150 This is a 150 pound/inch spring having a free length of 10 inches;
and 1400-250-120 This is a 120 pound/inch spring having a free length of 14 inches.

SUSPENSION, Sway bar

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Remember that you need to have the car sitting on its front wheels to take off the sway bar. Either that, or put a couple of vise-grips on the ends of the bar so you can take a come-along and string it like an archery bow.

"John D. Abbott" <jdaarch@arn.net> Rear sway bar is a homemade bar from a salvaged front bar. There are those that say the rear bar is not needed, but it did improve the handling for street driving fun. I also lowered the front about 1.5" by changing springs. Those springs were from DBE and are 12" x 115#. The shocks are Spax
adjustable also from DBE.

"GUS GEORGE" <gjohngeorge@hotmail.com> My '73 TC did not have a stock rear sway bar but I installed one. I bent a piece of 5/8" diameter solid steel rod from the hardware store in a pipe bender, to attach to 2 supports constructed of steel box channel stock (with clamps on the ends) that drop from the rearmost crossmember and are welded thereto. The ends of the sway bars are attached to 2 custom made welded steel brackets mounted to the bottoms of the rear shock assemblies. Three U-bolts with nuts are used per side to attach the sway bar ends to the brackets. I may upgrade the 5/8" stock to 3/4" stock. I have purchased the material.

"Briggs Pletcher" <Briggs1@ix.netcom.com> I'd take it all off and push like hell. Been there done that. Any dissenting opinions out there? They are tough to get in. Briggs Pletcher 72 S2

Unless you are talking a different bushing than I think, I've only done it with the anti-roll bar off the car. I used a heat gun and warmed it up a bit- slipped right no. Don't get it too hot. Just out of curiosity, why did you take it off? mark h

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> I have modified a spare front swaybar to make it adjustable, and I have laid out and begun fabricating articulating end link mounts. The adjustability is minimal - less than 10% of the car's total roll stiffness - and is there primarily because it turned out to be easy to provide for with the new end link mounting system. More details later.

I await this with interest. The adjustable rear bar on my Midget was quite a convenience. I see no reason to put a bar on the rear of a Europa, so making the front bar adjustable would be a similar tuning convenience.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Swaybars: whereas the introduction of a rear swaybar may improve a car's cornering balance - this depends on a lot of factors and isn't universally true - there is always a better way to achieve the same results. A rear bar creates lift on the inside rear wheel in corners and transmits shocks from one-wheel bumps to the far side of the car. If it is desired to increase rear roll stiffness, simply increasing the spring rates is the best approach.

"jeff hovis" <jhovis@mindspring.com> In today's mail I received an Addco catalog. On page 10, there is listed both front and rear sway bars for the Twink. Both are 3/4in bars. The front is part #880 and the rear part #222. There are three price columns: List $223.11, Retail $167.33 and Jobber $111.56. The phone number is: 800-338-7015 and they are in Lake Park, FL

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> I would not recommend Addco bars under any circumstances. Historically, their products have fit very poorly, even to the point of interfering with suspension/chassis/bodywork. There may well be exceptions, but who wants to be the guinea pig? I'm gonna offer some more observations on Europas and swaybars:

  1. The drop links on which the center bushings are supported are incapable of positively locating the bushings - and therefore the bar itself - at very high loadings. Increasing the diameter of the front bar much beyond stock will have potentially unpredictable effects for this reason alone.
  2. The front bar must bend as the suspension compresses - even when the compression is exactly the same on both sides of the car. This effect is entirely unintended (and undesirable) and will cause problems in direct proportion to the size of the bar.
  3. Fitting a rear bar has the potential of creating a vicious cycle: the car will oversteer due to lifting of the inside drive wheel, which will make a limited slip differential seem desirable. But the LSD will tend to create terminal understeer, especially in tighter turns.
  4. For a street driven S2, I would recommend retaining the stock front bar and fitting the widely-adopted aftermarket spring rates of 140F/110-115R. The front springs on a Twink probably need to be a bit stiffer - 15% or so - due to its significantly higher rearward weight bias.
  5. I don't know the damping rates of the various shocks sold for the Europa - neither do most of the vendors, BTW - but on my Carreras I wound up going to significantly higher damping rates than Carrera had provided
    for my car in the front to make the car more controllable in transient maneuvers. Optimal damping goes as the square root of the product of the spring rate and the sprung mass. If you can get damping rate information from you shock vendor, it's relatively straightforward to calculate the F/R balance of damping forces and see if it's right for your car.

Scott Mitchell <scott@fortner.com> >My hazy recollection of spring vs. wheel rates tells me that one is derived as a multiple of the other, the exact factor being derived from inspection of the suspension geometry.


wheel rate = spring rate * (motion ratio^2). Here are the numbers from an old post of Jay's:


>3. Determine wheel rates by multiplying the actual spring rate by the square of the motion ratio. My numbers for MRs are: F - .609, R - .988 (i.e., the spring's displacement is equal to the wheel displacement times the MR). Arguments in favor of different numbers are welcome. DON'T FORGET to account for the effect of any swaybar(s). I arrived at a wheel rate contribution of 33 lb/in. for the OEM front bar.

The rear is pretty close to 1 since it is pretty close to vertical. The front is less so, because... well, its not. Because of the vertical rear spring, I'd guess it is pretty linear to. You see the motion ratio can change with travel. Has anyone checked the geometry for the front? Does it increase or decrease?

>I have less of an idea of how one determines the contribution of the sway bar. In the case of the Europa, would you be willing to lay out the equations involved?

I wouldn't even begin to try to work out the equations. I'm guessing its pretty messy, dealing with the compliance of the swaybar bushings, the hanger bushings, etc. Though if you could narrow it down to the splay of the swaybar ends, coming up with a number might not be too difficult. Perhaps we should just test it.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Before you complicate matters, it's worthwhile to work out a simplified model. Carrera's 1994 catalog offers the formula:

R = (1129000*d^4)/(a^2*L), where R = spring rate, d = diameter of bar (assuming a solid bar), a = effective arm length, and L = effective bar length.

The constant accounts for the modulus of the material used to make the bar and the units used (pounds and inches). In the Europa's case, D = 9/16" (14mm), L =~ 33 1/2", and a =~ 7 3/8". This yields a rate of 62 lb/in. Multiply this by the square of the bar's motion ratio (.734), and you get 33 lb/in.

SUSPENSION, Twin Cam - Special differences

dan.morrison@autodesk.com I guess this would make sense, since the trailing arms are different for the Special. I think it means changing trailing arms as well as a few other bits. I don't think I need any measurements, I was just thinking out loud.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> dan.morrison@autodesk.com wrote: Does anyone know if the Europa rear hubs from the Twin Cam and the Special differ by more than the bearing sizes? Any other changes that might not make them interchangeable with the Twin Cam ones?

Lets see If I can remember this right. If we are talking about the aluminum axle bearing carriers? The specials have a larger bolt diameter for where the trailing arms bolt on, IIRC that is. As both bearings are the same size on the special, the bolt patterns are the same. If your TC ones are different, then the carriers are definately different. I believe the axles and axle hubs are the same, except that the special 1.5 inch wide drums have a slightly bigger ID, so they welded a small strip of steel on my hubs to make them larger to match the ID of the drums. Because the inner bearing is wider, the spacer is slightly smaller also, I think. The special carriers are beefier too, so thats a good thing. And they have only one hole for the shock/lower link connection. Let me know if you want to me to check any dimensions.

SWAP MEET, Electronic

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> GUS GEORGE >It seems like we all generally have something to buy and/or sell related to our Europas. Is there some internet way we could set up some classified ads to describe what we have available/what we want to buy? Maybe on a free web page somewhere?


I have several of these setup now for motorcycles. They work quite well. People just email me the ad they want to put up (or change/remove) and I do it. I don't have any big fancy search etc, so it is quite easy. I'd be glad to do a Europa one if there are people that would send ads. Here is what I have now, so you can see the format I use:
http://www.olympus.net/personal/markh/sales/vfr.htm

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

At 01:47 PM 3/30/99 -0500, you wrote: >I understand we have technical specialists for various models. I need some information for steering installation and front fiberglass formation.


Refer to the tech reps listed in the masthead on page 2 of every newsletter. Also, check the last telephone technical assistance network, which was published in the newsletter early last year (and is part of your membership packet if you joined since then). (An updated telephone tech assistance network will be included in the next club roster, which should be published sometime this spring.) –mark

I wholeheartedly agree with the guides for installing the head. Also, there is a section in the Bean catalog which gives tips on how to seal the head successfully. Jerry Rude 73 Special

>The French Revolution Pat Whale, Owner

>(512) 453-5050 Jonathan Burnett, Master Mechanic

>Austin, Texas.

>They specialize in orphaned French cars.


>P F Engineering

>818-244-2498
>4529 San Fernando Rd

>Glendale CA

>Renault specialist. Had a speedo angle-drive assembly for a 336 side- shifter trans sitting on the shelf when everyone else told me they didn't exist anymore. >


>Jim Smeed

>(503) 625-5443

>Europa West

>26464 SW McConnell Rd

>Sherwood, OR 97140

>Knows shifter tricks.


'I asked some time ago who Europa West was. I didn't recognize the name. However I do recognize the "owner". Be very careful dealing with this person. It is true that he knows a lot about Europas. However it is also true that he is difficult to deal with. I have also heard that the work quality is spotty. Some people are very happy with him and others hate him. This gets close to a religious issue at times. "I believe that it should be done this way." "No you're wrong my way is better." etc.' - overheard on the net.


>Tim Engel, (612) 472-1529, 79 Eclat, 80 Esprit S2

>President, LOON (Lotus Owners Oftha North, Minneapolis Chapter, Lotus Ltd.)

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Trammel pins and lower links Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:34:19 -0700 Found a nice substitute for trammel pins. Trammel pins are pins or bolts with a point on the threaded end and are used to accurately measure the adjusted distance of such things as control rods, carburetor linkages or Europa lower links. Carpenters use 'dowel centers' to locate the starting position of dowel holes in joinery operations. Dowel centers are available as 'General' Part number 888 in the hardware store as a package of 4 sets of varying diameters.

You da man. Its out there. First topical FAQ type info. (I converted it to html --- send me a refresh anytime). www.gglotus.org===>tech sect. ===>Europa===>ALPHABETICAL EUROPA INFORMATION from "mailing list"- compiled by Warren Hartenstine.

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> The complete address for Warrens compilation of Europa based list info is http://www.gglotus.org/ggtech/index.htm#EUROPA

Several people have noted that they obtained info on original color, assembly date, etc. on their Elans. How did they do that? Inquiries of this nature should be made by fax to archivist Mr. Maurice Storey, together with a copy of the registration document or other proof of ownership. No payment is necessary. The detail available on models this early will be very sparse, but gladly provided. Write to the Group Lotus archivist at this address:

Mr. Maurice Storey

Database Controller

Group Lotus Ltd.

Hethel

Norwich NR14 8EZ

England

Fax (44) 01953 608514

Last Updated July 21, 1999

TERMINOLOGY

"Balls-out" is not an anatomical reference. It's old railroad slang for top speed. Steam locomotives had governors, usually brass balls whirling around when the engine was going. As the balls moved all of the way out from centrifugal force, steam pressure was dumped and the locomotive wouldn't go any faster. Hench balls-out meant governor limited top speed. Can't go any faster. "Balls to the wall" is a similar story. Aircraft generally use hand
throttles, topped with a ball. Push the ball forward for more power, pull it back for less. In smaller/older planes the ball is frequently on a rod that pulls straight back, out of the instrument panel/firewall. Full throttle is with the ball pushed against the firewall. In a multi engine plane "balls to the wall" meant all engines at full power. George '69 S2 65/2501

TIRES

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Here are some basic wheel/tire principles as applied to Europas:

  1. On a Europa used as a street car, all of the non-competition tires most folks run are really too hard for a car as light as a Europa. For that reason alone, it's probably not productive to exceed 6" rim width or 185/60 tire size. And, even at that, you'll never get your tires up to their 140-150 degree optimum operating temperature range, ergo you'll not get maximum grip.
  2. Too much tire for a wheel is not a Good Thing in general, but there are exceptions. The previous-generation BFG Comp T/A R1 tire worked very well on wheels that were apparently far too narrow for the tire size.
    This, however, was one of the design goals for the tire, and significant compromises were made in other areas as a result. Cantilever slicks were specifically developed for race cars that, due to class rules, are
    restricted in the wheel widths they can run. Cantilever slicks are expensive and extremely touchy about wheel width and pressure. Given achoice between wider rims with "normal" racing slicks or narrow wheels
    with cantilevers, by far the more economical AND competitive alternative is wider wheels.
  3. Assuming you are willing to run competition rubber of appropriate compound for a Europa (pretty darn soft), wider is better for BOTH wheels and tires, up to a point. "Better" means "better times on a competition course," i.e., "quicker." You may or may not like the "feel" of wider tires and wheels - that's entirely subjective. To me it doesn't subjectively "feel" too good to get beaten. If you really want to go faster, you won't stop at 6" wide rims on a Europa. I haven't yet exceeded the optimum wheel width at 8", and I run the widest 13" tire
    available (225/45 x 13). I know of two Elans with 9" rims. One of them belonged to Charlie Cave, and he wasn't certain that the 9s worked any better than 8s. So the optimum may lie between 8" and 9".
  4. The wider your wheels and tires, the more sensitive your car's performance will become to alignment, tire pressures, suspension geometry, and driver inputs. The Europa's suspension geometry is very well-suited to the upgrade in width, however.

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> The Dunlop SP Aquajet tyres are still avaliable, but I havn't found any
in this country. They are resonably priced in England, but after adding the shipping costs they were fairly expensive. I just put some Michelin 'RainForce' tyres on my S2. Skinny and seemed to have a fairly flexible sidewall. So far they seem to work fine for what I want. Good performance in the rain and a light feel. I don't care
for the wider tyres as much for street use, especially in a very rainly climate like here.

From: marc j <jrmsn@goodnet.com> I was just out watch a NASA event, well whatever they run. A lotus Super 7 had Hoosiers on it. 185/60 R13; the were very, very soft.

ClassMaker@aol.com RBIEGEL@aol.com writes: One question I have for members of this list is about a good replacement tire to get for someone that wants to stay close to stock? Original tires were Dunlop SP Sport and I assume are no longer available. I still have the original Dunlop spare but the first owner changed to Pirelli Cinturato CN36. Fronts are 175/70 H13 and rear area 185/70 H13 as I'm sure you all know. The Pirelli tires are now showing many cracks so have to go. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Ron '74 Europa Special

I bought a set of wheels and tires from another list member. They are original GKN Lotus brand alloys (on your TC Special, too?) fitted with Yokohama AVS Intermediates, 185/60 front, 205/60 rear. I like them a lot. They are only a little lower and a little wider than the original tire sizes as you stated above (some were Cavallino's). You can poll this list for recommendations. The Yokohamas seem to be good value, modest price, nice feel and good performance.

From: "Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> Date: Monday, January 31, 2000 6:31 PM Subject: [lotuseuropa] tires Tire Rack still lists the Yokohama A008RS and A008RS II, but I haven't really checked out size availability lately. The camber pattern of the older generation Lotus cars isn't optimized for low profile, square-shouldered, stiff-sidewall tires. The A008's have a slightly rounder shoulder that works well on Europa's and Elan's. The down side is that they have a minimum of thread depth for everyday use. Anything lower than a 60 aspect ratio is of questionable value on a Europa or Elan with anything approaching "street" spring and anti-roll bar rates. 215/50 will probably be wasted on a Europa unless you have the suspension stiffened up to the point where it doesn't move. The wide, flat, square shouldered profiles are just going to lift an edge... and the part that doesn't touch doesn't do much good. 205/60 is pushing it. Unless you simply "like" the chunky look of the wide, low profile tires, the incremental grip benefit of the wider tires probably won't pay proportionate dividends and the Europa's overall dynamic character will suffer due to the greater unsprung weight. The Kumho and Yoko A032R have a deeper as-molded tread than the Hoosier or G-force DOT-R tires and as such are more appropriate for street use. Add the Toyo RA-1 to that deep-tread group. It comes with 1/4 inch of tread as-molded. I've used them on the heavier Esprit S2 and Eclat for street driving and autocross and like them. A lot. The "deep tread" DOT road race tires do not have the front-of-the-pack performance of a Hoosier or G-force. If you are choosing a deep tread DOT-R tire for street use, it's fun, but it's inconsistent with the goals of an all-out autocross suspension set-up. If you're keeping the car "streetable", stay with a relatively narrower, taller section and one of the deeper-tread tires... 205/60 at the extreme. I've used 185/70, 185/60 and 205/50 tires on Europa S2's and Twin Cams. IMHO, the skinnier tires deliver the more pleasurable driving experience. I'd probably be inclined to stay with 185/60's. The 205's "may" deliver a little more grip... I never put a stop watch to them on the skid pad...but they do tramline more and cause the lightweight cars to dart around more. Break away was also far less predictable so driving close to the edge becomes problematic... something usually so enjoyable in a Europa. Just switching to sticky rubber is going to pay greater dividends than trying to stuff the largest tire possible into the wheel wells.

From: ClassMaker@aol.com For those of us playing in the street, we should read and re-read Tim's note! At one of the LOG's, there was an S2 fitted with 175/60-13 Yoko A032R. On the original steel wheels, no less. << hey, David, are you reading? >> He said he liked them plenty, club auto-x for fun, and drove on the street. They are a little shorter than the original S1/S2 tires (155/80-13), and about the widest "175" size you'll see, with rounded shoulders. In line with Tim's comments, they may well be a much sweeter tire for all-around "fun runs" and hobby auto-x'ing a street-sweet Europa. On a track day, where the tire can warm up, it would even be better. After posing similar questions to an experienced racer in Atlanta, I would lean toward the A032R first, and then the Toyo Proxes RA1 as a second choice, sizes permitting. The RA1's feel heavier, and you'd have to use the 185/60-13 size, if it is still available in RA1. He would favor Yokohama over Toyo, if available in identical sizes. He also points out that neither is a "race" tire. Hoosiers are quicker! He has mostly used the A032R (and/or RA1) for playing in the rain.

"Briggs Pletcher" <Briggs1@ix.netcom.com> Since tires are measured in metrics you need to convert the wheel diameter to millimeters.

13" wheel = 330.2mm
14" wheel = 355.6mm

Easiest thing to do is put together a simple spreadsheet to do comparisons so as you change the tire size you can compare to the original. The aspect ratio is the additional diameter that the tire adds to the wheel. (A 185/ 70/13 adds 185mm x 70%, or 129.5 mm, to a 13" wheel diameter.) So the overall height of a wheel tire combination starting at 185/70/13 is 330.2 (13") plus 129.5 (185/70)= 459.7. With this as the starting point you can look at any wheel tire combination and see how much variation to the overall diameter you will have. If you want I have a simple, easy to read and use, excel spreadsheet that I would be glad to forward. Just realized that I forgot to multiply the side wall x 2. It will need to be added twice to the wheel diameter.

ClassMaker@aol.com There is a copy of the 13 and 14" tire sizing data for the Yokohama AVS Intermediate, on our Files upload area. Also see Richard Winter's tire recommendations (also uploaded). He has a one-size-fits-all 185/60R14 and recommends Hankook. If you have a TC and want to fatten it up by 10mm front & back, try AVS Intermediate in 185/60R14 front and 195/60R14 rear, which *may* clock approx. the same as Cavalino 185/70R13 did. CAVEAT: Not all tires are sized equally. There's a noticeable range of interpretation within a given "size." My modern AVSI 205/60R13's put more tread down than my 1970's Phoenix's did.

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> For a nice tyre calculator on the WEB, go to the "Modern ELAN " Web Site at www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

"Kiyoshi Hamai" <hamai@etak.com> Subject: 15" Europa Wheel/Tires Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:52:48 –0700
Okay, I'm a late entry... To follow up on Alan's query, Aaron'a and Oggie's comments concerning 13", 14" or 15" wheel/tire combos on a TC Europa. A good number of years ago a few GGLC members who were seriously Autocrossing Europas in the street classes did some back to back testing with various tire & wheel combos. What I don't recall are the specific numbers (skid pad and slalom results), but from my old worn and tattered grey matters here's some general comments and "rules" we discovered.

1) The fastest tire in the dry was the softest tire with the least amount of tread.
2) The soft compound was better than hard. (you can use the UAG numbers as a VERY general guide, but rockwell is the best)
3) Tires did get better as they got hotter, but in general street driving one RARELY drives hard enough to get that kind of heat into a tire.
4) In the same tire, the 13" tires did better than 14's or 15's. We attributed this to the Europa suspension which goes displays a lot of camber change. From inspecting the 14" & 15" tires it appeared the tread was being lifted. The taller sidewall WAS part of the suspension and allowed the tread on the 13 inchers to stay on the tarmac. What we were not able to test was trying to tune the chassis/suspension to take advantage of the 14 or 15 tires.
5) Softer sidewalls were better than really stiff ones.
Having said all that... Today is a different story! Soft 13" tires are gone. The racier, soft compound tires are in 15" 16" sizes. So, it may actually be better to go to a 14 or 15 wheel/tire with a soft tire and then work on spring, sway bar, damper tuning to optimize them. What I'd be afraid of, is the result would be a very stiff car (in order to limit camber change). Last comment... There are two tires that have DOT approval that are VERY soft in a 13" diameter. I've driven both in anger and I'm VERY impressed. Between these two I prefer the former (just my opinion).

Avon ACB 10 Sport
6.0/21.0-13
7.0/21.0-13
7.0/22.0-13
8.0/22.0-13
7.0/22.0-15
8.0/22.0-15
Yokohama 032R
175/60 x 13
215/50 x 13

From: "Kiyoshi Hamai" <hkhamai@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: 15" Europa Wheel/Tires Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 11:11:20 –0700 In-Reply-To: <Pine.PMDF.3.96.991011134337.687870649A-100000@conrad.appstate.edu>
> that because of the wide changes in camber throughout the full movement, tires that stay square better lift > their grippy surface away.
The ultimate goal is keep the tire contact patch as large as possible. So, you can imagine that if a wheel leans over then the sidewalls need to flex (compress on one side and extend on the other) in order to keep the contact patch flat to the road. From a simplistic view, it follows that shorter, stiff sidewalls have less flex and the contact patch will more likely move (lift) with wheel movement.
> for my recent choice for tires: Yokohama A509 185/60 X 13 on original brand wheels. They are square-ish and made to stay square.
The A509's are fine. You'll find that the sidewall height is similar to a 175/70. From those old tests I recall the fastest set up was 6 to 6.5 inch wide 13 inch wheels with 185/60x13 tires.
> My final question is where can I get those Avons you mentioned?
I'm sure they are available in the UK, but the only place I know of in the states is Roger Kraus in Castro Valley California (between Oakland & San Jose - about 20 miles east of me).
http://www.rogerkrausracing.com

From: Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> For those keeping up with the tire discussion... Today after I finished my Physics lab in study hall, I did some "research" on the www. Here's what I found:
(1)
http://www.hanta.co.kr This is the Hankook website. Some info on tires, but no sizes. Not a lot of help...but check out the part under "treasure island" on sidewall design.
(2)
http://www.1800wtctire.com This is a "tire house" in NY IIRC. They had info on 3 different Hankook tires, and they even sell them. No prices or sizes.

Info on Hankooks:
Ventus H101 (in SR and HR speed ratings)
All season
Traction A
Temp. A (HR) B (SR)
Tread Wear 340 (HR) 400 (SR)
Ventus Plus (ZR speed rating)
All season / "official" high performance tire
Traction A
Temp. A
Tread Wear 220
Website (2) says they have excellent grip and steering resonse

From: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> On a car this light, A008Rs2 would have been a better choice, even if you
drive on the street. 22 in the rear, 16 in the front. Assuming 185-60-13 on six-inch wheels. Unlike BFG R1 tires, Yokos can be chalked. The roll can be to the little arrows molded in the shoulders. Don't expect them to roll that far on the front. I'm leery of dropping the pressure below 16. Pyrometer is better. If you do use a pyrometer you should do one-direction testing. Readings after an autocross run will give erroneous results do to disproportionate heating of the inside edge of the inside wheels.

ken.landaiche@nokia.com I used 18/28 when I had A008s. Those pressures produced fine wear patterns given how out of spec my suspension was at the time.

TITLE

Getting info from the factory isn't going to help much in getting a title. My car didn't have a title and it could not be found in the DMV data banks. I went through US Auto and Title Co. to get the car registered and then got a
title in my state. There Are other firms that also do that. Jerry Rein

To all that wanted contact info for lotus. Way back in 1994, I spoke to a Mike Pomfret, Customer Relations Administrator at Lotus England. Mike forwarded to me a letter verifying sales date, original colour, original engine #, first purchaser and invoice #. I called him at 011-44-953-608-000. For anyone interested, he also forwarded a copy of the page from his sales/build registry. It has my car along with several others. Below is a list of the VIN #'s covered by this page. If anyone's car is included in this list let me know and I will send a copy to you (just nifty to have). 1144R through 1156R. By the way the list also contains all of the "P" cars as well as the "R" cars. These are cars built from 8-71 to 1-72. I have to tell you that when I was calling trying to track down information Lotus was incredibly helpful. Mike was even understanding when I called and told him that the first batch of stuff he sent me made it to me just fine, but somehow I LOST it (geez). So Mike was courteous, and sent everything to me again. So my suggestion to anyone who needs info is to grab the phone and talk to a real live human. You'll probably get much better results than going the mail route. I do know that when I talked to Lotus they were very willing to help and very pleasant to deal with. Good luck, Briggs Pletcher 72 S2

On March 21 I sent an email to the factory requesting info re 54/0777. I received a polite but short snail air mail reply April 7 from Maurice Storey, Archive Department, Lotus Cars Ltd., enclosing all info available: confirmation of engine #, date left factory, invoice #, shipped to (in my case Lotus Canada). Nothing to help anyone re title aquisition, but nice info to have on Lotus letterhead. I have since requested a copy of the original invoice for my file, am anxiously awaiting same. Maybe I sucked up more!!!!!! Keep trying, Paul Hill

The feds want to know what it says on the dashboard, where it can be seen through the windshield from outside the car. It is not formatted just like earlier VINs. The "R" was never used earlier. At least not in the book. And not on my car, either. There probably is a 46/0077. What gives is that either you are not seeing the entire VIN, or Lotus engaged in some "transitional" goings-on not covered by their official statements. For the record, Lotus stated in their workshop manual, page 8a, that the new method commenced on "the 1st of January 1970". The parts manual, page 7, states it "As from January, 1970". Their example in both cases is 7001.010001P (OK, the parts manual used "A" which was a fixed-head Elan standard for the UK). Here is the breakdown:

7001.010001P both chassis and body numbers being the same

7001. Represents year and month of manufacture

01 Represents the production batch

0001 Represents the unit (chassis) number

P Represents the model code

[All cars produced at the time are shown on the chart. I am too lazy to type them all, so here are the three lines for Europa cars:]

Europa Standard Great Britain and Northern Ireland P

Europa Standard Export Q

Europa Federal Export R

You say your number is 0077R and your car was built in 3/1970. To match the later method Lotus CLAIMS to have used (What, Lotus not following their own rules? How unlikely!), your number would be something like:
7003.010077R
Of course I am guessing about the batch number. Obviously, your car is not marked by either the new method nor the old, but by a combination thereof. The number "0077R" does not give as much information as either of the stated methods. Check the dashboard number and the number stamped on the chassis. You have an interesting anomaly here. I wonder how many others there are. Are there any cars which have both "65" and "R"? Sort of redundant, since "R" MEANS Lotus 65. A Lotus 54 of the same era should be marked either "P" or "Q". Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban LOON, MAC
pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

TOOLS

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate expensive parts not far from the object we are trying to hit.


MECHANIC'S KNIFE:

Used to open and slice through the contents of cardboard cartons delivered to your front door; works particularly well on boxes containing seats and motorcycle jackets.


ELECTRIC HAND DRILL:

Normally used for spinning steel Pop rivets in their holes until you die of old age, but it also works great for drilling mounting holes in fenders just above the brake line that goes to the rear wheel.


PLIERS:
Used to round off bolt heads.


HACKSAW:
One of a family of cutting tools built on the Ouija board principle. It transforms human energy into a crooked, unpredictable motion, and the more you attempt to influence its course, the more dismal your future becomes.


VISE-GRIPS:
Used to round off bolt heads. If nothing else is available, they can also be used to transfer intense welding heat to the
palm of your hand.


OXYACETELENE TORCH:

Used almost entirely for lighting various flammable objects in your garage on fire. Also handy for igniting the grease inside a brake drum you're trying to get the bearing race out of.


WHITWORTH SOCKETS:

Once used for working on older British cars and motorcycles, they are now used mainly for impersonating that 9/16 or 1/2 socket you've been searching for the last 15 minutes.


DRILL PRESS:

A tall upright machine useful for suddenly snatching flat metal bar stock out of your hands so that it smacks you in the chest and flings your beer across the room, splattering it against that freshly painted part you were drying.


WIRE WHEEL:

Cleans rust off old bolts and then throws them somewhere under the workbench with the speed of light. Also removes fingerprint whorls and hard-earned guitar calluses in about the time it takes you to say, "Shi...."


HYDRAULIC FLOOR JACK:

Used for lowering a motorcycle to the ground after you have installed your new front disk brake setup, trapping the jack handle firmly under the front fender.


EIGHT-FOOT LONG DOUGLAS FIR 2X4:

Used for levering a motorcycle upward off a hydraulic jack.

TWEEZERS:
A tool for removing wood splinters.


PHONE:
Tool for calling your neighbor to see if he has another hydraulic floor jack.


SNAP-ON GASKET SCRAPER:

Theoretically useful as a sandwich tool for spreading mayonnaise; used mainly for getting dog-doo off your boot.

E-Z OUT BOLT AND STUD EXTRACTOR:

A tool that snaps off in bolt holes and is ten times harder than any known drill bit.


TIMING LIGHT:

A stroboscopic instrument for illuminating grease buildup.


TWO-TON HYDRAULIC ENGINE HOIST:

A handy tool for testing the tensile strength of ground straps and brake lines you may have forgotten to disconnect.

CRAFTSMAN 1/2 x 16-INCH SCREWDRIVER:

A large motor mount prying tool that inexplicably has an accurately machined screwdriver tip on the end without the handle.

BATTERY ELECTROLYTE TESTER:

A handy tool for transferring sulfuric acid from a car battery to the inside of your toolbox after determining that your battery is dead as a doornail, just as you thought.


AVIATION METAL SNIPS:

See hacksaw.


TROUBLE LIGHT:

The mechanic's own tanning booth. Sometimes called a drop light, it is a good source of vitamin D, "the sunshine vitamin," which is not otherwise found under motorcycles at night. Health benefits aside, it's main purpose is to consume 40-watt light bulbs at about the same rate that 105-mm howitzer shells might be used during, say, the first few hours of the Battle of the Bulge. More often dark than light, its name is somewhat misleading.


PHILLIPS SCREWDRIVER:

Normally used to stab the lids of old-style paper-and-tin oil cans and splash oil on your shirt; can also be used, as the name implies, to round off Phillips screw heads.


AIR COMPRESSOR:

A machine that takes energy produced in a coal-burning power plant 200 miles away and transforms it into compressed air that travels by hose to a Chicago Pneumatic impact wrench that grips rusty bolts last tightened 40 years ago by someone in Sindelfingen, and rounds them off.


PRY BAR:

A tool used to crumple the metal surrounding that clip or bracket you needed to remove in order to replace a 50 cent part.


HOSE CUTTER:

A tool used to cut hoses 1/2 inch too short.

SJMARCY@aol.com In a message dated 6/30/99 12:08:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dan.morrison@autodesk.com writes: This is the second time in as many days that I have seen the name Vericom mentioned. Is this some sort of G-analyst or GEEZ type measuring device?


Yeah, pretty much. I've had mine for years. It's much more flexible than a g-tech and much more single purpose than a g-analyst. One thing it is really good at is in-gear acceleration times. So you can compare engines,.gearing, tweaks, etc very repeatably. My old BMW race car would repeat 30-50 mph in-2nd-gear times within .about 0.02 seconds. So if you make a change you can really see it it helped and where. No driver skill, quick shifting, launching etc to muck things up. Used in this way you can pick up the differences between air filters, oil, among other things. It can also do any other kind of measurement such as 0-60, 0 - distance time, speed to speed, 60 foot times, road hp and torque, braking peak-g average-g and distance from a speed to zero or even from one speed to another which is called a snub.

SJMARCY@aol.com In a message dated 6/30/99 12:13:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, dan.morrison@autodesk.com writes: Excuse my ignorance, but what is a drill jig bushing and what kind of business would stock these?


A machine shop or factory would use drill jig bushings to help drill round, accurately placed holes into a work piece. They look like bushings. They are made of hard strong tool steel so they don't wear out very quickly. With a work piece in position, the drill bit would first go through the bush and then into the piece. The bush is mounted in a jig in the correct position, so it guides the drill bit into exactly the right spot and holds it steady. I used headless press fit bushes - "headed" bushes have a larger OD shoulder fro fixture purposes. They have an accurate ID and OD. I purchased mine from Grand Tool 1-800-922-0512 p/n 073-346 on sale at 3.66 each (normally about 16) which are 1 3/16 ID by 2 1/2 long . P/N 073-320 which was not in stock but can be ordered at the regular price is the same size but 2 1/8 long, which is the exact early Europa length. The next size down is 1 3/4 long, too short. Or you could use two 1 inchers to get two inches for a special. I want mine to be one piece though, since I'm goinfg to the trouble and hope to have a bulletproof setup. According to Carrol Smith, you really
don't want to shim these things..but two largish pieces should be fine. Many machine tool suppliers have bushes at good prices lately. They are available in just about any drill size.

I have most of the Renault factory tools for the 336, 352, and 365 transaxles available to loan for the cost of the postage. This includes the side seal wrenches, and the pinion depth setting mandrel for the 336 and early 352. I
need a machinist to make up the gapping block to use with the pinion mandrel however. Send me a snail mail address and the tool(s) needed to
banzai@wserv.com and I'll send them out. David H. Putscher

TOOLS, Heat

g ford <gmfmo@mweb.co.za> I find that most people use too much low quality heat in situations like this. ie hairdryer or LPG flame. Best is to use ox/ac with a small tip and get it hot quickly so that the rapid expansion breaks the rust bond. You may have to do it a couple of times. Wrap a wet cloth around the area of the seal. This should protect it, Sundry tapping with hammers is not usually successful. Better get a really heavy chunk of old iron supported solidly on a jack underneath the shaft and give it some solid strikes on top turning it round as you go. Never the less a puller after removing the hook joint is a more classical way to go.

TOWING

rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> I use wheel net straps. i.e. two, side 2 inch belts tied together by 3 cross belts. The longitudinal belts fit each side of the tire. The hook of one end of the strap goes into a cleat, the free end (tail piece) is cinched with a ratchet to another cleat on the trailer.

dsrgr@aol.com I put tie downs through the wheels and then to the side of the trailer. I also block the wheels with two by fours because I can't get out of the car through the window after it is on the trailer and therefore have to leave it in neutral.

You can reach under the back of the car and shift the linkage. In the case of my car, I can open the rear deck lid and shift the transmission from above, since I have no trunk insert. Phil Ethier
pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> I have towed two Europas backwards quite a distance. (on tow dolleys). Never had a problem with the deck lifting.

Pete Canga" <pete.canga@hs.utc.com> I ran across this website while surfing. New racing gears for Europa
renault gearboxes. Pretty entertaining graphics also.
http://www.gear-net.com/tohmei/product.html

Paul Hill" <hillmotorsports@sympatico.ca> In my opinion........ I think some of you need to take a LONG look at your priorities. We probably all have way more money tied up in our cars than we would ever want to have to confess to "she who must be obeyed", and yet I see some out there who want to risk throwing it all away, (as well as possibly taking some other poor unsuspecting slob out of the picture, whose family will then sue your ass off), all for the sake of a few hundred dollars max worth of safety equipment like proper tie downs and brakes. Probably the same guys don't worry too much about adequate safety chains and functioning lights either. I know none of us like Big Brother ruling our lives, but it seems some of us need protection from ourselves. I'm sure all states and provinces have laws that cover most if not all that has appeared here lately re trailers and tie downs. Check it out: most of it is reasonable. I've towed trailers of all sizes and descriptions for over 30 years without any major mishaps of my own doing, but too many times I've seen the sickening result of someone ("it'll be OK") cutting too many corners. Scrap race cars in the ditch because they weren't properly tied down (safest--basket straps over diagonally opposite wheels, all 4 even better); trailers that became detached, broke their dog chain safety chains, then crossed to meet somebody head-on; truck, trailer and racer all a mess in the median because the trailer started to sway (almost always from insufficient tongue weight), with no trailer brakes to help the driver straighten it out. And on, and on....... Please guys---next time you're loading your pride and joy, look long and hard at the whole package. Ask someone with more experience to have a look at it. I know it hurts to miss a race to save money to buy safety junk "you'll never need". But it hurts a lot more when you have to rebuild your car (cheap) or your whole life (not so cheap) after your loose trailer wipes out some familly's breadwinner. There is no such thing as too careful. Thanks to those that take the time to read all this. For those that don't----- hope I don't "run into" you.

TRANSAXLE, Gasket

ClassMaker@aol.com whs018@conrad.appstate.edu writes: I've already added output shaft seals to my order from Banks. I'll try and add the rear cover gasket as well 'cause mine already leaks!

Or get a tube of Loctite 518 (Gasket Maker).

SJMARCY@aol.com I regard the Loctite 518 as a superior to stock approach. I use it wherever possible. Besides leak related issues the gasket's job is to prevent metal to metal contact which leads to fretting, etc. The 518 is a super product.

TRANSAXLE, Half shafts

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> 1) All the talk about UJ's is beginning to concern me. The inner joint can be removed without taking the suspention off, can't it? Or do I not have to remove the UJ (something else?)?

If you mean detach the half shafts, no, you do not have to touch the U joints. There is a roll pin (actually, a scroll pin?) joining the half shafts to the transmission. Relase the lower suspension links, drive out the pin, and put toward the outside. The half shafts will come off the splines fairly easily.

TRANSAXLE, Repair

JERTIGGER2@cs.com Taking apart the transaxel is not a difficult job. I did mine recently to replace a part in the differential. Parts do not fall out when the covers are parted. The seals were easy to replace and not very expensive. The only gasket I needed was where the shifter assembly attaches to the rear of the gear box. Was not the hardest thing I had to do on my ropa.

Aaron Hines <whs018@conrad.appstate.edu> <Did he say what caused his yoke to stick? After breaking it up he must have known what the original problem had been.>

Tha guy said that the right-side yoke gets frozen on because of the close proximity of the exaust system. The heat evaporates any kind of oil and accelerates the oxidation reaction. The workshop manual specifies powdered graphite as a lube on the output shaft. Since I doubt that its ever been off since it left the factory, it may have been rusted on for some time now. When I go to put the engine and transaxle back in, I'll use some high-quality grease (probably AMSOIL "Racing Grease" as for UJs) and wrap that section of the exaust system with heat wrap or some kind of heat sheilding.

TRANSAXLE, Spirol pins

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Poor Aaron is being misled. He has a Europa TC, which has one (1) spirol pin in each yoke. Europa Renaults have two (2) roll pins each yoke, one inside the other.

ElanS4 <elans4@erols.com> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa plans & questions Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 07:25:51 –0400 Mark was pointing out that on the factory setup, there are TWO roll pins on each side, one inside the other. It might be possible that you got them both out together as one piece on one side, but only got out the inner one on the other side. It might be worth a check to make sure...

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa plans & questions Mon, 26 Jul 1999 19:39:59 –0700 He has a Europa TC, which has one (1) spirol pin in each yoke. Europa Renaults have two (2) roll pins each yoke, one inside the other.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Scott wrote: He suggested that once I add the sticky DOT-R tires, I
should change the driveshaft roll pins in the back every couple of autocrosses.

That's entirely mistaken, and it comes from a complete misunderstanding of the function of the roll pins.

>I was a bit shocked that they should be changed that often.

They shouldn't. I've been autocrossing my Europa since 1994, and I've never once changed the roll pins. Just had 'em out this week, and there's no sign of stress. The same ones went back in, where I'm sure thay'll stay for at least a couple years. The roll pins carry no - that's absolutely zero - shear loading when the car is sitting on the wheels or being driven. Ever. They're under no stress. The only time that there are shear loads on the roll pins is when you've got the car jacked up. Then, the roll pins keep the halfaxles from falling off. If you don't jack the car up, you could operate it indefinitely with no roll pins in place and no problems. Why is that? Read on.... The halfaxles are always under compression, even at full cornering force on sticky tires. I've done the very basic load/moment analysis required to prove that - so has Mike Causer. That compression loading - which, BTW, is greatest at rest or when the car is moving in a straight line - is transmitted through the yoke shims (you HAVE checked to see that your yokes are shimmed properly, haven't you?) to the differential carrier. The compression load path does not include the roll pins. Nor the wheel bearings, but that's another subject. Now, there have been instances of Europas missing their shims or having incorrect shim thickness as a result of incompetent repair work. If this happens, you WILL shear roll pins, and no amount of pre-emptive replacement will make the problem go away. However, there's no excuse for allowing this problem to ever appear. The moral? Look at the design carefully. Read the shop manual. Do your own analysis. Don't be taken in by wives' tales, even from other Lotus owners. There's lots of superstition out there. Taking the time to identify superstitions as such is essential in
successfully maintaining any car. Jay "BTW, you can buy replacement roll pins at Lowe's" Mitchell.

Scott Mitchell <scott@alwaysthinking.com> Ken L. wrote: hey are metric, being part of the transmission. I think they are 7mm. And they have to be Spirol or a competitor's equivalent.

I'd check the manual first, but my memory is that the S2 has a 7mm Heavy Duty pin with a 4mm one inside that. I thought the Twink had just a 5mm Spirol pin. My current setup is a bit non-stock, whoever I got them from was out of the heavy duty pins so I ended up with the regular 7mm pin and the 5mm spirol inside. Probably at least as strong, if not more so.

"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> McMaster-Carr doesn't have 7mm roll pins, but they have 6s and 8s. Any chance it's one of those? The M8s come in 22,26,30,40, 50, and 60mm lengths, and there are 4mm pins up to 50 mm length. 5mm is .197". I'd try a 7/32" spiral wound pin. They're also available from McMaster's.

Sorry to bring this up one more time, but the final thing to do regarding sealing the transmission oil leaks is to be sure the driveshaft roll-pin is sealed at both ends with a blob of silicon... Renault use dual roll pins - which would suffer more from the problem that the solid pin used by Lotus - I think the Lotus manual suggests the whole pin be coated in sealant before insertion... Matt. Bowden

If the roll pins are not sealed, there will be some leakage. The oil makes it's way down the splines (between the output shaft and mating driveshaft coupling) and then will leak through the roll pin. Not a lot mind, but it will cause the traditional "Renault" drip. I've yet to own a car with a Renault transaxle that doesn't at least leave 2 drops of oil, no matter how well it is sealed! Renault have tried a few different methods over the years - I think they may have finally got it fairly right with the NG3 box... The rear casing should have two gaskets BTW - (352 transmission - not sure about NG3!) - I've seen many rebuilt just using a good sealing compound, as the gaskets are not that easy to come by! Matt Bowden

Not so. With the 352 there is a O ring that goes onto the out put shaft then a sleeve pushed onto the shaft against the O ring. The O-ring keeps oil from getting between the sleeve and the shaft. then the outer lip seal mates with the outer surface of the sleeve preventing oil flow along the outer diameter of the sleeve. If the O ring is perfect and the lip seal is perfect oil will never get out, to see the splines. The yoke is held up tight to the outer face of the sleeve by the spirol pin. The sequence is: shaft, O ring, sleeve, shims if necessary, yoke. Jerry (had transaxel completely apart an replaced an output shaft, seals, & O rings) Rein

TRANSAXLE, U- joints

Jon Lexau <Jon.Lexau@Eng.Sun.COM> jrowan@ix.netcom.com said: > So can someone please give some instructions on doing this for someone who's never replaced a U-joint in any type of car before?


Until about a week ago, I was in the same situation as you. I have now removed all of mine and started putting in the new ones. Unfortunately, it looks like I may need some new driveline components so I am a bit stalled. Anyway, here is how I did it (if you have a press, you may wish to substitute it for large vise below).

  1. Remove all of the circlips holding the U-joint cups in place.
  2. Pick a place to start and using a socket (or something similar) just smaller than the U-joint cup, use the vise to press the whole U-joint one way. You will need a larger socket on the other side of the assembly so that the opposite side cup can push outwards.
  3. Now remove the cup that is protruding from the outside. I used either a pair of channel lock pliers or just held the cup in the vise and wiggled the rest of it to get it to come loose.
  4. Now CAREFULLY push the U-joint the other way. You now have to push on the spider (I used a pretty small socket) so you want to be gentle here. You want to push until the remaining cup comes out the far side. At this point, the spider should come free. I removed the second cup by pushing it back into its holder until it fell out on the inside.
  5. Now do the other pair of cups and you have one joint disassembled.

Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.


Well yes, but... My method was to insert the spider (without the cups) where it belongs, and then start both cups from the outside. I put this whole sandwich in the vise and pushed both cups towards the center together. It is important to be sure that the spider stays centered as you do this, though. I managed to snap one of the needle bearings on my first try because I wasn't paying enough attention to what was happening. This should get both cups flush with the yoke or whatever. Now put your socket from step 2 on one side an push until you can reinstall that circlip. Then reverse the whole thing and do the second circlip. You may want to back up the other side with another socket so you are not pushing against just the circlip.

In a message dated 98-07-11 Clive writes: << ) How does one remove u-joints? >> I was taught by one of those wonder-mechanics you met once in a decade, never to apply any force to the bearing cups in a U-joint. His method was to remove the circlip, then carefully scrape all corrosion and junk out of the bore of the housing, to give the cups a clean path to move along. Then, holding the cross in one hand, tap the housing adjacent to the bearing cup where you just removed the circlip with a hammer. (Note: the operative word was _tap_ - not welt, welly, or beat the **** out of. The fact that you're holding the thing tends to be a good force-limiting device). His promise was that the inertia would gently move the cup out of the housing. You let that cup move almost, but not completely, out of the housing, then turn the assembly over and so the same on the opposite side. As one who had grown used to using arbor presses, clamps and sundry brutality to U-joints, accepting that some damage would be done along the way, I was sceptical that this _low-impact_ method would work - but it did then, and has since, every time I've needed to pull a joint apart. There may be times it won't, but I think it's definitely a technique worth learning, as it's low stress both on parts and operator. And you never know when it may be useful to be able to fix a U-joint beside the road, with only the tools you're carrying....

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> I have been told by folks who really abused their Europa drivelines that the strong setup is a Dana-Spicer brand U-joint with no grease fittings. The non-greasers are not drilled inside and are stronger.

Randall Fehr <rsfehr@seanet.com> Jason wrote: Any advice on good cheap replacement U-joints and where to get them would be useful too.


Good or cheap, which do you want? I use the UK-made Hardy Spicer joints sold by JAE, and prefer greaseable. Jeff at JAE did the research and found these were the best quality. Keep in mind that this is going to be a difficult job for you the first time - might as well use parts that will last. I use the hammer/intertia method Ken described, and have a copper-faced mallet that delivers a solid strike without marring or peening the yoke. Don't hammer too far so that the spider starts to nick the inside edge of the yoke bore. You should consider removing the rear suspension assemblies from the car for much greater access to the joints.

From: paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> Subject: Universal Joint Disassembly Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 22:20:03 –0500 Put the U-joint between a serious vice using sockets as suggested. Use your favorite pentrating lubricant if necessary. A big C-clamp, as suggested, might work. NOW, as you apply force to disassemble, GIVE THE VICE or CLAMP solid whacks with a hammer, if needed. Apply more force, then more solid whacks. DON'T hammer on the U-joint directly.

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Fresh U-joints completed the rear suspension work. I get mine from AutoZone for 6.99 each. They have the advantage of having the grease fitting on the end of one of the caps. Other U-joints I have used have had interference problems due to grease fitting placement.

I have been told that for high-stress work like racing and autocrossing, the Spicer brand without grease fittings are the strongest you can buy.

"Jason Rowan" <jrowan@ix.netcom.com> Last year I put a set of Hardy Spicer U joints on my S2, and discovered there's a right way and a wrong way to install them to avoid interference problems. These UJs have a grease fitting which is about 1" long, and, believe it or not, there is no interference problem if you orient the fitting towards a little "notch" which is in some of the yolks. Unfortunately, I didn't even notice that notch until I had 2 UJs installed, with one interfering and the other just fine. After a closer look at what the difference between the 2 was, I discovered that notch.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> DSRGR@aol.com wrote: Would you be kind enough to share the brand and part number for these Ujs?

Neapco 1-0300. I believe Pep Boys carries Neapco stuff.

ajhuang@hpbs1974.boi.hp.com (Andrew J Huang) Subject: Re: Rear Wheel Bearing Replacement (Europa) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:25:57 -0700 (MST) Aaron innocently asks, I'm getting around to replacing the wheel bearings and UJs on the rear of my Special (fronts if I ever get my parts from Banks!).

It's straightforward actually. First, tho, get the terminology right, the halfshaft is the part between the two U-joints, while the part that goes through the bearings is called the stub axle. Replacing the bearings involves the halfshaft only periphally, whereas the stub axle is committed. (What's the difference between "involved" and "committed"? The chicken is "involved" in the egg; the pig is "committed" to the bacon.) The stub axle has two bearing lands for the inner and the outer bearings. Originally, they were the same size, but the newer models, which certainly includes your'n, have the inner bearing land larger than the outer land so to simplify installation. The two bearings are separated by a mild steel spacer that fits loosely over the stub axle. Replace this spacer with a good higher-grade spacer - check the usual sources or make your own. The splined end of the stub axle is inserted through the hub and retained by loctite (Red - Stud'n'Bearing Mount) and the axle nut. That's the layout. Now for the disassembly.

  1. get the halfshaft off the stub axle
  2. remove the axle nut
  3. heat the hub until the loctite bubbles - ten minutes with a propane wrench - I think you want to avoid oxy-acetylene here
  4. apply a two or three prong gear puller and remove the hub
  5. remove the brake
  6. apply an appropriate gear puller to the stub axle and the bearing carrier. Be careful here because the bearing carrier is alloy and probably worth the price of your 'B (never did like MGs). I've done this with a Crapsman 8" two jaw puller - I think the jaws were applied to the mounting ears of the bearing carrier, but I'd try to do better than that.
  7. push the stub axle off the bearings. This part takes some oomph. I believe this was the prelude to understanding the true nature of a hacksaw. If you have trouble here, re-install the axle nut, inverted, but keeping the axle thread covered. Now apply the 1kg sledge. Vigorously.
  8. use a hacksaw to remove the mangled nut
  9. remove the bearing carrier from the trailing arm
  10. examine the bearing to carrier interface carefully to determine if loctite was used. If so, heat carefully to break the bond.
  11. support the bearing carrier appropriately and use a long drift to tap the bearings out of the carrier. Since you're tapping against the inner bearing race, you won't damage the bearing carrier. Of course, the bearings are toast, but the were toasted when you applied the puller.

TRANSMISSION, Case

Thanks to all who offered advise re. the overhaul of my 365 transaxle rear case. I found little in the archive regarding the 365 rear case weaknesses so thought I would summarize the collective wisdom of the list as well as my own experience. I am sure some of this is not 100% correct but is as I know it today! It seems 5th gear was added to the back of a 4 speed box by Renault requiring a large rear case to cover it. The case has two shafts passing out through the rear of it: The transmission selector shaft at the bottom and the rocking lever shaft in the middle. The shift linkage is low and vulnerable in the back of a 5spd europa and impacts between the linkage and curbs can bend the transmission selector shaft and crack the aluminum case that holds it. The rocking lever holds a shift détente cam that locates reverse and 5th gear and if adjusted poorly can put large side loads on the rocking lever cracking the case where the lever passes through it. My case was cracked at the rocking lever. The rear case is no longer available and damage is so common that used parts are impossible to find. Be very carefull when working on the rear case as it is possible to do more harm than good if too much force is exerted. The rear case can be removed with the trany in the car but the rear trany mount must be completely disassembled, half shafts and lower links removed and the main motor mounts loosened to allow the transmission to tip down in
the rear. The 5th gear selector shaft and the 3-4 gear selector shaft have a steel ball between them that fits into a notch in each shaft when the other is engaged preventing 5th gear from being engaged along with 3rd or 4th and
visa-versa. You must select 3rd gear before pulling the rear case or the 5th gear selector shaft comes out with the rear case and the steel ball falls into the transmission. Fortunately, Radio Shack sells a tiny rare earth
magnet for just this situation and when epoxied to the end of a length of stainless wire fishes the ball out in short order! With the case off you can seek out your favorite aluminum welder to patch it up….or so I thought. Seems the casting is very porous and welding is very difficult. I heard stories about a jig someone made to hold the shaft holes in alignment while welding (critical) but never tracked down just who owns the jig. I had mine welded without the jig and then had the holes re-machined on a CNC outfit and bushed in bronze to take some of the play out of the system. Welding the case distorted the holes to the point that the shafts would not even fit into them so plan on some cash for the machinist if you get yours welded. The CNC was critical as it is possible to zero on the mating surface and drill the holes for the bushes exactly perpendicular to that plane allowing the shafts to line up with the corresponding holes in the transmission. It is all back together now and 1-4 gears work great but I need to pull it apart and polish the 5th gear bushing a bit more as 5th takes too much force to engage still. New shifter bushings and locktite with new roll pins throughout the linkage allowed me to find the gears for the first time once the détente mechanism on the back of the transmission was adjusted properly. I don't know how the car never shifted before I got it as the entire linkage was messed up and took considerable grinding and aligning to get the détente mechanism working properly. There is a lot in the various archives about ways to improve the linkage but it seems adequate to me in stock form for now. Fired the car up and 15 min later the radiator sprayed coolant from several holes in unison. On to the next challenge! Regards, Dave Rettew 74 TC

TRANSMISSION, Clutch change

I recently pulled my transmission and clutch out of my car. I ordered clutch plate and throw out bearing, everything else looked good but a friend said the pressure plate should always be replaced too. He said the spring fingers loose their tension on the pressure plate. Car has about 40,000 miles on it. How do I check tension? Is this necessary? Thanks. Jerry Rein

"Mark MarKell, Sr." <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Just a note about the clutch conversion we've been talking about. Some time ago I got disgusted with the price of a new or rebuilt Ferrodo 200D clutch with release pad as used in the Renault-powered versions of the Europa. Local rebuilders wouldn't touch it due to the unusual 3 eared release pad and the fibre facing needed. I found the Sachs clutch available from my local supplier for around $50 new. This is the replacement clutch for the Renault R-17 Gordini engine and is a bolt-up replacement as far as the flywheel is concerned. The main difference is the throwout bearing, which mounts similar to a TC with wire clips and needs a rounded face, rather than the slip-on flat unit required by the older Renault transaxle throwout fork. (the disk is the same.) At that point I generated a full Autocad drawing of the cross section for the flywheel, pressure plate, disk throwout bearing and transaxle and checked dimensions against a shop setup. I then found a suitable, but generic, throwout bearing and generated a drawing for the throwout bearing carrier which had to be about 1/2 inch longer than stock. We had 5 manufactured at my local machinist and did some tweaks to the drawings having to do with tolerances. David Davidian, Chris Munson, Mark Hollingsworth and I all have them installed and Jeff Hovis now has the setup built for Bob Bulfin to be installed on Jeff’s Gordini. This requires NO modifications to the flywheel or transaxle and the carrier is pressed into the bearing and can be re-used again later. The clutch operation is smoother than the original with a distinct 'over-center' feel. The clutch strength is the same as the original, maybe slightly stronger, and was originally installed in R-17 Gordinis. I can supply either the whole works or the drawings and a parts list. (So far no one has been able to buy the parts as cheap as I can supply them.) Supplying the copyrighted drawings will also imply free use of the drawing for anyone building their own, but a prohibition of building them for profit. I also make no profit from this venture. The Pressure plate was about $53, the disk $37 and the bearing about $19 if memory serves. The re-usable carrier ran $50. All parts new not rebuilt. BTW, a side issue was finding the generic equivalents for the pilot
bearing and the input shaft seal, both of which are CR parts available from most bearing houses. I mentioned this on the Lotus list about a year ago and there was very little interest. This work was spurred by problems David Davidian was having with a NEW clutch being very sticky and not disengaging. He eventually sent it to me and we found it was assembled incorrectly with one of the flat springs installed backwards. A call to the supplier found he was aware of the problem and had a number of others fail for the same reason, but was unwilling to take them back. If you have a similar problem with a new pressure plate drop me a line.

TRANSMISSION, Drain plug

ken.landaiche@nokia.com That tranny drain plug is a 10 mm square socket, my only Snap-On to date.

TRANSMISSION, Gear change

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Subject: Re: Europa Progress (U) Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 21:27:13 -0500
Have I sent you this one before?

===========
Here is a bunch of info on Europa gearshifts. The biggest problem, even on the five-speeds, is the meeting of the shift lever and the first tube. Wade through this stuff, and you will see the solution:

======
\\\\\\\\\\gearchange To K.C.Babb Jun 19 '92 at 1:01 pm cdt Subject: Help with Lotus gearchange
I made more progress on the Europa frame last night. Removed the entire gearchange, speedometer cable, swaybar and lower front closing plate.


I think I have figured out the main problem with the gearchange. I will be putting in a heim joint to fix the problems with the departed rubber bushing on the top of the gearbox, thanks to Steve Valin's fine advice. But that is not the real problem.


95% of the guess-a-gear characteristic of this system is at the junction of the bottom end of the gear lever and the first horizontal tube that goes back. Without going into the rest of the linkage (trust me, Rube Goldberg would be proud), here is what this part does. The bottom of the lever is a simple tang with a hole in it. The tube has a clevis on the end. The lever tang fits in the clevis and a bolt (horizontal and across the car) goes through them both. The tube moves back and forth (end movement) to move from neutral into the gears. This works just fine.


As the lever is moved side-to-side, the front of the tube moves side-to-side. This motion is (and is supposed to be) irrelevant to the gearbox. The relevant motion is the ROTATION of the tube, which is supposed to move the selector from one gate to another. This tang-and-clevis is not up to it.


The problem: The clevis is supposed to have some spacer washers in it. They are not there. The whole assembly is worn, and the tang is bent. The result is that considerable sideways motion of the lever results in no rotation at all. Since there is a good locating spring in the gearbox, you always wind up in 3rd or 4th instead of 1st or 2nd. The locating spring for the reverse gate (reverse is next to 4th) is even stronger, so if you want to back up you get out and push. This actually makes sense, as at least you can SEE that way.


I believe that this is weak design point. Even if it is bought up to as-new spec, it will be inadequate. The present design relies on the fit of the tang in the clevis, and the whole contact area is only about 3/4" high. I think that this allows too much leverage advantage. I believe what is needed is a wider base.


The proposed solution: The lever could have the tang removed. A wide clevis, maybe 2.5" on the inside, can be welded in. Check the clearance to the coolant tubes on the right of the tunnel. For ease of assembly, a 5/16" Nylock nut could be spot-welded to the right side. There is room to weld in triangle gussets. The tube gets a 2.5" long tube welded across the end, with a 5/16" ID. This is also gusseted. After the tube is wrestled into the tunnel, the lever with suitable mounting flange, is put in through the oval access hole and mounted. The tube is introduced to the clevis and a 5/16" bolt secures them. I have to be able to do this part with only my left hand. The 5/16" bolt should be a regular Grade 2, so it will be a wear part. I think that can be replaced from the passenger seat with the body on. Side-to-side play in the clevis should be irrelevant. Wear in the tube should not be a big factor. I would like to put a Zerk in it, but it is so hard to reach, I would find it hard to grease it anyway. OK, all you Britcar engineers, shoot holes in my theory for me. I really don't want to be taking this whole car apart again!

I put an aluminum block about 1.5" wide on the bottom of the shift lever. It has holes drilled and tapped for 1/4-20. I procured some ball bearing assemblies from the local surplus store.


The shift tube has the clevis. After carefully measuring the location of the holes, I trimmed off the clevis ears, exposing a rectangular flat area on the end of the rod. I made up a U-shape of steel and drilled its ears to match the OD of the bearing assemblies. I pop-riveted the new clevis to the tube, then brought it and a 12-pack of pop to a professional welder. He welded it (which I may have been able to do) without wrecking it (which I am not so sure I could do) and welded on some reinforcement triangulation.


I placed my new clevis over my new aluminum tang and bolted in the bearings. Now I have a frictionless clevis with a MUCH wider base than the stock setup.


Tommy Schramm: Turns out Tommy actually did something I figured out independently. Toss out all the rubber mount stuff and the rubber ball on the shift stick. Just take a heim joint, cut off the threads and weld the ring to the bottom of the top shift-mount plate. Pass the stick through the heim joint.

Phil Ethier, THE RIGHT LINE, 672 Orleans Street, Saint Paul, MN 55107-2676 h (612) 224-3105 lotus@pnet51.orb.mn.org
w (612) 298-5324
phile@pwcs.stpaul.gov (list goes here) The workingman's GT-40 - Anthony Colin Bruce Chapman

davevh@microsoft.com Jun 25 '92 at 4:49 pm pdt | The problem: The clevis is supposed to have some spacer washers in it. They are not there.


They aren't supposed to be. It's not spacer washers that are missing, it's a pair of half bushings. They look like this (exploded view):


gear lever

vv
vv
||
||_ || _||

nut -> [] | _ || _ | =========] <- bolt

         

||
^ ^

half bushings


These half-bushings were originally rubber and over time they wear out, fall apart and disappear in the tunnel. The key to good shifting is to replace them. Unfortunately, they're NLA either from Lotus or from Ford (they were a Cortina part). However, I know someone who makes them up out of plastic (Nylon, I think; he tried Teflon but it was too soft). Replacing them with washers doesn't work very well; if you have enough to get good rotation, you get binding fore-and-aft as well.


| The whole assembly is worn, and the tang is bent. The result is that considerable sideways motion of the lever results in no rotation at all. Since there is a good locating spring in the gearbox, you always wind up in 3rd or 4th instead of 1st or 2nd.


This locating spring came in various strengths from the factory, who-knows-why. It appears to be based on what they had in the parts bin that day. If the tang is bent it appears you got one of the stronger ones, which put considerable strain on the linkage, notably the spot you were discussing. Fortunately the spring is easy to get to (it's on the gearbox) so you might consider cutting a loop or two off, or replacing it with a weaker one.


I waved your solution by my favorite Europa mechanic. He's the guy who makes up the plastic bushings. I can't remember all he said without having it here in front of me, but I suggest you call him - (503) 625-5443, ask for Jim. He runs a shop called Europa West and he's spent a ton of time tinkering with that linkage.


Dave Van Horn
davevh@microsoft.com I got the gearchange spherical bush for only a few dollars from Tri-State Bearing, 612-721-2463, 3418 E 25th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55406. Open Sat, 8-12


Subject: Europa gearchange To:
JPENGEL@tiny.computing.csbsju.edu (My inner child is a sick little bastard) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 13:48:53 -0600 (CST) Cc: Lotus-Cars@netcom.com


Tim Engel writes >>Rod Bean, "rebean@CCGATE.HAC.COM" writes > > > >I vintage race a S1 Europa... the car has had a shifting problem... I now suspect old, worn parts in the internal gear selector apparatus... Is there anyone in SoCal who knows these transmissions VERY WELL ..> .


>You have a rear shift trans (352?) in an S1 'ropa?


My somewhat-stunned reaction also.


>I've had (sold 'em... d__n) one S2 and two TC's (an early 336 and a 352) and the best shift linkage is that used on the late S2/ early TC 336 equipped cars. No Contest. Of course, with all those relay levers, bushings and rod ends, it can also get very sloppy if you don't take care of it.


The late S2/ early TC had larger-diameter longitudinal shift tubes and a heavier lateral link with Heim (rose) joints. I am not convinced that these modifications addressed the real problems.


>After tweaking the linkage on my S2, moving the pivot point up 1.5 in. on the shift lever,

Did that. Actually made a new lever to replace the mangled stocker. The purists among you don't want to know how I made it, but I did it without machine tools.


>replacing the rubber ball pivot with a metal-to-metal spherical bearing


Got mine for about 3 dollars after being quoted $50 plus machining at other places. Check your local bearing places for a "self-aligning bearing".


>and machining a custom shoulder bolt for the lower pivot,


Tim did the best you could hope for with the original design, but the design there stinks.


>I've also tried Phil Eithier's


Hey, watch your spelling there, Mr. Angle. :-) :-) :-)


>S2 with a more extensively modified linkage, and it's about as tight as you can get. Snick-snick. Like a toggle switch.

Thanks. It's nice to hear that the work is appreciated. I do not have the later, larger-tube S2 setup. I am not convinced it helps that much. There are three things I changed.


One: The rubber shift ball was toast. Tim is right, a metal one is better. I was going to leave the pattern the same as stock, but ran into angle problems with the ball joint, so I made the bottom of the shift lever longer to shrink the pattern. I like the results, although some other folks (not Tim!) dislike the high effort.


Two: At the rear, where the lateral link attaches to the gearbox, Colin's lads used a rubber bushing. Steve Valin showed me how he put a Heim joint in there on an angle bracket. Solid.


Three: The Achilles' Heel of the system. Here is what I wrote about it when I was working on the car:

======
>If the problem is inside the transaxle, there isn't a big advantage between one or the other shifter mechanisms; however, they all share the same disadvantage... they're Renault. I've driven a LeCar, Fuego, Alliance, R-17, three S2 'ropas & four Twin Cams and they all felt the same. They shift in their own sweet time and won't be rushed. That's a side effect of the baulk ring synchro and there isn't a whole lot you can do to effect a magnificent transformation. It never will shift like an Elan or Seven


======
An illustrated guide to re-engineering the worst part of a Europa gearchange without special tools: (Hang in there, you have not seen all this yet). I have figured out the main problem with the gearchange. I put in a heim joint to fix the problems with the departed rubber bushing on the top of the gearbox, thanks to Steve Valin's fine advice. But that is not the real problem. Be sure you have a non-proportional font so the ASCII graphics will look OK. View, from car left, of original shifter tube:

___________________________________________________
/ /rear of car ->

| O | forward shift tube /

\_________________________________________________\
^ tubing flattens here

^ bulkhead inside existing clevis

^ factory hole where bolt goes through clevis and captures

the tang on the factory shift lever


View from above:

_____________________________
--------------------- / rear of car ->

| forward shift tube /

---------------------___________________________\
Remove old clevis ^

back to bulkhead --->|


Pop-rivet, then weld, the larger clevis to the bulkhead. Top view:

_______________
\
|
|\ <- gusset welded between the shift tube and clevis.

| \

| \

| \______________________________

|---- / to rear of car ->

XXX < pop-rivets to hold pieces for welding

|----_____________________________\
| /

| / weld all around the rectangular bulkheaded

| / section of tube where it meets the new clevis

|/
|
_______________/

                       
                       
                       

||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||
|||||/ \||||||

||||| |||||| < top view of aluminum block

|||||\_/|||||| vertical through hole is tapped for 1/2-NC

|||||||||||||| New 1/2" shift lever is threaded to match.

||||||||||||||
|||||| |||||||

                       
                       


^ hole in each side tapped for 1/4-20-NC bolt


top view of the block and clevis as assembled


______|________
| \

                           

|||||||||||||| |\

|||||||||||||| | \

|||||||||||||| | \

|||||||||||||| | \______________________

|||||/ \|||||| |---- / to rear of car ->

||||| |||||| | /

|||||\_/|||||| |----____________________\

|||||||||||||| | /

|||||||||||||| | /

|||||||||||||| | /

|||||||||||||| |/

                           


______|________/
|
^ 1/4-20 bolt through bearing, see detail below


enlarged top view of bearing area:

[2 new messages! Most recent from Bob Stewart]


enlarged top view of bearing area:


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||BBB|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||BBB|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||BBB|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||< aluminum block

||||||||||||||||||||||||BBB|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||BBB|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________ XXXXXBBBXXXXX ______________________


__________________|XXXXXBBBXXXXX|______________________ < clevis

XXXXXBBBXXXXX < ball-bearing assembly

BBBBBBB
BBBBBBB < 1/4-20 bolt, unthreaded portion inside

bearing and tightened into tapped hole

aluminum block. Use LocTite.


The inside race of the bearing is longer than the outside race, so the bearing does not bind on the block or the bolt head. Don't space the bearing any further from the block, as you don't want the clevis to slip inside it. The clevis will not fall off the outside of the bearing because the clevis will hit the block on the other side first. Phil Ethier
==========

>Phil,>Thanks for your archive of shift linkage stuff. I've got a question, can you remove the front-most shift tube without removing the motor?


On an S2, sure. Could be a problem on a Twink.


Remove the grille from the mouth at the front of the car. Remove the paper-board at the back of the nose cavity. There is a big rubber plug on the front of the chassis frame. Yank it out.


Go under the car, in front of the engine, and disassemble the rear of the front-most shift tube. If the bellows still exists, shove it into the chassis frame "box".


Go inside the cockpit. Remove the armrest on the top of the chassis frame "box". Stick your arm in the oval hole and remove the bolt that connects the shift lever to the front-most shift tube. Now remove the shift lever from the car by taking apart the four bolts which sandwich the shift-lever ball joint into the frame.


Pick up the now-loose front-most shift tube and move it forward until it fits through the holes in the front of the frame. Be careful not to catch the tee on the hole at the back of the frame. Get out of the car go to the nose cavity. grab the front-most shift tube and guide it out of the chassis frame and on forward through the mouth. Phil pethier@isd.net
http://www.visi.com/mac/

Kiyoshi Hamai <khamai@tsoft.com> Subject: Re: Europa Progress (U) Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 22:25:44 -0700
Phil Either gear shift article also appears on the GGLC web site under Tech>Europa with redrawn illustrations. Warning, it was just posted and we still seem to be having a couple of bugs in getting the drawings to download (should have it fixed shortly).
http://www.gglotus.org

TRANSMISSION, Freeing clutch

I've broken them loose a bunch of times. Start the car up, get it warm. Now get a clear space- put it in gear, hold the clutch down. Start the car, it will start to move right away. Keep holding the clutch pedal down, get up to 15mph or so, and STAND! on the brakes (still holding the clutch down). This will usually brake it loose. You could go a bit faster if you need to, but I'd be pretty careful about it. Mark

If the engine is "in pieces", the clutch is that round thing bolted to the flywheel! Seriously, I would include a clutch, pressure plate and throw-out bearing in the rebuild of any vehicle that's been standing 25 years in a field. . . . better now that after the body is back on. Tony

I just got done with pulling the trans off a car alone and put it back on alone wasn't bad. If the thing is in pieces already it couldn't take any more than an hour to pull the trans off the engine. Then 6 bolts to remove the clutch and 6 more to remove the flywheel for refacing. I listened to the listers suggestions and am sure glad I did. Jerry Rein

I would include a clutch, pressure plate and throw-out bearing in the rebuild of any vehicle that's been standing 25 years in a field. . . . better now that after the body is back on. Tony

sometimes a thin kitchen knife thru the timing mark opening (have someone depress the clutch while you try to get the knife between flywheel and clutch disk) works. If you get the clutch moved to where you can get thru. davea@sgi.com

I'm not really advocating this as I really think you should pull the trans, BUT: there is a 'window' through the bell housing used to check clutch clearance on the right hand side up high. You should be able to rotate the flywheel and find three places where you can see the disk edge through an opening in the pressure plate. These openings are used to insert a feeler gauge and check clutch clearance. One could slide a paint scraper blade in at that point and try to separate the clutch from the flywheel, but it will probably scrape the flywheel face. The clutch pedal would need to be pressed during this operation. At least you should be able to tell if the clutch pedal is even pulling the pressure plate back as that is probably in doubt. When the clutch is released it should be possible to slide .050 worth of feeler gauge between the flywheel and disk. Mark MarKell

I just had my engine out for the purpose of replacing the water pump (73 Europa). If your engine is already in pieces taking the transmission off isn't any big deal. You might find out that the throwout bearing is shot also...... . The thread from the other day said that someone needed a pilot tool for the clutch disk and they got one. I have one if you need to borrow one also. Now that my engine is back inside the car, it's now time to get the air conditioning to work...... Good Luck Gordon

TRANSMISSION, Linkage

The URL for the Europa linkage that I have and really like. http://www.talbotco.com/lotus_cat.htm. That will take you to the lotus parts catalog. Mark Hollingsworth

TRANSMISSION, Removal

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Used spellchequer for sale(Europa) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 09:40:18 –0700 The gearbox cannot come off the clutch housing without removing the whole works from the engine. The bolts that hold the bell housing onto the gearbox cannot all be seen from the outside, there being at least six that can only be reached from the inside of the bell housing. Please take a look at http://www.micro-engineering.com/clutch2.jpg for a photo of the inside. (This photo also shows the sequence for removing/replacing the throwout bearing. Some have tried to remove the operating fork for this operation which is not to be done!) The other items I can't comment on as I'm not that familiar with the TC linkages.


As you've surmised by other listers, you must remove the bellhousing as it bolts to the transaxle from the inside. It also serves as the front of the transmission, with gasket and all, so it is best to remove the whole thing and put it on the bench. You should replace the input shaft seal while you are at it also, check the throwout bearing, and the clutch shaft bearings for wear.


The speedometer on the 365 and 352 is a funny affair, I've never seen anything like it. The end of the speedo cable housing fits into a plastic/nylon sleeve. The sleeve holds the speedo gear and seal also. So you can remove just the speedo sleeve/cable if you only back out the holding bolt so far, or remove the whole gear assembly if you pull out the holding bolt allowing the nylon sleeve to come out also. Once you have it all out, you'll see what I mean. The cable fits into the gear with a square fit, and should pull out easily, unless it has been damaged in some way, or rusted in.


Yes, the pin is all you should have unless the PO used loctite or something else to glue it on. Try attaching a slap hammer or something on the ujoint and gently try to tap it out. Don't use too much force as the aluminum housing is delicate. You may have to heat it a little too. Replace the shaft seal also, and if in there, the shaft bearing which causes the seal to leak due to wear. I think it is a bronze bearing which is pressed in. There is an article in the Lotus Ltd Europa manual which describes making a new shaft if yours is worn. Hope this Helps..Jerry Rude Prather CA

TRANSMISSION, Reverse lockout

I finally finished the drawing for the reverse lockout that I am using in my TC Special. There were several of you who expressed interest, but I have forgotten who. I will be glad to forward the drawing if interested. Also, it is on the group website at: http://www.egroups.com/files/lotuseuropa/5speedReverseLockout/Dimensional+Drawing.jpg
Any comments would be welcome. Tom Rollins
trollins@ntcs-inc.com

TRANSMISSION, Seals

SJMARCY@aol.com FWIW what Renault seems to have done in the long run is to seal directly against the shaft, which is slightly extended in length. The NG3 threaded adjuster has an o-ring around the OD to seal the threads and a normal oil seal with a spring loaded lip backed up by a thin metal splash plate in the behind-the-bearing area. And the seal as a lip which extends outward to surround the yoke input OD. My 336 seamed to have a small leak from where the splined seal disc with o-ring met the splines. Maybe a slightly thicker modern material 0-ring would help.

The nuts need to be removed, the seal is pressed into the nut. Mark the nut and count the turns out, this nut also adjusts perload tension on the output shaft bearings and adjusts the back lash on the ring and pinion gears, these settings are critical, mall adjustments will cause premature failure. Jerry had my transaxel apart and adjusted Rein

Yes, you need to remove the nut. The seal fits inside of the nut. After removing the nut, drain enough oil so that the level is below the output shaft. With no oil draining out, you will have a clear unobstucted view to guide the seal in. This is important. Don't let the other wheel free hang. This will make the diff gear on the open be cocked. Put the other wheel on the ground gently, so that the open driveshaft is properly centered. This way, you can screw in the nut, and guide the lip with a SOFT instrument, if necessary. If the diff is cocked, the seal will go in off center, and you will cut the seal. A real bummer. Please excuse my feable attempt to explain this. But I hope you get the idea. Put teflon tape, or a slight smear of silicon on the threads of the nut. The threads can be another point of leakage. After doing this, you still may have some leakage. That could be coming from the O-ring on the shaft. These are a bit trickier to replace. Doing all this, you might have no leaks for a few years. Then it could begin to leak again. If you have only a small leak, I'd live with it. So it comes down to your tolerance level. I've been many a show winner with a wet transmission. Paul A. Zielinski

As I recall the "nut" is the seal. After removing the pin from the axle stub and making sure the stub is free and moves, proceed to either remove drive shaft or make room to slide stub off - on the Renaults you could get the stub off without removing the shaft. Then special tool removed nut/seal - replace after being sure threads on nut have very light coating of sealer - or threads will leak. Dave

The output shaft and sun gear assembly Does Not have a port drilled into it to allow lube oil to get from the inside of the trans to the hole for the spirol pin, I had my trans apart and replaced the left shaft gear assembly. It sounds like you are in for a tear apart to remove the old gasket/sealer to correct the leaks. I got hylomar from R&D did a good job, if you get something localy make sure you get a gasket maker compound not gasket sealer
not the same stuff. Jerry (had mine apart and used the wrong stuff and had to take it out and apart again) Rein

TRANSMISSION, Shift linkage

JerTigger@aol.com Subject: Re: It runs, It moves, It shifts Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 15:57:14 EDT The shift linkage feels good. At the front I drilled out the lever and fork to 1/2 inch and installed a 3/8 by 1/2 bronze bushing in place of the plastic ones, use a 3/8 bolt with lock nut to snug it down and eliminate any side play. Mid point the balljoint was sliding on the shaft next to the universal joint, punch the shaft and set the balljoint with lock tight, where it attaches to side of gear box in put in new sleeve and bushings. At rear removed the roll pin, drilled shifter shaft and universal joint holes out to 5/16 made a saw cut to split the universal joint where it slides onto shifter shaft grade 8 bolt and lock nut through hole. ground off two turns off the reverse indent spring,

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> If you really want to fix your gearchange problems, get the complete linkage from Ardvaark International. I have one on my Europa, it is wonderful! I've never driven a Europa that shifted better. It is still firm, rather than light- but very very short throws and no missed shifts every. Reverse is a bit stiff too, but easy to find. They are not cheap, but very well made and make shifting like a whole new thing on the Europa.

The shift linkage feels good. At the front I drilled out the lever and fork to 1/2 inch and installed a 3/8 by 1/2 bronze bushing in place of the plastic ones, use a 3/8 bolt with lock nut to snug it down and eliminate any side play. \ mid point the balljoint was sliding on the shaft next to the universal joint, punch the shaft and set the balljoint with lock tight, where it attaches to side of gear box in put in new sleeve and bushings at rear removed the roll pin, drilled shifter shaft and universal joint holes out to 5/16 made a saw cut to split the universal joint where it slides onto shifter shaft grade 8 bolt and lock nut through hole. ground off two turns off the reverse indent spring, Jerry Rein

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> The Ardvaark Int. shift linkage will not work with the Twinks. But they do have some other stuff you may be interested in, Cibie lamps among them. www.talbotco.com

From: ken.landaiche@nokia.com It _might_ just be the reverse detent mechanism. That ball/cam arrangement is a bit flimsily screwed to the back of the box and provides all of the feel of the H pattern.
-----Original Message-----
From: EXT
jertigger2@cs.com [mailto:jertigger2@cs.com] I took my Europa TC to work today, had to, the other car is sick. The real problem--- ( 352 4 speed) I went from sort of an H shifting pattern to serious slop. I can’t get into reverse without shutting off the engine and moving shifter rod in back of the trans.

marc j <jrmsn@goodnet.com> If you can shift the car at the transmission, but not from the shift level you have a shift linkage problem. The lever runs out of movement too soon. if you take up play in the linkage, then what the linkage does at the transmission follow the lever. I replaced the rubber/metal brushing at the heim joint point in the linkage with a snug fitting delrin brushing I made. Plus make sure the shafts of the linkage turn together. (pins are
not broken).

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Sounds like a torque induced failure. I would start looking at the u-joint pins to see if the loctite has slipped and a pin has sheared. Then check the rear u-joint to transmission shifter rod to see if that is slipping/broken. I can't recall if you did the bolt modification in the rear or if you retained the original roll pin setup.

"David T. Pucillo" <pucho@goodnet.com> Subject: TC shifter Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 10:24:19 –0700 My suggestion regarding your shifter slop is to check the two roll pins in each of the longitudinal links where they each connect at the heim joint. If you can rotate either of the links at all without the entire assembly moving, then you have a broken roll pin.

SVeris@aol.com Subject: Re: Europa Shifter Problem Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:35:50 EST Can't remember, is your car a Renault or Twincam? The problem you describe for Renault powered vehicles most often stems from the cross-throw linkage located at the firewall. One of the heim joint shafts usually snaps in two, causing initial "slop" or looseness , but a car that can still be shifted. This probably depends on which one breaks. If another one goes, you have to shift with the car stationary, rear bonnet raised, then, a rolling start/pop the clutch to limp home. The biggest problem I had was accessing the broken part. Small hands and excellent manual dexterity, help, but there's just not much room. I replaced my broken joint with one from another complete shift linkage assembly [from a wreck], so I can't supply a part#/source/exact size or manufacturer of the heim joint. Maybe Bean, JAE, or R&D? Hope this helps. Good luck! I also had the misfortune to break the cross throw shaft at the rear of the transaxle one time -- it snapped right in half when my wife was driving -- and she came home walking. Fortunately, it can be removed without splitting the case. The "good" news is that it's a Renault part and was only several hundred dollars in 1982. The bad news at the time was that it had been backordered for years, and no one knew if it would ever be manufactured again. The really good news: it's a straight piece of cylindrical bar stock with a couple of slots, an undercut, and a drilled hole as I recall -- nothing more. The Toolroom Supervisor where I was working made it up for me in about 20 minutes one morning.

TRANSMISSION, Throwout bearing

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Don't even think about removing the pins. It's not the way to remove the throwout bearing. Those pins are horrible to get out and back in and totally unnecessary! The throwout bearing will slip off the shaft easily if the fork is rotated past the 'apparent' stop. The trick is to pull the cable arm outwards (no it won't break) just enough so it can swing forward past the bell housing edge. That will release the bearing inside. Take a look at the following links for a picture sequence showing three stages of removal. As they say, "assembly is the reverse procedure". http://www.micro-engineering.com/clutch1.jpg and http://www.micro-engineering.com/clutch2.jpg . Don't worry that your clutch doesn't quite look like this one as this is the 'cheap clutch conversion' that allows you to eliminate the 200D quill plate.

Removing these is really trivial. Removing the pins is only needed if you wish to replace the actuating arm bushing in the bell housing. I've never seen enough wear to warrant that. HOWEVER, if you were to remove the arm you would find it rather easy to re-assemble it 180 degrees out and turn it into a 'pusher' compatible with a hydraulic clutch cylinder instead of a 'puller' compatible with cables. Redrilling the holes allows one to set the arm position where it's most convenient as well. Of course there's then the problem of a master cylinder mount...

TRIM, Adhesive tape

jon rosner <jon@lotustrek.com> Subject: 3M trim adhesives Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 11:41:52 –0700 Someone posted a notice a while back asking about adhesives used by manufacturers to adhere trim pieces to the exterior and interior of new cars. Since my brother runs a polymer research lab for 3M in Austin I was able to ask him for the information.


3M Molding Tape

roll 7/8in by 5 ft

For: int trim panels, bdy side moldings, rockr panels, emblem cladding

part # 03615

3M Automotive Attachment Tape

roll 1/2in by 60 in

For: veh body side moldings, trim and emblems

part # 03609NA

3M Plastic Emblem and Trim Adhesive

tube 1 fl oz

For: bonding mirror, repair vinyl molding, int trim, plastic and metal

ornaments
part # 03601

TRIM, Windshield

"Rude, Gerald" <GDR1@pge.com> Subject: Re: (U) Burned Trim? Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:06:16 –0700 The cover apparently trapped moisture under it, and the trim soaked it up. The change in color is the trim rusting!! Options: 1) put in new trim... get a glass man to do it, trim is expensive. I just had mine done, Bean has the trim, and probably R&D. The window has to come out as the window locks into the trim. Be careful removing the corner pieces they are really thin aluminum. 2) Paint the darn stuff. I haven't tried that, but perhaps scuffing it up and painting with a silver paint and then with a clear would work?? Or paint it a semi flat black would be better, make it look like rubber?

UNSUBSCRIBE

How To Unsubscribe

*******************
To unsubscribe from this service you must first purchase a Craft-O-Matic Adjustable Subscription Cancellation Unit. The unit can be obtained from most hardware stores and dental clinics. Be sure to obtain the proper permits to operate the unit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Food and Drug Administration in Washington D.C. USA. Be sure to carefully unpack the kit and place each component in its accompanying mesh safety bag. Mount the Pershing DF4 mesinator on top of the perforated Gerring Mach 77 refibulator and attach them using the eight-millimeter torque fork. Be sure that the refibulator is mounted at a 66 degree angle and properly dispersed so that it is flush with the curved section of the Pyrex thistle tube. Place the four sections of the
> triangular separation gear into the posture cylinder and lock them into place using the band aid adhesive strip. Insert the wiggling pin into the wobbling hole, making sure that it seated correctly. Place the D cell battery and the eleven 9 volt batteries in the power chamber. The device should be calibrated before operation using the optional digital corkscrew accessory pack prior to operation. Insert the digital corkscrew through the electronic combustion service chamber using caution not to touch the reinforced tungsten igniter control module and quickly turn the inverter drive to 28.6 degrees. Turn the Craft-O-Matic Adjustable Subscription Cancellation Unit upside down and hit the bottom plate with a 48-ounce ball-peen hammer while shaking the unit vigorously. Force open the door to the incineration valve compartment and set the pressure gauge to 719 psi. Close the door and seal it shut with duct tape. The unit should now be properly calibrated and ready to use. Before activating the Craft-O-Matic Adjustable Subscription Cancellation Unit, you must first elevate it to a height of 229 feet above sea level to insure that the unit receives the proper oxygen level and barometric pressure. Point the aerial to 17 degrees north by northeast to within the parameters of the Telstar GS-2 weather satellite and apply pressure to the wing shaft on the southern most section of the modular accelerator. Using the special ratchet adapter supplied with the unit, rotate the heater core to the "on" position. The "on" position has been obtained when the green light begins to flash, signifying that the red light is about to go off. Once the red light is off, flip the toggle switch labeled "ON/OFF" to the "ON" position and count to 47 before logging on to the system. Logon using your username and password and wait for the prompt. Once prompted you must check the box with the appropriate action you wish to take and then press the pressure release button and turn off the compressor while turning the hand crank at 231 meters per minute. Next, press control, alt, delete, caps lock, shift, number lock, escape and tab simultaneously. Press enter. You will have one second to complete the procedure. If you fail to respond in the time limit allowed, simply purchase a new Craft-O-Matic Adjustable Subscription Cancellation Unit and start from the beginning. Please remember that this is the only way we will accept for you to unsubscribe from this service. We have made every attempt to simplify the procedure for your convenience. Failure to comply with the unsubscribe policy will result in immediate termination of your subscription so please follow the above directions closely.

VENTILATION, Fan replacement

>Anyone have an easy replacement solution for the ventilation fan motor on a 1970 Europa S2 (with the squirrel cage)?


You can buy replacements fans from Aardvark. They're not exact, but they're close, and are probably better quality than original. Go to
http://www.talbotco.com/cat.htm, click on the 'Body' link, and look for "Fresh air fan". Good luck, Mark

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> There's nothing THAT unusual about that motor to account for that price. Sounds like they just don't want to deal with it. Barring that, there are a number of similar squirrel-cage alternatives from VW's etc. I can probably help you with. I don't think the original Smith's is that hard to purchase used, but I'm not sure on that one. Let me know.

"Christopher H.Kang, MD" <chkangmd@qnis.net> Subject: europa blower fan('72) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 20:54:54-0700 I'm feeling pretty smug after finding a replacement motor/fan blade at the local self service wrecking yard from a '76 MG midget for only $18 vs $90 from the Moss Motors Catalog. The fan was made from a black colored plastic material that looks more weather resistant and the motor leads had water resistant connectors. It would be a good idea to look at your fan blades to see if they are cracking/weathered. I also noted that the fan motor from a XJ Jaguar sedan looked like it would fit but the blade was too wide.


VIN

2) I took a look at the complete serial number, which is 7311.4153R. That means that the car was made in '73 right?


Car was built Nov '73 (most cars in the US built in Nov of a year are considered in the next model year. Not so with Lotus.
The GGLC site has a letter that explains this. A number of folks have used this letter in Calif. to get their "74" Europas exempt from smog inspections.

7/9/99 2677R kmccormick@cgsinc.com

3642R Warren R. Hartenstine whartenstine@earthlink.net

6/17/99 4045R Al Hostetter honor@erinet.com

WEB SITES

"Richard Clifton" <richard.clifton@bigfoot.com > Subject: Useful Web Site Date: Tue, 20 Apr 99 16:20:00 +0100 I have stumbled upon what appears to be quite a useful web site. It has a list of the majority of the British Lotus specialists (not dealers) along with entries from Belgium and USA plus quite a lot of other interesting Classic Car stuff: http://www.ccdata.com/TKRZ-3WKLCL.htm

http://www.banks-europa.co.uk/

xtec@primenet.com> MAILING LIST ARCHIVES -- Now on the web Thu, 18 Mar 1999 16:18:51 -0700 (MST)
I've started a simple Mailing List Archive on the web. First and foremost, I am missing a lot of the digests. The ones that I am missing are as follows:


volume 1 – all

volume 2 - 001-322, 417

volume 3 - 371, 650-714


If you have any of these digests, please email them to
lance.johnson@asu.edu. All the files, except for the list of missing digests, are ZIP files. You will need PKZIP or WinZIP to decompress them. The URL: www.public.asu.edu/~lancej/lotus/archive. If you have any comments or suggestions, please email me at lance.johnson@asu.edu. Let me know if there is any problems!

While doing a search on automotive art, I uncovered a print of a JPS Europa Print. It can be found at the bottom of the webpage at http://justbmws.com/bmw_art/. I do not know this person, company, yada, yada, yada... jeff

*****Lotus Classified Ads***** http://idt.net/~lotusf1/classified.htm

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> Subject: Europa mailing list Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 19:40:58 –0500 To subscribe to the Lotus Europa list, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com/subscribe/lotuseuropa

http://www.gglotus.org/ggpart/europacr.html

http://www.fastcorner.com/lotus/

Bill Bird <BirdB@war.wyeth.com> Subject: Screensaver ready for download Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 04:48:24 –0400 The screensaver is 3MB in size which considering the number of images I was sent that were over 1MB in size for each image is a miracle of compression technology. It can be downloaded as an executable file. It has been virus checked before loading onto the web so is safe for you to download from http://www.photoalbum.co.uk/ssaver.htm. As this is a friends commercial site (who let me use the software) can I ask you not to put the screen saver onto the web on other web sites, but please feel free to provide a link to this site if you wish.

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Subject: Lotus bibliography updated Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 14:54:50 +0100 My bibliography of Lotus cars has just been updated. It now lists 261 books about the history of the company, the personalities involved, and technical details, including workshop manuals; plus 86 official workshop manuals, parts books and handbooks from Lotus and 22 videos. http://www.mikecauser.org/lotus/biblio

http://www.angelfire.com/al/europa

Mike Causer <mikec@mikecauser.org> Subject: Web site with part cross reference database (maybe) Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 17:20:35 +0100 It is quite possible that this web site has a parts cross reference for Elan and Europa. All I've managed to get out of it is a lot of OTT graphics, but it may be worth a try.....http://www.weservedata.ch/lotuseuropa/

McMaster-Carr is worth a look. You can order single quantity bolts from their website http://www.mcmaster.com

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> We've just re-furbished the Club Lotus Northwest website and changed it's location to http://www.micro-engineering.com/CLNW . There are some recent photos from the WCLM at Thunderhill. I'd like some folks with browsers other than Microsoft or Netscape to check it out and let me know if there are problems with it.

dan.morrison@autodesk.com Here is a link that has hub-centric rings for sale. It may be helpful if you can find the correct sizes listed in their chart. Let us know if anything looks like it will work.

http://www.mackinindustries.com/WheelMate/hub_centric/

You da man. Its out there. First topical FAQ type info. (I converted it to html --- send me a refresh anytime). www.gglotus.org===>tech sect. ===>Europa===>ALPHABETICAL EUROPA INFORMATION from "mailing list"- compiled by Warren Hartenstine.

Karl-Franz Marquez <karlfranz@bol.net> Subject: Official Lotus Web Site has been updated. Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 08:02:54 –0400 Check it out at: http://www.lotuscars.co.uk/

"Ron Arnold" <arnoldr@magicnet.net> Subject: My Europa & Elan M100 site Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:38:21 –0400 Please take a quick look at my modest web site. I have a few small pictures of both of my Lotuses, along with some quick text. I did the text in between meetings, so please be kind. I'll get it right someday. Especially the Europa text - it needs work. It's at: http://www.magicnet.net/~arnoldr. Don't expect much, as this is the first attempt. At least no external plug-ins are required, and there are absolutely none of the fine gif animations that are so very popular ;-)

"Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> Subject: Some new websites Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:42:39 -0700 I've just finished modifying the Club Lotus North West website and adding one of my own (only partially complete). Tried to eliminate the slow download stuff as much as practical per previous comments from the list. Please send comments off-list to mailto:Mark@micro-engineering.com. CLNW is at http://www.micro-engineering.com/CLNW. Mine is at http://www.micro-engineering.com/Type46.

"Tony Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net> Subject: Fw: Lotus Links Directory Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:19:04 -0500
The Netscape sponsored "Open Directory Project" list of Lotus websites now includes, among others:
22 Esprit sites 12 Europa sites 27 Parts, Sales & Service sites 2 M100 sites 12 60s & 70s Elan sites. . . plus lots of others. Check it out at:
http://dmoz.org/Recreation/Autos/Makers/Lotus/.

spockplug@email.com Jay’s Garage: Ask Jay As an S4 owner, I have found some great auto advice through the "Jay’s Garage" area of the Tonight Show site. I know it has been a while since Jay earned his living as a mechanic, but I think he has a team of auto pros working with him to answer visitor questions. There is also some very cool 3D technology on the site, specifically the "Virtual Jay" area of http://www.nbc.com/tonightshow/.

"Boyle, Bryan D, GOVMK" <bdboyle@att.com> Subject: New Hope auto show Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:07:08 -0400
more information:
http://www.newhopeautoshow.org/ or email newhopeautoshow@hotmail.com

Crete20@aol.com from what I’m finding there is gonna be a pretty big car show and seems like there will be a Philadelphia lotus gathering. (http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/speedway/1398/ it going to be the 14 and 15th of august and supposedly an amazing show. e-mail me for more info if u would like try...( www.newhopeautoshow.org/ )

France:

http://www.oceanet.tm.fr/clf/

Holland:

Lotus Club Holland

KIJCKERWEG 51

2678 AB DE LIER

+31 1745 18548

Secretary: J. van der Mout


Denmark:

Lotus Klub Danmark

c/o Ove J. Bladt (President)

Kastanievaenget 4

6000 Kolding

Denmark
+45 75531580

Lotus Car Club of Sweden has a list of cars for sale, I think you'll find Europas there every now and then. Check out http://www.autosite.se/lotus

http://www.sigsolutions.com/tlotus/ >Tony's Rotary Lotus Europa

GoatCrapp@aol.com hey I just came across the story of that europa-with-the-ferrari-dino-skin that got a lot of attention a few years ago - http://home.freeuk.net/david.mirylees/the_dino.htm.

http://LotusElan.net

http://www.onelist.com/viewarchive.cgi?listname=lotuseuropa

ClassMaker@aol.com Welcome! Go to www.onelist.com and do the member login, then go to the europa list area and check out the directory. You can add details about yourself while you are there.

"Le Cap Motorcycle Hire" <lecap@dockside.co.za> Hi Joseph, Have a look at www.sigsolutions.com/tlotus/ It's exactly what you need! See the following website for a Europa/Mazda conversion.

Peter M. Blackford <pmbsab@naples.infi.net> Re: [lotuseuropa] Europa plans & questions Wed, 28 Jul 1999 18:27:19 –0400 Kroil - try http://www.kanolabs.com

ClassMaker@aol.com > P.S. How do I get back issues of the Lotuseuropa digest? Go to www.onelist.com, login with your email address and a password. Select the "My OneList" Tab (at the top) and click on [lotuseuropa]. Then visit the "messages" page by clicking on "messages" (left side). You can pull up daily archives, do searches, and read whatever. PS: You don't have to login -- if you like, go directly there via AHREF="http://www.onelist.com/viewarchive.cgi?listname=lotus4seaters">http://www.onelist.com/viewarchive.cgi?listname=lotuseuropa</A>

Al Hostettler" <honor@erinet.com> Thanks to Joel Farber, the list has been updated. I hope I did not miss anyone. It was not on purpose. The following is the link to it: http://www.best.com/~gglotus/gglink/europa.htm Al

Hostettler 4045R

Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> I finally finished my Europa, after 5 or six years of working on it.
Body off, frame, most everything. I don't have the money to rebuild the original engine yet, so it is a stock R-16 engine. Check my web site for photos of it. I do need to add some info with it on the road.
http://www.olympus.net/personal/markh/lotus.htm

From: lotusf1@idt.net Try: http://www.lotuswebshop.com and click on the "Classifieds" link. There may not
be any there now but there have been and new listings are always coming in...

See my progress at http://home.c2i.net/bhaverst/progress.htm Bjorn-Anders, Norway

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> It's up! (The site of course.) There are 4 pages. You must click from 1 to 4, like reading a book. That's the way that I wanted it. t you enjoy! http://home.sprintmail.com/~paulzielinski

rgvivace@aol.com Below is the website for "Marc's Lotus Europa" which is a *very* nice white Europa Special with gold pinstripes as you describe, with Arizona plates. www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn/lotus.html

ClassMaker@aol.com If you are looking for that super-tidy yellow Europa, with all those nifty restoration detail pictures, I think you are looking for John Abbott's site. Great story and photos...


John D. Abbott
Amarillo, Texas
'71 Europa S-2 Hermes
http://users.arn.net/~jdaarch/
West Texas Region SCCA
http://members.amaonline.com/wtrscca/

paul a zielinski <paulzielinski@juno.com> For a nice tyre calculator on the WEB, go to the "Modern ELAN " Web Site at www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

marc j <jrmsn@goodnet.com> I found this Page: "Excellent resources for any automotive enthusiast" @
http://www.seansa4page.com/resource/autotech.html

I've finally taken time to put up a homepage on my Europa. Take a look at http://home.c2i.net/bhaverst. Tell me if you like it, and give me suggestions for improvement. Bjorn-Anders – Norway

I've put together a simple page with scans of Europa sales literature. One piece is a reprint of a canadian car magazine which compares the Elan to the Europa and favors the latter! http://pages.infinit.net/europe/. A review of serial numbers and dates at the europa registry web site of Daniel Herreo kind of supports that
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dherrero/numchassis2.htm Thanks for comments and further discussions. Jean Giroux - St-Augustin, Québec, Canada

From: rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> Try http://www.jaeparts.com/jaehome.html

If you are still hesitating concerning the colour of your Europa, see my web page showing original colours :
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dherrero/couleurs.htm

Dunno if this is the site you are thinking of, but http://www.enginemusic.com has a nice selection of classic sounds. Only one Europa clip, though...a '67 S1 IIRC. Aaron Hines '73 Lotus Europa Special #4153R Boone, NC USA '79 MGB "daily driver" AIM: europa4153r www.geocities.com/aaronhines

The URL for the Europa linkage that I have and really like. http://www.talbotco.com/lotus_cat.htm. That will take you to the lotus parts catalog. Mark Hollingsworth

For those interested and following some more or less recent discussions on this list, I have added a page dedicated to the JPS Europa on my website. http://perso.club-internet.fr/dherrero/jps.htm Every comment is welcome. Daniel Herrero EUROPE S2 1968 - 54/0724

Pictures of my pride-and-joy can be found at: http://members.aol.com/jpritch706/Europa_special.htm Julian
Europa Special 73/2880Q

From: "Bennett, Stephen" <Stephen.Bennett@fid-intl.com> Subject: Re: F1 games on the internet Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:40:34 –0000 Try this out.............http://www.rte.ie/grandprix/fantasy/index.html

From: "simon coleman" <simonc@mhie.ac.uk> I would strongly recommend joining Club Lotus (NOT the other two clubs). You can find the website at http://www.autolinkuk.co.uk/club-lotus/index.html

Pete Canga <pete.canga@hs.utc.com> I ran across this website while surfing. New racing gears for Europa
renault gearboxes. Pretty entertaining graphics also.
http://www.gear-net.com/tohmei/product.html

marc j <jrmsn@goodnet.com> Ok, so I'm a very slow with the response. I'm very flattered. This is a link to exactly what Gene saw. Note that the car does (http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn/prettycar.jpg) not have the normal europa high nose. I raised the front one half inch from were it was, and the back by a whole inch. The front hits the ground very easily yet, but the cross winds don't steer the car as much. I don't know if that is the camber or the aero change. I just like it better. Oh, and some "discount tire shops" can balance the TC alloy wheels with a lug centering adapter. Very Kool and smooth.

Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com> Here's proof that I really DO own a Europa. Go to http://frazierspeakers.com/Europa/Europa.htm to see photos of the car. I'll add content and images to the page as time permits.

"Tom Rollins" <trollins@ntcs-inc.com> I have some pictures of the reverse lockout on the list web page. Here is the url: http://www.onelist.com/files/lotuseuropa/5speedReverseLockout/ I have yet to make a dimensional drawing, but will get one together as time allows.

a freind of my got a handa S2000, just this week. He has been teasing about what a real sports car is. I told him that if it doesn't ROAR then I Snore. He also found this link that shows the difference between new and old sports cars. http://www.s2000fans.com/faq_comparison.htm Marc rc car person http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn 74 TC Spl

I trade my TC for this any day. http://www.supercars.net/present_cars/lotus/m250/index.html marc rc car person

http://www.goodnet.com/~jrmsn 74 TC Spl

Tom Rollins took some photos at the Texas National Tour last month and has generously forwarded some .jpgs to me. I've posted several of these on my Europa page. Start at http://www.frazierspeakers.com/Europa/Europa.htm and follow the National Tour and Comparison links from there. Jay Mitchell

WHEELS

scott@alwaysthinking.com said: > Who is the new Revolution Wheel importer in Arizona that was mentioned
> on list a while back. I remember visiting their website, but can't come up with it now. Tom Tatalovich Racing Services at
www.ttrsracing.com. –Jon

FF (Cortina) wheels are on 4.25 inch bolt spread where the Europa/Triumph Spifire/GT6 is on 3.75 inch. Suppose you could have adapter plates made but probably not worth the effort. I converted my Super 7 that way but only the fronts needed the change as the rear end is a Cortina solid axle.

WHEELS, Alignment

The tech manual from Lotus Limited Club has an excellent method for setting alignment at home, sticks strings and rulers. Jerry Rein

WHEELS, Balancing

farberjf@us.ibm.com OK --- I run these option factory alloy wheels also. This is a test. Here is where you find out
if you are mentally well balanced or will go this distance to make a Europa right. There is a fair amount of effort involved so I hope these are new tires and wheel bearings..............

  1. The center wheel hole is not true and is useless in balancing on modern machines. To balance accurately you need to use a jig with fingers that hold the wheel via the lug holes. Unless damaged the lug nuts themselves are not usually the problem. (as a complete topical digression wheel studs for some Fords - Scorpios......etc. will press in and give you twice the meat as those woosy stock 3/8" studs....wont strip.........)
  2. I mount my wheels w/ inflator stem up, having marked the corresponding stud, and the hub and the caliper so all the relationships are the same. This all assumes you have measured the runnout at the hub and are within spec or all the rest of this is a waste of time.
  3. To really get the vibration out --- go somewhere where they do highspeed, on-car wheel balancing. Makes a big difference. These cars are exceptionally light in the front and are really sensitive to this.
  4. If this all is too much trouble get a set of new Panasports like 90% of the owners .......

dan.morrison@autodesk.com Here is a link that has hub-centric rings for sale. It may be helpful if you can find the correct sizes listed in their chart. Let us know if anything looks like it will work.

http://www.mackinindustries.com/WheelMate/hub_centric/

From: Tammy and Jeff <jeffandtam@inficad.com> on the Lotus list at Best.com

From: Mark Hollingsworth <markh@olympus.net> For those interested, I finally got around to putting up a photo of my Europa finished (mostly). I still have a few emblems to install, some buffing to do- the rear bumper really needs to be rechromed. Here is the direct URL: http://www.olympus.net/personal/markh/europa_finish.jpg Or, for those that haven't seen the rest of the site (including photos start to finish) go to:
http://www.olympus.net/personal/markh/lotus.htm Click on 'general Europa for lots of photos during the job; 'type 54' for some photos of the car before I started (and comparisons between the type 54 federal and type 65)

marc j <
jrmsn@goodnet.com> > From: jertigger2@cs.com Are the center holes in the Lotus brand alloy wheels true enough for balancing tires on them. ?

No, If you look real close there is a knob which can get in the way of the balancing machine. Plus I don't think they are accurate even without that problem. I've had some luck with removing wheels and remounting on hub 180 degree differently. Also you have to torque down wheel very carefully, starting with a low torque value, 10 and increasing in small increments to 50 or so.

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> I was told the wheels are "stud centric" and I had to search for a place which could do the balancing on the studs, not the hub. It wasn't too hard to find a place to do it though, let your fingers do the walking.....

Steven Shipley <shiples@home.com> Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Wheel balancing Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:41:39 –0800 Anthony Krncevic wrote: Some shops will do a high speed balancing with the wheels on the car. Cost is $20 per wheel over here in Miami.


Seconded. Balancing on the car is the only way some wheels get properly balanced. My Europa would vibrate
so badly at the front it felt like it was going to fly On car spin balance, and it's rock solid.

If the wheels on the TC are anything like my originals on the S2, with a centre cap with the lotus badge on it, then I never found anyone who could fit a stud balancing assmbly to the wheel. The centre cap can be very gently tapped out with a rubber mallet, after appropriate application of (1) release oil (2) Invective (3) obscenities (4) sacrificed cats, dogs or gerbils (the last only if cats or dogs not available) (5) Kicking any cupboard. Replacing the cap is easier, because, by and large, you'll be in a better mood. Richard (new boy)

Actually the problem with balancing the wheels on my car (which is an S2 with TC wheels) is that the hole in the "centre" of the wheel is not concentric with the OD of the wheel or with the circle through the 4 stud holes. On at least one of my wheels, it's probably a good 1/8" out. This is a notorious problem with TC wheels and there's three solutions - on car balance, off car balance with a "stud-centric" balancing machine, or the scrap bin for these wheels. Jason

Having balanced the TC special "optional alloy wheels" a signficant number of times using hub centric, stud centric and on car high speed methods.... The problem is lousy casting at the center hub. It just isnt true relative
to the wheel. I have heard of folks machining this true but I havent.... A jig that mounts throught the wheel lug holes or an on-car high speed balancing both produce good results. The little wheel cover doesnt make much difference. -Joel

Just finally got my Europa's wheels balanced on the car at Precision Frame in San Jose. They did a great job. It was quite a simple process. They attached a "vibration meter" (which I presume was a single axis accelerometer) to the suspension. The vibration meter controlled a strobe light, which had a variable sensitivity knob for different vibration levels. A white chalk line was marked on the tire. The front wheels were spun with an electric motor. The rear wheels were spun under the engine's own power (with one or the other brake adjuster tightened so that only one wheel would spin). As the tire spun and the maximum vibration was reached along the axis of the vibration meter, the strobe would flash on, indicating where to put the weights. The setting of the sensitivity knob gave a quantitative measure of out-of-balance. So now I'm thinking: this doesn't look too complicated, maybe I can do it myself. Especially at $100 for an hours worth of work. Anyone have experience with this? Anyone sell these parts? Jason Rowan

Yep. Back in 1974, I worked at an independent repair shop that specialized in BMWs. '02s were notorious for the "BMWobbly" effect of 55 mph steering wheel shimmy. It was caused in part by imbalances in the hub/rotor assembly, and it could only be fixed by balancing the wheels on the car using a strobe balancer. We bought a used Alemite strobe unit for cheap, and after that we never had any problem fixing the wobble. We also marked front wheels and hubs whenever we had to remove them, so they would go back on in the same position. Jay Mitchell

WHEELS, Centering

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> The wheels you describe, the 5.5 inch wide Lotus "Mags" (I couldn't
access the web page you noted) are "stud centric" that is they center on the studs. If there is too much play in the stud fit, they will be off center. The way to fix this is to make the wheels/hubs "hubcentric" which involves having a ring made for each wheel which will fit over the hub centering surface and fit inside the wheel tapered surface. I think Ken Landaiche had some made (If my memory serves me right --- but its a 50-50 gamble any more). I made some for the rear of my special, but haven't yet for the front (which vibrate somewhat).

"Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net> The problem is the nuts themselves. I have a full set of them. (In a box, not on my car, as I use 1/2" studs and tapered nuts on BWA Sportstar wheels.) They are unbelievably eccentric. Try turning one onto a stud sans wheel. You can SEE the runout.

dan.morrison@autodesk.com I wonder if it would be possible to press in a tapered sleeve where the shouldered lug nut fits and use tapered lugnuts. You might be able to purchase them from one of the smaller wheel manufacturers such as Keizer or Monocoque. I suppose you could have some made, but it might be costly. This way the wheels could be made stud-centric. Of course this assumes that the wheels are true in relation to the lugnut holes!


WHEELS, Finish

whs018@conrad.appstate.edu Subject: Re: OOOOPS Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 17:46:58 -0500 (EST) Paint? I would think that you scraped the clear coat or an anodized finish off. If it is the clear coat, there are many wheel shops that will re-coat the wheel. If it is anodizing that scraped off, there are also companies around that will acid-etch the old anodizing and redo the entire wheel. If your wheels are painted (maybe powder coated?) then the paint would all have to come off and be re-applied to get a nice finish. If you don't want to redo the entire wheel, buy a bottle of model car enamel that matches the color the closest and do a touch up.

WHEELS, Hubcentric

"David H Putscher" <David.H.Putscher@USA.dupont.com> Been following the hub centric wheels thread. Before anyone goes too far the Lotus wheels are not a machined taper in the back of the wheel. For the centering rings to work, you would have to machine a stepped ring in the back of the wheel to mate with the centering ring. This would still not relieve you from the problem of balancing the wheel in the first place. Basically, you need to find someone equipped to balance either on the car or using fingers in the lug holes, using the Lotus style sleeve nuts. To problem comes back every time you take the wheel off. Without a machined taper in the wheel the alignment of the wheel on the cone of the spin balancer changes every time you put it on the machine. I'm trying to evaluate if machining a taper and then the stepped centering ring will solve the problem. Problem is finding a lathe big enough to chuck up a wheel by its outer rim. Anyone know a good!!! cheap !!!!!! machinist with big tools?

From: "Mark MarKell" <Type46@micro-engineering.com> With respect to balancing, why not take an old Europa hub (there are a few that have worn out!) and have the center cut out concentric to the bolts for a centering adapter? Then the remaining problem of centering the wheel on the car should be solved by chucking up a set of lug nuts and truing up the conical sections? Not as nice as true hub centering, but practical.

From: farberjf@us.ibm.com I have considered taking old hubs and doing this but to fit the balancing machines you need "the stub axle" part which mounts in the hub bearings and you really need to be sure that they are near zero runout. I have considered fabricating a circle from aluminum -- welded to a pipe as an alternative.....drill and insert studs......again needs to be accurate. SO far only thinking........somebody wants to set up a batch order count me in.

dan.morrison@autodesk.com There was some discussion a few weeks back about how to make the Lotus alloy
wheels mount so they were centered. Since then I ordered a set of steel inserts to install in the factory alloy wheels. I am hoping this will eliminate the centering problem. I was actually ordering these for a set of wheel centers I am making, but thought I would try a set in the stock alloy wheels too. In order to install the inserts, the holes in the wheel need to be countersunk. I still need to have the machine work done (I hope it is not too cost prohibitive), but will let you know the outcome if I decide do it. In case you're interested, I ordered the inserts from Keizer Aluminum Wheels, and they were $1.25 each. I did not think that was a bad price since I have seen them elsewhere for three times that price. The inserts are split between a straight knurled part and a countersunk part. A set of 16 inserts weighs 7.9 oz, and should press in to the existing hole of the wheel after the countersinking.


(Cheezy ASCII art work)

_______________
\ /

\ /

| |

| | Knurled part

WHEEL, Lug nuts

From: JERTIGGER2@cs.com Subject: Re: [lotuseuropa] Loose lug nuts Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 13:06:54 EST

In a message dated 3/3/00 11:17:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
farberjf@us.ibm.com writes:
Be sure they arent loosening because of hub movement (rear) or loose brearings (front). Just installed new bearings in front and all is tight. Just rechecked them. I also just redid all the rear bearings and every thing is snug. You can thread chase the studs and retap the lugs (3/8" 24tpi). When that fails you can put in Mercur Scorpio studs (12mm) they will press in just fine. I have done all of the above...... I re torqued them on and will try them for a few miles then recheck new studs will be next if it keeps happening.

 

WHEEL, Refinishing

Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> I've had first hand experience in sand blasting STEEL wheels to get the
rust off. Sandblasting seems to get down to base metal quite quickly for repainting. Alloy wheels take a great deal more care. Where I live is know for it's pot holes in the spring and I have bent quite a few rims traversing them. Some can be straightened and some can not. Heavy salting of our winter roads also takes it's toll on aluminum rims. The tire / rim interface, as well as the surface, takes a severe beating becoming very ugly over the years as the wheels coating is undermined and falls off. I've used the services of a well know and respected commercial, trade only, wheel refinisher. They can do amazing things for alloy rims and a lot less expensive than purchasing a new rim. They also stock about 11,000 rims at any given day. I had found a set of vintage Cosmic wheels so I sent them to them to see what they could do. In general they check the wheel for true, wash the wheel in a cleaning solution, bead blast the areas that should be. They then place the wheel in a lathe and turn the original rims turned surface before coating the rim with the original hard wearing clear or coloured coating which they guarantee for 1 year. Unfortunately when they cleaned my old Cosmic alloy rims, it was apparent that there wasn't enough meat left on the rim for a satisfactory finish. The pitting was so deep that turning them on the lathe would not have left enough material to keep a safe rim bead thickness. At the same time they checked them to see if the rims were porous, and they were. UGH! Only solution was to seal the wheel, and paint it to match the original silver and black. They did an excellent job. It wasn't cheap but I thought it was worth it. I'd check out both establishments and see what kind and of what quality their work is and, based on that, make an educated guess on who to go with. I also found out that I could have bought a set of brand new wheels for about 2x what I paid to refinish my Cosmics.
>
> From: "gail zuskin" <
ezuskin@home.com> My alloy wheels are rather pitted and the black paint is peeling. A local sandblast guy does side work on weekends and bead blasts steel wheels for $10 ea and alloys for $15-18 because they require more time and care. He said that they won't be perfect but it should smooth and even out the look. Another place called Wheel Worx claims they will refinish the wheel and it should look like new for $75 each(ouch), the say they do restoration work like this all the time. Any experience with this type of service?

"Patrick O'Sullivan" <posulliv@eironix.com> I've used a place in Elkridge, Maryland called Ye Olde Wheel Shop (or Shoppe?). They advertise in the back of Autoweek. They straightened and refinished 5 Elan wheels and refinished 5 Europa alloys for me. The Elan wheels look pretty good, the Europa wheels look great. They were able to match the original charcoal gray metalflake finish on the Europa wheels. They clear-coated the wheels, something that didn't appear to have been done as original. It was in the $70-$80 a wheel range for the Europa wheels, including mounting and balancing new tires. The guy who did my wheels, "Spaz", was so proud of his work he even signed and dated the wheels. I haven't seen any other examples of their work, so I can't tell you if my experience was the exception or the rule.

WHEELS, Well trim

Jerry Rude <gdrude@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: Europa Wheelwell Query Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 21:22:58 -0700
Paul Gregory wrote: On my Federal TC (lhd) I just noticed the absence of a protective guard inside the passenger-side wheel well. There's one on the driver's side, but nada on the passenger side. It mounts inside the well (opposite the radiator) where four empty bolt/rivet holes now do nothing but permit water and road schmutz shed directly from the tyre to enter into the passenger footwell/doghouse. Does such a part exist, or shall I 1) fabricate one or 2) cease being fussy? If it does exist, what is it called?


Paul, are you referring to the "cardboard" pieces just aft of the wheels in the front, and in front of the rear wheels? It’s a "waterproof" cardboard material which is available at upholstery shops, used for door panels. It is simply cut out to the pattern of the "hole" and pop riveted to the fiberglass then coated with undercoating. No big deal, did all of mine in 4 hours. Nice to use large pop rivet heads, and get the backing washers on the rivets when possible. Mine took 3/16 rivets, 1/2 inch long.

"Richard Clifton" <richard.clifton@bigfoot.com> Subject: FWD:Re: Europa Wheelwell Query Date: Tue, 08 Jun 99 09:15:00 +0100 I ordered mine from a Lotus specialist who I'm pretty sure got them direct from Lotus. These weren't waterproofed cardboard but seemed more like bituminised roofing felt. Whatever they are made of it is essential to block off the gap between the side bodywork and the wheel arch in order to prevent the seat belt anchorages from being given a permanent rust inducing bath. I think, once attached using pop rivets, they should be coated in underseal and edges sealed with your choice of mastic.

If you want them to be really waterproof, cut up a Miniboggan. pethier@isd.net http://www.visi.com/mac/

WHITWORTH

"Tony Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net> Re: motor mount bolts/Whitworth Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:51:33 -0500
Mike Causer wrote of Whitworth fastener terminology: Excuse me! Whitworth _bolts_ are designated by the thread diameter just like all others, it's only the spanners (wrenches if you must) that are classified by the A/F head size -- just like UNC, UNF & all others.


MY Whitworth "spanners" aren't "head sized --just like UNC & UNF":

My Whitworth 3/8w wrench jaw opening is .71" or 18 mm instead of the .375 one would expect.

The 7/16w is .82" rather than .438

The 1/2w wrench is .92" while one would expect .500"

1/8w = .344" or 11/32"

3/16w = .445 .007" over 7/16"

1/4w = .525

5/16w = .600

3/8w = .710 or 18 mm

7/16w = .820

1/2w = .920

9/16w = 1.010

5/8w = 1.100

11/16w = 1.200

3/4w = 1.300

13/16w = 1.390

7/8w = 1.480

15/16w = 1.575

1w = 1.670

WINDOWS, Motor replacements

"Tim Engel" <tengel@isd.net> This is what I've had in my file for a long time and (like Phil) I don't recall the original source. But at least it seems to be zeroing in on a more specific period and application.

Standard Delco Type, ie, 1969 Pontiac Grand Prix.

"Betsy" <betsy@malpas12.freeserve.co.uk> I met somebody at Donnington 1999 who worked for the company which made the window motors for the Europa (and almost every other car ever). The motors do look remarkably similar to almost every other UK car wiper motor and that's because - they're all pretty much the same. Swipe the motor from most UK cars and mount it in the frame using the motor's standard mounting points. There are one or two modern motors which offer the same lift power and weigh half the amount; think of all the strain relieved on the hinge pins! Unfortunately he never came back to me with a part number. Whenever mine pack up I just clean the contacts and reinstall. That lasts 2/3 years! Matt Topham

From: John Pels <pelsfam@ev1.net> Having been involved somewhat peripherally in the salvage business during my grad school days, and having owned an S2 during that time, I can unequivocally attest to the fact that the window motors on Europas are Delco units as fitted to almost every GM power window during the mid
sixties through mid seventies. I can't speak for the actuating arm itself but without a doubt the motor is GM. I haven't checked the type 54 presently owned, but the type 65 for sure.

WINDOWS, Switches

From: rod farnsworth <farnsworthr@nucleus.com> > From: nongag <nongag@aei.ca> i have a lotus europa s2 1970 with electric windows ,but one of the switch for the window is broken now where can i found one or it came from which car?? Try an early Jaguar XJ6. the window switches seem the same.

From: Harald Freise <hfreise@fox.nstn.ca> While rummaging through Princess auto I stumbled on the identical
switches! Princess Auto #4210226 $5.99 each (were on sale for 3.99 ea.). Markings on the momentary rocker switch itself "430508C1 25 A. 12-16V DC". They even have "UP" and "DOWN" in white embossed on the rocker which sits in a chrome metal surround. I've had good luck in cleaning the old window switches to make them operable again. Princess Auto is a chain of stores in Canada in which Winnipeg is their main office. They've been around for quite some time. Small web presence at
http://www.princessauto.com/ Tel: 1-800-665-8685 Fax: 1-800-265-4212.

ken.landaiche@nokia.com Last summer I discovered (what others here already know!) that the window switches can be cleaned and reused. Mine had simply been very dirty inside. When you remove the switch, you will find a couple of plastic prongs on the back which hold it together. Watch out for the spring inside and you should be fine.

Princess Auto has more Europa style window switches available. They are NOS momentary contact, 25 amp., 2-16 vdc, SPDT. Three spade connectors & exposed return springs. Black rocker marked in white with the words "up" "down" and includes a chromed, friction fit, metal besel. They fit the Europa console exactly. They are close but not original. If you took the words off they would be very, very close to the original. Reg $3.99 (if & when they have them) on sale now $1.99 (Canadian dollars). If you need 'em & can't find 'em let me know. Harald Freise & Associates Ottawa, CANADA (613) 828-3411 hfreise@fox.nstn.ca

WINDSHIELD, Molding

"Jason Rowan" <jrowan@ix.netcom.com> Do you want original looking windshield trim, or modern looking flush black trim? If the latter, see the email copied below, which I sent to the list a few months ago. Note that on the S2, there isn't actually a windshield gasket - the chrome trim piece is just that, and the seal is actually made with an applied sealant. For backlight gaskets, I plan on trying a piece from JC Whitney, which looks like a close fit. Late last year, I decided to remove the windshield because, 1- it was leaking like a sieve, and 2-the original trim was turning a not-so-lovely rust colour from the inside out. I first called the usual sources to get some new original-looking trim, but basically I decided it was too expensive and apparently not even very original looking. So I visited the local windshield places, and found something calling flexitrim (or something like that), which is the generic rubber trim they use on lots of modern cars. I paid about $10 from a windshield place for enough for the windshield. It's intended just to cover the gap between the windshield and body opening, and so the windshield has to be flush with the body. Unfortunately, the windshield cavity in the S2 is too deep for the windshield to be flush, unless you use a strip of butyl. Butyl is available from body shop supply stores, or high end car parts stores, and comes in a ribbon about 20-odd feet long and in several thicknesses. I chose an appropriate thickness, placed the butyl in the cavity, and placed the windshield on top of the butyl. Everything was held in place with some spacers which came with the butyl. To fill the void between the butyl and the outer edge of the windshield cavity, and to hold the flexitrim to the car, I used a 3M product called ultra-fast urethane (or similar). This stuff is the most amazing sealant I've ever encountered. It's very sticky, dries fast and dries very hard. It's also great for fixing door trim. The flexitrim I got needed to be trimmed because it was intended for a thinner windshield, but that was no problem. I had to get creative for the corner pieces. I just used thin sheets of galvanized roofing metal, which I cut with tin snips and bent with a vise. A couple of coats of black rustoleum later, and they looked as good as anything on a modern car. It's now been about 3 months of parking outside in the rainy season of California, and so far, so good, all for about $30.

Jeff Hovis JeffH@biowhittaker.com I also have the black trim around my windshield and I like it. If anyone wants to see it, you can go to Aaron's site and look under Lotus Fall Festival.

Kevin Swart <kgs113@mail.a-znet.com> I've been lurking for a while and enjoying all the posts. Getting me inspired to start my project car but enough of that. I replaced my backlight gasket a number of years ago and went to a local auto window place and they sold it by the foot. It went in easily and was a one piece gasket that had a piece molded in to push into a slot that locked everything in place. Check locally maybe?

WINDSHIELD, Replacement

From: "Dan Morrison" <danmo@yahoo.com>

To: <peter@nobudgetracing.com>; <lotuseuropa@yahoogroups.com>

Subject: RE: [lotuseuropa] TC Windshield needed. Help!

Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:54 PM

I have this listing but it is not current. Glass West, 350 South Kiely Blvd. Suite 7A, San Jose, CA 95129

(408) 556-0256, (408) 556-0260 (fax), Lotus Windshield $212 (P/N: SW8083). Dan Morrison

--- ken.landaiche@nokia.com wrote: > I think mine cost ~$250, though that was eight years ago. It was a stock item with one national windshield company. Triplex comes to mind, but a quick web search implies that is a generic name for safety glass. Europa windshields generally break when one tries to remove them. So looking for a used one might be futile, though here is the place to ask if there is one. Good luck, Ken Landaiche

> -----Original Message-----

> From: ext peter@nobudgetracing.com


> [mailto:peter@nobudgetracing.com]

> I just found you and hope you can help me. While taking apart my 74' TC for painting I busted my windshield. Bean wants over $500 : ( With trying to maintain my fleet of other British car I would love to try and find a good used one that wouldn't hurt the pocket book so much. Any suggestions? Peter Morton

WINDSHIELD, Sealer

"Jason Rowan" <jrowan@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Windshield glue/silicone Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:33:10 –0800 I recently installed a windshield on my Europa. I talked to a couple of windshield people beforehand, and they said the standard now is a product by 3M called something like ultra-fast urethane (or similar). Anyway, I used this on my windshield and was very impressed. It sets fast and very hard, and sticks way better than any silicone I've used. It can be bought at big car parts stores, or auto body supply stores. There also is butyl, which comes in a long ribbon rolled on some wax paper. My understanding, though, is that butyl isn't a particularly strong adhesive and is mostly used as a standoff to raise the windshield. The urethane is then squirted in the void next to the butyl. That's the way I did it.

Harry Trafford <traff@GNV.IFAS.UFL.EDU> Subject: RE: Windshield glue/silicone Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:25:23 –0500 A fellow I know, in Florida, went thru a similar mis-adventure with his S1 Esprit a few years ago ..... windscreen cracked on delivery ...... ordered another. The adhesive he used may not have cured properly, and he admits to not having the bottom of the glass blocked, as it should have been, so before it cured, the windscreen had slipped downwards and wasn't in the right place. Now he can't move it. The adhesive that was used for mine is a fast cure urethane. I have a tube of the sealer (not the adhesive) made by 3M. It was $18 for the tube, so the adhesive is probably a similar price. I have the proper name of it at home and will post it as soon as I find it. This is the professional stuff. "Solbit" is not available now. Anyway, 'Solbit' didn't hold my rear glass in and the front glass was coming loose. With the new stuff, I doubt if it will ever come loose on its own.

Harry Trafford <traff@GNV.IFAS.UFL.EDU> Subject: RE: 3M Windshield adhesive Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 5:57:31 –0500 Below are (short) instructions I received from a collision shop repairman. The adhesive is 3M Super Fast Urethane, # 08609. It usually takes at least 2 people to set the windshield correctly. The 'sealer' is 3M Windo-Weld Sealer, # 08606. This is used to seal between the glass and frame, if there is a leak.

WINDSHIELD, Washer

From: "Jason Rowan" <jrowan@ix.netcom.com> Subject: manual windshield washer pump repair (europa and others?) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:47:30 –0700 Don't know if this will be of any use to anyone, but this weekend I fixed the manual washer pump on my Europa S2, and I thought I'd relay what I learned. The problem was that no matter how much I pumped it, no washer fluid would come out. The system is quite simple. Within the pump housing, there's a heavy rubber diaphragm which is actuated by pushing the washer knob. The diaphragm is shaped in a way that causes it to pop back when the knob is released, thereby sucking water into the pump. To keep the water from just moving back and forth within the system, there are two check valves. One check valve is pressed right into the outlet fitting of the pump, and the other is at the washer reservoir bag. The check valve in the pump outlet lets the water flow from the pump towards the nozzles when the knob is pressed, while keeping water from being sucked back in when the knob is released. The check valve on the reservoir bag lets the water flow from the bag into the pump when the knob is released, while keeping water from being pushed back into the bag when the knob is pressed. Both check valves are just small rubber diaphragms over an orifice which are held in place with a small spring. On my car, the outlet check valve was sticking open, which prevented water from being sucked from the reservoir bag to the pump. I diagnosed this by unplugging the pump outlet hose and using my finger as a check valve - if I plugged the outlet while releasing the knob the pump worked fine. I took apart the pump to have a closer look. This required hacking away about half of the plastic on the housing which retained the hose fitting piece to the pump housing. Once that was done, the whole pump could be taken apart. My first attempt at a fix was to just use a small screwdriver to gently poke the outlet check valve, hoping that this would reseat it. I put the pump back together and all worked well for a few days, when the same problem reappeared. This time, I took apart the pump and used a small punch to drive out the check valve from the outlet fitting, and threw it away. I put the pump back together without the check valve and reinstalled it in the car. I then added a small brass Parker check valve with 1/4" compression fittings (=Swagelok fittings) and 1 psi cracking pressure into the outlet line. The compression fittings work by inserting the line, then tightening the nut. I spliced the check valve into the existing outlet line with the arrow pointing towards the nozzles. This type of check valve (or equivalent from lots of other mfgs.) should be available at any industrial welding or gas equipment shop for about $20. Or you can probably find a plastic one even cheaper.